Last defense bill included aid for Ukraine, which the dems voted against

It’s a non-sequitor Mrs Ernst. The question isn’t whether aid should be sent to Ukraine. That issue was settled by a Congressional appropriation. The question was whether the president has the authority to use that aid to get a personal, political benefit.
first you need to give your proof that the president used the aid for personal gain before you can make such a comment.

He was only going through his personal attorney. He was not using any legitimate means of investigation. He was pushing for a public announcement.

All things you do for a personal political benefit.
Your opinion is irrelevant but funny

Unfortunately for them, they have no proof of their allegations, and hopefully we will start and continue rooting out our corrupt lifelong establishment politicians.

If Biden Wasn’t Impeached Over Quid Pro Quo, Trump Shouldn’t Be Either

Americans Aren’t Stupid
The issue on the table is not whether the president committed “high crimes and misdemeanors” however ill-defined these terms may be. The real question is whether behavior that has already been found not to constitute “high crimes and misdemeanors” for one candidate can still be found to constitute “high crimes and misdemeanors” for another candidate.

The American people are not stupid. In fact, they tend to exhibit uncommon wisdom and foresight at the presidential ballot box. If the past is prologue, Trump is well on his way to a second term while Biden won’t even be able to find his way to his own party’s nomination.

If there is a silver lining in all of this, it is that Congress is investigating prospective corruption rather than passing intrusive and economy-killing legislation. Had the 2016 presidential election been decided differently, corruption would be standard operating procedure.
 
It’s a non-sequitor Mrs Ernst. The question isn’t whether aid should be sent to Ukraine. That issue was settled by a Congressional appropriation. The question was whether the president has the authority to use that aid to get a personal, political benefit.
first you need to give your proof that the president used the aid for personal gain before you can make such a comment.

He was only going through his personal attorney. He was not using any legitimate means of investigation. He was pushing for a public announcement.

All things you do for a personal political benefit.
Your opinion is irrelevant but funny
You ask me for proof and then ignore it. There’s no winning with some folks.
 
Nothing.

The thread premise is just another failed attempt to deflect from Trump’s impeachment and disgrace
You forgot maybe that there was no failure on Trump's part fo give Ukraine the aid that Joe Biden wanted to cut off.
They got their money. Your whole so called argument goes down the toilet then.
 
If you think Democrats are crying now, wait till Ginsburg has to be replaced by Trump. That should be a real circus between the crying, the lying and the false accusations against the appointee. This one will make the Kavanaugh travesty look like a walk in the park.
 
Nothing.

The thread premise is just another failed attempt to deflect from Trump’s impeachment and disgrace
You forgot maybe that there was no failure on Trump's part fo give Ukraine the aid that Joe Biden wanted to cut off.
They got their money. Your whole so called argument goes down the toilet then.

What happens to your argument if it turns out Ukraine doesn’t get all the money that was allocated by Congress?
 
Nothing.

The thread premise is just another failed attempt to deflect from Trump’s impeachment and disgrace
You forgot maybe that there was no failure on Trump's part fo give Ukraine the aid that Joe Biden wanted to cut off.
They got their money. Your whole so called argument goes down the toilet then.

Nope. What made him release the funds?

And, Biden did not want to cut off military aid to Ukraine. Stop lying.
 
Three democrat senators sent a letter to Ukraine warning them to be helpful to the Mueller Investigation.....or they'd vote against military aid?!
WTF, they voted against it anyway. If I was Ukraine I'd know which party butters my bread.
 
If you think Democrats are crying now, wait till Ginsburg has to be replaced by Trump. That should be a real circus between the crying, the lying and the false accusations against the appointee. This one will make the Kavanaugh travesty look like a walk in the park.

You think the Senate should give a hearing to a Trump nominee to the SC in an election year?
 
Joni Ernst Asks Why Is Donald Trump Being Impeached Over Ukraine Aid That Most of the House Impeachment Managers Voted Against?

The marxist Dims have been sanctimoniously lecturing us on the how much we hurt Ukraine by holding up the funding for 55 days. And yet most of them voted AGAINST providing the aid. Fatfuck Nads did it TWICE.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! And they wonder why we don't take them seriously.

Discuss.


Joni Ernst Asks Why Is Donald Trump Being Impeached Over Ukraine Aid That Most of the House Impeachment Managers Voted Against?

If we ever run short on irony all we have to do is review this whole impeachment process.
 
Nope. What made him release the funds?
Assurances he got from Zylenski.

And, Biden did not want to cut off military aid to Ukraine. Stop lying.
FLASHBACK, 2018: Joe Biden Brags At CFR Meeting About Withholding Aid To Ukraine To Force Firing Of Prosecutor
Fuck off. Tell it to the Quid Pro Quo Joe video at the CFR.

Joe didn't mind shutting off Ukraine military assistance when he was Obama's butt boy.
In fact he threatened to do it himself if he didn't get his way toot de suite.
 
Last edited:
Nope. What made him release the funds?
Assurances he got from Zylenski.

And, Biden did not want to cut off military aid to Ukraine. Stop lying.
FLASHBACK, 2018: Joe Biden Brags At CFR Meeting About Withholding Aid To Ukraine To Force Firing Of Prosecutor
Fuck off. Tell it to the Quid Pro Quo Joe video at the CFR.

Joe didn't mind shutting off Ukraine military assistance when he was Obama's butt boy.
In fact he threatened to do it himself if he didn't get his way toot de suite.

No. Biden threatened to cut off guaranteed loans...not military aid. You are lying.

And the reason was because Ukraine WAS NOT FIGHTING CORRUPTION. That prosecutor was
corrupt. It was OFFICIAL US POLICY.
 
Nope. What made him release the funds?
Assurances he got from Zylenski.

And, Biden did not want to cut off military aid to Ukraine. Stop lying.
FLASHBACK, 2018: Joe Biden Brags At CFR Meeting About Withholding Aid To Ukraine To Force Firing Of Prosecutor
Fuck off. Tell it to the Quid Pro Quo Joe video at the CFR.

Joe didn't mind shutting off Ukraine military assistance when he was Obama's butt boy.
In fact he threatened to do it himself if he didn't get his way toot de suite.

Assurances from Zelenski? Lie. He released it because he got caught. Asshole.
 
No. Biden threatened to cut off guaranteed loans...not military aid. You are lying.

And the reason was because Ukraine WAS NOT FIGHTING CORRUPTION. That prosecutor was
corrupt. It was OFFICIAL US POLICY.
Solomon: These once-secret memos cast doubt on Joe Biden's Ukraine story

Get out of your leftist bubble...documents and court records show the Biden narrative about Viktor Shokin were a lie.

Old Creepy Joe only "cared" about corruption when Shokin started to look into Burisma.
It wasn't his place to have Ukranian officials fired in any case.
 
Why are the house mangers whining about holding up aid to Ukraine when they voted against Ukraine from getting the aid they need?
Sen. Joni Ernst calls out House impeachment hypocrisy over Ukraine aid
joni is not talking about THIS MILITARY AID BILL For the Ukraine BigReb, she is talking about bills before this bill for Ukraine aid that trump illegally held up for his own personal gain....

why do you think she or the article is talking about PAST National security/defense funding bills and NOT this one....that is the only bill relevant to the impeachment case?
 
No. Biden threatened to cut off guaranteed loans...not military aid. You are lying.

And the reason was because Ukraine WAS NOT FIGHTING CORRUPTION. That prosecutor was
corrupt. It was OFFICIAL US POLICY.
Solomon: These once-secret memos cast doubt on Joe Biden's Ukraine story

Get out of your leftist bubble...documents and court records show the Biden narrative about Viktor Shokin were a lie.

Old Creepy Joe only "cared" about corruption when Shokin started to look into Burisma.
It wasn't his place to have Ukranian officials fired in any case.

You are lying.
 
If you think Democrats are crying now, wait till Ginsburg has to be replaced by Trump. That should be a real circus between the crying, the lying and the false accusations against the appointee. This one will make the Kavanaugh travesty look like a walk in the park.
With republicans in charge of both houses. This will be good!
 
No. Biden threatened to cut off guaranteed loans...not military aid. You are lying.

And the reason was because Ukraine WAS NOT FIGHTING CORRUPTION. That prosecutor was
corrupt. It was OFFICIAL US POLICY.
Solomon: These once-secret memos cast doubt on Joe Biden's Ukraine story

Get out of your leftist bubble...documents and court records show the Biden narrative about Viktor Shokin were a lie.

Old Creepy Joe only "cared" about corruption when Shokin started to look into Burisma.
It wasn't his place to have Ukranian officials fired in any case.

You are lying.
00b0b_libcSyL5b9L_1200x900.jpg
 

Forum List

Back
Top