liarintheWH
Diamond Member
- Oct 24, 2012
- 1,927
- 1,823
- 1,930
Uh oh.
"HE'S NOT LYING!!!!!!"
"LETTERMANS FULL OF SHIT!!!"
"ROMNEY IS THE LIAR!!!!!"
?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Uh oh.
"HE'S NOT LYING!!!!!!"
"LETTERMANS FULL OF SHIT!!!"
"ROMNEY IS THE LIAR!!!!!"
Now you want to listen to Entertainers? lol
Who cares who offers it up? As long as the truth about Obama's lies is put out there. We know some media will avoid doing the same.
Letterman didn't point to any lies by Obama, just said he was taking liberty with the op-ed. The only statement by Obama anyone could have a problem with is when he said "would not provide government assistance to the U.S. auto companies, even if they went through bankruptcy."
Which is taken out of context. And begs the question is bankruptcy "government assistance"?
Now, I dont care whether youre Republican or Democrat, you want your president to be telling the truth; you want the contender to be lying. And so what we found out today or soon thereafter that, in fact, the President Obama was not telling the truth about what was excerpted from that op-ed piece. I felt discouraged."
Uh oh.
"HE'S NOT LYING!!!!!!"
"LETTERMANS FULL OF SHIT!!!"
"ROMNEY IS THE LIAR!!!!!"
?
Now you want to listen to Entertainers? lol
Letterman didn't point to any lies by Obama, just said he was taking liberty with the op-ed. The only statement by Obama anyone could have a problem with is when he said "would not provide government assistance to the U.S. auto companies, even if they went through bankruptcy."
Which is taken out of context. And begs the question is bankruptcy "government assistance"?
Here's the quote from the oped:
"The American auto industry is vital to our national interest as an employer and as a hub for manufacturing. A managed bankruptcy may be the only path to the fundamental restructuring the industry needs. It would permit the companies to shed excess labor, pension and real estate costs. The federal government should provide guarantees for post-bankruptcy financing and assure car buyers that their warranties are not at risk."
Mitt Romney - TARP and GM
I put his words in bold just to make it easy for you to find.
Bucktooth Letterman has finally seen the light?? Hell must be frozen over....
Letterman didn't point to any lies by Obama, just said he was taking liberty with the op-ed. The only statement by Obama anyone could have a problem with is when he said "would not provide government assistance to the U.S. auto companies, even if they went through bankruptcy."
Which is taken out of context. And begs the question is bankruptcy "government assistance"?
Here's the quote from the oped:
"The American auto industry is vital to our national interest as an employer and as a hub for manufacturing. A managed bankruptcy may be the only path to the fundamental restructuring the industry needs. It would permit the companies to shed excess labor, pension and real estate costs. The federal government should provide guarantees for post-bankruptcy financing and assure car buyers that their warranties are not at risk."
Mitt Romney - TARP and GM
I put his words in bold just to make it easy for you to find.
Most experts agree GM would not have made it out of bankruptcy. Would that be like offering someone food after they are dead and saying you assisted them?
Letterman didn't point to any lies by Obama, just said he was taking liberty with the op-ed. The only statement by Obama anyone could have a problem with is when he said "would not provide government assistance to the U.S. auto companies, even if they went through bankruptcy."
Which is taken out of context. And begs the question is bankruptcy "government assistance"?
Here's the quote from the oped:
"The American auto industry is vital to our national interest as an employer and as a hub for manufacturing. A managed bankruptcy may be the only path to the fundamental restructuring the industry needs. It would permit the companies to shed excess labor, pension and real estate costs. The federal government should provide guarantees for post-bankruptcy financing and assure car buyers that their warranties are not at risk."
Mitt Romney - TARP and GM
I put his words in bold just to make it easy for you to find.
Most experts agree GM would not have made it out of bankruptcy. Would that be like offering someone food after they are dead and saying you assisted them?
Letterman didn't point to any lies by Obama, just said he was taking liberty with the op-ed. The only statement by Obama anyone could have a problem with is when he said "would not provide government assistance to the U.S. auto companies, even if they went through bankruptcy."
Which is taken out of context. And begs the question is bankruptcy "government assistance"?
Here's the quote from the oped:
"The American auto industry is vital to our national interest as an employer and as a hub for manufacturing. A managed bankruptcy may be the only path to the fundamental restructuring the industry needs. It would permit the companies to shed excess labor, pension and real estate costs. The federal government should provide guarantees for post-bankruptcy financing and assure car buyers that their warranties are not at risk."
Mitt Romney - TARP and GM
I put his words in bold just to make it easy for you to find.
Most experts agree GM would not have made it out of bankruptcy. Would that be like offering someone food after they are dead and saying you assisted them?
Now, I dont care whether youre Republican or Democrat, you want your president to be telling the truth; you want the contender to be lying. And so what we found out today or soon thereafter that, in fact, the President Obama was not telling the truth about what was excerpted from that op-ed piece. I felt discouraged."
Here's the quote from the oped:
"The American auto industry is vital to our national interest as an employer and as a hub for manufacturing. A managed bankruptcy may be the only path to the fundamental restructuring the industry needs. It would permit the companies to shed excess labor, pension and real estate costs. The federal government should provide guarantees for post-bankruptcy financing and assure car buyers that their warranties are not at risk."
Mitt Romney - TARP and GM
I put his words in bold just to make it easy for you to find.
Most experts agree GM would not have made it out of bankruptcy. Would that be like offering someone food after they are dead and saying you assisted them?
Did you just pull that out of your ass? Most experts do not agree with that assessment at all. The only reason Democrats didn't want it to happen is because then they would not have been able to protect the Unions and fuck over the Bond Holders. You pathetic Hack.
But many auto industry experts, including the Obama administration's former car czar, Steven Rattner, a Democrat, and former GM Vice Chairman Bob Lutz, a Republican, say there was no private-sector financing available in 2009 and the bailout was the only way to keep the companies alive.
"He thinks we didn't try to borrow money from the banks?" Lutz told the Detroit Free Press in February. "The banks were even more broke than we were. Who had the money?"
Without financing during bankruptcy, GM and Chrysler would have had to go out of business, taking down many suppliers. That would have likely caused bankruptcies at the healthier automakers such Ford Motor (F, Fortune 500), who would not have been able to get the parts they needed to build cars. That is why Ford went to Capitol Hill in late 2008 pushing for the rescue of its rivals.
The Center for Automotive Research, a well-respected Michigan think tank estimates that the bailout therefore saved 1.5 million U.S. jobs by keeping GM, Chrysler and the companies that depended on them in business.
Even if one assumes private financing could have been found, what's clear from Romney's own criticism of the bailout is that the autoworkers at GM and Chrysler today would have been far worse off today than they were with the bailout.
The pension plans for United Auto Workers union members at the companies were basically left untouched. It's likely that without Treasury financing those pension plans would have been dumped on the government pension agency, reducing payments to many retirees. Plus, automakers would have likely tried to cut wages in bankruptcy, as many companies do. That didn't happen during these bankruptcies since Treasury, not bankers, was calling the shots.
O'Reilly is on Letterman tonight.
He will bring it up again.
LOL
O'Reilly is on Letterman tonight.
He will bring it up again.
LOL
I would like to see the whole clip to see if Maddow set Letterman straight.
Now, I dont care whether youre Republican or Democrat, you want your president to be telling the truth; you want the contender to be lying. And so what we found out today or soon thereafter that, in fact, the President Obama was not telling the truth about what was excerpted from that op-ed piece. I felt discouraged."
O'Reilly is on Letterman tonight.
He will bring it up again.
LOL
I would like to see the whole clip to see if Maddow set Letterman straight.
Now, I dont care whether youre Republican or Democrat, you want your president to be telling the truth; you want the contender to be lying. And so what we found out today or soon thereafter that, in fact, the President Obama was not telling the truth about what was excerpted from that op-ed piece. I felt discouraged."
dumb ass
Letterman didn't point to any lies by Obama, just said he was taking liberty with the op-ed. The only statement by Obama anyone could have a problem with is when he said "would not provide government assistance to the U.S. auto companies, even if they went through bankruptcy."
Which is taken out of context. And begs the question is bankruptcy "government assistance"?
dumb assNow, I dont care whether youre Republican or Democrat, you want your president to be telling the truth; you want the contender to be lying. And so what we found out today or soon thereafter that, in fact, the President Obama was not telling the truth about what was excerpted from that op-ed piece. I felt discouraged."
Wow.
"DAVID LETTERMAN, HOST: .....Now, I dont care whether youre Republican or Democrat, you want your president to be telling the truth; you want the contender to be lying. And so what we found out today or soon thereafter that, in fact, the President Obama was not telling the truth about what was excerpted from that op-ed piece. I felt discouraged."
He's talking about Obama claiming that Romney said to let Detroit go bankrupt during the debate. Romney of course never said that.
"LETTERMAN: ....the President is invoking it and swearing that he was right and that Romney was wrong and I thought, well, hes the president of course hes right. Well, it turned out no, he was taking liberties with that."
Letterman: Say, Obamas kind of lying about this GM bankruptcy thing, huh? « Hot Air
Wow.
"DAVID LETTERMAN, HOST: .....Now, I dont care whether youre Republican or Democrat, you want your president to be telling the truth; you want the contender to be lying. And so what we found out today or soon thereafter that, in fact, the President Obama was not telling the truth about what was excerpted from that op-ed piece. I felt discouraged."
He's talking about Obama claiming that Romney said to let Detroit go bankrupt during the debate. Romney of course never said that.
"LETTERMAN: ....the President is invoking it and swearing that he was right and that Romney was wrong and I thought, well, hes the president of course hes right. Well, it turned out no, he was taking liberties with that."
Letterman: Say, Obamas kind of lying about this GM bankruptcy thing, huh? « Hot Air
Now you want to listen to Entertainers? lol
Who cares who offers it up? As long as the truth about Obama's lies is put out there. We know some media will avoid doing the same.
Letterman didn't point to any lies by Obama, just said he was taking liberty with the op-ed. The only statement by Obama anyone could have a problem with is when he said "would not provide government assistance to the U.S. auto companies, even if they went through bankruptcy."
Which is taken out of context. And begs the question is bankruptcy "government assistance"?
so now you like Letterman?
Hacks