Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Very true... my best friend had to have forceps deliveries with all 3 of her boys. Another friend of mine has four kids, and every one was born with some sort of genetic disorder where they have to go get transfusions until a certain age. But, they all lived and are healthy, "normal" kids.I hope it works out. The poor guy is beside himself with worry. He's 45, this is his second marriage and he didn't have any kids with his first wife. They kind of feel like this is their last chance. If anything goes wrong this time I don't know how either one of them are going to be able to cope with it.
I think she should have a c-section, but he said she's more afraid of that than she is of anything going wrong at the very end.
Shit. My baby just got caught on the lip of the cervix and if my doctor hadn't reached in with his bare hands and pulled her out by the head she would have been born dead, or severly retarded. Instead she just had this bump on her head that went away after a couple of years.
You never know.
Originally Posted by dilloduck
No----It's NOT totally untrue. Women HAVE had abortions due to outside pressure and regret until this day. Reproductive choice is all about changing the natural process of life so women can somehow feel more "equal" to men.
Religion and science have only served to confuse the real issue.
Feel more equal or be more equal?
What is the real issue? That women aren't equal and have no right to "feel" they are?
I'd say you pretty much summed it up right there.
From the original post, had the murder been committed, should there be a conviction of 1 or 2 murders?
Bump
Very true... my best friend had to have forceps deliveries with all 3 of her boys. Another friend of mine has four kids, and every one was born with some sort of genetic disorder where they have to go get transfusions until a certain age. But, they all lived and are healthy, "normal" kids.
Oh, good, we're agreed that it's ALIVE. I have heard people argue that it isn't.
Do you agree that any person who take the position that life begins at conception is only because of a religous belief?
Ultimately, it doesn't matter. What matters is that you can't tell other people to live the way you want them to. It also, ultimately, comes down to what is the priority. I will always think the life/lives in being take priority.
Luckily, this isn't a theocracy.
You're exactly right---it's a power issue. Women want power that men don't have.
Men can't have a medical procedure of their choice that they can pay for?
Name one.
Ultimately, it doesn't matter. What matters is that you can't tell other people to live the way you want them to. It also, ultimately, comes down to what is the priority. I will always think the life/lives in being take priority.
Luckily, this isn't a theocracy.
are you even reading what you write?
It's a trick question--pro-abortionists want it both ways. If the mother kills it, it's called choice. If someone else kills it, it's called murder. Another convenient redefining of terms so they have al lthe power. I say the indictment should be for two murders.
Do you agree that any person who take the position that life begins at conception is only because of a religous belief?
Yes. Because anyone relying on science would say a fertilized egg is potential life.
Actually it is not a trick question, unborn victims of violence have rights according to law.
http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/abortion/unbornbill32504.html
Why would such a law pass?
So that others do not have the same power as the pregnant woman.
But why would an unborn child have the right of protection?
Because the mother claims that the unborn child is really an extension of her. No one touches that "thing" except her.
