Inthemiddle
Rookie
- Oct 4, 2011
- 6,354
- 675
- 0
- Banned
- #141
You're an idiot
I can see that from the get-go you don't seem to have much intellectual fuel for your fires.
and turn off the moveon.org talking points bullshit.
It would seem that you don't know the difference between "talking points bullshit" and case law.
How a judge with an IQ over 6 possibly connected the 4th amendment to a non-right such as welfare is laughable. Any constitutional lawyer would laugh after hearing this. A person does NOT have a right to welfare, they do not have to accept a drug test if they choose not to accept welfare.
I guess you haven't been paying attention. Funny, how you call me an "idiot" yet have not been paying attention, or are simply too idiotic to "get it." I'll repeat, NOWHERE is anyone saying there is a constitutional right to welfare. That's not the issue here. We're talking about FOURTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS that protect us all against searches without probable cause.
Now, if you can't understand the difference between welfare and searches without probable cause, then don't bother replying to anything, just go back to 1st grade.
I do not have a RIGHT to a driver's license, if I want to have one I have to pass a test. If I do not want to deal with the test, I cannot get a driver's license, real fucking simple.
The driving test is not a search. Are you incapable of understanding the difference?
This whole fucking nonsensical house of cards the asshole judge set up has no chance of surviving.
Why are you so mad? All the judge has done is executed a standard procedural step for when a case like this comes up.
All states will have laws on the books with drug testing within 36 months - FACT.
Prove it.