Liberal Question Of The Day:

easyt65

Diamond Member
Aug 4, 2015
90,307
61,076
2,645
It is Illegal for any American citizen NOT working for the US government and/or NOT having 'need to know' to have in their possession classified materials, ESPECIALLY HIGHLY classified TOP SECRET compartmentalized information (stored on multiple un-authorized, un-encrypted personal computets handled by persons who have no security clearance).

It has been PROVEN, beyond any legal doubt, that Hillary Clinton - AFTER having left the employment of the State Department as Secretary of State, making her nothing more than an American citizen with NO AUTHORITY to possess classified material / information - that Hillary Clinton not only ILLEGALLY had classified material / emails in her posession but she had THOUSANDSof them.

SO HOW IN THE HELL CAN LIBERALS CONTINUE TO INSIST HILLARY BROKE NO LAW?

(Unless they are as 'Dain Bramaged' as she is...)
 
It's actually quite clear:

It was illegal for her to have classified information / material in her possession.

She had classified in her possession.

She broke the law...PERIOD.
 
She paid/pandered to the right people so it's ok. Laws are for poor people...
 
giphy.gif
 
It is Illegal for any American citizen NOT working for the US government and/or NOT having 'need to know' to have in their possession classified materials,

Is it? George H.W. Bush still gets briefings. Is he breaking the law?


ESPECIALLY HIGHLY classified TOP SECRET compartmentalized information

Really. So this law says "especially"?
 
It is Illegal for any American citizen NOT working for the US government and/or NOT having 'need to know' to have in their possession classified materials,

Is it? George H.W. Bush still gets briefings. Is he breaking the law?


ESPECIALLY HIGHLY classified TOP SECRET compartmentalized information

Really. So this law says "especially"?


Not to mention that W "lost" MILLIONS of emails.

This is old news, settled and the RWNJ traitors or desperate, grabbing at any straws they can find.
 
Hey you libs, come out come out wherever you are...

CANDY, WHERE YOU HIDIN'?!

Again, HOW can you say Hillary never broke the law when it is BLATANTLY OBVIOUS that she DID?!

HER FAT ASS BELONGS IN JAIL...PERIOD!
 
That's right...BEAT THAT DEAD DONKEY / DEMOCRAT...poor thing couldn't run anymore on that bullshit!
 
It is Illegal for any American citizen NOT working for the US government and/or NOT having 'need to know' to have in their possession classified materials, ESPECIALLY HIGHLY classified TOP SECRET compartmentalized information (stored on multiple un-authorized, un-encrypted personal computets handled by persons who have no security clearance).

It has been PROVEN, beyond any legal doubt, that Hillary Clinton - AFTER having left the employment of the State Department as Secretary of State, making her nothing more than an American citizen with NO AUTHORITY to possess classified material / information - that Hillary Clinton not only ILLEGALLY had classified material / emails in her posession but she had THOUSANDSof them.

SO HOW IN THE HELL CAN LIBERALS CONTINUE TO INSIST HILLARY BROKE NO LAW?

(Unless they are as 'Dain Bramaged' as she is...)

actually her staff without clearance and it guys without security clearance

had access to her clasified information on her server

which in itself is a crime
 
WHOSE SERVERS was that clasified on again?

As you admitted - HILLARY'S SERVERS. SHE BROKE THE LAW simply by having ANY classified in HER possession.

Don't try to pull a 'Barry' by pointing fingers at someone else!
 
It is Illegal for any American citizen NOT working for the US government and/or NOT having 'need to know' to have in their possession classified materials,

Is it? George H.W. Bush still gets briefings. Is he breaking the law?


ESPECIALLY HIGHLY classified TOP SECRET compartmentalized information

Really. So this law says "especially"?


Not to mention that W "lost" MILLIONS of emails.

This is old news, settled and the RWNJ traitors or desperate, grabbing at any straws they can find.

Yes we know the far left Bush defense!
 
Nice continued attempt to distract from the subject / FACT...

Who care about lost e-mails.

Hillary BROKE THE LAW, despite every denial, lie, justificatIon, distraction, Or bullshit libs CONTINUE to throw out!

She belongs in jail, like so many others are for much less!

Libs can't even admit it or SAY it despite how ridiculously OBVIOUS it is -- HILLARY BROKE THE LAW!
 
Is there not one Liberal honest enough (or who has the balls) to admit / say HILLARY BROKE THE LAW?

Or are ALL the libs gutless / cowards / liars?
 
Got it...ANSWER:

Libs are just gutless cowards / liars.
 
Wah.......................Wah............................... The October surprise was indeed a surprise. And Trump provided it. Now all you people can do is try to beat a dead horse. That horse is, indeed, dead. Women make up 52% of the voters. And then you have Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, and educated whites. There is not a chance, with 29 days left before election day, for Trump to recover from his big mouth.

Now there is a debate tomorrow. Hillary was smart enough to bait Trump into a really stupid move twice in the last debate. How will he handle this debate now that there is real pressure on him? And if he blows it one more time, how is the GOP going to handle it? LOL Interesting times, indeed.
 
So Rocks, thanks for proving my point that you had to attempt to distract from the main point of this thread, that you don't have the honesty, the integrity, and / or the balls to finally ADMIT / SAY HILLARY BROKE THE LAW!

Don't be ashamed, though - you aren't alone. Not one single fellow liberal USMB member has been able to, either.
 
So Rocks, thanks for proving my point that you had to attempt to distract from the main point of this thread, that you don't have the honesty, the integrity, and / or the balls to finally ADMIT / SAY HILLARY BROKE THE LAW!

Don't be ashamed, though - you aren't alone. Not one single fellow liberal USMB member has been able to, either.
You really believe all this garbage you print, don't you?

You ought to learn what a SCIF is, and you ought to learn what the actual laws are.
 
Hint, I do know what a SCIFF is and DO know the laws. YOU obviously DON'T.

YOU should learn what Special Compartmentalized Programs / information are. They are programs you have to be 'read into' to gain access to them, as Hillary was. When you leave govt service you are 'read out' of those programs and sign a letter stating you will not talk about or have any further access to the programs and info...which Hillary did.

As reported though, the WHITE HOUSE declared in a press conference that Hillary's servers /emails contained Top Secret Compartmentalized Information, info 'so highly classified that it cannot be released in any format because it would cause grave damage to national security'.

Of course if you KNEW that you would not have made your ignorant comment.

AGAIN, when Hillary Clinton left the State Department she had to be 'read out' of all such programs, had to turn over ALL classified, had to sign documents, and was to legally have no further access to classified information as a civilian, which is what she was.

Also your reference to a SCIFF was a bullshit smokescreen...unless your are ignorantly trying to imply that Hillary Clinton - who had UNAUTHORIZED, ILLEGAL, UNENCRYPTED servers in her possession - went through the necessary legal process of getting a room in her house...or the BATHROOM of the IT company in which her server was found...legally accredited through the proper govt agencies/processes as a 'SCIF'...again as required by law.

...and I KNOW you can't be claiming THAT. The IT company didn't even have the proper security clearances to handle Hillary's classified servers let alone be able to get their BATHROOM accredited as a SCIF!

You should really stop trying to pass yourself off as an 'expert' when others who are far more experienced and knoweldgeable know you're full of shit.
 
Hint, I do know what a SCIFF is and DO know the laws. YOU obviously DON'T.

YOU should learn what Special Compartmentalized Programs / information are. They are programs you have to be 'read into' to gain access to them, as Hillary was. When you leave govt service you are 'read out' of those programs and sign a letter stating you will not talk about or have any further access to the programs and info...which Hillary did.

As reported though, the WHITE HOUSE declared in a press conference that Hillary's servers /emails contained Top Secret Compartmentalized Information, info 'so highly classified that it cannot be released in any format because it would cause grave damage to national security'.

Of course if you KNEW that you would not have made your ignorant comment.

AGAIN, when Hillary Clinton left the State Department she had to be 'read out' of all such programs, had to turn over ALL classified, had to sign documents, and was to legally have no further access to classified information as a civilian, which is what she was.

Also your reference to a SCIFF was a bullshit smokescreen...unless your are ignorantly trying to imply that Hillary Clinton - who had UNAUTHORIZED, ILLEGAL, UNENCRYPTED servers in her possession - went through the necessary legal process of getting a room in her house...or the BATHROOM of the IT company in which her server was found...legally accredited through the proper govt agencies/processes as a 'SCIF'...again as required by law.

...and I KNOW you can't be claiming THAT. The IT company didn't even have the proper security clearances to handle Hillary's classified servers let alone be able to get their BATHROOM accredited as a SCIF!
In other words, you know full well that she didn't break a single law.

Having 3 THREE, iii, III, Tres emails that had legit confidential information, but without appropriate header markings, out of tens of thousands of emails is a really pathetic joke.

The insane assumption is that she actually read every word of the email, as if anybody ever does that — especially list of names.

She didn't even do one teenie tiny thing remotely close to illegal.

You have less than nothing.
 

Forum List

Back
Top