Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The Judge rightly is looking at this as a hope and poke raid. I hope she tosses it for cause.Looky here......
Trump medical records, tax documents seized in FBI raid: judge
Former President Trump’s medical records and documents related to his accounting information and taxes were seized during the FBI’s raid of Mar-a-Lago.www.foxnews.com
If these items are leaked.....only one possible source.The Judge rightly is looking at this as a hope and poke raid. I hope she tosses it for cause.
When ever a piece of crap judge pulls a fast one on Trump no problem but one rules in his favor it's obstruction of justice. Clowns as you give me a big laugh and I don't know why cause there is nothing funny about you except maybe your clown shoes and your little horn..Former prosecutors Cynthia Alksne and Glenn Kirschner sounded the alarm about the judge who granted Donald Trump's demand for a "special master" to review the documents at Mar-a-Lago for any possible attorney-client privilege, while speaking to MSNBC fill-in host Michael Steele.
Kirschner pointed out that never in his 30 years practicing law has he ever seen a judge make a ruling before she'd heard from the opposing side.
"I went back and looked at U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon's order, and here is what she said," Kirschner began. "Before I read this one sentence, Michael, mind you that she entered this tentative order before the Department of Justice prosecutors even had an opportunity to weigh in on the issue. She said quote, 'The court hereby provides notice of its preliminary intent to appoint a special master in this case.' And she has only heard from Trump's defense team."
He said that he's never heard a judge even announce a "tentative ruling" before both parties have been heard.
"I think this indicates a judge who has extraordinarily poor judgment at best, and at worse is biased in favor of Donald Trump," he continued. "As a footnote, I think it is worth mentioning that she was confirmed by the Senate, Mitch McConnell's Senate after Donald Trump lost the presidential election."
Alksne straight-up called it "pandering. I think that is the legal term for this garbage."
She went on to say that there likely won't be a so-called "special master" appointed. The government seems to be indicating that they've already searched through the documents with those who have the appropriate level of clearance. The appointment of a special master would mean that they had to find someone who has the highest level of clearance to handle such documents in a secure facility. The problem, however, is that there is no "special master" for executive privilege cases. The Justice Department is likely to appeal the decision to a higher court that will overrule Judge Aileen Cannon, and likely, publicly humiliate her.
Legal experts bash 'pandering' judge running to Trump's defense — and predict he'll be charged with obstruction
Former prosecutors Cynthia Alksne and Glenn Kirschner sounded the alarm about the judge who granted Donald Trump's demand for a "special master" to review the documents at Mar-a-Lago for any possible attorney-client privilege, while speaking to MSNBC fill-in host Michael Steele. Kirschner...www.rawstory.com
Oh look, a Nazi has dumped Raw Sewage on the board again....Former prosecutors Cynthia Alksne and Glenn Kirschner sounded the alarm about the judge who granted Donald Trump's demand for a "special master" to review the documents at Mar-a-Lago for any possible attorney-client privilege, while speaking to MSNBC fill-in host Michael Steele.
Kirschner pointed out that never in his 30 years practicing law has he ever seen a judge make a ruling before she'd heard from the opposing side.
"I went back and looked at U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon's order, and here is what she said," Kirschner began. "Before I read this one sentence, Michael, mind you that she entered this tentative order before the Department of Justice prosecutors even had an opportunity to weigh in on the issue. She said quote, 'The court hereby provides notice of its preliminary intent to appoint a special master in this case.' And she has only heard from Trump's defense team."
He said that he's never heard a judge even announce a "tentative ruling" before both parties have been heard.
"I think this indicates a judge who has extraordinarily poor judgment at best, and at worse is biased in favor of Donald Trump," he continued. "As a footnote, I think it is worth mentioning that she was confirmed by the Senate, Mitch McConnell's Senate after Donald Trump lost the presidential election."
Alksne straight-up called it "pandering. I think that is the legal term for this garbage."
She went on to say that there likely won't be a so-called "special master" appointed. The government seems to be indicating that they've already searched through the documents with those who have the appropriate level of clearance. The appointment of a special master would mean that they had to find someone who has the highest level of clearance to handle such documents in a secure facility. The problem, however, is that there is no "special master" for executive privilege cases. The Justice Department is likely to appeal the decision to a higher court that will overrule Judge Aileen Cannon, and likely, publicly humiliate her.
Legal experts bash 'pandering' judge running to Trump's defense — and predict he'll be charged with obstruction
Former prosecutors Cynthia Alksne and Glenn Kirschner sounded the alarm about the judge who granted Donald Trump's demand for a "special master" to review the documents at Mar-a-Lago for any possible attorney-client privilege, while speaking to MSNBC fill-in host Michael Steele. Kirschner...
Why? Are you Nazis going to kill her, the way you tried to kill Kavanaugh?I bet she is HIGHLY regretting her decision right now. And Trump will ultimately be denied his "overseer"
The fact that she made a ruling at all is totally out of line. A ruling based on one sides excuse, based upon the events of another trial, that is in no way related, without hearing any argument from the opposition, after 3 weeks of the evidence already reviewed by the government. With no evidence of independent counsel, that has the security clearance necessary to review top secret documents.
This should be thrown out with extreme prejudice on appeal, by a three judge panel.
Tosses for cause?The Judge rightly is looking at this as a hope and poke raid. I hope she tosses it for cause.
Tosses for cause?
Because of what?
They got a search warrant to look for, exactly what they found.
