Leave Iran alone- Another Big Lie?

[eots]

^^ conspiracy theories - us message board - political discussion forum

so i see you cant address facts

 

[Ropey]

Facts?

Prove your conspiracy theory then...

In the forum I linked you to

 

[eots]

Facts?

Prove your conspiracy theory then...

In the forum I linked you to

its a theory that war kills children ?...its a theory Iran is not invading anyone
its a theory the Rothschild financed Hitler and Bush did business with the NAZIS
It is only theory in your war warmongering fantasy land

 

[eots]

 

[JStone]

Ron Paul on Iran and nukes CBS Republican Debate 11/12/11 - YouTube

Ron who?

 

[JStone]

Facts?

Prove your conspiracy theory then...

In the forum I linked you to

its a theory that war kills children ?...its a theory Iran is not invading anyone

Stupid little boy, Iran invaded Abu Musa and the Tunb Islands. Have mommy show you a map. Also, stupid little boy, Iran supports Hizballah that massacred 300 US Marines in Lebanon and Iran supports Hamas that murders Israelis and Americans.

Go to mommy, stupid little boy My hand hurts from smacking you around

 

[Ropey]

^^ conspiracy theories - us message board - political discussion forum

so i see you cant address facts

Facts?

Prove your conspiracy theory then...

In the forum I linked you to

its a theory that war kills children ?...its a theory Iran is not invading anyone
its a theory the Rothschild financed Hitler and Bush did business with the NAZIS
It is only theory in your war warmongering fantasy land

Still no facts.

 

[JStone]

Rothschild and bush only needed not to finance hitler

You read that on the internet, stupid little boy? Mommy needs to take away your internet privileges

 

[R.C. Christian]

Muslimes can't fight, they can only blow themselves up. The Israelis smacked down multiple muslime shitholes in just 6 days in 1967.

Allah is a loser.

They seem to have done a pretty good job in Afghanistan, but you wouldn't know anything about that arm chair general. Repeat after me "must kill Muslims, all dune coons must die". Is that the gist of it? Is Saudi Arabia on your list too or do they get a free pass?

A bunch of sand rats hide in caves and blow themselves up. Allah is great

LOL, where you expect tribal people in a country like that to live, a condo? These are same "sand rats" that your government negotiates with.

 

[R.C. Christian]

Rothschild and bush only needed not to finance hitler

You read that on the internet, stupid little boy? Mommy needs to take away your internet privileges

Prescott Bush worked for the Harriman Brothers. It is purported that this Skull and Bones company financed uncle Adolf prior to Dec 8, 1941 most notably the Thyssen Corporation. The crippled village idiot Roosevelt then signed the Trading With The Enemies act and assets belonging to the Reich were seized. Prescott Bush, of Geronimo skull fame, was complicit by being a part of that organization just as Joe Paterno is complicit in the Penn State Nitnany Paedophiles debacle. I figured someone with an IQ of less than 90 like yourself could digest a football analogy.

 

[Ropey]

Rothschild and bush only needed not to finance hitler

You read that on the internet, stupid little boy? Mommy needs to take away your internet privileges

Prescott Bush worked for the Harriman Brothers. It is purported that this Skull and Bones company financed uncle Adolf prior to Dec 8, 1941 most notably the Thyssen Corporation. The crippled village idiot Roosevelt then signed the Trading With The Enemies act and assets belonging to the Reich were seized. Prescott Bush, of Geronimo skull fame, was complicit by being a part of that organization just as Joe Paterno is complicit in the Penn State Nitnany Paedophiles debacle. I figured someone with an IQ of less than 90 like yourself could digest a football analogy.

Proof?

 

[freedombecki]

Ever since we lost Iran and the Shah, we have been having a war of words. It probably will end up in war.Maybe the idea of detente and MAD will ensue if Iran does develop nukes? Pakistan has nukes and is Muslim but has never used them. Same with N. Korea

It's been a little more than that, Moonglow. Iran's Khomeini government took 52 Americans hostage in Tehran November 4, 1979 and held them for 444 days. They were innocent bystanders. Terrorist Attacks on Americans, 1979-1988

On December 3, 1984, Tehran hosted terrorists who hijacked a Kuwaiti plane and killed two Americans from the U.S. Agency for International Development. They were "held" in Tehran for a short time but never prosecuted for this crime.

Suspicion that Iran had a hand in many other anti-American terrorist plots fell short of prosecutorial proofs, particularly Pan Am Flight 103, downed by Libyan terrorists is one of them.

Tehran's President Ahmadinejad has made public and open threats against Israel as well as threats against the United States of America.

Iran is a terrorist regime and sponsors terror against the United States and Israel.

 

[taichiliberal]

Here's the deal: Once Iran gets the bomb, it's going to less likely that the US will invade (either by proxy or co-jointly like with Iraq). That being said, it's also highly unlikely that Iran would actually use the bomb against Israel....for the same reason that Israel hasn't used any of it's nuclear arsenal in the last 40 years......because it would be damned stupid to nuke a country that cac be downwind from you (fallout can be nasty business, I hear).

The real danger could and can be dirty bombs being created and exported by Iran. But if Israel wants to go all pre-emptive strike, America will be stupid enough to somehow throw in with them...as will Russia or China be stupid enough to get behind Iran and whatever regional countries back them. And the military/industrial complex gets stoked, the economy gets saved, and we all get to see how it takes before a DRAFT is brought back.

And the band played on.

 

[freedombecki]

Here's the deal: Once Iran gets the bomb, it's going to less likely that the US will invade (either by proxy or co-jointly like with Iraq). That being said, it's also highly unlikely that Iran would actually use the bomb against Israel....for the same reason that Israel hasn't used any of it's nuclear arsenal in the last 40 years......because it would be damned stupid to nuke a country that cac be downwind from you (fallout can be nasty business, I hear).

The real danger could and can be dirty bombs being created and exported by Iran. But if Israel wants to go all pre-emptive strike, America will be stupid enough to somehow throw in with them...as will Russia or China be stupid enough to get behind Iran and whatever regional countries back them. And the military/industrial complex gets stoked, the economy gets saved, and we all get to see how it takes before a DRAFT is brought back.

And the band played on.

The Russians will not work against themselves. Sometimes it seems they are against us, and without a doubt, we are their keenest rival. However, the Russians have a very sophisticated understanding of international dealings and may realize the unstable nutcases running Iran would benefit them less than America.

They do like us to doublethink everything, however, and they're probably a little offish because each administration that comes down the pike is diametrically opposite of the one preceding it.

We're getting a reputation as a country that is flighty and changes every 4 to 8 years rather than showing a consistent and dependable outcome. Right now, we lost prestige by having our credit rating downgraded internationally, and 20% unemployed counting the hard-core unemployed. That isn't helping the situation at all.

We must not ever elect another thoroughly craven executive and we've done so twice in the past 50 years--Carter and Obama.

Russians respect strength and not cowardice. Just sayin.

 

[Ropey]

Here's the deal: Once Iran gets the bomb, it's going to less likely that the US will invade (either by proxy or co-jointly like with Iraq). That being said, it's also highly unlikely that Iran would actually use the bomb against Israel....for the same reason that Israel hasn't used any of it's nuclear arsenal in the last 40 years......because it would be damned stupid to nuke a country that cac be downwind from you (fallout can be nasty business, I hear).

The real danger could and can be dirty bombs being created and exported by Iran. But if Israel wants to go all pre-emptive strike, America will be stupid enough to somehow throw in with them...as will Russia or China be stupid enough to get behind Iran and whatever regional countries back them. And the military/industrial complex gets stoked, the economy gets saved, and we all get to see how it takes before a DRAFT is brought back.

And the band played on.

The Russians will not work against themselves. Sometimes it seems they are against us, and without a doubt, we are their keenest rival. However, the Russians have a very sophisticated understanding of international dealings and may realize the unstable nutcases running Iran would benefit them less than America.

They do like us to doublethink everything, however, and they're probably a little offish because each administration that comes down the pike is diametrically opposite of the one preceding it.

We're getting a reputation as a country that is flighty and changes every 4 to 8 years rather than showing a consistent and dependable outcome. Right now, we lost prestige by having our credit rating downgraded internationally, and 20% unemployed counting the hard-core unemployed. That isn't helping the situation at all.

We must not ever elect another thoroughly craven executive and we've done so twice in the past 50 years--Carter and Obama.

Russians respect strength and not cowardice. Just sayin.

 

[taichiliberal]

Here's the deal: Once Iran gets the bomb, it's going to less likely that the US will invade (either by proxy or co-jointly like with Iraq). That being said, it's also highly unlikely that Iran would actually use the bomb against Israel....for the same reason that Israel hasn't used any of it's nuclear arsenal in the last 40 years......because it would be damned stupid to nuke a country that cac be downwind from you (fallout can be nasty business, I hear).

The real danger could and can be dirty bombs being created and exported by Iran. But if Israel wants to go all pre-emptive strike, America will be stupid enough to somehow throw in with them...as will Russia or China be stupid enough to get behind Iran and whatever regional countries back them. And the military/industrial complex gets stoked, the economy gets saved, and we all get to see how it takes before a DRAFT is brought back.

And the band played on.

The Russians will not work against themselves. Sometimes it seems they are against us, and without a doubt, we are their keenest rival. However, the Russians have a very sophisticated understanding of international dealings and may realize the unstable nutcases running Iran would benefit them less than America.

But the Russians are in business for Iranian oil, and have been for sometime. Israel is joined at the hip to America....so if Israel does a strike against Iran, and there's an escalation...ANY supplies or from Russia will be deemed aggressive.

They do like us to doublethink everything, however, and they're probably a little offish because each administration that comes down the pike is diametrically opposite of the one preceding it.

Right now, Russia is not in an economically good position to start venturing into a proxy war in the Middle East, so that may be a good thing. But, they won't sit idle while the US gains Iran via an Israel throw down....nor will Syria or Egypt for that matter. What exactly will they do and to what degree will determine if there is a quasi-WWIII in the Middle East. And remember, China is the gorilla leaning against the door.


We're getting a reputation as a country that is flighty and changes every 4 to 8 years rather than showing a consistent and dependable outcome. Right now, we lost prestige by having our credit rating downgraded internationally, and 20% unemployed counting the hard-core unemployed. That isn't helping the situation at all.

I don't buy that....our international downgrade came from screwing around with both Iran and Iraq, and then invading the latter on a false premise.....the mindset that lead to that had been going on for at least 40 years.

We must not ever elect another thoroughly craven executive and we've done so twice in the past 50 years--Carter and Obama.

Are you shitting me? Given the FACTS regarding the Reagan/Bush/Bush foreign policy, it's a miracle we have any standing on the foreign playing field at all. Like it or not and for all his faults, Carter got Egypt and Israel to the table better than anyone since, and got hostages HOME SAFE from Iran without risking all out war. Obama re-established the system that eventually got Bin Ladin, tried and convicted a terrorist in civilian court and put down the Somalian pirates when the situation arose.....so spare me the neocon/teabagger BS about "craven", will ya please?

Russians respect strength and not cowardice. Just sayin.

Returning to the Cold War status that you are insinuating is just plain stupid....it bankrupted Russia and didn't do us a whole hell of a lot of good either, as an eternal military/industrial based economy eventually fails.

 

[JStone]

Here's the deal: Once Iran gets the bomb, it's going to less likely that the US will invade (either by proxy or co-jointly like with Iraq). That being said, it's also highly unlikely that Iran would actually use the bomb against Israel....for the same reason that Israel hasn't used any of it's nuclear arsenal in the last 40 years

Bright eyes, the doctrine of mutual assured destruction is inapplicable to muslimes who desire death over life.

 

[JStone]

Iran Hey Ayatollah !! ,leave those kids alone - YouTube

War does not save children it cripples and kills them and takes their parents
Wars are not waged for children they are waged for profit and power

Coming from an infantile mind.

 

[Jos]

Russia urges IAEA to name ‘content provider’ for its report

Russia urges IAEA to list countries which provided documents for the report on Iran, which 'contains no new details', RIA Novosti quoted Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov as saying on Monday.

"The IAEA Director General's recent report lacks anything new," Lavrov told journalists. "It just reaffirmed that Iran has provided no necessary explanations for so-called 'proposed military developments'."

He noted that the IAEA claims the report was developed based on documents which were submitted by another country.

"We urge the IAEA to name 'another country' so that we could investigate the case," Lavrov said.

Russia urges IAEA to name

Does it begin with an I?

 

[Ropey]

Here's the deal: Once Iran gets the bomb, it's going to less likely that the US will invade (either by proxy or co-jointly like with Iraq). That being said, it's also highly unlikely that Iran would actually use the bomb against Israel....for the same reason that Israel hasn't used any of it's nuclear arsenal in the last 40 years

Bright eyes, the doctrine of mutual assured destruction is inapplicable to Muslims who desire death over life.

Edited so that I can agree with the post.

Giving background to this week's controversy over remarks by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of Iran, the article below mentioned his previous call for Israel to be "wiped off the pages of history". The translation of the statement he made in 2005, at The World without Zionism conference in Tehran, has been the subject of dispute. A more literal translation is: "the regime occupying Jerusalem must vanish from the page of time", and this is the translation we should have used (as noted in Corrections and clarifications, 28 July 2007).

Must vanish from the pages of time = complete destruction of Israel as if it had never existed...

Britain walks out of conference as Ahmadinejad calls Israel 'racist'

Video: Britain walks out of conference as Ahmadinejad calls Israel 'racist' | World news | guardian.co.uk

Nothing has changed other than Ahmadinejad works towards an attack to hasten the end of times.

There is no question but that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad did Israel a favor by kicking off the Durban II Conference with his racist rant against Israel.

Surely he knew the speech would prompt the reaction that it did even before the representatives of forty countries got up and walked out on him. Didn’t he?

Maybe he did, but probably he didn’t. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said what he said because he believes every word of it, and so does the regime that supports him.

The Iran Factor - Ahamidenjads End Time Theology - Nuclear Bomb and the Mahdi/

Mahdi Iran and the Muslim AntiChrist