Liberal Business Owner Says He Will Be Hurt By Minimum Wage Hike

Clementine

Platinum Member
Dec 18, 2011
12,919
4,823
350
He supported the increase only because he thought it was no big deal to small business owners. He had the same ignorance many Dem supporters do. He didn't realize how much it would cost him. Now that he's found out, he is wondering what to do. It's more than he can afford. Oh hell, what's another small business biting the dust? Isn't that something the left supports? Considering how many businesses have gone under, thanks to Obama, I thought that was one of their goals.

"Hibbs is a self-identified progressive, but he’s looking for answers. Then he asked a profound question:


Why can’t two consenting people make arrangements for less than x dollars per hour?"

Why? Because liberals don't look out across this country and see intelligent adults. They see ignorant people who need to be controlled and that shouldn't ever be allowed to make decisions on their own. The left knew this wouldn't hurt some big businesses and they are either too fucking stupid or just cruel to take down small businesses this way. Some will lose their jobs now. Only in liberal land is being unemployed better than the old minimum wage.

http://www.ijreview.com/2015/05/310771-san-francisco-business-owner-threatened-minimum-wage-law-asks-important-question-possible/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=organic&utm_content=conservativedaily&utm_campaign=Politics
 
He could simply negotiate with his suppliers for a better bulk price.

If he was able to sell more, he would already do that. You have to buy a lot to get a cheaper price and if he can't sell the stuff, he'll go bankrupt. Sounds like he's already in trouble.
 
He supported the increase only because he thought it was no big deal to small business owners. He had the same ignorance many Dem supporters do. He didn't realize how much it would cost him. Now that he's found out, he is wondering what to do. It's more than he can afford. Oh hell, what's another small business biting the dust? Isn't that something the left supports? Considering how many businesses have gone under, thanks to Obama, I thought that was one of their goals.

"Hibbs is a self-identified progressive, but he’s looking for answers. Then he asked a profound question:


Why can’t two consenting people make arrangements for less than x dollars per hour?"

Why? Because liberals don't look out across this country and see intelligent adults. They see ignorant people who need to be controlled and that shouldn't ever be allowed to make decisions on their own. The left knew this wouldn't hurt some big businesses and they are either too fucking stupid or just cruel to take down small businesses this way. Some will lose their jobs now. Only in liberal land is being unemployed better than the old minimum wage.

http://www.ijreview.com/2015/05/310771-san-francisco-business-owner-threatened-minimum-wage-law-asks-important-question-possible/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=organic&utm_content=conservativedaily&utm_campaign=Politics
It gets worse. In Seattle they went to 15 dollars an hour. My family lives there and rents JUMPED. Their NOT getting the money.
And their taxes are going up on simple things like car tags and inspections.

Rents USED to go up every time Boeing gave raises. Their paying their paying harsh.
 
It gets worse. In Seattle they went to 15 dollars an hour. My family lives there and rents JUMPED. Their NOT getting the money.
And their taxes are going up on simple things like car tags and inspections.

Rents USED to go up every time Boeing gave raises. Their paying their paying harsh.

Everything is going up. That way the increase in minimum wage can get passed on to the wealthy people that the Dems really support.

Of course, the people lucky enough to keep working will pay more in taxes, which is needed because so many people will lose their jobs and end up on welfare.
 
He only has to compete with other businesses who have to pay the same wage.

Well, he's been in business a while and was doing fine. Now he's not. It's the wage hike that will do him and many other small businesses in. That is clearly what the left wants or they wouldn't create policies that destroy small businesses. Does unemployment or welfare pay more than minimum wage? Actually, welfare benefits add up to way more than the average worker. I think the left wants more dependents and they hope that people will turn to government after they lose their job. If that is the plan, the left has executed it brilliantly.
 
He only has to compete with other businesses who have to pay the same wage.

Well, he's been in business a while and was doing fine. Now he's not. It's the wage hike that will do him and many other small businesses in. That is clearly what the left wants or they wouldn't create policies that destroy small businesses. Does unemployment or welfare pay more than minimum wage? Actually, welfare benefits add up to way more than the average worker. I think the left wants more dependents and they hope that people will turn to government after they lose their job. If that is the plan, the left has executed it brilliantly.

San Francisco is one of the most prosperous cities in America.
 
He only has to compete with other businesses who have to pay the same wage.
So you don't understand the problem do you stupid? Let me try, the 10 dollar and hour worker has done NOTHING but change the numbers idiot.

The 10 dollar an hour worker IF they still have a job just got SET BACK on wages vs cost. The GOVERNMENT is getting the money you retard.

The worker just gets to hold it for a few minutes. ALL you did was change a number you moron NOT his lifestyle.
 
He only has to compete with other businesses who have to pay the same wage.
So you don't understand the problem do you stupid? Let me try, the 10 dollar and hour worker has done NOTHING but change the numbers idiot.

The 10 dollar an hour worker IF they still have a job just got SET BACK on wages vs cost. The GOVERNMENT is getting the money you retard.

The worker just gets to hold it for a few minutes. ALL you did was change a number you moron NOT his lifestyle.

A dollar an hour increase in the minimum wage is $40 a week, $160 a month with probably $120 a month takehome.
 
He only has to compete with other businesses who have to pay the same wage.
So you don't understand the problem do you stupid? Let me try, the 10 dollar and hour worker has done NOTHING but change the numbers idiot.

The 10 dollar an hour worker IF they still have a job just got SET BACK on wages vs cost. The GOVERNMENT is getting the money you retard.

The worker just gets to hold it for a few minutes. ALL you did was change a number you moron NOT his lifestyle.

A dollar an hour increase in the minimum wage is $40 a week, $160 a month with probably $120 a month takehome.
120 take home minus 60 increase of rent and and another 30 on utilities. There ARE other increases as well. The money was NEVER meant to go to the worker BECAUSE the state winds up with it. You did NOTHING but change a number, NOTHING.
 
He only has to compete with other businesses who have to pay the same wage.
So you don't understand the problem do you stupid? Let me try, the 10 dollar and hour worker has done NOTHING but change the numbers idiot.

The 10 dollar an hour worker IF they still have a job just got SET BACK on wages vs cost. The GOVERNMENT is getting the money you retard.

The worker just gets to hold it for a few minutes. ALL you did was change a number you moron NOT his lifestyle.

A dollar an hour increase in the minimum wage is $40 a week, $160 a month with probably $120 a month takehome.
120 take home minus 60 increase of rent and and another 30 on utilities. There ARE other increases as well. The money was NEVER meant to go to the worker BECAUSE the state winds up with it. You did NOTHING but change a number, NOTHING.

Why does someone's rent and utilities go up because they got an extra buck an hour at their job?
 
He only has to compete with other businesses who have to pay the same wage.
So you don't understand the problem do you stupid? Let me try, the 10 dollar and hour worker has done NOTHING but change the numbers idiot.

The 10 dollar an hour worker IF they still have a job just got SET BACK on wages vs cost. The GOVERNMENT is getting the money you retard.

The worker just gets to hold it for a few minutes. ALL you did was change a number you moron NOT his lifestyle.

A dollar an hour increase in the minimum wage is $40 a week, $160 a month with probably $120 a month takehome.
120 take home minus 60 increase of rent and and another 30 on utilities. There ARE other increases as well. The money was NEVER meant to go to the worker BECAUSE the state winds up with it. You did NOTHING but change a number, NOTHING.

Why does someone's rent and utilities go up because they got an extra buck an hour at their job?
Because the value of money is attached to the costs of producing goods.
Everything eventually goes up and the min wagers end up exactly where they were because the value of their work is not increasing. In many ways it is DECREASING.
 
He only has to compete with other businesses who have to pay the same wage.
So you don't understand the problem do you stupid? Let me try, the 10 dollar and hour worker has done NOTHING but change the numbers idiot.

The 10 dollar an hour worker IF they still have a job just got SET BACK on wages vs cost. The GOVERNMENT is getting the money you retard.

The worker just gets to hold it for a few minutes. ALL you did was change a number you moron NOT his lifestyle.

A dollar an hour increase in the minimum wage is $40 a week, $160 a month with probably $120 a month takehome.

Yopu don't know a damn thing about employee costs, do you. (That's not a question.)
 
He only has to compete with other businesses who have to pay the same wage.

No...he is going to go out of business...as will the other small businesses....you can bet the big businesses helped pass the minimum wage increase....knocks out their up and coming competition....
 
.

Here's an interview with the guy: Interview Retailer Brian HIbbs on the Minimum Wage and Surviving in San Francisco The Beat

He describes how neighboring cities have lower minimum wages:

One of my main frustrations with the law is that it is so arbitrarily, geographically. My minimum wage is going to be $15, but travel just a few minutes south to Daly City and it is only $11; even Marin to our north, which is historically filled with “rich people”, only maxes at $13. Within an half-hour drive, it is only $9.

So your competition has clear advantages, too bad. You'll have to cut hours and/or positions, look for ways to decrease hard costs like utilities. Hey, wear a sweater. The quality of your customer service will probably suffer a bit with fewer people working at any given time. If you can find ways to cut costs enough, the damage will only be moderate instead of catastrophic. Look for efficiencies everywhere you can.

Hey, tough shit. That's what you get for starting and growing and owning a business. Your business is no longer about making a profit or building equity for yourself and your family, it's about putting food on the tables of your employees. Surprise!

It's good we're starting just in municipalities with this, as it grows we can look for best practices. It would have been less damaging if we had been raising the MW bit by bit over time.

.
 

Forum List

Back
Top