Black_Label
Registered Democrat
- Jun 20, 2012
- 6,306
- 510
- 48
The anti gun people argues that if the public is armed people will get killed
I have never heard of someone going to a place to rob it and someone else is there with a gun and their ends up a shoot out and a innocent bystander getting shot by the person who was their trying to shoot the bad guy who was trying to rob the place.
Why is it that when someone who is legally armed ends up and kills the bad guy no one else is killed?
But only when the bad guy has a gun others get killed?
You come across as one of those right wing nutcases with an arsenal of weapons, walking around with an itchy trigger finger waiting for the moment you can smoke someone, so can you be called a "hero"
That was George Zimmerman's problem. There are too many idiots that want attention.
Exactly. There are far too many idiots walking around waiting for an excuse to shoot someone because they want to feel like some kind of hero for doing so.
Engaging in deadly force should only be used in an absolute last resort, life or death, absoutly no other option scenario, not waiting for the moment to "stand your ground" allowing you to do so,...
Last edited: