Liberals....Come To The Marketplace

Can y'all just imagine PC's desktop? Full of categorized folders, it has to be.
what a piece of work the stuff she comes up with She could get a job on FOX


1. There is the suggestion that I 'come up with' stuff.

Everything I post is linked, sourced and documented.
Hence...100% accurate, true and correct.
Like I said FOX You're better than Hanitty or O'Reilly and they make about 25 million a year
 
Back on point:

The premise of this thread is that reliable Democrat voters, Liberals, have been well trained to accept any statements, policies, that their masters roll out.

...and the proof is that they have no response to these central issues for Liberals...


a. The nation was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. Why do Liberals/Democrats support not any of these?



b. The most basic of our freedoms is that of free speech.
But, under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech under penalty of loss of tax benefits.

What possible compelling government interest could this, restricting the free speech of religious folks, represent????




c. Democrats are for the Iran Nuclear Weapons Treaty.
.....how do you explain the war criminal, Obama, insisting that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism have nuclear weapons....and become the North Korea of the Middle East?




d. ....that there is no systemic racism, nothing more than the fact that some folks may not like you for whatever reasons.....something allowed by the first amendment,....

...Democrat voters can never provide support for the institutional 'racism' claims, with the commensurate policies that single out certain races, and slander others...outside of the totalitarian 'thought crimes' charge.




Where are the explanations from Democrat voters????
they were taught to never question the directive from the boss. NEVER. You will never see on face the nation or meet the press a negative against the left. NEVER. They double down on bias like this past Sunday. Amazing stuff. Push the leftist agenda at all costs.

It is all about money and power to them.
 
Can y'all just imagine PC's desktop? Full of categorized folders, it has to be.
what a piece of work the stuff she comes up with She could get a job on FOX


1. There is the suggestion that I 'come up with' stuff.

Everything I post is linked, sourced and documented.
Hence...100% accurate, true and correct.
Like I said FOX You're better than Hanitty or O'Reilly and they make about 25 million a year

She's gotta be better than Megyn Kelly. :D
 
Back on point:

The premise of this thread is that reliable Democrat voters, Liberals, have been well trained to accept any statements, policies, that their masters roll out.

...and the proof is that they have no response to these central issues for Liberals...


a. The nation was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. Why do Liberals/Democrats support not any of these?



b. The most basic of our freedoms is that of free speech.
But, under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech under penalty of loss of tax benefits.

What possible compelling government interest could this, restricting the free speech of religious folks, represent????




c. Democrats are for the Iran Nuclear Weapons Treaty.
.....how do you explain the war criminal, Obama, insisting that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism have nuclear weapons....and become the North Korea of the Middle East?




d. ....that there is no systemic racism, nothing more than the fact that some folks may not like you for whatever reasons.....something allowed by the first amendment,....

...Democrat voters can never provide support for the institutional 'racism' claims, with the commensurate policies that single out certain races, and slander others...outside of the totalitarian 'thought crimes' charge.




Where are the explanations from Democrat voters????
they were taught to never question the directive from the boss. NEVER. You will never see on face the nation or meet the press a negative against the left. NEVER. They double down on bias like this past Sunday. Amazing stuff. Push the leftist agenda at all costs.

Aw man, a few Sundays back I started watching "Meet The Press" and had to turn it off five minutes in.

Such propaganda! :eek:
 
Back on point:

The premise of this thread is that reliable Democrat voters, Liberals, have been well trained to accept any statements, policies, that their masters roll out.

...and the proof is that they have no response to these central issues for Liberals...


a. The nation was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. Why do Liberals/Democrats support not any of these?



b. The most basic of our freedoms is that of free speech.
But, under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech under penalty of loss of tax benefits.

What possible compelling government interest could this, restricting the free speech of religious folks, represent????




c. Democrats are for the Iran Nuclear Weapons Treaty.
.....how do you explain the war criminal, Obama, insisting that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism have nuclear weapons....and become the North Korea of the Middle East?




d. ....that there is no systemic racism, nothing more than the fact that some folks may not like you for whatever reasons.....something allowed by the first amendment,....

...Democrat voters can never provide support for the institutional 'racism' claims, with the commensurate policies that single out certain races, and slander others...outside of the totalitarian 'thought crimes' charge.




Where are the explanations from Democrat voters????
they were taught to never question the directive from the boss. NEVER. You will never see on face the nation or meet the press a negative against the left. NEVER. They double down on bias like this past Sunday. Amazing stuff. Push the leftist agenda at all costs.

It is all about money and power to them.
Did you have a bone spur too??? just asking
 
Can y'all just imagine PC's desktop? Full of categorized folders, it has to be.
what a piece of work the stuff she comes up with She could get a job on FOX


1. There is the suggestion that I 'come up with' stuff.

Everything I post is linked, sourced and documented.
Hence...100% accurate, true and correct.
Like I said FOX You're better than Hanitty or O'Reilly and they make about 25 million a year

She's gotta be better than Megyn Kelly. :D
If she looks like Megyn I want to date her
 
Can y'all just imagine PC's desktop? Full of categorized folders, it has to be.
what a piece of work the stuff she comes up with She could get a job on FOX


1. There is the suggestion that I 'come up with' stuff.

Everything I post is linked, sourced and documented.
Hence...100% accurate, true and correct.
Like I said FOX You're better than Hanitty or O'Reilly and they make about 25 million a year
How about Liz Wheeler at OAN? Tucker Carlson? Always the opposing view is torn apart. The fact is, there is no argument from the left that can be backed up by fact. Taken down every time and filibustering is what happens by the guests. It is fking annoying as hell.

The art of irritation as demonstrated by the left. just talk and talk and talk and talk and babble and babble and babble and talk. fk them all.
 
So, you've inadvertently admitted that the personification of the Democrat Party has been a racist his entire life.

Excellent.
I doubt he is a life-long racist. Got evidence? Do you hold Republicans to the same standard?

Even if what you say is true I do believe Bill Clinton is popular in spite of any racism, not because of it.

He is a life-long racist, and represents the Democrat Party.

"Got evidence?"

You betcha'!!!!



Not only was the Democrat Party the home of slavers, segregationists, the Jim Crow folks, and the KKK....but the folks who try to lie their way out of the stain that attaches to all Democrats by claiming that it all changed in the 1960's, and the Democrats reversed themselves....

Clinton proves otherwise.


His 40 or so years as Democrat, up to and including the fact that he is so popular to Democrats that he was given the keynote speech at Obama's 2016 convention....

...and for his entire political life he has been a racist.


2. Now, "Democrats 100 years ago, or 50 years ago..." doesn't seem fair...it was so long ago....


Was it?

a. Dixiecrats lost in 1948 (65 years ago)....then went right back to being Democrats.

3. Let's take a look at the most popular Democrat today, and see how your math holds up...

  1. Governor Clinton was among three state officials the NAACP sued in 1989 under the federal Voting Rights Act of 1965. “Plaintiffs offered plenty of proof of monolithic voting along racial lines, intimidation of black voters and candidates and other official acts that made voting harder for blacks,” the Arkansas Gazette reported December 6, 1989.

    b. Bill Clinton had a Confederate flag-like issue, every year he was governor: 1979-1992 Arkansas Code Annotated, Section 1-5-107, provides as follows:

    (a) The Saturday immediately preceding Easter Sunday of each year is designated as ‘Confederate Flag Day’ in this state.

    (b) No person, firm, or corporation shall display an Confederate flag or replica thereof in connection with any advertisement of any commercial enterprise, or in any manner for any purpose except to honor the Confederate States of America. [Emphasis added.]

    (c) Any person, firm, or corporation violating the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be fined not less than one hundred dollars ($100) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000).

    Bill Clinton took no steps during his twelve years as governor to repeal this law.
    Hillary Clinton's Confederacy Hypocrisy | The Gateway Pundit
Hillary Clinton's Confederacy Hypocrisy


[Let's Stop Pretending the Confederate Flag Isn't a Symbol of RacismJust to refresh everyone's memories, we're talking about the official national flag that was used to represent the Confederate States of America during the Civil War. You know, that awkward time period when the South was vehemently fighting to keep slavery around as a means of economic prosperity for white plantation owners.

I've heard arguments time and again about how the Confederate flag is no longer representative of slavery, and how it's now indicative of "Southern pride and heritage." But I'm really over the whole "respect your heritage" mantra, especially when your heritage is hate.
Let's Stop Pretending the Confederate Flag Isn't a Symbol of Racism | HuffPost]
upload_2017-10-23_11-27-59.jpeg


Gee....'til 1992,....


  1. Governor Clinton invited Orval Faubus to his inauguration and they exchanged an almost South American abrazo, embrace, http://www.booknotes.org/Watch/72551-1/Paul+Greenberg.aspx
Governor Orval Faubus, progressive New Deal Democrat, blocked the schoolhouse door to the Little Rock Central High School with the state’s National Guard rather than allow nine black students to attend.


  1. Clinton’s mentor was J. William Fulbright, a vehement foe of integration who had voted against the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Orval Eugene Faubus, attended Bill Clinton’s 1979 gubernatorial inauguration, where the two pols hugged, as Arkansas Democrat-Gazette editorial page editor Paul Greenberg recalls.)
Know who Faubus was?
Yup...he used the National Guard to prevent blacks from going to school



c. Bill Clinton wrote his first letter, dated June 21, 1994, of congratulations to the UDC [Untied Daughters of the Confederacy] celebrating their 100th anniversary. Later Clinton wrote a letter September 8, 1994 letter of congratulation to the Georgia Division of the UDC celebrating their 100th anniversary, then August 9, 1995 welcoming to Washington, D.C. for their 1995 national convention. Each letter was given a full page with Clinton’s picture in the United Daughters of the Confederacy Magazine (UDC Magazine) giving legitimacy to the UDC.

For reference, the UDC magazine includes " a Ku Klux Klan praising book, not just the Klan of Reconstruction but the Klan of the 1920s, a book which recommends the racist books of Thomas Dixon, “The Clansman” ...
Anti-Neo-Confederate: Bill Clinton Enables Neo-Confederates & Betrays Carol Moseley-Braun: UPDATED


d. "Clinton praised Arkansas’ late Democratic senator J. William Fulbright, a notorious segregationist who opposed the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the 1965 Voting Rights Act. He also signed the Southern Manifesto, which denounced the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark Brown vs. Board of Education school desegregation decision in 1954. Clinton called Fulbright “My mentor, a visionary, a humanitarian.”Dems Need to Houseclean - Deroy Murdock - National Review Online

and....

Fulbright was a full-bore segregationist, voting against the 1957, 1960, 1964, and 1965 civil rights bills.
But...in 1993, Bill Clinton gave the Medal of Freedom award to a lifelong segregationist, Democrat Wm. J. Fulbright. And another life-long segregationist, Democrat Albert Gore, Sr. was in attendance.

Hey...didn't Bill Clinton just recently speak at the Democrat National Convention?

Bill Clinton was prevailed upon to make certain Obama won his re-election:

www.cnn.com/.../bill-clinton-dnc-speech-preview-serfaty-wolf-pkg....
Jul 26, 2016
"Former President Bill Clinton will deliver the keynote address on Tuesday night at the Democratic National ..."



… President Bill Clinton

argued that Colin Powell, promoted

to brigadier general during Mr.

Alexander’s tenure, was the product

of an affirmative action program.
http://cdn.virtuallearningcourses.com/ivtcontent/images/edw12_ch05_e.pdf



'BILL CLINTON: IN PAST, OBAMA WOULD BE 'CARRYING OUR BAGS'
Bill Clinton: In Past, Obama Would Be 'Carrying Our Bags' - Breitbart



In your face, boooooyyyyyyyeeeeeee!!!!!
 
Back on point:

The premise of this thread is that reliable Democrat voters, Liberals, have been well trained to accept any statements, policies, that their masters roll out.

...and the proof is that they have no response to these central issues for Liberals...


a. The nation was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. Why do Liberals/Democrats support not any of these?



b. The most basic of our freedoms is that of free speech.
But, under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech under penalty of loss of tax benefits.

What possible compelling government interest could this, restricting the free speech of religious folks, represent????




c. Democrats are for the Iran Nuclear Weapons Treaty.
.....how do you explain the war criminal, Obama, insisting that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism have nuclear weapons....and become the North Korea of the Middle East?




d. ....that there is no systemic racism, nothing more than the fact that some folks may not like you for whatever reasons.....something allowed by the first amendment,....

...Democrat voters can never provide support for the institutional 'racism' claims, with the commensurate policies that single out certain races, and slander others...outside of the totalitarian 'thought crimes' charge.




Where are the explanations from Democrat voters????
they were taught to never question the directive from the boss. NEVER. You will never see on face the nation or meet the press a negative against the left. NEVER. They double down on bias like this past Sunday. Amazing stuff. Push the leftist agenda at all costs.

It is all about money and power to them.
Did you have a bone spur too??? just asking
what did obummer have? How about Bill?
 
So, you've inadvertently admitted that the personification of the Democrat Party has been a racist his entire life.

Excellent.
I doubt he is a life-long racist. Got evidence? Do you hold Republicans to the same standard?

Even if what you say is true I do believe Bill Clinton is popular in spite of any racism, not because of it.

Bill Clinton isn't that racist and his wife hates him for it.


Wrong.

See my 'evidence' post #109
 
1. There is the axiom 'In the marketplace of ideas, the Right eats the Left's lunch.'


Coulter put it this way:
"Let me give you a little tip: if you want liberalism to continue in this country, you have to realize that liberal students are being let down by their professors! They have liberal school teachers, and read the liberal press! Because of this weak preparation, they are unable to argue, to think beyond the first knee-jerk impulse. They can’t put together a logical thought. Now, compare that to a college Republican…"




2. If, as many of us on the Right do, you applaud logic and education as the basis of your worldview, then you should be able to support said views.
You can't: you support them based on repetition and the fear of retribution if you question them.

I can pose several questions that show the weaknesses of the Left's doctrines, and policies, and for which Leftist drones will have no way to dispute same.
But...unable to dispute the Right's arguments, the Left has a very effective method of side-stepping the issues.......they lie.

In order to hide the flaws in the Left's dogma, a number of fallacies are published and advanced. Several of the most blatant lies are as follows:

a. It was the group known today as Liberals founded the country and produced the Constitution

b. While the Republican Party was founded to fight slavery and for civil rights, at some point they reversed that perspective and embraced segregation. Oh...and the Democrats gave women the right to vote.

c. While communists are Leftist, like Liberals, the Nazis are Rightwing and far worse than communists.

d. America is such a racist and xenophopic nation that special classes of individuals must be created protected by government with special rights.

e. There is a 'Far Right' in this country that that works against traditional American values.
Oh....and the corollary to that, that there are Rightwing wealthy that are buying our government....and there there is some eternal group known as 'the rich.'



None of the above is based on truth, but control of the schools and the media by the Left has allowed many to be convinced that these are the facts.
They aren't.




The founding documents of the nation, the Declaration of Independence, and the United States Constitution, memorialize a nation built on specific principles, such as individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.

The Left opposes all three of these founding principles.

By 'the Left,' I mean all six of these:
Communism, Nazism, Fascism, Modern Liberalism, Progressivism, and Socialism.


Specifics examples to follow......
When you quote Ann the Man , you lost all credibility .... not that you’ve ever had any in the first place.
She’s a demogogue and revolting human being just like the new guy you fellate on a daily basis.
 
So, you've inadvertently admitted that the personification of the Democrat Party has been a racist his entire life.

Excellent.
I doubt he is a life-long racist. Got evidence? Do you hold Republicans to the same standard?

Even if what you say is true I do believe Bill Clinton is popular in spite of any racism, not because of it.

He is a life-long racist, and represents the Democrat Party.

"Got evidence?"

You betcha'!!!!



Not only was the Democrat Party the home of slavers, segregationists, the Jim Crow folks, and the KKK....but the folks who try to lie their way out of the stain that attaches to all Democrats by claiming that it all changed in the 1960's, and the Democrats reversed themselves....

Clinton proves otherwise.


His 40 or so years as Democrat, up to and including the fact that he is so popular to Democrats that he was given the keynote speech at Obama's 2016 convention....

...and for his entire political life he has been a racist.


2. Now, "Democrats 100 years ago, or 50 years ago..." doesn't seem fair...it was so long ago....


Was it?

a. Dixiecrats lost in 1948 (65 years ago)....then went right back to being Democrats.

3. Let's take a look at the most popular Democrat today, and see how your math holds up...

  1. Governor Clinton was among three state officials the NAACP sued in 1989 under the federal Voting Rights Act of 1965. “Plaintiffs offered plenty of proof of monolithic voting along racial lines, intimidation of black voters and candidates and other official acts that made voting harder for blacks,” the Arkansas Gazette reported December 6, 1989.

    b. Bill Clinton had a Confederate flag-like issue, every year he was governor: 1979-1992 Arkansas Code Annotated, Section 1-5-107, provides as follows:

    (a) The Saturday immediately preceding Easter Sunday of each year is designated as ‘Confederate Flag Day’ in this state.

    (b) No person, firm, or corporation shall display an Confederate flag or replica thereof in connection with any advertisement of any commercial enterprise, or in any manner for any purpose except to honor the Confederate States of America. [Emphasis added.]

    (c) Any person, firm, or corporation violating the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be fined not less than one hundred dollars ($100) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000).

    Bill Clinton took no steps during his twelve years as governor to repeal this law.
    Hillary Clinton's Confederacy Hypocrisy | The Gateway Pundit
Hillary Clinton's Confederacy Hypocrisy


[Let's Stop Pretending the Confederate Flag Isn't a Symbol of RacismJust to refresh everyone's memories, we're talking about the official national flag that was used to represent the Confederate States of America during the Civil War. You know, that awkward time period when the South was vehemently fighting to keep slavery around as a means of economic prosperity for white plantation owners.

I've heard arguments time and again about how the Confederate flag is no longer representative of slavery, and how it's now indicative of "Southern pride and heritage." But I'm really over the whole "respect your heritage" mantra, especially when your heritage is hate.
Let's Stop Pretending the Confederate Flag Isn't a Symbol of Racism | HuffPost]
View attachment 156068

Gee....'til 1992,....


  1. Governor Clinton invited Orval Faubus to his inauguration and they exchanged an almost South American abrazo, embrace, http://www.booknotes.org/Watch/72551-1/Paul+Greenberg.aspx
Governor Orval Faubus, progressive New Deal Democrat, blocked the schoolhouse door to the Little Rock Central High School with the state’s National Guard rather than allow nine black students to attend.


  1. Clinton’s mentor was J. William Fulbright, a vehement foe of integration who had voted against the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Orval Eugene Faubus, attended Bill Clinton’s 1979 gubernatorial inauguration, where the two pols hugged, as Arkansas Democrat-Gazette editorial page editor Paul Greenberg recalls.)
Know who Faubus was?
Yup...he used the National Guard to prevent blacks from going to school



c. Bill Clinton wrote his first letter, dated June 21, 1994, of congratulations to the UDC [Untied Daughters of the Confederacy] celebrating their 100th anniversary. Later Clinton wrote a letter September 8, 1994 letter of congratulation to the Georgia Division of the UDC celebrating their 100th anniversary, then August 9, 1995 welcoming to Washington, D.C. for their 1995 national convention. Each letter was given a full page with Clinton’s picture in the United Daughters of the Confederacy Magazine (UDC Magazine) giving legitimacy to the UDC.

For reference, the UDC magazine includes " a Ku Klux Klan praising book, not just the Klan of Reconstruction but the Klan of the 1920s, a book which recommends the racist books of Thomas Dixon, “The Clansman” ...
Anti-Neo-Confederate: Bill Clinton Enables Neo-Confederates & Betrays Carol Moseley-Braun: UPDATED


d. "Clinton praised Arkansas’ late Democratic senator J. William Fulbright, a notorious segregationist who opposed the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the 1965 Voting Rights Act. He also signed the Southern Manifesto, which denounced the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark Brown vs. Board of Education school desegregation decision in 1954. Clinton called Fulbright “My mentor, a visionary, a humanitarian.”Dems Need to Houseclean - Deroy Murdock - National Review Online

and....

Fulbright was a full-bore segregationist, voting against the 1957, 1960, 1964, and 1965 civil rights bills.
But...in 1993, Bill Clinton gave the Medal of Freedom award to a lifelong segregationist, Democrat Wm. J. Fulbright. And another life-long segregationist, Democrat Albert Gore, Sr. was in attendance.

Hey...didn't Bill Clinton just recently speak at the Democrat National Convention?

Bill Clinton was prevailed upon to make certain Obama won his re-election:

www.cnn.com/.../bill-clinton-dnc-speech-preview-serfaty-wolf-pkg....
Jul 26, 2016
"Former President Bill Clinton will deliver the keynote address on Tuesday night at the Democratic National ..."



… President Bill Clinton

argued that Colin Powell, promoted

to brigadier general during Mr.

Alexander’s tenure, was the product

of an affirmative action program.
http://cdn.virtuallearningcourses.com/ivtcontent/images/edw12_ch05_e.pdf



'BILL CLINTON: IN PAST, OBAMA WOULD BE 'CARRYING OUR BAGS'
Bill Clinton: In Past, Obama Would Be 'Carrying Our Bags' - Breitbart



In your face, boooooyyyyyyyeeeeeee!!!!!

:eek: Holy Sheep shit, Batman! :eek: TL;DR!

I'll take "your word for it, and a cup of coffee" for $500, Alex. :coffee:
 
Can y'all just imagine PC's desktop? Full of categorized folders, it has to be.
what a piece of work the stuff she comes up with She could get a job on FOX


1. There is the suggestion that I 'come up with' stuff.

Everything I post is linked, sourced and documented.
Hence...100% accurate, true and correct.
Like I said FOX You're better than Hanitty or O'Reilly and they make about 25 million a year
How about Liz Wheeler at OAN? Tucker Carlson? Always the opposing view is torn apart. The fact is, there is no argument from the left that can be backed up by fact. Taken down every time and filibustering is what happens by the guests. It is fking annoying as hell.

The art of irritation as demonstrated by the left. just talk and talk and talk and talk and babble and babble and babble and talk. fk them all.
lets try an easy one jk how about the denial that russia interfered with our election with 1000's of posts to twitter and fb working to bs republicans ?
 
Ann the Man: “Lets kill all the Mideast leaders and convert their countries to Christianity.”

It just doesn’t get any crazier than that.
 
1. There is the axiom 'In the marketplace of ideas, the Right eats the Left's lunch.'


Coulter put it this way:
"Let me give you a little tip: if you want liberalism to continue in this country, you have to realize that liberal students are being let down by their professors! They have liberal school teachers, and read the liberal press! Because of this weak preparation, they are unable to argue, to think beyond the first knee-jerk impulse. They can’t put together a logical thought. Now, compare that to a college Republican…"




2. If, as many of us on the Right do, you applaud logic and education as the basis of your worldview, then you should be able to support said views.
You can't: you support them based on repetition and the fear of retribution if you question them.

I can pose several questions that show the weaknesses of the Left's doctrines, and policies, and for which Leftist drones will have no way to dispute same.
But...unable to dispute the Right's arguments, the Left has a very effective method of side-stepping the issues.......they lie.

In order to hide the flaws in the Left's dogma, a number of fallacies are published and advanced. Several of the most blatant lies are as follows:

a. It was the group known today as Liberals founded the country and produced the Constitution

b. While the Republican Party was founded to fight slavery and for civil rights, at some point they reversed that perspective and embraced segregation. Oh...and the Democrats gave women the right to vote.

c. While communists are Leftist, like Liberals, the Nazis are Rightwing and far worse than communists.

d. America is such a racist and xenophopic nation that special classes of individuals must be created protected by government with special rights.

e. There is a 'Far Right' in this country that that works against traditional American values.
Oh....and the corollary to that, that there are Rightwing wealthy that are buying our government....and there there is some eternal group known as 'the rich.'



None of the above is based on truth, but control of the schools and the media by the Left has allowed many to be convinced that these are the facts.
They aren't.




The founding documents of the nation, the Declaration of Independence, and the United States Constitution, memorialize a nation built on specific principles, such as individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.

The Left opposes all three of these founding principles.

By 'the Left,' I mean all six of these:
Communism, Nazism, Fascism, Modern Liberalism, Progressivism, and Socialism.


Specifics examples to follow......
When you quote Ann the Man , you lost all credibility .... not that you’ve ever had any in the first place.
She’s a demogogue and revolting human being just like the new guy you fellate on a daily basis.



Soooo....how many of her scholarly, fully documented best sellers have you read?



(I love doing this....showing what windbags Leftists are.)
 
Back on point:

The premise of this thread is that reliable Democrat voters, Liberals, have been well trained to accept any statements, policies, that their masters roll out.

...and the proof is that they have no response to these central issues for Liberals...


a. The nation was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. Why do Liberals/Democrats support not any of these?



b. The most basic of our freedoms is that of free speech.
But, under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech under penalty of loss of tax benefits.

What possible compelling government interest could this, restricting the free speech of religious folks, represent????




c. Democrats are for the Iran Nuclear Weapons Treaty.
.....how do you explain the war criminal, Obama, insisting that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism have nuclear weapons....and become the North Korea of the Middle East?




d. ....that there is no systemic racism, nothing more than the fact that some folks may not like you for whatever reasons.....something allowed by the first amendment,....

...Democrat voters can never provide support for the institutional 'racism' claims, with the commensurate policies that single out certain races, and slander others...outside of the totalitarian 'thought crimes' charge.




Where are the explanations from Democrat voters????
they were taught to never question the directive from the boss. NEVER. You will never see on face the nation or meet the press a negative against the left. NEVER. They double down on bias like this past Sunday. Amazing stuff. Push the leftist agenda at all costs.

Aw man, a few Sundays back I started watching "Meet The Press" and had to turn it off five minutes in.

Such propaganda! :eek:
Face the Nation yesterday had Gold Star father Khizr Khanon on. The guy who lost his son in battle, stood up on stage at the Democratic Convention yelling at Trump as unpartiotic. yeah that guy on to discuss John Kelly. DOUBLE FKING DOWN ON BIAS MUCH? I was laughing my ass off. Let's bring in our panel, so and so from the NY Times, so and so from the Washington Post and someone from the democratic strategy? Now, where is the conservative view on this station? The left are afraid to bring conservatives on. Can't back up their claims and they know it.
 
He is a life-long racist, and represents the Democrat Party.

"Got evidence?"

You betcha'!!!!
Lots of distortions, historical rewrites, and innuendo but no direct evidence. Also you called him a life-long racist, got any example more recent than 20 years ago.
 

Forum List

Back
Top