Let Me Get This Straight About Impeachment Over Trump's Ukraine Phone Call


So?

That's 11-days-old news. You still unsure whether you are still supposed to hyperventilate, and run around in circles screaming... something?

The whistleblower contacted a House Intelligence Committee staffer for advice how to proceed with her or his complaint. The staffer advised the whistleblower on the procedure, and informed Schiff about the broad outlines of the complaint.

There is nothing, not a shred, to support the narrative you can't quite formulate anyway.
 

So?

That's 11-days-old news. You still unsure whether you are still supposed to hyperventilate, and run around in circles screaming... something?

The whistleblower contacted a House Intelligence Committee staffer for advice how to proceed with her or his complaint. The staffer advised the whistleblower on the procedure, and informed Schiff about the broad outlines of the complaint.

There is nothing, not a shred, to support the narrative you can't quite formulate anyway.
But at 5he time it was NO HE DID NOT!

And lord you are such a penile projection.
 
But at 5he time it was NO HE DID NOT!

And lord you are such a penile projection.

At what time did who what? You been drinking?

What do you imagine a "penile projection" is? Scratch that, no one's interested in your feverish imagination.
 
I understand the historical background. Probably better than you. I read Rise and Fall of the Third Reich at 11 and much more since.

You seem to think that unless the current situation is exactly like some other situation that there is no need for concern?

Whatever

You might have read it at 11, but your alcohol-soaked brain probably cannot remember any of it. Right Lush?
 
You seem to think that unless the current situation is exactly like some other situation that there is no need for concern?
You're the one drawing a direct comparison between Hitler and Trump - if Trump isn't doing what Hitler did, then your comparison fails.
Since you claim to know what you're talking about, why don't you list what Hitler did in his first three years as Chancellor and list the comparable actions taken by Trump.
G'head. I dare you.
 
That demonstrates a complete lack of historical background, and a short look at Trump's history and the comparison with Hitler's demonstrates conclusively, there is a lack of trying, a lack of means, and obstacles Trump is very, very unlikely to overcome.
Where do you think five more years of this will end up?
The retirement of Democratic Socialism (or whatever you liberals call your self these days) from meaningful consideration in the minds of rational people.
 
You might have read it at 11, but your alcohol-soaked brain probably cannot remember any of it. Right Lush?

WTF are you babbling about you old fucking drunk?

Wow! Two out of three isn't bad! I am old, and fucking, but not drunk. That would be you, Lush!
Three ought of four..at least...you ARE babbling

No, that is your brain unable to comprehend the written word. Go sleep it off Lush! You're getting boring. Your responses are lame and lacking any thought. That's just normal for you, but we can always hope for a miracle that something falls off your headboard and knocks some sense into you.
 
You might have read it at 11, but your alcohol-soaked brain probably cannot remember any of it. Right Lush?

WTF are you babbling about you old fucking drunk?

Wow! Two out of three isn't bad! I am old, and fucking, but not drunk. That would be you, Lush!
Three ought of four..at least...you ARE babbling

No, that is your brain unable to comprehend the written word. Go sleep it off Lush! You're getting boring. Your responses are lame and lacking any thought. That's just normal for you, but we can always hope for a miracle that something falls off your headboard and knocks some sense into you.
Way to go Capn Maginot. Nothing as usual
 
You might have read it at 11, but your alcohol-soaked brain probably cannot remember any of it. Right Lush?

WTF are you babbling about you old fucking drunk?

Wow! Two out of three isn't bad! I am old, and fucking, but not drunk. That would be you, Lush!
Three ought of four..at least...you ARE babbling

No, that is your brain unable to comprehend the written word. Go sleep it off Lush! You're getting boring. Your responses are lame and lacking any thought. That's just normal for you, but we can always hope for a miracle that something falls off your headboard and knocks some sense into you.
Way to go Capn Maginot. Nothing as usual

Goodbye Lush! You are boring me to tears!
 
That demonstrates a complete lack of historical background, and a short look at Trump's history and the comparison with Hitler's demonstrates conclusively, there is a lack of trying, a lack of means, and obstacles Trump is very, very unlikely to overcome.
Where do you think five more years of this will end up?
The retirement of Democratic Socialism (or whatever you liberals call your self these days) from meaningful consideration in the minds of rational people.

You're kidding yourself. Trump is paving the way.
 
Moron, this is the law I posted...

§30121 Contributions and donations by foreign nationals

(a) Prohibition

It shall be unlawful for-

(1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make-

(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;

(B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or

(C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or
(2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national.

The red text highlights your error. There was nothing of value exchanged. NOTHING!

The information requested was in accordance with a criminal investigation of corruption, and had to do with Biden's son, and not Biden. The fact that Biden may have used his influence to stop the investigation of his son is the crime, and being a political opponent does not absolve him of responsibility, nor make it a "thing of value".

You libtards lump them together, so it is your error that is causing your confusion.
LOLOL

Dumbfuck....

"Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it..."

You need to seek out professional help with your lack of reading comprehension.

I said, "The fact that Biden may have used his influence to stop the investigation of his son is the crime, and being a political opponent does not absolve him of responsibility, nor make it a "thing of value"."

Why are you claiming I am wrong, when I stated that as fact?

You get dumber by the post! Go get a Q-tip and shove it in your ear. If you see brown stuff, it is obviously the shit you have for brains leaking out!

Seek medical attention!
LOL

Holyfuckingshit :eusa_doh:

You calling your claim a "fact" does not make it a fact.
icon_rolleyes.gif


Trying to eliminate candidates from the same election one is running in -- benefits their campaign. That makes it a "thing of value."

So, if I run for president, I cannot be prosecuted because doing so will be seen as a "thing of value" to my opponent?

Do you realize how stupid you are?

So if you run for president, and the President asks Communist China to dig up dirt on you, you think that is okay?

Now that is stupid.
 
Trump asked a foreign country to dig up dirt on his political opponent.

Trump didn't ask that same foreign country to investigate anyone else for 'corruption', he didn't ask the FBI to investigate his political opponent.

Then Trump asked Communist China to do the same thing.

And the Trumpkins find this all okey dokey.
 
Trump asked a foreign country to dig up dirt on his political opponent.

Trump didn't ask that same foreign country to investigate anyone else for 'corruption', he didn't ask the FBI to investigate his political opponent.

Then Trump asked Communist China to do the same thing.

And the Trumpkins find this all okey dokey.

If one of the Clintons were caught doing this, I wonder how they'd react?
 
Trump asked a foreign country to dig up dirt on his political opponent.
Look at you, engaged in a lie of omission.

That "political opponent" was the VP of the US, and the "dirt" he wanted looked into is the potentially corrupt acts taken by that person -while in office- for personal gain.
That is, Trump asked a foreign country, with which we have a treaty in place for this very thing, to help him do his job

The reaction by the lunatic left?
IMPEACH HIM!!!!!!!
 
So, if I run for president, I cannot be prosecuted because doing so will be seen as a "thing of value" to my opponent?

Of course not. You can be prosecuted for anything. The issue here is the sitting President using the power of their office to dig up "dirt" on an opponent. You people turning a blind eye to this for spurious, partisan reasons are really fucking this country in the ass with your idiocy.

The real problem here isn't that Trump's actions weren't impeachable. It's that Democrats spent the bulk of their political capital on the Russian nonsense (and similar nothing-burgers) and now that they finally have their smoking gun, they're the boy who cried wolf.
Incorrect. There was no Russian nonsense. What Mueller concluded was that Russia did interfere. What Mueller could not do was charge Trump with a crime because the DOJ can't indict a sitting president as a matter of policy. The congress had continued to investigate Trump and Trump has continued to obstruct. He does this hoping people will not pay attention to everything and fall for his Goebbels big lie.
 

Forum List

Back
Top