Modbert
Daydream Believer
- Sep 2, 2008
- 33,178
- 3,055
- 48
I know. They sold their principles for a GOP win.
With your two previous posts Art and others tonight, we seem to be thinking quite alike on this issue.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I know. They sold their principles for a GOP win.
the tea partiers voting for him would have put Coakley in the seat easily.Kennedy was the real small government, anti-establishment candidate on the ballot. The tea partiers, as predicted by yours truly, abandoned their principles at the first sight of a Republican with a chance.
I know. They sold their principles for a GOP win.
I should have voted for Michael Badnarek and Bob Barr, I guess. It just seems like a wasted vote.
And that is why at the end of the day, the tea parties are just another right wing advocate group as a whole. Principle goes out the window when you have a shot of winning an election.
the tea partiers voting for him would have put Coakley in the seat easily.
I know. They sold their principles for a GOP win.
If you wanna look at it that way. In another example, these Palinites need to "sell their principles" because a vote for Palin is essentially a vote for Obama.
He ran a great campaign, and capitalized well on Martha's terrible campaign.
I know. They sold their principles for a GOP win.
If you wanna look at it that way. In another example, these Palinites need to "sell their principles" because a vote for Palin is essentially a vote for Obama.
They wont have to, IMO ... she isn't going to run.
He ran a great campaign, and capitalized well on Martha's terrible campaign.
Yep...it's all Martha's fault...lets keel haul her on the USS Constitution.
Let's face it...this was a referendum on a fucked up healthcare bill the Democrats tried to ram down the throats of a CLEAR MAJORITY of Americans who DID NOT support this bill OR THE METHODS USED TO ACHIEVE 60 DEMOCRAT VOTES.
is usually a vote for the greater of two evils. because the best candidate (being the third party) is essentially a vote for the greater of two evils.
He ran a great campaign, and capitalized well on Martha's terrible campaign.
Yep...it's all Martha's fault...lets keel haul her on the USS Constitution.
Let's face it...this was a referendum on a fucked up healthcare bill the Democrats tried to ram down the throats of a CLEAR MAJORITY of Americans who DID NOT support this bill OR THE METHODS USED TO ACHIEVE 60 DEMOCRAT VOTES.
but if she does......
the tea partiers voting for him would have put Coakley in the seat easily.Kennedy was the real small government, anti-establishment candidate on the ballot. The tea partiers, as predicted by yours truly, abandoned their principles at the first sight of a Republican with a chance.
I know. They sold their principles for a GOP win.
If you wanna look at it that way. In another example, these Palinites need to "sell their principles" because a vote for Palin is essentially a vote for Obama.
They wont have to, IMO ... she isn't going to run.
but if she does......
is usually a vote for the greater of two evils. because the best candidate (being the third party) is essentially a vote for the greater of two evils.
No, it's a vote for maintaining your principles instead of waiving them for the temptation of giving them up for a maybe. Come 2010, unless good third party candidates don't run, I'm not voting for Democrat or Republican in my state.
He ran a great campaign, and capitalized well on Martha's terrible campaign.
Yep...it's all Martha's fault...lets keel haul her on the USS Constitution.
Let's face it...this was a referendum on a fucked up healthcare bill the Democrats tried to ram down the throats of a CLEAR MAJORITY of Americans who DID NOT support this bill OR THE METHODS USED TO ACHIEVE 60 DEMOCRAT VOTES.
If it were a referendum on healthcare then Brown wouldn't have had a 30 point gap to close.
He ran a great campaign, and capitalized well on Martha's terrible campaign.
Yep...it's all Martha's fault...lets keel haul her on the USS Constitution.
Let's face it...this was a referendum on a fucked up healthcare bill the Democrats tried to ram down the throats of a CLEAR MAJORITY of Americans who DID NOT support this bill OR THE METHODS USED TO ACHIEVE 60 DEMOCRAT VOTES.
I don't think anyone's disagreeing with you. The smartest thing that Brown's campaign did was make the election a referendum on the very unpopular healthcare bill.
He ran a great campaign, and capitalized well on Martha's terrible campaign.
Yep...it's all Martha's fault...lets keel haul her on the USS Constitution.
Let's face it...this was a referendum on a fucked up healthcare bill the Democrats tried to ram down the throats of a CLEAR MAJORITY of Americans who DID NOT support this bill OR THE METHODS USED TO ACHIEVE 60 DEMOCRAT VOTES.
If it were a referendum on healthcare then Brown wouldn't have had a 30 point gap to close.
I think it's more to do with stopping an agenda than selling their principles. This election was a clear message to the current Administration.
I think it's more to do with stopping an agenda than selling their principles. This election was a clear message to the current Administration.
No, it has to do with selling their principles. Their reasoning to justify it may be to stop a agenda but they still sold their principles at the end of the day.
You trying to convince Art is a bit silly as he voted for Brown personally.
the tea partiers voting for him would have put Coakley in the seat easily.
I know. They sold their principles for a GOP win.
I think it's more to do with stopping an agenda than selling their principles. This election was a clear message to the current Administration.