Liberals....Come To The Marketplace

[PoliticalChic]

Back on point:

The premise of this thread is that reliable Democrat voters, Liberals, have been well trained to accept any statements, policies, that their masters roll out.

...and the proof is that they have no response to these central issues for Liberals...


a. The nation was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. Why do Liberals/Democrats support not any of these?



b. The most basic of our freedoms is that of free speech.
But, under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech under penalty of loss of tax benefits.

What possible compelling government interest could this, restricting the free speech of religious folks, represent????




c. Democrats are for the Iran Nuclear Weapons Treaty.
.....how do you explain the war criminal, Obama, insisting that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism have nuclear weapons....and become the North Korea of the Middle East?




d. ....that there is no systemic racism, nothing more than the fact that some folks may not like you for whatever reasons.....something allowed by the first amendment,....

...Democrat voters can never provide support for the institutional 'racism' claims, with the commensurate policies that single out certain races, and slander others...outside of the totalitarian 'thought crimes' charge.

racism is rampant especially in southern republican states ,,,,deny it all you want ,,it's there
There was only one way to stop iran producing nuclear weapons WAR Is that what you'd prefer?
and honestly I dont GAF if pastors spew whatever bs they spew


Where are the explanations from Democrat voters????

you dolts have been buying trump bs from the day that he stepped on the stage with 16 of his betters and you say dems have ? lol

Soooo......where are your explanations for these, eddie????

Or...is thinking not allowed for Democrat voters?


...and the proof is that they have no response to these central issues for Liberals...


a. The nation was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. Why do Liberals/Democrats support not any of these?



b. The most basic of our freedoms is that of free speech.
But, under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech under penalty of loss of tax benefits.

What possible compelling government interest could this, restricting the free speech of religious folks, represent????




c. Democrats are for the Iran Nuclear Weapons Treaty.
.....how do you explain the war criminal, Obama, insisting that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism have nuclear weapons....and become the North Korea of the Middle East?




d. ....that there is no systemic racism, nothing more than the fact that some folks may not like you for whatever reasons.....something allowed by the first amendment,....

...Democrat voters can never provide support for the institutional 'racism' claims, with the commensurate policies that single out certain races, and slander others...outside of the totalitarian 'thought crimes' charge.




Where are the explanations from Democrat voters????

PC sinceyou asked It's not so much what the DEMS say it's the vile bull bleep that come from republicans that rubs me the wrong way

eddie, ol' pal.....I don't expect a smart guy like you to run and hide....

These are just a few of the questions Democrats/Liberals are unable to answer....

...unless you'd like to try.


Soooo......where are your explanations for these, eddie????

Or...is thinking not allowed for Democrat voters?


...and the proof is that they have no response to these central issues for Liberals...


a. The nation was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. Why do Liberals/Democrats support not any of these?



b. The most basic of our freedoms is that of free speech.
But, under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech under penalty of loss of tax benefits.

What possible compelling government interest could this, restricting the free speech of religious folks, represent????




c. Democrats are for the Iran Nuclear Weapons Treaty.
.....how do you explain the war criminal, Obama, insisting that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism have nuclear weapons....and become the North Korea of the Middle East?




d. ....that there is no systemic racism, nothing more than the fact that some folks may not like you for whatever reasons.....something allowed by the first amendment,....

...Democrat voters can never provide support for the institutional 'racism' claims, with the commensurate policies that single out certain races, and slander others...outside of the totalitarian 'thought crimes' charge.




Where are the explanations from Democrat voters????

Let's go to d first Racism is rampant in America The southern states inparticular Deny it all you want, It's there

Back on point:

The premise of this thread is that reliable Democrat voters, Liberals, have been well trained to accept any statements, policies, that their masters roll out.

...and the proof is that they have no response to these central issues for Liberals...


a. The nation was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. Why do Liberals/Democrats support not any of these?



b. The most basic of our freedoms is that of free speech.
But, under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech under penalty of loss of tax benefits.

What possible compelling government interest could this, restricting the free speech of religious folks, represent????




c. Democrats are for the Iran Nuclear Weapons Treaty.
.....how do you explain the war criminal, Obama, insisting that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism have nuclear weapons....and become the North Korea of the Middle East?




d. ....that there is no systemic racism, nothing more than the fact that some folks may not like you for whatever reasons.....something allowed by the first amendment,....

...Democrat voters can never provide support for the institutional 'racism' claims, with the commensurate policies that single out certain races, and slander others...outside of the totalitarian 'thought crimes' charge.




Where are the explanations from Democrat voters????

you dolts have been buying trump bs from the day that he stepped on the stage with 16 of his betters and you say dems have ? lol

Soooo......where are your explanations for these, eddie????

Or...is thinking not allowed for Democrat voters?


...and the proof is that they have no response to these central issues for Liberals...


a. The nation was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. Why do Liberals/Democrats support not any of these?



b. The most basic of our freedoms is that of free speech.
But, under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech under penalty of loss of tax benefits.

What possible compelling government interest could this, restricting the free speech of religious folks, represent????




c. Democrats are for the Iran Nuclear Weapons Treaty.
.....how do you explain the war criminal, Obama, insisting that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism have nuclear weapons....and become the North Korea of the Middle East?




d. ....that there is no systemic racism, nothing more than the fact that some folks may not like you for whatever reasons.....something allowed by the first amendment,....

...Democrat voters can never provide support for the institutional 'racism' claims, with the commensurate policies that single out certain races, and slander others...outside of the totalitarian 'thought crimes' charge.




Where are the explanations from Democrat voters????

PC sinceyou asked It's not so much what the DEMS say it's the vile bull bleep that come from republicans that rubs me the wrong way

eddie, ol' pal.....I don't expect a smart guy like you to run and hide....

These are just a few of the questions Democrats/Liberals are unable to answer....

...unless you'd like to try.


Soooo......where are your explanations for these, eddie????

Or...is thinking not allowed for Democrat voters?


...and the proof is that they have no response to these central issues for Liberals...


a. The nation was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. Why do Liberals/Democrats support not any of these?



b. The most basic of our freedoms is that of free speech.
But, under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech under penalty of loss of tax benefits.

What possible compelling government interest could this, restricting the free speech of religious folks, represent????




c. Democrats are for the Iran Nuclear Weapons Treaty.
.....how do you explain the war criminal, Obama, insisting that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism have nuclear weapons....and become the North Korea of the Middle East?




d. ....that there is no systemic racism, nothing more than the fact that some folks may not like you for whatever reasons.....something allowed by the first amendment,....

...Democrat voters can never provide support for the institutional 'racism' claims, with the commensurate policies that single out certain races, and slander others...outside of the totalitarian 'thought crimes' charge.




Where are the explanations from Democrat voters????

"Let's go to d first Racism is rampant in America The southern states inparticular Deny it all you want, It's there"


Where?

Links?


Now...let's be clear: 'racism,' if it's any individual's opinion of another individual, or even of another race......
...is that person's right.

We don't criminalize thoughts.


Now...let's have your examples of:
a. laws that single out a race in a negative way....you seem copacetic if laws single out a particular race in a positive way (affirmative action).

b. find 'racism' that actually hurts more than feelings.


Bet you can't.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Back on point:

The premise of this thread is that reliable Democrat voters, Liberals, have been well trained to accept any statements, policies, that their masters roll out.

...and the proof is that they have no response to these central issues for Liberals...


a. The nation was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. Why do Liberals/Democrats support not any of these?



b. The most basic of our freedoms is that of free speech.
But, under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech under penalty of loss of tax benefits.

What possible compelling government interest could this, restricting the free speech of religious folks, represent????




c. Democrats are for the Iran Nuclear Weapons Treaty.
.....how do you explain the war criminal, Obama, insisting that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism have nuclear weapons....and become the North Korea of the Middle East?




d. ....that there is no systemic racism, nothing more than the fact that some folks may not like you for whatever reasons.....something allowed by the first amendment,....

...Democrat voters can never provide support for the institutional 'racism' claims, with the commensurate policies that single out certain races, and slander others...outside of the totalitarian 'thought crimes' charge.

racism is rampant especially in southern republican states ,,,,deny it all you want ,,it's there
There was only one way to stop iran producing nuclear weapons WAR Is that what you'd prefer?
and honestly I dont GAF if pastors spew whatever bs they spew


Where are the explanations from Democrat voters????

you dolts have been buying trump bs from the day that he stepped on the stage with 16 of his betters and you say dems have ? lol

Soooo......where are your explanations for these, eddie????

Or...is thinking not allowed for Democrat voters?


...and the proof is that they have no response to these central issues for Liberals...


a. The nation was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. Why do Liberals/Democrats support not any of these?



b. The most basic of our freedoms is that of free speech.
But, under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech under penalty of loss of tax benefits.

What possible compelling government interest could this, restricting the free speech of religious folks, represent????




c. Democrats are for the Iran Nuclear Weapons Treaty.
.....how do you explain the war criminal, Obama, insisting that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism have nuclear weapons....and become the North Korea of the Middle East?




d. ....that there is no systemic racism, nothing more than the fact that some folks may not like you for whatever reasons.....something allowed by the first amendment,....

...Democrat voters can never provide support for the institutional 'racism' claims, with the commensurate policies that single out certain races, and slander others...outside of the totalitarian 'thought crimes' charge.




Where are the explanations from Democrat voters????

PC sinceyou asked It's not so much what the DEMS say it's the vile bull bleep that come from republicans that rubs me the wrong way

eddie, ol' pal.....I don't expect a smart guy like you to run and hide....

These are just a few of the questions Democrats/Liberals are unable to answer....

...unless you'd like to try.


Soooo......where are your explanations for these, eddie????

Or...is thinking not allowed for Democrat voters?


...and the proof is that they have no response to these central issues for Liberals...


a. The nation was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. Why do Liberals/Democrats support not any of these?



b. The most basic of our freedoms is that of free speech.
But, under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech under penalty of loss of tax benefits.

What possible compelling government interest could this, restricting the free speech of religious folks, represent????




c. Democrats are for the Iran Nuclear Weapons Treaty.
.....how do you explain the war criminal, Obama, insisting that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism have nuclear weapons....and become the North Korea of the Middle East?




d. ....that there is no systemic racism, nothing more than the fact that some folks may not like you for whatever reasons.....something allowed by the first amendment,....

...Democrat voters can never provide support for the institutional 'racism' claims, with the commensurate policies that single out certain races, and slander others...outside of the totalitarian 'thought crimes' charge.




Where are the explanations from Democrat voters????

Let's go to d first Racism is rampant in America The southern states inparticular Deny it all you want, It's there

Back on point:

The premise of this thread is that reliable Democrat voters, Liberals, have been well trained to accept any statements, policies, that their masters roll out.

...and the proof is that they have no response to these central issues for Liberals...


a. The nation was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. Why do Liberals/Democrats support not any of these?



b. The most basic of our freedoms is that of free speech.
But, under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech under penalty of loss of tax benefits.

What possible compelling government interest could this, restricting the free speech of religious folks, represent????




c. Democrats are for the Iran Nuclear Weapons Treaty.
.....how do you explain the war criminal, Obama, insisting that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism have nuclear weapons....and become the North Korea of the Middle East?




d. ....that there is no systemic racism, nothing more than the fact that some folks may not like you for whatever reasons.....something allowed by the first amendment,....

...Democrat voters can never provide support for the institutional 'racism' claims, with the commensurate policies that single out certain races, and slander others...outside of the totalitarian 'thought crimes' charge.




Where are the explanations from Democrat voters????

you dolts have been buying trump bs from the day that he stepped on the stage with 16 of his betters and you say dems have ? lol

Soooo......where are your explanations for these, eddie????

Or...is thinking not allowed for Democrat voters?


...and the proof is that they have no response to these central issues for Liberals...


a. The nation was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. Why do Liberals/Democrats support not any of these?



b. The most basic of our freedoms is that of free speech.
But, under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech under penalty of loss of tax benefits.

What possible compelling government interest could this, restricting the free speech of religious folks, represent????




c. Democrats are for the Iran Nuclear Weapons Treaty.
.....how do you explain the war criminal, Obama, insisting that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism have nuclear weapons....and become the North Korea of the Middle East?




d. ....that there is no systemic racism, nothing more than the fact that some folks may not like you for whatever reasons.....something allowed by the first amendment,....

...Democrat voters can never provide support for the institutional 'racism' claims, with the commensurate policies that single out certain races, and slander others...outside of the totalitarian 'thought crimes' charge.




Where are the explanations from Democrat voters????

PC sinceyou asked It's not so much what the DEMS say it's the vile bull bleep that come from republicans that rubs me the wrong way

eddie, ol' pal.....I don't expect a smart guy like you to run and hide....

These are just a few of the questions Democrats/Liberals are unable to answer....

...unless you'd like to try.


Soooo......where are your explanations for these, eddie????

Or...is thinking not allowed for Democrat voters?


...and the proof is that they have no response to these central issues for Liberals...


a. The nation was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. Why do Liberals/Democrats support not any of these?



b. The most basic of our freedoms is that of free speech.
But, under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech under penalty of loss of tax benefits.

What possible compelling government interest could this, restricting the free speech of religious folks, represent????




c. Democrats are for the Iran Nuclear Weapons Treaty.
.....how do you explain the war criminal, Obama, insisting that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism have nuclear weapons....and become the North Korea of the Middle East?




d. ....that there is no systemic racism, nothing more than the fact that some folks may not like you for whatever reasons.....something allowed by the first amendment,....

...Democrat voters can never provide support for the institutional 'racism' claims, with the commensurate policies that single out certain races, and slander others...outside of the totalitarian 'thought crimes' charge.




Where are the explanations from Democrat voters????

Soooo....we agree that Democrats/Liberals have no response to a., b., and c.?

a. The nation was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. Why do Liberals/Democrats support not any of these?



b. The most basic of our freedoms is that of free speech.
But, under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech under penalty of loss of tax benefits.

What possible compelling government interest could this, restricting the free speech of religious folks, represent????




c. Democrats are for the Iran Nuclear Weapons Treaty.
.....how do you explain the war criminal, Obama, insisting that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism have nuclear weapons....and become the North Korea of the Middle East?



I win again????

 

[eddiew37]

you dolts have been buying trump bs from the day that he stepped on the stage with 16 of his betters and you say dems have ? lol

Soooo......where are your explanations for these, eddie????

Or...is thinking not allowed for Democrat voters?


...and the proof is that they have no response to these central issues for Liberals...


a. The nation was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. Why do Liberals/Democrats support not any of these?



b. The most basic of our freedoms is that of free speech.
But, under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech under penalty of loss of tax benefits.

What possible compelling government interest could this, restricting the free speech of religious folks, represent????




c. Democrats are for the Iran Nuclear Weapons Treaty.
.....how do you explain the war criminal, Obama, insisting that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism have nuclear weapons....and become the North Korea of the Middle East?




d. ....that there is no systemic racism, nothing more than the fact that some folks may not like you for whatever reasons.....something allowed by the first amendment,....

...Democrat voters can never provide support for the institutional 'racism' claims, with the commensurate policies that single out certain races, and slander others...outside of the totalitarian 'thought crimes' charge.




Where are the explanations from Democrat voters????

PC sinceyou asked It's not so much what the DEMS say it's the vile bull bleep that come from republicans that rubs me the wrong way

eddie, ol' pal.....I don't expect a smart guy like you to run and hide....

These are just a few of the questions Democrats/Liberals are unable to answer....

...unless you'd like to try.


Soooo......where are your explanations for these, eddie????

Or...is thinking not allowed for Democrat voters?


...and the proof is that they have no response to these central issues for Liberals...


a. The nation was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. Why do Liberals/Democrats support not any of these?



b. The most basic of our freedoms is that of free speech.
But, under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech under penalty of loss of tax benefits.

What possible compelling government interest could this, restricting the free speech of religious folks, represent????




c. Democrats are for the Iran Nuclear Weapons Treaty.
.....how do you explain the war criminal, Obama, insisting that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism have nuclear weapons....and become the North Korea of the Middle East?




d. ....that there is no systemic racism, nothing more than the fact that some folks may not like you for whatever reasons.....something allowed by the first amendment,....

...Democrat voters can never provide support for the institutional 'racism' claims, with the commensurate policies that single out certain races, and slander others...outside of the totalitarian 'thought crimes' charge.




Where are the explanations from Democrat voters????

Let's go to d first Racism is rampant in America The southern states inparticular Deny it all you want, It's there

you dolts have been buying trump bs from the day that he stepped on the stage with 16 of his betters and you say dems have ? lol

Soooo......where are your explanations for these, eddie????

Or...is thinking not allowed for Democrat voters?


...and the proof is that they have no response to these central issues for Liberals...


a. The nation was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. Why do Liberals/Democrats support not any of these?



b. The most basic of our freedoms is that of free speech.
But, under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech under penalty of loss of tax benefits.

What possible compelling government interest could this, restricting the free speech of religious folks, represent????




c. Democrats are for the Iran Nuclear Weapons Treaty.
.....how do you explain the war criminal, Obama, insisting that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism have nuclear weapons....and become the North Korea of the Middle East?




d. ....that there is no systemic racism, nothing more than the fact that some folks may not like you for whatever reasons.....something allowed by the first amendment,....

...Democrat voters can never provide support for the institutional 'racism' claims, with the commensurate policies that single out certain races, and slander others...outside of the totalitarian 'thought crimes' charge.




Where are the explanations from Democrat voters????

PC sinceyou asked It's not so much what the DEMS say it's the vile bull bleep that come from republicans that rubs me the wrong way

eddie, ol' pal.....I don't expect a smart guy like you to run and hide....

These are just a few of the questions Democrats/Liberals are unable to answer....

...unless you'd like to try.


Soooo......where are your explanations for these, eddie????

Or...is thinking not allowed for Democrat voters?


...and the proof is that they have no response to these central issues for Liberals...


a. The nation was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. Why do Liberals/Democrats support not any of these?



b. The most basic of our freedoms is that of free speech.
But, under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech under penalty of loss of tax benefits.

What possible compelling government interest could this, restricting the free speech of religious folks, represent????




c. Democrats are for the Iran Nuclear Weapons Treaty.
.....how do you explain the war criminal, Obama, insisting that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism have nuclear weapons....and become the North Korea of the Middle East?




d. ....that there is no systemic racism, nothing more than the fact that some folks may not like you for whatever reasons.....something allowed by the first amendment,....

...Democrat voters can never provide support for the institutional 'racism' claims, with the commensurate policies that single out certain races, and slander others...outside of the totalitarian 'thought crimes' charge.




Where are the explanations from Democrat voters????

Soooo....we agree that Democrats/Liberals have no response to a., b., and c.?

a. The nation was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. Why do Liberals/Democrats support not any of these?



b. The most basic of our freedoms is that of free speech.
But, under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech under penalty of loss of tax benefits.

What possible compelling government interest could this, restricting the free speech of religious folks, represent????




c. Democrats are for the Iran Nuclear Weapons Treaty.
.....how do you explain the war criminal, Obama, insisting that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism have nuclear weapons....and become the North Korea of the Middle East?



I win again????

LOL LOL you're gonna get so tired of winning ,,,,you and trump.... For a real smart person like you seem to be ,to deny racism is rampant puts you on a lower limb than you deserve to be imho

 

[PoliticalChic]

Soooo......where are your explanations for these, eddie????

Or...is thinking not allowed for Democrat voters?


...and the proof is that they have no response to these central issues for Liberals...


a. The nation was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. Why do Liberals/Democrats support not any of these?



b. The most basic of our freedoms is that of free speech.
But, under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech under penalty of loss of tax benefits.

What possible compelling government interest could this, restricting the free speech of religious folks, represent????




c. Democrats are for the Iran Nuclear Weapons Treaty.
.....how do you explain the war criminal, Obama, insisting that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism have nuclear weapons....and become the North Korea of the Middle East?




d. ....that there is no systemic racism, nothing more than the fact that some folks may not like you for whatever reasons.....something allowed by the first amendment,....

...Democrat voters can never provide support for the institutional 'racism' claims, with the commensurate policies that single out certain races, and slander others...outside of the totalitarian 'thought crimes' charge.




Where are the explanations from Democrat voters????

PC sinceyou asked It's not so much what the DEMS say it's the vile bull bleep that come from republicans that rubs me the wrong way

eddie, ol' pal.....I don't expect a smart guy like you to run and hide....

These are just a few of the questions Democrats/Liberals are unable to answer....

...unless you'd like to try.


Soooo......where are your explanations for these, eddie????

Or...is thinking not allowed for Democrat voters?


...and the proof is that they have no response to these central issues for Liberals...


a. The nation was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. Why do Liberals/Democrats support not any of these?



b. The most basic of our freedoms is that of free speech.
But, under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech under penalty of loss of tax benefits.

What possible compelling government interest could this, restricting the free speech of religious folks, represent????




c. Democrats are for the Iran Nuclear Weapons Treaty.
.....how do you explain the war criminal, Obama, insisting that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism have nuclear weapons....and become the North Korea of the Middle East?




d. ....that there is no systemic racism, nothing more than the fact that some folks may not like you for whatever reasons.....something allowed by the first amendment,....

...Democrat voters can never provide support for the institutional 'racism' claims, with the commensurate policies that single out certain races, and slander others...outside of the totalitarian 'thought crimes' charge.




Where are the explanations from Democrat voters????

Let's go to d first Racism is rampant in America The southern states inparticular Deny it all you want, It's there

Soooo......where are your explanations for these, eddie????

Or...is thinking not allowed for Democrat voters?


...and the proof is that they have no response to these central issues for Liberals...


a. The nation was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. Why do Liberals/Democrats support not any of these?



b. The most basic of our freedoms is that of free speech.
But, under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech under penalty of loss of tax benefits.

What possible compelling government interest could this, restricting the free speech of religious folks, represent????




c. Democrats are for the Iran Nuclear Weapons Treaty.
.....how do you explain the war criminal, Obama, insisting that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism have nuclear weapons....and become the North Korea of the Middle East?




d. ....that there is no systemic racism, nothing more than the fact that some folks may not like you for whatever reasons.....something allowed by the first amendment,....

...Democrat voters can never provide support for the institutional 'racism' claims, with the commensurate policies that single out certain races, and slander others...outside of the totalitarian 'thought crimes' charge.




Where are the explanations from Democrat voters????

PC sinceyou asked It's not so much what the DEMS say it's the vile bull bleep that come from republicans that rubs me the wrong way

eddie, ol' pal.....I don't expect a smart guy like you to run and hide....

These are just a few of the questions Democrats/Liberals are unable to answer....

...unless you'd like to try.


Soooo......where are your explanations for these, eddie????

Or...is thinking not allowed for Democrat voters?


...and the proof is that they have no response to these central issues for Liberals...


a. The nation was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. Why do Liberals/Democrats support not any of these?



b. The most basic of our freedoms is that of free speech.
But, under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech under penalty of loss of tax benefits.

What possible compelling government interest could this, restricting the free speech of religious folks, represent????




c. Democrats are for the Iran Nuclear Weapons Treaty.
.....how do you explain the war criminal, Obama, insisting that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism have nuclear weapons....and become the North Korea of the Middle East?




d. ....that there is no systemic racism, nothing more than the fact that some folks may not like you for whatever reasons.....something allowed by the first amendment,....

...Democrat voters can never provide support for the institutional 'racism' claims, with the commensurate policies that single out certain races, and slander others...outside of the totalitarian 'thought crimes' charge.




Where are the explanations from Democrat voters????

Soooo....we agree that Democrats/Liberals have no response to a., b., and c.?

a. The nation was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. Why do Liberals/Democrats support not any of these?



b. The most basic of our freedoms is that of free speech.
But, under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech under penalty of loss of tax benefits.

What possible compelling government interest could this, restricting the free speech of religious folks, represent????




c. Democrats are for the Iran Nuclear Weapons Treaty.
.....how do you explain the war criminal, Obama, insisting that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism have nuclear weapons....and become the North Korea of the Middle East?



I win again????

LOL LOL you're gonna get so tired of winning ,,,,you and trump.... For a real smart person like you seem to be ,to deny racism is rampant puts you on a lower limb than you deserve to be imho

You're tap-dancin,' pal.



Now...let's be clear: 'racism,' if it's any individual's opinion of another individual, or even of another race......
...is that person's right.

We don't criminalize thoughts.


Now...let's have your examples of:
a. laws that single out a race in a negative way....you seem copacetic if laws single out a particular race in a positive way (affirmative action).

b. find 'racism' that actually hurts more than feelings.



And....I believe I just proved that you can't.



QED....there is neither institutional nor widespread racism.....no more against blacks than against any other group.

Admit it.

 

[alang1216]

c. While communists are Leftist, like Liberals, the Nazis are Rightwing

This statement is mostly true and denying it is a rewriting of history. A lie. Communism is the extreme left. Far more extreme than today's liberals. The Nazis were the extreme right. Far more extreme that today's conservatives but do share some of their ideologies with the Alt-Right. Nazis were anti-communist, xenophobic, and extreme nationalists.

The assertions or accusations listed above appear to stem from the official name of the party that Hitler led to take over Germany in the early 1930s. It was called the National Socialist German Workers’ Party—later shortened to Nazi party—and gained power by promising voters to alleviate a German economy mired in depression while also restoring “German cultural values, reverse the provisions of the Treaty of Versailles, turn back the perceived threat of a Communist uprising, put the German people back to work, and restore Germany to its 'rightful position' as a world power," according to the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum.

The party represented an extreme side of German’s right wing, and the key word in its title was not necessarily "socialism," but rather "national." During Hitler’s ascension, nationalism was preached and took hold, and excluded anyone who wasn’t fully German or considered superior.

"The Nazis opposed all traditional socialism, wanting to substitute something they called ‘German socialism’ or ‘Aryan socialism,’” Bryn Mawr College professor Barbara Miller Lane told PolitiFact in October 2015.

 

[NYcarbineer]

1. There is the axiom 'In the marketplace of ideas, the Right eats the Left's lunch.'


Coulter put it this way:
"Let me give you a little tip: if you want liberalism to continue in this country, you have to realize that liberal students are being let down by their professors! They have liberal school teachers, and read the liberal press! Because of this weak preparation, they are unable to argue, to think beyond the first knee-jerk impulse. They can’t put together a logical thought. Now, compare that to a college Republican…"




2. If, as many of us on the Right do, you applaud logic and education as the basis of your worldview, then you should be able to support said views.
You can't: you support them based on repetition and the fear of retribution if you question them.

I can pose several questions that show the weaknesses of the Left's doctrines, and policies, and for which Leftist drones will have no way to dispute same.
But...unable to dispute the Right's arguments, the Left has a very effective method of side-stepping the issues.......they lie.

In order to hide the flaws in the Left's dogma, a number of fallacies are published and advanced. Several of the most blatant lies are as follows:

a. It was the group known today as Liberals founded the country and produced the Constitution

b. While the Republican Party was founded to fight slavery and for civil rights, at some point they reversed that perspective and embraced segregation. Oh...and the Democrats gave women the right to vote.

c. While communists are Leftist, like Liberals, the Nazis are Rightwing and far worse than communists.

d. America is such a racist and xenophopic nation that special classes of individuals must be created protected by government with special rights.

e. There is a 'Far Right' in this country that that works against traditional American values.
Oh....and the corollary to that, that there are Rightwing wealthy that are buying our government....and there there is some eternal group known as 'the rich.'



None of the above is based on truth, but control of the schools and the media by the Left has allowed many to be convinced that these are the facts.
They aren't.




The founding documents of the nation, the Declaration of Independence, and the United States Constitution, memorialize a nation built on specific principles, such as individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.

The Left opposes all three of these founding principles.

By 'the Left,' I mean all six of these:
Communism, Nazism, Fascism, Modern Liberalism, Progressivism, and Socialism.


Specifics examples to follow......

Next time you're at the marketplace, buy some clues.

 

[NYcarbineer]

[


Now...let's have your examples of:
a. laws that single out a race in a negative way....you seem copacetic if laws single out a particular race in a positive way (affirmative action).

b. find 'racism' that actually hurts more than feelings.
.

U.S. top court again faults North Carolina on voting rights

"WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday faulted North Carolina again in a racially tinged voting rights case, upholding a lower court’s ruling that Republican lawmakers mapped state legislative districts in a way that diluted the clout of black voters."

Happy now? lolol

U.S. top court again faults North Carolina on voting rights

 

[eddiew37]

PC sinceyou asked It's not so much what the DEMS say it's the vile bull bleep that come from republicans that rubs me the wrong way

eddie, ol' pal.....I don't expect a smart guy like you to run and hide....

These are just a few of the questions Democrats/Liberals are unable to answer....

...unless you'd like to try.


Soooo......where are your explanations for these, eddie????

Or...is thinking not allowed for Democrat voters?


...and the proof is that they have no response to these central issues for Liberals...


a. The nation was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. Why do Liberals/Democrats support not any of these?



b. The most basic of our freedoms is that of free speech.
But, under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech under penalty of loss of tax benefits.

What possible compelling government interest could this, restricting the free speech of religious folks, represent????




c. Democrats are for the Iran Nuclear Weapons Treaty.
.....how do you explain the war criminal, Obama, insisting that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism have nuclear weapons....and become the North Korea of the Middle East?




d. ....that there is no systemic racism, nothing more than the fact that some folks may not like you for whatever reasons.....something allowed by the first amendment,....

...Democrat voters can never provide support for the institutional 'racism' claims, with the commensurate policies that single out certain races, and slander others...outside of the totalitarian 'thought crimes' charge.




Where are the explanations from Democrat voters????

Let's go to d first Racism is rampant in America The southern states inparticular Deny it all you want, It's there

PC sinceyou asked It's not so much what the DEMS say it's the vile bull bleep that come from republicans that rubs me the wrong way

eddie, ol' pal.....I don't expect a smart guy like you to run and hide....

These are just a few of the questions Democrats/Liberals are unable to answer....

...unless you'd like to try.


Soooo......where are your explanations for these, eddie????

Or...is thinking not allowed for Democrat voters?


...and the proof is that they have no response to these central issues for Liberals...


a. The nation was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. Why do Liberals/Democrats support not any of these?



b. The most basic of our freedoms is that of free speech.
But, under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech under penalty of loss of tax benefits.

What possible compelling government interest could this, restricting the free speech of religious folks, represent????




c. Democrats are for the Iran Nuclear Weapons Treaty.
.....how do you explain the war criminal, Obama, insisting that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism have nuclear weapons....and become the North Korea of the Middle East?




d. ....that there is no systemic racism, nothing more than the fact that some folks may not like you for whatever reasons.....something allowed by the first amendment,....

...Democrat voters can never provide support for the institutional 'racism' claims, with the commensurate policies that single out certain races, and slander others...outside of the totalitarian 'thought crimes' charge.




Where are the explanations from Democrat voters????

Soooo....we agree that Democrats/Liberals have no response to a., b., and c.?

a. The nation was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. Why do Liberals/Democrats support not any of these?



b. The most basic of our freedoms is that of free speech.
But, under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech under penalty of loss of tax benefits.

What possible compelling government interest could this, restricting the free speech of religious folks, represent????




c. Democrats are for the Iran Nuclear Weapons Treaty.
.....how do you explain the war criminal, Obama, insisting that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism have nuclear weapons....and become the North Korea of the Middle East?



I win again????

LOL LOL you're gonna get so tired of winning ,,,,you and trump.... For a real smart person like you seem to be ,to deny racism is rampant puts you on a lower limb than you deserve to be imho

You're tap-dancin,' pal.



Now...let's be clear: 'racism,' if it's any individual's opinion of another individual, or even of another race......
...is that person's right.

We don't criminalize thoughts.


Now...let's have your examples of:
a. laws that single out a race in a negative way....you seem copacetic if laws single out a particular race in a positive way (affirmative action).

b. find 'racism' that actually hurts more than feelings.



And....I believe I just proved that you can't.



QED....there is neither institutional nor widespread racism.....no more against blacks than against any other group.

Admit it.

OK PC chalk up another win ,,,There is no racism shown in our employment or educational choices Back when I was in the service they didn't have white only water fountains or white labeled bathrooms for men and women but only one bathroom for blacks ,,,, did my eyes deceive me? And in the great state of Texas we had to leave a bar because I was with a black friend A soldier BTW

 

[alang1216]

b. While the Republican Party was founded to fight slavery and for civil rights, at some point they reversed that perspective and embraced segregation.

Although I wouldn't accuse today's GOP of embracing segregation it is unquestionably true the the two parties switched their positions on a number of issues.

During the 1860s, Republicans, who dominated northern states, orchestrated an ambitious expansion of federal power, helping to fund the transcontinental railroad, the state university system and the settlement of the West by homesteaders, and instating a national currency and protective tariff. Democrats, who dominated the South, opposed these measures. After the Civil War, Republicans passed laws that granted protections for African Americans and advanced social justice; again, Democrats largely opposed these expansions of power.

Sound like an alternate universe? Fast forward to 1936. Democratic president Franklin Roosevelt won reelection that year on the strength of the New Deal, a set of Depression-remedying reforms including regulation of financial institutions, founding of welfare and pension programs, infrastructure development and more. Roosevelt won in a landslide against Republican Alf Landon, who opposed these exercises of federal power.

Those of us who lived through the end of segregation remember the switch on this issue. Southern Dems were segregationists and used 'States Rights' as their motto. When Southern schools were forceably desegregated by Eisenhower (the last of the old-style GOP) and Kennedy and the Civil Rights bill was passed under Johnson, Southern Dems left the party. Goldwater was a vocal opponent to desegregation and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, believing it was an overreach of federal government and changed the GOP into what we now have.

 

[alang1216]

b. While the Republican Party was founded to fight slavery and for civil rights, at some point they reversed that perspective and embraced segregation.

Although I wouldn't accuse today's GOP of embracing segregation it is unquestionably true the the two parties switched their positions on a number of issues.

During the 1860s, Republicans, who dominated northern states, orchestrated an ambitious expansion of federal power, helping to fund the transcontinental railroad, the state university system and the settlement of the West by homesteaders, and instating a national currency and protective tariff. Democrats, who dominated the South, opposed these measures. After the Civil War, Republicans passed laws that granted protections for African Americans and advanced social justice; again, Democrats largely opposed these expansions of power.

Sound like an alternate universe? Fast forward to 1936. Democratic president Franklin Roosevelt won reelection that year on the strength of the New Deal, a set of Depression-remedying reforms including regulation of financial institutions, founding of welfare and pension programs, infrastructure development and more. Roosevelt won in a landslide against Republican Alf Landon, who opposed these exercises of federal power.

Those of us who lived through the end of segregation remember the switch on this issue. Southern Dems were segregationists and used 'States Rights' as their motto. When Southern schools were forceably desegregated by Eisenhower (the last of the old-style GOP) and Kennedy and the Civil Rights bill was passed under Johnson, Southern Dems left the party. Goldwater was a vocal opponent to desegregation and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, believing it was an overreach of federal government and changed the GOP into what we now have.

 

[GreenBean]

Back on point:

The premise of this thread is that reliable Democrat voters, Liberals, have been well trained to accept any statements, policies, that their masters roll out.

...and the proof is that they have no response to these central issues for Liberals...


a. The nation was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. Why do Liberals/Democrats support not any of these?



b. The most basic of our freedoms is that of free speech.
But, under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech under penalty of loss of tax benefits.

What possible compelling government interest could this, restricting the free speech of religious folks, represent????




c. Democrats are for the Iran Nuclear Weapons Treaty.
.....how do you explain the war criminal, Obama, insisting that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism have nuclear weapons....and become the North Korea of the Middle East?




d. ....that there is no systemic racism, nothing more than the fact that some folks may not like you for whatever reasons.....something allowed by the first amendment,....

...Democrat voters can never provide support for the institutional 'racism' claims, with the commensurate policies that single out certain races, and slander others...outside of the totalitarian 'thought crimes' charge.




Where are the explanations from Democrat voters????

you dolts have been buying trump bs from the day that he stepped on the stage with 16 of his betters and you say dems have ? lol

Soooo......where are your explanations for these, eddie????

Or...is thinking not allowed for Democrat voters?


...and the proof is that they have no response to these central issues for Liberals...


a. The nation was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. Why do Liberals/Democrats support not any of these?



b. The most basic of our freedoms is that of free speech.
But, under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech under penalty of loss of tax benefits.

What possible compelling government interest could this, restricting the free speech of religious folks, represent????




c. Democrats are for the Iran Nuclear Weapons Treaty.
.....how do you explain the war criminal, Obama, insisting that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism have nuclear weapons....and become the North Korea of the Middle East?




d. ....that there is no systemic racism, nothing more than the fact that some folks may not like you for whatever reasons.....something allowed by the first amendment,....

...Democrat voters can never provide support for the institutional 'racism' claims, with the commensurate policies that single out certain races, and slander others...outside of the totalitarian 'thought crimes' charge.




Where are the explanations from Democrat voters????

JFK was the last good Democrat

And Reagan the last great Republican?

There's a few good ones floating around - The current occupant of 1600 Pa. Avenue included

 

[PoliticalChic]

c. While communists are Leftist, like Liberals, the Nazis are Rightwing

This statement is mostly true and denying it is a rewriting of history. A lie. Communism is the extreme left. Far more extreme than today's liberals. The Nazis were the extreme right. Far more extreme that today's conservatives but do share some of their ideologies with the Alt-Right. Nazis were anti-communist, xenophobic, and extreme nationalists.

The assertions or accusations listed above appear to stem from the official name of the party that Hitler led to take over Germany in the early 1930s. It was called the National Socialist German Workers’ Party—later shortened to Nazi party—and gained power by promising voters to alleviate a German economy mired in depression while also restoring “German cultural values, reverse the provisions of the Treaty of Versailles, turn back the perceived threat of a Communist uprising, put the German people back to work, and restore Germany to its 'rightful position' as a world power," according to the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum.

The party represented an extreme side of German’s right wing, and the key word in its title was not necessarily "socialism," but rather "national." During Hitler’s ascension, nationalism was preached and took hold, and excluded anyone who wasn’t fully German or considered superior.

"The Nazis opposed all traditional socialism, wanting to substitute something they called ‘German socialism’ or ‘Aryan socialism,’” Bryn Mawr College professor Barbara Miller Lane told PolitiFact in October 2015.

"This statement is mostly true and denying it is a rewriting of history. A lie. Communism is the extreme left. Far more extreme than today's liberals. The Nazis were the extreme right."

As usual, you couldn't be more incorrect.

Let's prove it with a short quiz.

Let's begin with definitions.
Nazism, communism, socialism..Liberalism, Progressivism,.and fascism....

1. Which stem from the works of Karl Marx?
2. Which is a form of command and control big government?
3. Which has no problem with genocide, actual or figurative, as an accepted procedure on its political enemies?
4. Which is based on the collective over the individual?
5. Which oppresses and/or slaughters its own citizens as pro forma (including depriving them of a living)....?
6. Which represents totalitarian governance?
7. Which believes that mandating/dictating every aspect of their citizen's lives is their prerogative?
8. Which aims for an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life

9. Which restricts free speech and thought?

10. Which can be summed up in Hegel's “The state says … you must obey …. The state has rights against the individual; its members have obligations, among them that of obeying without protest”



And, of course, they all are do...they are all consubstantial.

They are all the same in their ultimate plan for society: a totalitarian regime with the peons marching lock-step.



Nazism

Communism

Socialism

Fascism

Progressivism

Liberalism






How about pointing out which of them are defenders of religious, political, and economic freedom, and recognize the individual as the most important element of society?
Right....none of 'em.
Only right wing philosophies...i.e., conservatism.

 

[PoliticalChic]

eddie, ol' pal.....I don't expect a smart guy like you to run and hide....

These are just a few of the questions Democrats/Liberals are unable to answer....

...unless you'd like to try.


Soooo......where are your explanations for these, eddie????

Or...is thinking not allowed for Democrat voters?


...and the proof is that they have no response to these central issues for Liberals...


a. The nation was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. Why do Liberals/Democrats support not any of these?



b. The most basic of our freedoms is that of free speech.
But, under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech under penalty of loss of tax benefits.

What possible compelling government interest could this, restricting the free speech of religious folks, represent????




c. Democrats are for the Iran Nuclear Weapons Treaty.
.....how do you explain the war criminal, Obama, insisting that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism have nuclear weapons....and become the North Korea of the Middle East?




d. ....that there is no systemic racism, nothing more than the fact that some folks may not like you for whatever reasons.....something allowed by the first amendment,....

...Democrat voters can never provide support for the institutional 'racism' claims, with the commensurate policies that single out certain races, and slander others...outside of the totalitarian 'thought crimes' charge.




Where are the explanations from Democrat voters????

Let's go to d first Racism is rampant in America The southern states inparticular Deny it all you want, It's there

eddie, ol' pal.....I don't expect a smart guy like you to run and hide....

These are just a few of the questions Democrats/Liberals are unable to answer....

...unless you'd like to try.


Soooo......where are your explanations for these, eddie????

Or...is thinking not allowed for Democrat voters?


...and the proof is that they have no response to these central issues for Liberals...


a. The nation was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. Why do Liberals/Democrats support not any of these?



b. The most basic of our freedoms is that of free speech.
But, under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech under penalty of loss of tax benefits.

What possible compelling government interest could this, restricting the free speech of religious folks, represent????




c. Democrats are for the Iran Nuclear Weapons Treaty.
.....how do you explain the war criminal, Obama, insisting that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism have nuclear weapons....and become the North Korea of the Middle East?




d. ....that there is no systemic racism, nothing more than the fact that some folks may not like you for whatever reasons.....something allowed by the first amendment,....

...Democrat voters can never provide support for the institutional 'racism' claims, with the commensurate policies that single out certain races, and slander others...outside of the totalitarian 'thought crimes' charge.




Where are the explanations from Democrat voters????

Soooo....we agree that Democrats/Liberals have no response to a., b., and c.?

a. The nation was founded on individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. Why do Liberals/Democrats support not any of these?



b. The most basic of our freedoms is that of free speech.
But, under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors of their right of free speech under penalty of loss of tax benefits.

What possible compelling government interest could this, restricting the free speech of religious folks, represent????




c. Democrats are for the Iran Nuclear Weapons Treaty.
.....how do you explain the war criminal, Obama, insisting that the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism have nuclear weapons....and become the North Korea of the Middle East?



I win again????

LOL LOL you're gonna get so tired of winning ,,,,you and trump.... For a real smart person like you seem to be ,to deny racism is rampant puts you on a lower limb than you deserve to be imho

You're tap-dancin,' pal.



Now...let's be clear: 'racism,' if it's any individual's opinion of another individual, or even of another race......
...is that person's right.

We don't criminalize thoughts.


Now...let's have your examples of:
a. laws that single out a race in a negative way....you seem copacetic if laws single out a particular race in a positive way (affirmative action).

b. find 'racism' that actually hurts more than feelings.



And....I believe I just proved that you can't.



QED....there is neither institutional nor widespread racism.....no more against blacks than against any other group.

Admit it.

OK PC chalk up another win ,,,There is no racism shown in our employment or educational choices Back when I was in the service they didn't have white only water fountains or white labeled bathrooms for men and women but only one bathroom for blacks ,,,, did my eyes deceive me? And in the great state of Texas we had to leave a bar because I was with a black friend A soldier BTW

"Back when I was in the service...."
Anecdotes from the Revolutionary War no longer have any import.

But....thank you for your service.


Now....are you ready to claim that your recollection applies currently...
....or is Biden a bald faced liar?

"VP Biden Says Republicans Are 'Going to Put Y'all Back in Chains'"
Biden: GOP Will 'Put Y'all Back in Chains'

 

[PoliticalChic]

b. While the Republican Party was founded to fight slavery and for civil rights, at some point they reversed that perspective and embraced segregation.

Although I wouldn't accuse today's GOP of embracing segregation it is unquestionably true the the two parties switched their positions on a number of issues.

During the 1860s, Republicans, who dominated northern states, orchestrated an ambitious expansion of federal power, helping to fund the transcontinental railroad, the state university system and the settlement of the West by homesteaders, and instating a national currency and protective tariff. Democrats, who dominated the South, opposed these measures. After the Civil War, Republicans passed laws that granted protections for African Americans and advanced social justice; again, Democrats largely opposed these expansions of power.

Sound like an alternate universe? Fast forward to 1936. Democratic president Franklin Roosevelt won reelection that year on the strength of the New Deal, a set of Depression-remedying reforms including regulation of financial institutions, founding of welfare and pension programs, infrastructure development and more. Roosevelt won in a landslide against Republican Alf Landon, who opposed these exercises of federal power.

Those of us who lived through the end of segregation remember the switch on this issue. Southern Dems were segregationists and used 'States Rights' as their motto. When Southern schools were forceably desegregated by Eisenhower (the last of the old-style GOP) and Kennedy and the Civil Rights bill was passed under Johnson, Southern Dems left the party. Goldwater was a vocal opponent to desegregation and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, believing it was an overreach of federal government and changed the GOP into what we now have.

".... it is unquestionably true the the two parties switched their positions on a number of issues."

Of course, you're an imbecile.


Watch me prove how truly stupid the 'flip' myth is:

What the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as you do, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for your news.....

.....what are the chances would be that you woke up tomorrow praising Donald Trump's election and presidency, and voting Republican......you know....'flipping.'




And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives, who formed a party to fight Democrats and slavery, suddenly decided to become racists.

 

[eddiew37]

b. While the Republican Party was founded to fight slavery and for civil rights, at some point they reversed that perspective and embraced segregation.

Although I wouldn't accuse today's GOP of embracing segregation it is unquestionably true the the two parties switched their positions on a number of issues.

During the 1860s, Republicans, who dominated northern states, orchestrated an ambitious expansion of federal power, helping to fund the transcontinental railroad, the state university system and the settlement of the West by homesteaders, and instating a national currency and protective tariff. Democrats, who dominated the South, opposed these measures. After the Civil War, Republicans passed laws that granted protections for African Americans and advanced social justice; again, Democrats largely opposed these expansions of power.

Sound like an alternate universe? Fast forward to 1936. Democratic president Franklin Roosevelt won reelection that year on the strength of the New Deal, a set of Depression-remedying reforms including regulation of financial institutions, founding of welfare and pension programs, infrastructure development and more. Roosevelt won in a landslide against Republican Alf Landon, who opposed these exercises of federal power.

Those of us who lived through the end of segregation remember the switch on this issue. Southern Dems were segregationists and used 'States Rights' as their motto. When Southern schools were forceably desegregated by Eisenhower (the last of the old-style GOP) and Kennedy and the Civil Rights bill was passed under Johnson, Southern Dems left the party. Goldwater was a vocal opponent to desegregation and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, believing it was an overreach of federal government and changed the GOP into what we now have.

".... it is unquestionably true the the two parties switched their positions on a number of issues."

Of course, you're an imbecile.


Watch me prove how truly stupid the 'flip' myth is:

What the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as you do, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for your news.....

.....what are the chances would be that you woke up tomorrow praising Donald Trump's election and presidency, and voting Republican......you know....'flipping.'




And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives, who formed a party to fight Democrats and slavery, suddenly decided to become racists.

PC I was a republican all my life even voted for GWB in 2000 That was the last time I'll ever vote repub again

 

[alang1216]

c. While communists are Leftist, like Liberals, the Nazis are Rightwing

This statement is mostly true and denying it is a rewriting of history. A lie. Communism is the extreme left. Far more extreme than today's liberals. The Nazis were the extreme right. Far more extreme that today's conservatives but do share some of their ideologies with the Alt-Right. Nazis were anti-communist, xenophobic, and extreme nationalists.

The assertions or accusations listed above appear to stem from the official name of the party that Hitler led to take over Germany in the early 1930s. It was called the National Socialist German Workers’ Party—later shortened to Nazi party—and gained power by promising voters to alleviate a German economy mired in depression while also restoring “German cultural values, reverse the provisions of the Treaty of Versailles, turn back the perceived threat of a Communist uprising, put the German people back to work, and restore Germany to its 'rightful position' as a world power," according to the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum.

The party represented an extreme side of German’s right wing, and the key word in its title was not necessarily "socialism," but rather "national." During Hitler’s ascension, nationalism was preached and took hold, and excluded anyone who wasn’t fully German or considered superior.

"The Nazis opposed all traditional socialism, wanting to substitute something they called ‘German socialism’ or ‘Aryan socialism,’” Bryn Mawr College professor Barbara Miller Lane told PolitiFact in October 2015.

"This statement is mostly true and denying it is a rewriting of history. A lie. Communism is the extreme left. Far more extreme than today's liberals. The Nazis were the extreme right."

As usual, you couldn't be more incorrect.

Let's prove it with a short quiz.

Let's begin with definitions.
Nazism, communism, socialism..Liberalism, Progressivism,.and fascism....

1. Which stem from the works of Karl Marx?
2. Which is a form of command and control big government?
3. Which has no problem with genocide, actual or figurative, as an accepted procedure on its political enemies?
4. Which is based on the collective over the individual?
5. Which oppresses and/or slaughters its own citizens as pro forma (including depriving them of a living)....?
6. Which represents totalitarian governance?
7. Which believes that mandating/dictating every aspect of their citizen's lives is their prerogative?
8. Which aims for an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life

9. Which restricts free speech and thought?

10. Which can be summed up in Hegel's “The state says … you must obey …. The state has rights against the individual; its members have obligations, among them that of obeying without protest”



And, of course, they all are do...they are all consubstantial.

They are all the same in their ultimate plan for society: a totalitarian regime with the peons marching lock-step.



Nazism

Communism

Socialism

Fascism

Progressivism

Liberalism






How about pointing out which of them are defenders of religious, political, and economic freedom, and recognize the individual as the most important element of society?
Right....none of 'em.
Only right wing philosophies...i.e., conservatism.

Nazis, Conservative, Alt-Right

Which of them
1. Hate communists?
2. Are nationalistic?

Right....all of 'em.

 

[alang1216]

b. While the Republican Party was founded to fight slavery and for civil rights, at some point they reversed that perspective and embraced segregation.

Although I wouldn't accuse today's GOP of embracing segregation it is unquestionably true the the two parties switched their positions on a number of issues.

During the 1860s, Republicans, who dominated northern states, orchestrated an ambitious expansion of federal power, helping to fund the transcontinental railroad, the state university system and the settlement of the West by homesteaders, and instating a national currency and protective tariff. Democrats, who dominated the South, opposed these measures. After the Civil War, Republicans passed laws that granted protections for African Americans and advanced social justice; again, Democrats largely opposed these expansions of power.

Sound like an alternate universe? Fast forward to 1936. Democratic president Franklin Roosevelt won reelection that year on the strength of the New Deal, a set of Depression-remedying reforms including regulation of financial institutions, founding of welfare and pension programs, infrastructure development and more. Roosevelt won in a landslide against Republican Alf Landon, who opposed these exercises of federal power.

Those of us who lived through the end of segregation remember the switch on this issue. Southern Dems were segregationists and used 'States Rights' as their motto. When Southern schools were forceably desegregated by Eisenhower (the last of the old-style GOP) and Kennedy and the Civil Rights bill was passed under Johnson, Southern Dems left the party. Goldwater was a vocal opponent to desegregation and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, believing it was an overreach of federal government and changed the GOP into what we now have.

".... it is unquestionably true the the two parties switched their positions on a number of issues."

Of course, you're an imbecile.


Watch me prove how truly stupid the 'flip' myth is:

What the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as you do, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for your news.....

.....what are the chances would be that you woke up tomorrow praising Donald Trump's election and presidency, and voting Republican......you know....'flipping.'




And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives, who formed a party to fight Democrats and slavery, suddenly decided to become racists.

You have it completely wrong. The voters never changed their values, the parties did. Is the party of Lincoln the same party as that of Trump? I see no similarities.

 

[PoliticalChic]

b. While the Republican Party was founded to fight slavery and for civil rights, at some point they reversed that perspective and embraced segregation.

Although I wouldn't accuse today's GOP of embracing segregation it is unquestionably true the the two parties switched their positions on a number of issues.

During the 1860s, Republicans, who dominated northern states, orchestrated an ambitious expansion of federal power, helping to fund the transcontinental railroad, the state university system and the settlement of the West by homesteaders, and instating a national currency and protective tariff. Democrats, who dominated the South, opposed these measures. After the Civil War, Republicans passed laws that granted protections for African Americans and advanced social justice; again, Democrats largely opposed these expansions of power.

Sound like an alternate universe? Fast forward to 1936. Democratic president Franklin Roosevelt won reelection that year on the strength of the New Deal, a set of Depression-remedying reforms including regulation of financial institutions, founding of welfare and pension programs, infrastructure development and more. Roosevelt won in a landslide against Republican Alf Landon, who opposed these exercises of federal power.

Those of us who lived through the end of segregation remember the switch on this issue. Southern Dems were segregationists and used 'States Rights' as their motto. When Southern schools were forceably desegregated by Eisenhower (the last of the old-style GOP) and Kennedy and the Civil Rights bill was passed under Johnson, Southern Dems left the party. Goldwater was a vocal opponent to desegregation and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, believing it was an overreach of federal government and changed the GOP into what we now have.

".... it is unquestionably true the the two parties switched their positions on a number of issues."

Of course, you're an imbecile.


Watch me prove how truly stupid the 'flip' myth is:

What the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as you do, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for your news.....

.....what are the chances would be that you woke up tomorrow praising Donald Trump's election and presidency, and voting Republican......you know....'flipping.'




And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives, who formed a party to fight Democrats and slavery, suddenly decided to become racists.

PC I was a republican all my life even voted for GWB in 2000 That was the last time I'll ever vote repub again

"PC I was a republican all my life...."

Changing the subject?

I win again?????????

 

[PoliticalChic]

b. While the Republican Party was founded to fight slavery and for civil rights, at some point they reversed that perspective and embraced segregation.

Although I wouldn't accuse today's GOP of embracing segregation it is unquestionably true the the two parties switched their positions on a number of issues.

During the 1860s, Republicans, who dominated northern states, orchestrated an ambitious expansion of federal power, helping to fund the transcontinental railroad, the state university system and the settlement of the West by homesteaders, and instating a national currency and protective tariff. Democrats, who dominated the South, opposed these measures. After the Civil War, Republicans passed laws that granted protections for African Americans and advanced social justice; again, Democrats largely opposed these expansions of power.

Sound like an alternate universe? Fast forward to 1936. Democratic president Franklin Roosevelt won reelection that year on the strength of the New Deal, a set of Depression-remedying reforms including regulation of financial institutions, founding of welfare and pension programs, infrastructure development and more. Roosevelt won in a landslide against Republican Alf Landon, who opposed these exercises of federal power.

Those of us who lived through the end of segregation remember the switch on this issue. Southern Dems were segregationists and used 'States Rights' as their motto. When Southern schools were forceably desegregated by Eisenhower (the last of the old-style GOP) and Kennedy and the Civil Rights bill was passed under Johnson, Southern Dems left the party. Goldwater was a vocal opponent to desegregation and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, believing it was an overreach of federal government and changed the GOP into what we now have.

".... it is unquestionably true the the two parties switched their positions on a number of issues."

Of course, you're an imbecile.


Watch me prove how truly stupid the 'flip' myth is:

What the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as you do, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for your news.....

.....what are the chances would be that you woke up tomorrow praising Donald Trump's election and presidency, and voting Republican......you know....'flipping.'




And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives, who formed a party to fight Democrats and slavery, suddenly decided to become racists.

PC I was a republican all my life even voted for GWB in 2000 That was the last time I'll ever vote repub again

Now...let's be clear: 'racism,' if it's any individual's opinion of another individual, or even of another race......
...is that person's right.

We don't criminalize thoughts.


Now...let's have your examples of:
a. laws that single out a race in a negative way....you seem copacetic if laws single out a particular race in a positive way (affirmative action).

b. find 'racism' that actually hurts more than feelings.



And....I believe I just proved that you can't.



QED....there is neither institutional nor widespread racism.....no more against blacks than against any other group.

Admit it.

 

[PoliticalChic]

b. While the Republican Party was founded to fight slavery and for civil rights, at some point they reversed that perspective and embraced segregation.

Although I wouldn't accuse today's GOP of embracing segregation it is unquestionably true the the two parties switched their positions on a number of issues.

During the 1860s, Republicans, who dominated northern states, orchestrated an ambitious expansion of federal power, helping to fund the transcontinental railroad, the state university system and the settlement of the West by homesteaders, and instating a national currency and protective tariff. Democrats, who dominated the South, opposed these measures. After the Civil War, Republicans passed laws that granted protections for African Americans and advanced social justice; again, Democrats largely opposed these expansions of power.

Sound like an alternate universe? Fast forward to 1936. Democratic president Franklin Roosevelt won reelection that year on the strength of the New Deal, a set of Depression-remedying reforms including regulation of financial institutions, founding of welfare and pension programs, infrastructure development and more. Roosevelt won in a landslide against Republican Alf Landon, who opposed these exercises of federal power.

Those of us who lived through the end of segregation remember the switch on this issue. Southern Dems were segregationists and used 'States Rights' as their motto. When Southern schools were forceably desegregated by Eisenhower (the last of the old-style GOP) and Kennedy and the Civil Rights bill was passed under Johnson, Southern Dems left the party. Goldwater was a vocal opponent to desegregation and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, believing it was an overreach of federal government and changed the GOP into what we now have.

".... it is unquestionably true the the two parties switched their positions on a number of issues."

Of course, you're an imbecile.


Watch me prove how truly stupid the 'flip' myth is:

What the chances are that, after a lifetime of believing as you do, arguing DNC talking points, reading the NYTimes, and watching MSNBC, being indoctrinated...er, 'taught' in government schools, and watching Comedy Central for your news.....

.....what are the chances would be that you woke up tomorrow praising Donald Trump's election and presidency, and voting Republican......you know....'flipping.'




And that calculation represents the same chance that Republicans and conservatives, who formed a party to fight Democrats and slavery, suddenly decided to become racists.

You have it completely wrong. The voters never changed their values, the parties did. Is the party of Lincoln the same party as that of Trump? I see no similarities.

You wrote nothing....which makes it the most astute of your posts.

Keep up the good work.