Let’s see if you have Trump-Hillary Classified Indictment Consistency

Mr. Friscus

Diamond Member
Dec 28, 2020
4,521
4,749
1,938
1. If you still believe in the “lock her up” idea for Hillary for her illegally and recklessly holding classified docs, then you’d have to chant “lock him up” at Donald.

2. If you support that Hilary wasn’t indicted by Comey/Holder.. then you can’t demand Trump be indicted.

It’s that simple. We’ll see if Merrick Garland and such want to start a Civil War just so they can get Trump..
 
Of course not....It's always (D)ifferent when your team breaks laws.
If the circumstances are different, then they are different, Oddball.

Pretending and distorting circumstances, conflating them to be the same, when they are not, is dishonest...and a childish excuse for choosing to intentionally break the law, as Trump did...imo.
 
1. If you still believe in the “lock her up” idea for Hillary for her illegally and recklessly holding classified docs, then you’d have to chant “lock him up” at Donald.

2. If you support that Hilary wasn’t indicted by Comey/Holder.. then you can’t demand Trump be indicted.

It’s that simple. We’ll see if Merrick Garland and such want to start a Civil War just so they can get Trump..
1) Hillary cooperated. Probably why she wasn't charged. Trump did not. Probably why he was charged.
2) Why yes we can. No one is above the law...right?

The moment Trump declared his run for the White House in 2024, Garland appointed a Special Prosecutor. Who turn the evidence over to a grand jury. A GRAND JURY...of voters returned indictments.
Since he will have his day in court, you should have no problem with what is going on.
 
1) Hillary cooperated. Probably why she wasn't charged. Trump did not. Probably why he was charged.
She bleached her server., that’s not cooperation, that’s destroying evidence.. evidence that was then found on Anthony Weiners laptop.

How did classified material get on a random laptop?? Did it magically download itself? You really think Hillary just sat there and all of this happened by itself? LMAO
2) Why yes we can. No one is above the law...right?
Of course they are. Mainstream Democrats are openly refusing the border laws calling themselves sanctuaries. You’ll have to give up the bumper stickers and actually look at what’s happening.
 
She bleached her server., that’s not cooperation, that’s destroying evidence.. evidence that was then found on Anthony Weiners laptop.

How did classified material get on a random laptop?? Did it magically download itself? You really think Hillary just sat there and all of this happened by itself? LMAO

Of course they are. Mainstream Democrats are openly refusing the border laws calling themselves sanctuaries. You’ll have to give up the bumper stickers and actually look at what’s happening.
Emails from the laptop that the DOJ already admitted they had. That Comey used to put the final nail into her presidential ambition coffin.

What do border laws have to with Hillary Clinton?
 
1. If you still believe in the “lock her up” idea for Hillary for her illegally and recklessly holding classified docs, then you’d have to chant “lock him up” at Donald.

2. If you support that Hilary wasn’t indicted by Comey/Holder.. then you can’t demand Trump be indicted.

It’s that simple. We’ll see if Merrick Garland and such want to start a Civil War just so they can get Trump..

False equivalence. Read it. Learn it.

Then read the Trump classified documents indictment.

What is this bizarre mental block which prevents tards from reading the indictment? Seriously.
 
What is stopping you fools from reading the indictment?

Are the words too big?

Is it because it is longer than an all caps Truth Social post?

What is this freakish aversion to facing the facts of the case?

If all you can bring to the debate is red herrings, straw men, false equivalencies, hoaxes, and lies, then just know you are advertising your stupidity and partisan hackery far and wide.
 
1. If you still believe in the “lock her up” idea for Hillary for her illegally and recklessly holding classified docs, then you’d have to chant “lock him up” at Donald.

2. If you support that Hilary wasn’t indicted by Comey/Holder.. then you can’t demand Trump be indicted.

It’s that simple. We’ll see if Merrick Garland and such want to start a Civil War just so they can get Trump..
😄

I support the DOJ and FBI charging anyone they have evidence of committing a crime being charged with a crime. What's so hard about that?
 
1. If you still believe in the “lock her up” idea for Hillary for her illegally and recklessly holding classified docs, then you’d have to chant “lock him up” at Donald.

2. If you support that Hilary wasn’t indicted by Comey/Holder.. then you can’t demand Trump be indicted.

It’s that simple. We’ll see if Merrick Garland and such want to start a Civil War just so they can get Trump..
Great thread!
 
What is stopping you fools from reading the indictment?

Are the words too big?

Is it because it is longer than an all caps Truth Social post?

What is this freakish aversion to facing the facts of the case?

If all you can bring to the debate is red herrings, straw men, false equivalencies, hoaxes, and lies, then just know you are advertising your stupidity and partisan hackery far and wide.
IF the Gateway pundit published it...they may read it. Not likely though
 

Forum List

Back
Top