Let's indict Obama and Hillary

Townhall Larry O'Connor | Aug 14, 2020

Today's news that former FBI attorney Kevin Clinesmith is expected to plead guilty in the Obamagate/Spygate scandal will be tough news for journalists like Jim Acosta.

Just this week, he haughtily intoned on his "network" that President Trump's charge that the Obama campaign spied on his campaign in 2016 was "just not true. That did not happen; it has not been proven."

Well, today's guilty plea from Clinesmith proves it did.

The spying began in early 2016 as a robust opposition research tactic of the Hillary Clinton campaign and transformed into an "insurance policy" to handicap the Trump Administration after his unpredictable victory.

Clinesmith was so intent on spying on Carter Page, an unpaid advisor to the Trump campaign, that he lied to the secret FISA court and doctored an official document to misrepresent that Page had not cooperated with the CIA in past investigations involving Russian espionage.

Page, a retired intelligence officer from the United States Navy and a graduate of the US Naval Academy, had fully cooperated with an earlier investigation involving Russian bad guys. That information surely would have thrown a wrench into the attempts to tap Page's phones, his emails, his text messages, and the phones, emails, and text messages of everyone he corresponded with and everyone they corresponded with.


Comment:
If Trump can be indicted on BS charges, then Obama can be indicted on some real charges.
If this is how the Democrats are going to operate, then make them play by their own rules.
Can you imagine all of the grinding of teeth and caterwauling from the Hollywood/Media hate machine.
And how about Hillary Clinton destroying subpoenaed evidence and her illegal e-mail server?
Why should she be allowed to get away with crimes that other people have gone to prison for?
And how about Col. Yevgeny Vindman who eavesdropped on Trump's phone calls and then reported to Adam Schiff so that Pelosi could have her bogus impeachment.
Make the Dems play by their own rules.
This article is from 3 years ago, so by now action would have been taken on this.
As for Hillary destroying evidence, it was physical destruction of mobile devices by her aids, and the FBI found they didnt intend to destroy evidence.
As for Vindman, he worked for the National Security Council at the time, meaning it was his job to listen to those sorts of calls with foreign leaders.
In order to have indictments, you need a criminal investigation and a grand jury to vote on it. In order to achieve an indictment, a prosecutor needs present "probable cause" to a grand jury. For a trial, evidence needs to reach the higher level of "proof beyond a reasonable doubt".
 
Pension and SS detail cut, exposed as the traitorous fraud he is.
When the jailbird called Trump with the strawberry blonde hair is found guilty & locked up he won't need secret service protection.

Have another shit sammich.
 
Townhall Larry O'Connor | Aug 14, 2020

Today's news that former FBI attorney Kevin Clinesmith is expected to plead guilty in the Obamagate/Spygate scandal will be tough news for journalists like Jim Acosta.

Just this week, he haughtily intoned on his "network" that President Trump's charge that the Obama campaign spied on his campaign in 2016 was "just not true. That did not happen; it has not been proven."

Well, today's guilty plea from Clinesmith proves it did.

The spying began in early 2016 as a robust opposition research tactic of the Hillary Clinton campaign and transformed into an "insurance policy" to handicap the Trump Administration after his unpredictable victory.

Clinesmith was so intent on spying on Carter Page, an unpaid advisor to the Trump campaign, that he lied to the secret FISA court and doctored an official document to misrepresent that Page had not cooperated with the CIA in past investigations involving Russian espionage.

Page, a retired intelligence officer from the United States Navy and a graduate of the US Naval Academy, had fully cooperated with an earlier investigation involving Russian bad guys. That information surely would have thrown a wrench into the attempts to tap Page's phones, his emails, his text messages, and the phones, emails, and text messages of everyone he corresponded with and everyone they corresponded with.


Comment:
If Trump can be indicted on BS charges, then Obama can be indicted on some real charges.
If this is how the Democrats are going to operate, then make them play by their own rules.
Can you imagine all of the grinding of teeth and caterwauling from the Hollywood/Media hate machine.
And how about Hillary Clinton destroying subpoenaed evidence and her illegal e-mail server?
Why should she be allowed to get away with crimes that other people have gone to prison for?
And how about Col. Yevgeny Vindman who eavesdropped on Trump's phone calls and then reported to Adam Schiff so that Pelosi could have her bogus impeachment.
Make the Dems play by their own rules.
If these Trump indictments fail, I believe it far more likely that the Biden corruption will be indicted.

If any of that leads back to Obama? We'll see. . .


IMO? The case can be made for selling technology to China for political influence and money all these years, going all the way back to the Clinton years and that Chinagate funding raising scandal.

But that affected both parties, and the justice system too.

The whole damn system? Rotten to the core.
 
True yet because of limitations being what they are yous guys are a little late.
If the Republican congress was like Progs, they would be on several anti Prog dictums right now. Showcasing everything on TV. Oh, that's right. Progs control near all TV.
 
Townhall Larry O'Connor | Aug 14, 2020

Today's news that former FBI attorney Kevin Clinesmith is expected to plead guilty in the Obamagate/Spygate scandal will be tough news for journalists like Jim Acosta.

Just this week, he haughtily intoned on his "network" that President Trump's charge that the Obama campaign spied on his campaign in 2016 was "just not true. That did not happen; it has not been proven."

Well, today's guilty plea from Clinesmith proves it did.

The spying began in early 2016 as a robust opposition research tactic of the Hillary Clinton campaign and transformed into an "insurance policy" to handicap the Trump Administration after his unpredictable victory.

Clinesmith was so intent on spying on Carter Page, an unpaid advisor to the Trump campaign, that he lied to the secret FISA court and doctored an official document to misrepresent that Page had not cooperated with the CIA in past investigations involving Russian espionage.

Page, a retired intelligence officer from the United States Navy and a graduate of the US Naval Academy, had fully cooperated with an earlier investigation involving Russian bad guys. That information surely would have thrown a wrench into the attempts to tap Page's phones, his emails, his text messages, and the phones, emails, and text messages of everyone he corresponded with and everyone they corresponded with.


Comment:
If Trump can be indicted on BS charges, then Obama can be indicted on some real charges.
If this is how the Democrats are going to operate, then make them play by their own rules.
Can you imagine all of the grinding of teeth and caterwauling from the Hollywood/Media hate machine.
And how about Hillary Clinton destroying subpoenaed evidence and her illegal e-mail server?
Why should she be allowed to get away with crimes that other people have gone to prison for?
And how about Col. Yevgeny Vindman who eavesdropped on Trump's phone calls and then reported to Adam Schiff so that Pelosi could have her bogus impeachment.
Make the Dems play by their own rules.

Hillary is a fair target because she is white and straight, but Obama is black and gay so he is off limits
 
"Let's indict _____ " translates to

"We're not going to indict _____, we're just going to bitch and moan because we're sad."
 
Well, you say that. I want to read it from Comer.
IMO? The evidence looks pretty compelling.

Comer did do an interview with Hannity admitting there was no, "direct evidence," but we all know about questionable bank deposits and aliases. ..

The circumstantial and questionable activity is pretty overwhelming. One has to have their head up their ass, and want to gas-light themselves, and blind themselves to corruption, not to get it at this point.

Criminals don't make it easy to find criminal activity.

Of course, the folks carrying water for the administration, will, spin it in a positive light, as they must.



Rep. James Comer: Biden's Use Of Pseudonyms Shows He Was Most Corrupt Vice President In American History​




822269


memo-chart-for-JG.png


822271


etc.
 
This article is from 3 years ago, so by now action would have been taken on this.
As for Hillary destroying evidence, it was physical destruction of mobile devices by her aids, and the FBI found they didnt intend to destroy evidence.
As for Vindman, he worked for the National Security Council at the time, meaning it was his job to listen to those sorts of calls with foreign leaders.
In order to have indictments, you need a criminal investigation and a grand jury to vote on it. In order to achieve an indictment, a prosecutor needs present "probable cause" to a grand jury. For a trial, evidence needs to reach the higher level of "proof beyond a reasonable doubt".
we all know the fbi is just a bunch of saints who would never ever ever participate in anything not nice
 
IMO? The evidence looks pretty compelling.

Comer did do an interview with Hannity admitting there was no, "direct evidence," but we all know about questionable bank deposits and aliases. ..

The circumstantial and questionable activity is pretty overwhelming. One has to have their head up their ass, and want to gas-light themselves, and blind themselves to corruption, not to get it at this point.

Criminals don't make it easy to find criminal activity.

Of course, the folks carrying water for the administration, will, spin it in a positive light, as they must.



Rep. James Comer: Biden's Use Of Pseudonyms Shows He Was Most Corrupt Vice President In American History​




822269


memo-chart-for-JG.png


822271


etc.

Question here is:

Do you people want to solve the problem of corruption in politics or do they just want to see Biden get done because they don't like him?

Probably the latter.
 

Let's indict Obama and Hillary​

Why for Gods sake ONLY these two? Indict every single politician in the USA.
As such starting off with an obvious case like Trump - is a great beginning.
 

Forum List

Back
Top