I wasn't exposed to anything sexual "straight or queer" during my entire time in school because it wasn't part of the curriculum nor should have it have been because that isn't the reason for education.You simply don't "get it" that it's not the job of "da gubermint" to teach children morality...that is the job of the parents. I have no problem with you being a fan of the faglet...knock yourself out about it. I will reserve my 1st amendment right to say that I disagree and will speak out against having it taught in schools.
Of course you resort to calling fag, or are you just extremely old and not realize the weight behind that term under this context?
Sexual education should be part of a curriculum, it's a very important subject for kids approaching their teens to understand, and it wouldn't hurt to mention homosexual relationships in such a course. This doesn't have anything to do with what they should think about them, too, it's a mention and an explanation on how they come to be so kids can get the facts draw their own conclusions. Or is an entirely non biased approach still not enough for you, if you can even handle sex ed at all?
And again, I don't see how letting kids be ignorant and teaching them to find homosexuality is wrong is teaching them good morals. Teaching to hate another for merely existing can't be good in any context.
Teaching morality, teaching sex education is not the function of the public school system n.....end of story. There is nothing further to discuss..
Okay- you are wrong.
There is nothing further to discuss.
No, schools are not for teaching faggotry and nor should groups like GLSEN and the LGBTQ be allowed in schools to give "presentations" and anyone that is fine with that is just as disgustingly perverted as the queers..
You said there was nothing more to discuss yet you keep opening your pie hole.
As always- you are wrong- and that is really all that is needed to be discussed.