Lindsey Graham garbage

What a petulant child...


About this website

ESSENCE.COM

Lindsey Graham Says He'll Out Whistleblowers If Trump Is Impeached
Senate Judiciary Chair Lindsey Graham said it was "imperative that the whistleblower be interviewed in public, under oath and cross-examined."
The man is pure garbage Republican garbage


You upset you might have to testify in public, snitch ?

.
Yes let all the scum issued a subpoena testify What is the POS in our WH afraid of ?
 
What a petulant child...


About this website

ESSENCE.COM

Lindsey Graham Says He'll Out Whistleblowers If Trump Is Impeached
Senate Judiciary Chair Lindsey Graham said it was "imperative that the whistleblower be interviewed in public, under oath and cross-examined."
The man is pure garbage Republican garbage


You upset you might have to testify in public, snitch ?

.
Yes let all the scum issued a subpoena testify What is the POS in our WH afraid of ?

Sure, as soon as the House votes. After that, the Republicans will have equal subpoena power.

I suggest their first witness be Adam Schiff.
 
What a petulant child...


About this website

ESSENCE.COM

Lindsey Graham Says He'll Out Whistleblowers If Trump Is Impeached
Senate Judiciary Chair Lindsey Graham said it was "imperative that the whistleblower be interviewed in public, under oath and cross-examined."
The man is pure garbage Republican garbage


You upset you might have to testify in public, snitch ?

.
Yes let all the scum issued a subpoena testify What is the POS in our WH afraid of ?

Sure, as soon as the House votes. After that, the Republicans will have equal subpoena power.

I suggest their first witness be Adam Schiff.
LOL I'll take that under advisement
 
A whistleblower has nothing but hearsay evidence. Why should anyone believe what he says unless he presents solid evidence. This double-secret trial is bullshit. It won't move the impeachment needle.

What is it about the word "mostly" that you don't understand .

Is it the same reason Barr didn't understand "suggest"??
Not sure what your post means, the only "mostly" I recall is "Leslie Mostly" from SNL way back?!
Your post is a lie.

Some of what the WB used in the complaint was hearsay and some was not.

And guess what?

The part that was hearsay was the actual phone call...which he got RIGHT.

The newest WB has FIRST HAND evidence that agrees with the first...HE (or she ) was ON THE CALL

I don't care what "evidence" the WB presents, the accused needs the opportunity to cross-examine the "witness/liar" as to "intent".
Why? What's the purpose?

The whistleblower is not bringing charges against Trump, and he can not bring any charges, criminal or articles of impeachment.... in this case, it is the IG and now Congress that determines the facts....

there is no purpose for this second hand witness other than to intimidate, harass or likely get him or her killed by an insane Trumpster... plus it hurts us, as a nation to expose whistleblowers... we WANT whistleblowers to come forward and feel safe in doing so... intimidating them as you and Trump have done, is uncalled for and hurts us. Trump is BREAKING THE LAW by doing so....

As evidence... we have the transcript summary, and Trump's presser, and the emails of Ambassador Volker with others... THAT'S first HAND evidence... that matches up with the complaint, perfectly... that is ALL that matters... the actual evidence.

The IG gets many whistle blower complaints, that go nowhere... because there is no evidence to support the complaint.... but with this particular one, the IG Found evidence to support it and found it urgent, and that is why it needed to go to Congress, by LAW.
 
What a petulant child...


About this website

ESSENCE.COM

Lindsey Graham Says He'll Out Whistleblowers If Trump Is Impeached
Senate Judiciary Chair Lindsey Graham said it was "imperative that the whistleblower be interviewed in public, under oath and cross-examined."
The man is pure garbage Republican garbage
He's a twink that loves the cock.
Irrelevant to his job. Don't be a tard
He's a candidate for blackmail.
I don't trust him.
 
A whistleblower has nothing but hearsay evidence. Why should anyone believe what he says unless he presents solid evidence. This double-secret trial is bullshit. It won't move the impeachment needle.

What is it about the word "mostly" that you don't understand .

Is it the same reason Barr didn't understand "suggest"??
Not sure what your post means, the only "mostly" I recall is "Leslie Mostly" from SNL way back?!
Your post is a lie.

Some of what the WB used in the complaint was hearsay and some was not.

And guess what?

The part that was hearsay was the actual phone call...which he got RIGHT.

The newest WB has FIRST HAND evidence that agrees with the first...HE (or she ) was ON THE CALL

I don't care what "evidence" the WB presents, the accused needs the opportunity to cross-examine the "witness/liar" as to "intent".
Why? What's the purpose?

The whistleblower is not bringing charges against Trump, and he can not bring any charges, criminal or articles of impeachment.... in this case, it is the IG and now Congress that determines the facts....

there is no purpose for this second hand witness other than to intimidate, harass or likely get him or her killed by an insane Trumpster... plus it hurts us, as a nation to expose whistleblowers... we WANT whistleblowers to come forward and feel safe in doing so... intimidating them as you and Trump have done, is uncalled for and hurts us. Trump is BREAKING THE LAW by doing so....

As evidence... we have the transcript summary, and Trump's presser, and the emails of Ambassador Volker with others... THAT'S first HAND evidence... that matches up with the complaint, perfectly... that is ALL that matters... the actual evidence.

The IG gets many whistle blower complaints, that go nowhere... because there is no evidence to support the complaint.... but with this particular one, the IG Found evidence to support it and found it urgent, and that is why it needed to go to Congress, by LAW.

The DNI is in-charge of the intel agencies. Any whistle-blower issues need to be UNDER the DNI, not against the president of the USA. The WB does not have more authority than the president. The federal government can't get tied-up in knots every time someone from the out party gets a bug about something, credible or not. I'm still struggling to explain how an anonymous WB can make charges about something way above his/her pay grade, and way outside their lane. It makes no sense.
 
What a petulant child...


About this website

ESSENCE.COM

Lindsey Graham Says He'll Out Whistleblowers If Trump Is Impeached
Senate Judiciary Chair Lindsey Graham said it was "imperative that the whistleblower be interviewed in public, under oath and cross-examined."
The man is pure garbage Republican garbage
He's a twink that loves the cock.
Irrelevant to his job. Don't be a tard
He's a candidate for blackmail.
I don't trust him.
Fucking someone be it in the front or the back doesn't make you a candidate for blackmail.
That statement is as stupid as your first.
 
What a petulant child...


About this website

ESSENCE.COM

Lindsey Graham Says He'll Out Whistleblowers If Trump Is Impeached
Senate Judiciary Chair Lindsey Graham said it was "imperative that the whistleblower be interviewed in public, under oath and cross-examined."
The man is pure garbage Republican garbage
He's a twink that loves the cock.
Irrelevant to his job. Don't be a tard
He's a candidate for blackmail.
I don't trust him.
Fucking someone be it in the front or the back doesn't make you a candidate for blackmail.
That statement is as stupid as your first.
That's because you don't know shit about having a clearance or holding an important position in the government.
This is one of those things they constantly tell us is a threat to national security.
Co-workers that have lifestyles or secrets that can be used against them by a foreign or domestic enemy in a blackmail case.
We have to go thru retraining on this subject every year.
 
The American people deserve to have tramp under oath and question him


Not without a valid issue to do so, and you aren't even close hiding this "whistleblower" under a white sheet in Obama's CLOSET....

Mueller tried and failed. Who cares he will be under oath enough when he leaves the oval office.

For a man with nothing to hide, he sure hides everything even his word, which is all lies. One lie to the cover the previous lie, once a liar , always a liar.

With your head up his skirt all the time, it's no wonder he is angry.
 
The American people deserve to know the identity of the "whistleblower" and question him/her under oath....

especially about 911....


To deny that would be to subvert the concept of DUE PROCESS....

The American people deserve to have tramp under oath and question him.
Yeah....all of you commies think we should just forget about the constitution and do what you fascists say or we'll be in big trouble.
 
Alleged homo Graham should be leading the Senate in regards to exposing the coup attempt on our government by the Democrats and then exposing the fake news, Obama orchestrated fake snitching which confirms Democrats are treasonous attackers of our democracy and need to face justice..
 
Graham would vote to impeach Trump in a millisecond if he could do so from

INSIDE HIS CLOSET!!!!
 

Forum List

Back
Top