Bfgrn
Gold Member
- Apr 4, 2009
- 16,829
- 2,492
- 245
Sowell's a political pundit, not a scientist, and has little training in any scientific discipline. Economics is hardly a science, and he is hardly a leading light in that discipline.
But is point is that the concept of "climate science" is not really a science at all. Even Einstein ( Id consider him a real scientist ) stated that it is folly to call anything "science" if there are ANY questions about its validity. Rejecting prevailing information ( science ) that doesn't conform with a segment of scientists does not equal science.
Why do you think that Al Gore has ALWAYS refused to debate ANYBODY? Because he'd be slaughtered.
People ( the public at large ) will start accepting climate science when it isn't shutting out alternative data than their own. The fact is, most of the population thinks that climate scientists screw around with the data ( the polls show that without a shadow of a doubt )......which means it isn't accepted as "science" yet. Its a huge hurdle that that climate science community has failed to recognize, except for some of the smarter ones like Dr Judith Curry, a giant in the field of climate science. ( or was until the extremists threw her under the bus )
The whole "peer reviewed" stuff is exactly what it suggests........but it should say "reviewed only by peers who think exactly alike".
If you are a scientist and NOT a member of the secret society, you are a fake scientist = science fraud.
Moral justification to suck CEO ass..