Maher says red state voters are jealous of blue: "We have chef Wolfgang Puck, they have Boyardee"

[The Republicans]

You know America is the best place and liberals disagree because they are embarrassed about the history?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[hjmick]

Maher should really do a little research before he flaps his gums. There are numerous great chefs in both red and blue states. One need look no farther than Charleston, SC for examples...


Not to mention the fact that Wolfgang is so 1985...

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Bill Maher shreds red state Americans: ‘We have chef Wolfgang Puck, they have Chef Boyardee’

Bill Maher "We have orchestras and theater districts and world-class shopping. We have Chef Wolfgang Puck. They have Chef Boyardee. Our roofs have solar panels. Theirs have last year's Christmas lights. We've got legal bud. They've got Bud[weiser]."

Maher is a white supremacist. White Liberals believe that the middle class Americans who outside of LA and Manhattan are inferior human beings. These elitist Liberals have a backwards belief in regional eugenics. Maher has always been a thinly veiled anti-Wasp bigot.

Without an educated middle class workforce there would not be an affluent market which makes it possible for America to be a prosperous county. Maher would not be rich and famous in any other country. The truth is that majority of educated middle class Americans vote Republican and the majority of the Poor vote Democrat, and the Rich are split about 50/50.

White supremist?
What have you been smoking?

The Germans thought that they we superior to other Europeans, Bill Maher has the same sort of mindset, except that he thinks that it's the middle class American who white Liberal are superior to.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Bill Maher shreds red state Americans: ‘We have chef Wolfgang Puck, they have Chef Boyardee’

Bill Maher "We have orchestras and theater districts and world-class shopping. We have Chef Wolfgang Puck. They have Chef Boyardee. Our roofs have solar panels. Theirs have last year's Christmas lights. We've got legal bud. They've got Bud[weiser]."

Maher is a white supremacist. White Liberals believe that the middle class Americans who outside of LA and Manhattan are inferior human beings. These elitist Liberals have a backwards belief in regional eugenics. Maher has always been a thinly veiled anti-Wasp bigot.

Without an educated middle class workforce there would not be an affluent market which makes it possible for America to be a prosperous county. Maher would not be rich and famous in any other country. The truth is that majority of educated middle class Americans vote Republican and the majority of the Poor vote Democrat, and the Rich are split about 50/50.

View attachment 247869

Maybe he oughta travel a little. Didn't the left used to love to criticize President Bush for not having gone to any other countries besides Mexico? Maher hasn't even been to other STATES in his own country.

Maher reminds me of Europeans who travel to Arizona and are shocked to find out it doesn't look like a spaghetti Western, with cowboys and Indians shooting it out. Pull your head out of movies and TV, Billy boy, and recognize that the big blank space in the middle of your map of the US actually contains real cities with all the same technology and amenities yours has . . . just at lower prices.

 

[Crixus]

For once I’ll agree with some here.

I don’t know how this irrelevant actor ever got a platform but I cannot wait until someone pulls it out from under him.

Actor? I thought he was a comedian.
I find most comedians not funny.
Bill can be funny sometimes, if you don’t take him too seriously.

He tried acting for a while before he got this gig. I cannot fathom how he has managed to keep it for so long. My guess is that HBO had Dennis Miller, didn’t like his politics and moved on to this dude.

Dennis Miller is actually, to my way of thinking, very funny and I find his political rants very effective. He, like most conservatives though, misses the big picture but that’s a topic for another thread.

HBO needs filler.

 

[Crixus]

Bill Maher shreds red state Americans: ‘We have chef Wolfgang Puck, they have Chef Boyardee’

Bill Maher "We have orchestras and theater districts and world-class shopping. We have Chef Wolfgang Puck. They have Chef Boyardee. Our roofs have solar panels. Theirs have last year's Christmas lights. We've got legal bud. They've got Bud[weiser]."

Maher is a white supremacist. White Liberals believe that the middle class Americans who outside of LA and Manhattan are inferior human beings. These elitist Liberals have a backwards belief in regional eugenics. Maher has always been a thinly veiled anti-Wasp bigot.

Without an educated middle class workforce there would not be an affluent market which makes it possible for America to be a prosperous county. Maher would not be rich and famous in any other country. The truth is that majority of educated middle class Americans vote Republican and the majority of the Poor vote Democrat, and the Rich are split about 50/50.

View attachment 247869

Maybe he oughta travel a little. Didn't the left used to love to criticize President Bush for not having gone to any other countries besides Mexico? Maher hasn't even been to other STATES in his own country.

Maher reminds me of Europeans who travel to Arizona and are shocked to find out it doesn't look like a spaghetti Western, with cowboys and Indians shooting it out. Pull your head out of movies and TV, Billy boy, and recognize that the big blank space in the middle of your map of the US actually contains real cities with all the same technology and amenities yours has . . . just at lower prices.

But he is relevant and cool. He implied that he smokes the reefer.

 

[candycorn]

For once I’ll agree with some here.

I don’t know how this irrelevant actor ever got a platform but I cannot wait until someone pulls it out from under him.

He was kind of funny back when he was doing Politically Inncorrect on ABC when they cancelled him and he went to HBO he became a one trick pony. He found a nice little niche audience but overall his act is stale and predictable.

Watched seldom in the past. Haven’t watched in years.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

He's right.

When you look at where the money is.

Who has healthcare.

How most people in Red States don't have education and do unskilled jobs.

Republicans talk about people fleeing California and New York. The people fleeing are uneducated and unskilled. They compete better in Red States where the competition is so much less.

You could have a two year college degree and make a great life in most Red States because you will be competing with people who barely finished high school. And what if they were home schooled by Republicans who believe the earth is only a few thousand years old. These people will hate continuing education because schools will teach facts and not religion. And Republicans can't handle that. They believe the education is biased and "good" science will come down on the side of magical creation.

In a civil war, the urban/suburban coalation woud lose to the semi rural/rural coalation. Perobably won't happen. But now you know.

Rural America depends on suburbia for its survival. How do you think the farm bill is subsidized? If it weren't for that Socialist program middle America would not exist.

the purpose of subsidized agriculture is to ensure a food supply

 

[BWK]

He's right.

When you look at where the money is.

Who has healthcare.

How most people in Red States don't have education and do unskilled jobs.

Republicans talk about people fleeing California and New York. The people fleeing are uneducated and unskilled. They compete better in Red States where the competition is so much less.

You could have a two year college degree and make a great life in most Red States because you will be competing with people who barely finished high school. And what if they were home schooled by Republicans who believe the earth is only a few thousand years old. These people will hate continuing education because schools will teach facts and not religion. And Republicans can't handle that. They believe the education is biased and "good" science will come down on the side of magical creation.

In a civil war, the urban/suburban coalation woud lose to the semi rural/rural coalation. Perobably won't happen. But now you know.

Rural America depends on suburbia for its survival. How do you think the farm bill is subsidized? If it weren't for that Socialist program middle America would not exist.

the purpose of subsidized agriculture is to ensure a food supply

Why is the government required to ensure your food supply through farm bill welfare?
And so, it's okay for farmers to get free welfare to feed you, who may not be on welfare, but it's not okay to feed those who are on welfare, because they don't have a job? Which means, you are guaranteeing job employment welfare for farmers, over those who may or may not have lost their jobs. Do I read that right? In other words, you are okay with welfare to feed you, even though farming can be a big failure, as opposed to individual failure in the work place, and that feeding them is not okay?

 

[22lcidw]

Bill Maher shreds red state Americans: ‘We have chef Wolfgang Puck, they have Chef Boyardee’

Bill Maher "We have orchestras and theater districts and world-class shopping. We have Chef Wolfgang Puck. They have Chef Boyardee. Our roofs have solar panels. Theirs have last year's Christmas lights. We've got legal bud. They've got Bud[weiser]."

Maher is a white supremacist. White Liberals believe that the middle class Americans who outside of LA and Manhattan are inferior human beings. These elitist Liberals have a backwards belief in regional eugenics. Maher has always been a thinly veiled anti-Wasp bigot.

Without an educated middle class workforce there would not be an affluent market which makes it possible for America to be a prosperous county. Maher would not be rich and famous in any other country. The truth is that majority of educated middle class Americans vote Republican and the majority of the Poor vote Democrat, and the Rich are split about 50/50.

White supremist?
What have you been smoking?

The Germans thought that they we superior to other Europeans, Bill Maher has the same sort of mindset, except that he thinks that it's the middle class American who white Liberal are superior to.

He is comparable to the Germans that caused the Germans to become NAZIS out of desperation.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

He's right.

When you look at where the money is.

Who has healthcare.

How most people in Red States don't have education and do unskilled jobs.

Republicans talk about people fleeing California and New York. The people fleeing are uneducated and unskilled. They compete better in Red States where the competition is so much less.

You could have a two year college degree and make a great life in most Red States because you will be competing with people who barely finished high school. And what if they were home schooled by Republicans who believe the earth is only a few thousand years old. These people will hate continuing education because schools will teach facts and not religion. And Republicans can't handle that. They believe the education is biased and "good" science will come down on the side of magical creation.

In a civil war, the urban/suburban coalation woud lose to the semi rural/rural coalation. Perobably won't happen. But now you know.

Rural America depends on suburbia for its survival. How do you think the farm bill is subsidized? If it weren't for that Socialist program middle America would not exist.

the purpose of subsidized agriculture is to ensure a food supply

Why is the government required to ensure your food supply through farm bill welfare?
And so, it's okay for farmers to get free welfare to feed you, who may not be on welfare, but it's not okay to feed those who are on welfare, because they don't have a job? Which means, you are guaranteeing job employment welfare for farmers, over those who may or may not have lost their jobs. Do I read that right? In other words, you are okay with welfare to feed you, even though farming can be a big failure, as opposed to individual failure in the work place, and that feeding them is not okay?

if enough farmers go out of business we would have food shortages

 

[22lcidw]

He's right.

When you look at where the money is.

Who has healthcare.

How most people in Red States don't have education and do unskilled jobs.

Republicans talk about people fleeing California and New York. The people fleeing are uneducated and unskilled. They compete better in Red States where the competition is so much less.

You could have a two year college degree and make a great life in most Red States because you will be competing with people who barely finished high school. And what if they were home schooled by Republicans who believe the earth is only a few thousand years old. These people will hate continuing education because schools will teach facts and not religion. And Republicans can't handle that. They believe the education is biased and "good" science will come down on the side of magical creation.

In a civil war, the urban/suburban coalation woud lose to the semi rural/rural coalation. Perobably won't happen. But now you know.

Rural America depends on suburbia for its survival. How do you think the farm bill is subsidized? If it weren't for that Socialist program middle America would not exist.

the purpose of subsidized agriculture is to ensure a food supply

Why is the government required to ensure your food supply through farm bill welfare?
And so, it's okay for farmers to get free welfare to feed you, who may not be on welfare, but it's not okay to feed those who are on welfare, because they don't have a job? Which means, you are guaranteeing job employment welfare for farmers, over those who may or may not have lost their jobs. Do I read that right? In other words, you are okay with welfare to feed you, even though farming can be a big failure, as opposed to individual failure in the work place, and that feeding them is not okay?

I think part of it is to guarantee rotation of crops. However I do not agree with anyone living the life of riley over it either.

 

[BWK]

He's right.

When you look at where the money is.

Who has healthcare.

How most people in Red States don't have education and do unskilled jobs.

Republicans talk about people fleeing California and New York. The people fleeing are uneducated and unskilled. They compete better in Red States where the competition is so much less.

You could have a two year college degree and make a great life in most Red States because you will be competing with people who barely finished high school. And what if they were home schooled by Republicans who believe the earth is only a few thousand years old. These people will hate continuing education because schools will teach facts and not religion. And Republicans can't handle that. They believe the education is biased and "good" science will come down on the side of magical creation.

In a civil war, the urban/suburban coalation woud lose to the semi rural/rural coalation. Perobably won't happen. But now you know.

Rural America depends on suburbia for its survival. How do you think the farm bill is subsidized? If it weren't for that Socialist program middle America would not exist.

the purpose of subsidized agriculture is to ensure a food supply

Why is the government required to ensure your food supply through farm bill welfare?
And so, it's okay for farmers to get free welfare to feed you, who may not be on welfare, but it's not okay to feed those who are on welfare, because they don't have a job? Which means, you are guaranteeing job employment welfare for farmers, over those who may or may not have lost their jobs. Do I read that right? In other words, you are okay with welfare to feed you, even though farming can be a big failure, as opposed to individual failure in the work place, and that feeding them is not okay?

I think part of it is to guarantee rotation of crops. However I do not agree with anyone living the life of riley over it either.

The farm bill is insurance against natural famine, not just crop rotation.

 

[BWK]

He's right.

When you look at where the money is.

Who has healthcare.

How most people in Red States don't have education and do unskilled jobs.

Republicans talk about people fleeing California and New York. The people fleeing are uneducated and unskilled. They compete better in Red States where the competition is so much less.

You could have a two year college degree and make a great life in most Red States because you will be competing with people who barely finished high school. And what if they were home schooled by Republicans who believe the earth is only a few thousand years old. These people will hate continuing education because schools will teach facts and not religion. And Republicans can't handle that. They believe the education is biased and "good" science will come down on the side of magical creation.

In a civil war, the urban/suburban coalation woud lose to the semi rural/rural coalation. Perobably won't happen. But now you know.

Rural America depends on suburbia for its survival. How do you think the farm bill is subsidized? If it weren't for that Socialist program middle America would not exist.

the purpose of subsidized agriculture is to ensure a food supply

Why is the government required to ensure your food supply through farm bill welfare?
And so, it's okay for farmers to get free welfare to feed you, who may not be on welfare, but it's not okay to feed those who are on welfare, because they don't have a job? Which means, you are guaranteeing job employment welfare for farmers, over those who may or may not have lost their jobs. Do I read that right? In other words, you are okay with welfare to feed you, even though farming can be a big failure, as opposed to individual failure in the work place, and that feeding them is not okay?

if enough farmers go out of business we would have food shortages

And? What about it? At the end of the day, it's still Socialism for all of us to ensure a food supply. That's reality. And the fact that you can't answer my questions about those less fortunate on another front, tells us just how full of shit you are. You are making differences for your privileged guaranteed socialist food supply if you are employed, compliments of farmers, versus the socialist welfare for those who do not have a job. You're a real piece of shit.

 

[2aguy]

Red states don't have Wolfgang Puck . They have vegan Spartacus Booker. Ugh.

Get back to us when they solve their homeless problem in their Blue Cities, the human feces all over the place, the crime and the needles from all the drug users......not to forget the fact that maher's Blue State buddies are raping any woman they have some power over....get back to us when you clean that up....

 

[22lcidw]

In a civil war, the urban/suburban coalation woud lose to the semi rural/rural coalation. Perobably won't happen. But now you know.

Rural America depends on suburbia for its survival. How do you think the farm bill is subsidized? If it weren't for that Socialist program middle America would not exist.

the purpose of subsidized agriculture is to ensure a food supply

Why is the government required to ensure your food supply through farm bill welfare?
And so, it's okay for farmers to get free welfare to feed you, who may not be on welfare, but it's not okay to feed those who are on welfare, because they don't have a job? Which means, you are guaranteeing job employment welfare for farmers, over those who may or may not have lost their jobs. Do I read that right? In other words, you are okay with welfare to feed you, even though farming can be a big failure, as opposed to individual failure in the work place, and that feeding them is not okay?

if enough farmers go out of business we would have food shortages

And? What about it? At the end of the day, it's still Socialism for all of us to ensure a food supply. That's reality. And the fact that you can't answer my questions about those less fortunate on another front, tells us just how full of shit you are. You are making differences for your privileged guaranteed socialist food supply if you are employed, compliments of farmers, versus the socialist welfare for those who do not have a job. You're a real piece of shit.

So to feed people and to pay for people to chitt out babies is the same. So abortions gives the whores an option.

 

[BWK]

Rural America depends on suburbia for its survival. How do you think the farm bill is subsidized? If it weren't for that Socialist program middle America would not exist.

the purpose of subsidized agriculture is to ensure a food supply

Why is the government required to ensure your food supply through farm bill welfare?
And so, it's okay for farmers to get free welfare to feed you, who may not be on welfare, but it's not okay to feed those who are on welfare, because they don't have a job? Which means, you are guaranteeing job employment welfare for farmers, over those who may or may not have lost their jobs. Do I read that right? In other words, you are okay with welfare to feed you, even though farming can be a big failure, as opposed to individual failure in the work place, and that feeding them is not okay?

if enough farmers go out of business we would have food shortages

And? What about it? At the end of the day, it's still Socialism for all of us to ensure a food supply. That's reality. And the fact that you can't answer my questions about those less fortunate on another front, tells us just how full of shit you are. You are making differences for your privileged guaranteed socialist food supply if you are employed, compliments of farmers, versus the socialist welfare for those who do not have a job. You're a real piece of shit.

So to feed people and to pay for people to chitt out babies is the same. So abortions gives the whores an option.

That's an off the reservation counter argument coming from a coward who cannot handle the truth about welfare. Ha, we get it. With your team, welfare is for the privileged. You know, like the welfare we pay for with football players and the stadiums they play in.; You don't believe in safety nets to feed people and babies, but when it comes to sports Socialism, or the farm bill to feed you, that's okay. Damn, what a piece of shit you are;

 

[22lcidw]

the purpose of subsidized agriculture is to ensure a food supply

Why is the government required to ensure your food supply through farm bill welfare?
And so, it's okay for farmers to get free welfare to feed you, who may not be on welfare, but it's not okay to feed those who are on welfare, because they don't have a job? Which means, you are guaranteeing job employment welfare for farmers, over those who may or may not have lost their jobs. Do I read that right? In other words, you are okay with welfare to feed you, even though farming can be a big failure, as opposed to individual failure in the work place, and that feeding them is not okay?

if enough farmers go out of business we would have food shortages

And? What about it? At the end of the day, it's still Socialism for all of us to ensure a food supply. That's reality. And the fact that you can't answer my questions about those less fortunate on another front, tells us just how full of shit you are. You are making differences for your privileged guaranteed socialist food supply if you are employed, compliments of farmers, versus the socialist welfare for those who do not have a job. You're a real piece of shit.

So to feed people and to pay for people to chitt out babies is the same. So abortions gives the whores an option.

That's an off the reservation counter argument coming from a coward who cannot handle the truth about welfare. Ha, we get it. With your team, welfare is for the privileged. You know, like the welfare we pay for with football players and the stadiums they play in.; You don't believe in safety nets to feed people and babies, but when it comes to sports Socialism, or the farm bill to feed you, that's okay. Damn, what a piece of shit you are;

I delivered a dozen babies working the death box medical squad and took at least a hundred pregnant teenagers to hospitals working just one squad in a big city every fourth tour of work for the first ten years. You want to live third nation that is what you get.

 

[BWK]

Why is the government required to ensure your food supply through farm bill welfare?
And so, it's okay for farmers to get free welfare to feed you, who may not be on welfare, but it's not okay to feed those who are on welfare, because they don't have a job? Which means, you are guaranteeing job employment welfare for farmers, over those who may or may not have lost their jobs. Do I read that right? In other words, you are okay with welfare to feed you, even though farming can be a big failure, as opposed to individual failure in the work place, and that feeding them is not okay?

if enough farmers go out of business we would have food shortages

And? What about it? At the end of the day, it's still Socialism for all of us to ensure a food supply. That's reality. And the fact that you can't answer my questions about those less fortunate on another front, tells us just how full of shit you are. You are making differences for your privileged guaranteed socialist food supply if you are employed, compliments of farmers, versus the socialist welfare for those who do not have a job. You're a real piece of shit.

So to feed people and to pay for people to chitt out babies is the same. So abortions gives the whores an option.

That's an off the reservation counter argument coming from a coward who cannot handle the truth about welfare. Ha, we get it. With your team, welfare is for the privileged. You know, like the welfare we pay for with football players and the stadiums they play in.; You don't believe in safety nets to feed people and babies, but when it comes to sports Socialism, or the farm bill to feed you, that's okay. Damn, what a piece of shit you are;

I delivered a dozen babies working the death box medical squad and took at least a hundred pregnant teenagers to hospitals working just one squad in a big city every fourth tour of work for the first ten years. You want to live third nation that is what you get.

This has nothing to do with the welfare topic. You are a coward.

 

[captkaos]

All the book smarts in the world will never equal common sense.

Here's the difference between Red and Blue as simply as I can put it. The red side knows when someone's pissing on their shoes and trying to convince them it's raining! The Blue side are the one's pissing on your shoes! Bill Maher is a Comedian an irrelevant Comedian but a Comedian yet and still. He's just pissing on your shoes . There's my proof!