Liberal professor warns censorship of infowars will backfire on the left

[MindWars]

Professor Erik Nielson warns in a New York Times op-ed that the kind of censorship that saw Infowars banned from most major social media platforms this week will eventually backfire on the left.

Liberal Professor Warns Censorship of Infowars Will Backfire on the Left



Ever notice leftist liberal pricks all have that similar facial feature. They are such losers and so genetaically intertwined these idiots don't realize they are pathetically stupid because they all share the same Genetic DNA called the Liberal gene and no that is not a joke.

Pay back is a bitch isn't you jerk offs all deserve to lose EVERYTHING thing you are and own pos punta .

This will blowback on the tards of society

 

[Roudy]

I think Alex Jones has said a lot of stupid, untrue, and controversial things, but he has the right to say them just as much as Louis Farakhan and others do.

 

[MindWars]

I think Alex Jines has said a lot of stupid, untrue, and controversial things, but he has the right to say them just as much as Louis Farakhan and others do.

Sandyhook thinkgs balmed on him are LIES nobody can PROVE it there are NO VIDEOS proving it and S.H. was used against him to try and SINK him even then. MSM LIED and LIES and LIED........... Just like with eerything else he can PROVE and everybody else thinks it's full of shit .........

but oh well live and learn some never do learn.

 

[Roudy]

Regardless, he still says a lot of controversial things in order to generate more views and clicks. Don't misunderstand me, he's also said and done a lot of good things too, but Rush Limbaugh, he's not. He's more in the "shock jock" category.

 

[Camp]

I think Alex Jines has said a lot of stupid, untrue, and controversial things, but he has the right to say them just as much as Louis Farakhan and others do.

Not really the argument. Of course, Jones has the right to promote info wars. Question is, does he have the right to force you to put his advertising signs on your front lawn without your approval or force privately owned platforms, venues, stages, etc. to carry or promote his message?

 

[Mac1958]

Zealots are always short-sighted.
.

 

[MindWars]

Regardless, he still says a lot of controversial things in order to generate more views and clicks. Don't misunderstand me, he's also said and done a lot of good things too, but Rush Limbaugh, he's not. He's more in the "shock jock" category.

It's all prove dude it's msm who created the doubt gene.........it's just what they wanted. just like gay frogs dude this is what does cause it

Also he can BACK UP EVERYTHING HE PUTS OUT and HAS PUT OUT one does NOT HAVE TO LIKE HIM to learn his information is true and can be found as documented proof etc.

But yeah anyway we can go back and forth on the ALEX thing like him or not as it's being said if he goes down the rest will follow but most trendy leftist morons can't think past the current moment. LOL

 

[Camp]

I think Alex Jines has said a lot of stupid, untrue, and controversial things, but he has the right to say them just as much as Louis Farakhan and others do.

Sandyhook thinkgs balmed on him are LIES nobody can PROVE it there are NO VIDEOS proving it and S.H. was used against him to try and SINK him even then. MSM LIED and LIES and LIED........... Just like with eerything else he can PROVE and everybody else thinks it's full of shit .........

but oh well live and learn some never do learn.

If animals like you had your way photos of the murdered mutilated children would be published for the entertainment of all the warped and sick Alex Jones fans like you.

 

[Roudy]

I think Alex Jines has said a lot of stupid, untrue, and controversial things, but he has the right to say them just as much as Louis Farakhan and others do.

Not really the argument. Of course, Jones has the right to promote info wars. Question is, does he have the right to force you to put his advertising signs on your front lawn without your approval or force privately owned platforms, venues, stages, etc. to carry or promote his message?

We are talking about a public Internet forum that is privately owned, and there are people on the Left that are saying far worse than Alex Jones. You have heard of 9-11 truthers haven't you? Some say it never happened, and some say it was an inside job. They still have a right to say those things and look like fools.

 

[night_son]

Professor Erik Nielson warns in a New York Times op-ed that the kind of censorship that saw Infowars banned from most major social media platforms this week will eventually backfire on the left.

Liberal Professor Warns Censorship of Infowars Will Backfire on the Left



Ever notice leftist liberal pricks all have that similar facial feature. They are such losers and so genetaically intertwined these idiots don't realize they are pathetically stupid because they all share the same Genetic DNA called the Liberal gene and no that is not a joke.

Pay back is a bitch isn't you jerk offs all deserve to lose EVERYTHING thing you are and own pos punta .

This will blowback on the tards of society

The Wheel is coming around to a great grand smackdown of radical American Leftist ideology. The radical Left has jabbed and pushed and poked at the American people for sixty years experimenting on us and our young people with their endless evolutions of cultural perversions. Surely their intellectual elite must foresee the incoming consequences: the American people will no longer bloody stand for it. The recent and ongoing censorship represents a doubling down of Leftist ideological cultural warfare, a calculated but foolish move resulting in the immediate increase in the pressure asserted on the American majority calling out now for a return to the traditional and the sane. Pressure cooker left on high, back burner. Boom!

 

[Camp]

I think Alex Jines has said a lot of stupid, untrue, and controversial things, but he has the right to say them just as much as Louis Farakhan and others do.

Not really the argument. Of course, Jones has the right to promote info wars. Question is, does he have the right to force you to put his advertising signs on your front lawn without your approval or force privately owned platforms, venues, stages, etc. to carry or promote his message?

We are talking about a public Internet forum that is privately owned, and there are people on the Left that are saying far worse than Alex Jones. You have heard of 9-11 truthers haven't you? Some say it never happened, and some say it was an inside job. They still have a right to say those things and look like fools.

Not about what is said. And, not about the content. It's about what the owner of the platform approves of or disapproves of.

 

[Roudy]

I think Alex Jines has said a lot of stupid, untrue, and controversial things, but he has the right to say them just as much as Louis Farakhan and others do.

Not really the argument. Of course, Jones has the right to promote info wars. Question is, does he have the right to force you to put his advertising signs on your front lawn without your approval or force privately owned platforms, venues, stages, etc. to carry or promote his message?

We are talking about a public Internet forum that is privately owned, and there are people on the Left that are saying far worse than Alex Jones. You have heard of 9-11 truthers haven't you? Some say it never happened, and some say it was an inside job. They still have a right to say those things and look like fools.

Not about what is said. And, not about the content. It's about what the owner of the platform approves of or disapproves of.

Owner of the platform is a Democrat and has filled his / her platform with like minded Democrat employees (as in the fake news media), who are biased against people who are on the right.

It's more than obvious what is going on, and it's happening on an industry wide basis.

 

[Rambunctious]

When the left comes after our freedom of thought it riles up our base like almost nothing else....

 

[Camp]

I think Alex Jines has said a lot of stupid, untrue, and controversial things, but he has the right to say them just as much as Louis Farakhan and others do.

Not really the argument. Of course, Jones has the right to promote info wars. Question is, does he have the right to force you to put his advertising signs on your front lawn without your approval or force privately owned platforms, venues, stages, etc. to carry or promote his message?

We are talking about a public Internet forum that is privately owned, and there are people on the Left that are saying far worse than Alex Jones. You have heard of 9-11 truthers haven't you? Some say it never happened, and some say it was an inside job. They still have a right to say those things and look like fools.

Not about what is said. And, not about the content. It's about what the owner of the platform approves of or disapproves of.

Owner of the platform is a Democrat and has filled his / her platform with like minded Democrat employees (as in the fake news media), who are biased against people who are on the right.

It's more than obvious what is going on, and it's happening on an industry wide basis.

So, you object to the First Amendment?

 

[Roudy]

I think Alex Jines has said a lot of stupid, untrue, and controversial things, but he has the right to say them just as much as Louis Farakhan and others do.

Not really the argument. Of course, Jones has the right to promote info wars. Question is, does he have the right to force you to put his advertising signs on your front lawn without your approval or force privately owned platforms, venues, stages, etc. to carry or promote his message?

We are talking about a public Internet forum that is privately owned, and there are people on the Left that are saying far worse than Alex Jones. You have heard of 9-11 truthers haven't you? Some say it never happened, and some say it was an inside job. They still have a right to say those things and look like fools.

Not about what is said. And, not about the content. It's about what the owner of the platform approves of or disapproves of.

Owner of the platform is a Democrat and has filled his / her platform with like minded Democrat employees (as in the fake news media), who are biased against people who are on the right.

It's more than obvious what is going on, and it's happening on an industry wide basis.

So, you object to the First Amendment?

I object to Alex Jones having his first amendment rights violated.

Like everything else, the Democratic Party just PRETEND that they are for free speech.

 

[Skylar]

Professor Erik Nielson warns in a New York Times op-ed that the kind of censorship that saw Infowars banned from most major social media platforms this week will eventually backfire on the left.

Liberal Professor Warns Censorship of Infowars Will Backfire on the Left



Ever notice leftist liberal pricks all have that similar facial feature. They are such losers and so genetaically intertwined these idiots don't realize they are pathetically stupid because they all share the same Genetic DNA called the Liberal gene and no that is not a joke.

Pay back is a bitch isn't you jerk offs all deserve to lose EVERYTHING thing you are and own pos punta .

This will blowback on the tards of society

To quote Alex Jones in his own terms of service on Infowars.....its not censorship if you don't follow the rules and your post is deleted.

You're whining....because Jones own standards were applied to him. Good luck with that.

 

[Skylar]

Not really the argument. Of course, Jones has the right to promote info wars. Question is, does he have the right to force you to put his advertising signs on your front lawn without your approval or force privately owned platforms, venues, stages, etc. to carry or promote his message?

We are talking about a public Internet forum that is privately owned, and there are people on the Left that are saying far worse than Alex Jones. You have heard of 9-11 truthers haven't you? Some say it never happened, and some say it was an inside job. They still have a right to say those things and look like fools.

Not about what is said. And, not about the content. It's about what the owner of the platform approves of or disapproves of.

Owner of the platform is a Democrat and has filled his / her platform with like minded Democrat employees (as in the fake news media), who are biased against people who are on the right.

It's more than obvious what is going on, and it's happening on an industry wide basis.

So, you object to the First Amendment?

I object to Alex Jones having his first amendment rights violated.

Like everything else, the Democratic Party just PRETEND that they are for free speech.

Um.....have you read the 1st amendment? It says nothing about facebook. Read it and get back to us. You'll see your mistake in the first word.