Little Bobby Jindal throws tantrum ignoring voters and issueing EO legalizing discrimination

[Spare_change]

A person should be free to associate or not associate with any person or group that they want. Homo's it seems simply want to force the acceptance of their abominable lifestyle on everyone around them.

No, bigot, that's not how it works in this country. You're not allowed to refuse service to a person because you don't approve of their sexual orientation.

You should be able to in a free society. BTW, you are just as bigoted as you allege me to be.

You haven't been able to discriminate against certain groups since 1964. It's not suddenly tyranny when gays are ADDED to these existing laws.

I can discriminate against anyone I wish and I have been since 1961.

42 U.S. Code § 2000a - Prohibition against discrimination or segregation in places of public accommodation

All persons shall be entitled to the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of public accommodation, as defined in this section, without discrimination or segregation on the ground of race, color, religion, or national origin.

Many LOCAL (state's rights, folks) ordinances also protect gays.

That which is passed into law is not always right.

 

[Seawytch]

No, bigot, that's not how it works in this country. You're not allowed to refuse service to a person because you don't approve of their sexual orientation.

You should be able to in a free society. BTW, you are just as bigoted as you allege me to be.

You haven't been able to discriminate against certain groups since 1964. It's not suddenly tyranny when gays are ADDED to these existing laws.

I can discriminate against anyone I wish and I have been since 1961.

42 U.S. Code § 2000a - Prohibition against discrimination or segregation in places of public accommodation

All persons shall be entitled to the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of public accommodation, as defined in this section, without discrimination or segregation on the ground of race, color, religion, or national origin.

Many LOCAL (state's rights, folks) ordinances also protect gays.

That which is passed into law is not always right.

So get the FEDERAL law changed. If I can't refuse to serve a bigoted Christian, he shouldn't be able to refuse to serve me.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

A person should be free to associate or not associate with any person or group that they want. Homo's it seems simply want to force the acceptance of their abominable lifestyle on everyone around them.

No, bigot, that's not how it works in this country. You're not allowed to refuse service to a person because you don't approve of their sexual orientation.

You should be able to in a free society. BTW, you are just as bigoted as you allege me to be.

You haven't been able to discriminate against certain groups since 1964. It's not suddenly tyranny when gays are ADDED to these existing laws.

I can discriminate against anyone I wish and I have been since 1961.

42 U.S. Code § 2000a - Prohibition against discrimination or segregation in places of public accommodation

All persons shall be entitled to the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of public accommodation, as defined in this section, without discrimination or segregation on the ground of race, color, religion, or national origin.

Many LOCAL (state's rights, folks) ordinances also protect gays.

So?

That means nothing to me.

 

[Seawytch]

No, bigot, that's not how it works in this country. You're not allowed to refuse service to a person because you don't approve of their sexual orientation.

You should be able to in a free society. BTW, you are just as bigoted as you allege me to be.

You haven't been able to discriminate against certain groups since 1964. It's not suddenly tyranny when gays are ADDED to these existing laws.

I can discriminate against anyone I wish and I have been since 1961.

42 U.S. Code § 2000a - Prohibition against discrimination or segregation in places of public accommodation

All persons shall be entitled to the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of public accommodation, as defined in this section, without discrimination or segregation on the ground of race, color, religion, or national origin.

Many LOCAL (state's rights, folks) ordinances also protect gays.

So?

That means nothing to me.

Do you own a business open to the public?

 

[Spare_change]

You should be able to in a free society. BTW, you are just as bigoted as you allege me to be.

You haven't been able to discriminate against certain groups since 1964. It's not suddenly tyranny when gays are ADDED to these existing laws.

I can discriminate against anyone I wish and I have been since 1961.

42 U.S. Code § 2000a - Prohibition against discrimination or segregation in places of public accommodation

All persons shall be entitled to the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of public accommodation, as defined in this section, without discrimination or segregation on the ground of race, color, religion, or national origin.

Many LOCAL (state's rights, folks) ordinances also protect gays.

That which is passed into law is not always right.

So get the FEDERAL law changed. If I can't refuse to serve a bigoted Christian, he shouldn't be able to refuse to serve me.

Change a federal law that has infringed on my rights???

What a cool idea!

 

[Lonestar_logic]

You should be able to in a free society. BTW, you are just as bigoted as you allege me to be.

You haven't been able to discriminate against certain groups since 1964. It's not suddenly tyranny when gays are ADDED to these existing laws.

I can discriminate against anyone I wish and I have been since 1961.

42 U.S. Code § 2000a - Prohibition against discrimination or segregation in places of public accommodation

All persons shall be entitled to the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of public accommodation, as defined in this section, without discrimination or segregation on the ground of race, color, religion, or national origin.

Many LOCAL (state's rights, folks) ordinances also protect gays.

So?

That means nothing to me.

Do you own a business open to the public?

Yes I do, a gun shop and I reserve the right to refuse service to anyone I believe doesn't need to be owning a firearm. They may have the right to bear arms, but they don't have the right to buy it from me.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

And Mitch Landrieu issued an EO in New Orleans overruling it within the city.

Whatever.....

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

So, I wonder if the left would embrace a law requiring a Muslim business owner to server me pork chops or bacon? Or, better yet, considering homosexuality is punishable by death, force a Muslim baker to bake a cake for two gays?

 

[Seawytch]

You haven't been able to discriminate against certain groups since 1964. It's not suddenly tyranny when gays are ADDED to these existing laws.

I can discriminate against anyone I wish and I have been since 1961.

42 U.S. Code § 2000a - Prohibition against discrimination or segregation in places of public accommodation

All persons shall be entitled to the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of public accommodation, as defined in this section, without discrimination or segregation on the ground of race, color, religion, or national origin.

Many LOCAL (state's rights, folks) ordinances also protect gays.

So?

That means nothing to me.

Do you own a business open to the public?

Yes I do, a gun shop and I reserve the right to refuse service to anyone I believe doesn't need to be owning a firearm. They may have the right to bear arms, but they don't have the right to buy it from me.

Then I guess you're lucky you've not gotten caught discriminating based on race, religion, etc.

 

[Seawytch]

So, I wonder if the left would embrace a law requiring a Muslim business owner to server me pork chops or bacon? Or, better yet, considering homosexuality is punishable by death, force a Muslim baker to bake a cake for two gays?

So I wonder why "the right" always brings up this silly analogy? Nobody has been asked to provide a product or service they don't provide to straight couples.

If the Muslim business owner served me a pork chop, but refused to serve you a pork chop, THAT would be discrimination.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Bobby Jindal Allows LGBT Discrimination With an Executive Order Care2 Causes

"When a license to discriminate bill that Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal had personally supported failed to get through the legislature this week, Jindal vowed that he would sign an executive order to “protect religious freedom.” What that adds up to, LGBT rights advocates say, is Jindal legislating from the governor’s office to give the religious the privilege of lawfully discriminating against LGBT people.

The legislation, known as HB 707 or the Louisiana Marriage and Conscience Act, would have created religious freedom exemptions for anyone opposed to same-sex marriage. Essentially, that would mean that any business or person could refuse to provide services for a married gay couple or honor or recognize a same-sex couple’s marriage.

This was seen as a preemptive strike against a possible Supreme Court ruling at the end of June that would end Louisiana’s ban on marriage equality. LGBT rights groups had lobbied against the bill, saying it essentially licensed discrimination in a way that was even more explicit than the bills that were passed but later amended in Indiana and Arkansas. Fortunately, Democratic lawmakers were able to prevent the Louisiana bill from advancing out of committee this week, effectively killing it in the process.

Governor Jindal decided that he would not allow that to be the end of the matter though and a mere two hours after the bill was defeated on Tuesday, Jindal’s office released a statement that he would create an executive order to accomplish the same aims as the bill."

rest at link

So this is how democracy dies.

Jindal is supporting the 1st Amendment?

As a leftist, you must be OUTRAGED.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

So, I wonder if the left would embrace a law requiring a Muslim business owner to server me pork chops or bacon? Or, better yet, considering homosexuality is punishable by death, force a Muslim baker to bake a cake for two gays?

So I wonder why "the right" always brings up this silly analogy? Nobody has been asked to provide a product or service they don't provide to straight couples.

If the Muslim business owner served me a pork chop, but refused to serve you a pork chop, THAT would be discrimination.

Well, it isn't silly. I assure you a Muslim cleric will not perform a gay marriage while we will provide services for heterosexuals. I can pretty darned well assure you he ain't baking a cake with two dudes on top either.

 

[OnePercenter]

So what, you people really have a lot of nerve pointing a finger at a governor using his pen after Obama ignores congress and the courts and uses his pen. You're chickens are coming home to roost, eat it.

'you people' such ignorance on your part.

 

[OnePercenter]

...Jindal legislating from the governor’s office...

so what's the problem ? your muslime mulatto America HATING presidunce does it at least 2 or 3 times a week, so it must be OK.., RIGHT ??

Obama is fighting ignorance, in other words...YOU.

 

[Seawytch]

So, I wonder if the left would embrace a law requiring a Muslim business owner to server me pork chops or bacon? Or, better yet, considering homosexuality is punishable by death, force a Muslim baker to bake a cake for two gays?

So I wonder why "the right" always brings up this silly analogy? Nobody has been asked to provide a product or service they don't provide to straight couples.

If the Muslim business owner served me a pork chop, but refused to serve you a pork chop, THAT would be discrimination.

Well, it isn't silly. I assure you a Muslim cleric will not perform a gay marriage while we will provide services for heterosexuals. I can pretty darned well assure you he ain't baking a cake with two dudes on top either.

Now you're being sillier. Churches, Mosques, Synagogues or any other religious organization will never have to perform a ceremony against the tenants of their faith.

5 Imams Who Are Openly Gay - LGBT Muslims

 

[Lonestar_logic]

I can discriminate against anyone I wish and I have been since 1961.

42 U.S. Code § 2000a - Prohibition against discrimination or segregation in places of public accommodation

All persons shall be entitled to the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of public accommodation, as defined in this section, without discrimination or segregation on the ground of race, color, religion, or national origin.

Many LOCAL (state's rights, folks) ordinances also protect gays.

So?

That means nothing to me.

Do you own a business open to the public?

Yes I do, a gun shop and I reserve the right to refuse service to anyone I believe doesn't need to be owning a firearm. They may have the right to bear arms, but they don't have the right to buy it from me.

Then I guess you're lucky you've not gotten caught discriminating based on race, religion, etc.

I don't "get caught" because my refusal to sell doesn't have anything to do with race or religion, etc. At least not that can be proven.

 

[Seawytch]

42 U.S. Code § 2000a - Prohibition against discrimination or segregation in places of public accommodation

All persons shall be entitled to the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of public accommodation, as defined in this section, without discrimination or segregation on the ground of race, color, religion, or national origin.

Many LOCAL (state's rights, folks) ordinances also protect gays.

So?

That means nothing to me.

Do you own a business open to the public?

Yes I do, a gun shop and I reserve the right to refuse service to anyone I believe doesn't need to be owning a firearm. They may have the right to bear arms, but they don't have the right to buy it from me.

Then I guess you're lucky you've not gotten caught discriminating based on race, religion, etc.

I don't "get caught" because my refusal to sell doesn't have anything to do with race or religion, etc. At least not that can be proven.

Then you're just typing to type? The fact is that certain discrimination is against the law...on a state and or a federal level.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

So, I wonder if the left would embrace a law requiring a Muslim business owner to server me pork chops or bacon? Or, better yet, considering homosexuality is punishable by death, force a Muslim baker to bake a cake for two gays?

So I wonder why "the right" always brings up this silly analogy? Nobody has been asked to provide a product or service they don't provide to straight couples.

If the Muslim business owner served me a pork chop, but refused to serve you a pork chop, THAT would be discrimination.

Well, it isn't silly. I assure you a Muslim cleric will not perform a gay marriage while we will provide services for heterosexuals. I can pretty darned well assure you he ain't baking a cake with two dudes on top either.

Now you're being sillier. Churches, Mosques, Synagogues or any other religious organization will never have to perform a ceremony against the tenants of their faith.

5 Imams Who Are Openly Gay - LGBT Muslims

Ok then, what about a Muslim baker?

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

So, I wonder if the left would embrace a law requiring a Muslim business owner to server me pork chops or bacon? Or, better yet, considering homosexuality is punishable by death, force a Muslim baker to bake a cake for two gays?

So I wonder why "the right" always brings up this silly analogy? Nobody has been asked to provide a product or service they don't provide to straight couples.

If the Muslim business owner served me a pork chop, but refused to serve you a pork chop, THAT would be discrimination.

Well, it isn't silly. I assure you a Muslim cleric will not perform a gay marriage while we will provide services for heterosexuals. I can pretty darned well assure you he ain't baking a cake with two dudes on top either.

Now you're being sillier. Churches, Mosques, Synagogues or any other religious organization will never have to perform a ceremony against the tenants of their faith.

5 Imams Who Are Openly Gay - LGBT Muslims

But why not, you will support churches that refuse to marry gays? Sorry, the militant gays will not let that go unchallenged.

 

[J.E.D]

Bobby Jindal Allows LGBT Discrimination With an Executive Order Care2 Causes

"When a license to discriminate bill that Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal had personally supported failed to get through the legislature this week, Jindal vowed that he would sign an executive order to “protect religious freedom.” What that adds up to, LGBT rights advocates say, is Jindal legislating from the governor’s office to give the religious the privilege of lawfully discriminating against LGBT people.

The legislation, known as HB 707 or the Louisiana Marriage and Conscience Act, would have created religious freedom exemptions for anyone opposed to same-sex marriage. Essentially, that would mean that any business or person could refuse to provide services for a married gay couple or honor or recognize a same-sex couple’s marriage.

This was seen as a preemptive strike against a possible Supreme Court ruling at the end of June that would end Louisiana’s ban on marriage equality. LGBT rights groups had lobbied against the bill, saying it essentially licensed discrimination in a way that was even more explicit than the bills that were passed but later amended in Indiana and Arkansas. Fortunately, Democratic lawmakers were able to prevent the Louisiana bill from advancing out of committee this week, effectively killing it in the process.

Governor Jindal decided that he would not allow that to be the end of the matter though and a mere two hours after the bill was defeated on Tuesday, Jindal’s office released a statement that he would create an executive order to accomplish the same aims as the bill."

rest at link

So this is how democracy dies.

So you're saying the faggots have the right to be protected but religious people don't.

At least you're not afraid to show your hypocrisy

.

How is allowing people to use religion as an excuse to discriminate, "protecting religious freedom"?

A person should be free to associate or not associate with any person or group that they want. Homo's it seems simply want to force the acceptance of their abominable lifestyle on everyone around them.

No, bigot, that's not how it works in this country. You're not allowed to refuse service to a person because you don't approve of their sexual orientation.

You should be able to in a free society. BTW, you are just as bigoted as you allege me to be.

No, dipshit. I don't discriminate against people for their sexual orientation or political or personal beliefs. Don't lump me in with the likes of you