Lester Holt: The third debater

TheGreatGatsby

Gold Member
Mar 27, 2012
24,433
3,103
280
California
Lester Holt: The Third Debater?'

The game of two-on-one saw Holt ask no questions about:

  • Hillary’s emails
  • Benghazi
  • The Clinton Foundation

LH asks no questions about Hillary's corruption, yet he does dredge up the birther issue that Hillary started and tries to hit Trump on it. That's more important than current news such as Wells Fargo's corruption?

Many have noted Lester's compulsive need to "fact check" Trump as well. Additionally, he asked Trump six follow-up questions and zero of Hillary.

And based on some libnerd's graphic, LH interrupted Trump 58 percent more often.
 
And how many times did Rump interrupt the question itself to try to negotiate a different question?
(Such as denying his own on-the-record assent for the Iraq war?)

As for "fact check" --- when you deliberately try to get away with bullshit, and it's already bullshit that everybody already knows is bullshit because it's on the record (as in above) ----- then obviously you're going to be corrected when you intentionally try to deny reality. That's the way Reality works.

Don't want to get called out on it? Then don't try to peddle bullshit. What do we all look like --- Rump University?
 
Lester Holt: The Third Debater?'

The game of two-on-one saw Holt ask no questions about:

  • Hillary’s emails
  • Benghazi
  • The Clinton Foundation

LH asks no questions about Hillary's corruption, yet he does dredge up the birther issue that Hillary started and tries to hit Trump on it. That's more important than current news such as Wells Fargo's corruption?

Many have noted Lester's compulsive need to "fact check" Trump as well. Additionally, he asked Trump six follow-up questions and zero of Hillary.

And based on some libnerd's graphic, LH interrupted Trump 58 percent more often.

:cuckoo:

he pointed out that dumb donald was lying. it was not up for debate.

sorry if that offends you.
 
Lester Holt: The Third Debater?'

The game of two-on-one saw Holt ask no questions about:

  • Hillary’s emails
  • Benghazi
  • The Clinton Foundation

LH asks no questions about Hillary's corruption, yet he does dredge up the birther issue that Hillary started and tries to hit Trump on it. That's more important than current news such as Wells Fargo's corruption?

Many have noted Lester's compulsive need to "fact check" Trump as well. Additionally, he asked Trump six follow-up questions and zero of Hillary.

And based on some libnerd's graphic, LH interrupted Trump 58 percent more often.

:cuckoo:

he pointed out that dumb donald was lying. it was not up for debate.

sorry if that offends you.


It's just so UNFAIR that Rump doesn't get to live in his own Orange reality safe-space Bubble, where any past fuckups no longer exist because the Flooby Dust Fairy poofed them away. :eusa_boohoo:
 
As for "fact check" --- when you deliberately try to get away with bullshit, and it's already bullshit that everybody already knows is bullshit because it's on the record (as in above) ----- then obviously you're going to be corrected when you intentionally try to deny reality. That's the way Reality works.

Let the viewers decide. Let the pundits discuss if that is so. It's not a moderators job to debate.
 
As for "fact check" --- when you deliberately try to get away with bullshit, and it's already bullshit that everybody already knows is bullshit because it's on the record (as in above) ----- then obviously you're going to be corrected when you intentionally try to deny reality. That's the way Reality works.

Let the viewers decide. Let the pundits discuss if that is so. It's not a moderators job to debate.

It is not. Nor is that what Holt was doing, so your entire thread is air.
 
Lester ("yet ANOTHER" outrage") Holt, that's my nick name for the guy. The front man for liberals. He lost his credibility with me when he used those exact words opening the NBC nightly news after a black man was shot by police, before they had all the facts , stirring up more anti police backlash and fanning the flame of race riots. And yet, these same people tippy-toe around black crimes against whites or possible terrorist attacks urging "restraint". Really? That is an OUTRAGE, the double standards and hypocrisy of the liberals like Holt.
 
Lester ("yet ANOTHER" outrage") Holt, that's my nick name for the guy. The front man for liberals. He lost his credibility with me when he used those exact words opening the NBC nightly news after a black man was shot by police, before they had all the facts

---- and what was the rest of the sentence?


oopsie.
 
Hillary provided ZERO details on ANY topic except that we've avoided Nuclear War.
 
Lester Holt: The Third Debater?'

The game of two-on-one saw Holt ask no questions about:

  • Hillary’s emails
  • Benghazi
  • The Clinton Foundation

LH asks no questions about Hillary's corruption, yet he does dredge up the birther issue that Hillary started and tries to hit Trump on it. That's more important than current news such as Wells Fargo's corruption?

Many have noted Lester's compulsive need to "fact check" Trump as well. Additionally, he asked Trump six follow-up questions and zero of Hillary.

And based on some libnerd's graphic, LH interrupted Trump 58 percent more often.
Let's find another scapegoat! What is it with Conservatives primarily and the huckster buffoon Trump? Every thing needs a scapegoat and RIGHT NOW!

Trump is hardly infallible. He is a lousy businessman, a lousy philanthropist, a lousy character without manners but a fantastic promoter. P.T. Barnum for the 21st century. But he needs a scapegoat to deflect all those lousy qualities.

And his minions need a scapegoat to clear away the guilt.
 
Lester Holt: The Third Debater?'

The game of two-on-one saw Holt ask no questions about:

  • Hillary’s emails
  • Benghazi
  • The Clinton Foundation

LH asks no questions about Hillary's corruption, yet he does dredge up the birther issue that Hillary started and tries to hit Trump on it. That's more important than current news such as Wells Fargo's corruption?

Many have noted Lester's compulsive need to "fact check" Trump as well. Additionally, he asked Trump six follow-up questions and zero of Hillary.

And based on some libnerd's graphic, LH interrupted Trump 58 percent more often.
Let's find another scapegoat! What is it with Conservatives primarily and the huckster buffoon Trump? Every thing needs a scapegoat and RIGHT NOW!

Trump is hardly infallible. He is a lousy businessman, a lousy philanthropist, a lousy character without manners but a fantastic promoter. P.T. Barnum for the 21st century. But he needs a scapegoat to deflect all those lousy qualities.

And his minions need a scapegoat to clear away the guilt.

It's interesting that his own sister calls him "P.T. Barnum".

Apparently it's a case of obsequious hero-worshiping sheeple taking on the traits of their idol, who has never taken any responsibility for anything -- it's always "I'm the CEO but I'm not in charge" or "all I did was license my name" or when caught red-handed, outright denial with "I never said that".

That last one -- the outright denial of what everybody already knows --- is the most concerning, because that's outright self-delusional obliviousness to reality, and that's serious mental illness.
 


"Holt wearing earpiece"??

Seriously, "Holt wearing earpiece? When the fuck does a talk show host *NOT* wear an earpiece? How the fuck is he supposed to hear the producer? Do you hacks have no idea how this shit works, seriously?


He doesn't need to hear his producer if it's 90 minutes commercial free and he's boasting about only him knowing the questions.
 

Forum List

Back
Top