Las Vegas shooting: Reports of shooter at Mandalay Bay Casino

[rightwinger]

Derp!

Which of course has not a fucking thing to do with Paddock.

Thinking only guns are good weapons for mass murder is a bit shallow no?

In this case they are, dope.

And you can't see why using the argument that a particular thing is good for mass murder to support regulation is simplistic?

It's not simplistic. Your argument is. These are guns. Guns designed to kill.
Measures have been taken to mitigate the possibility of attacks in every other way. Cockpit doors are fortified and TSA screens passengers. Cities around the world are working to better protect large gatherings of pedestrians from vehicles. The glaring difference is of course that America has done nothing to address these attacks. Not one thing. In fact, people like you actively fight against it. So when you use arguments like, " ya but...trucks", it is not only simplistic but dumb.

European Cities Add Barriers to Thwart Vehicle Attacks

Guns are designed to propel a projectile at a target
Anything else that happens is the shooter's responsibility.

OK so how do you stop these type of attacks without trampling on the rights of people who own guns or want to own guns who will never commit such a crime?

You do not need to propel a projectile at a target at 500 rounds per minute

 

[Skull Pilot]

Thinking only guns are good weapons for mass murder is a bit shallow no?

In this case they are, dope.

And you can't see why using the argument that a particular thing is good for mass murder to support regulation is simplistic?

It's not simplistic. Your argument is. These are guns. Guns designed to kill.
Measures have been taken to mitigate the possibility of attacks in every other way. Cockpit doors are fortified and TSA screens passengers. Cities around the world are working to better protect large gatherings of pedestrians from vehicles. The glaring difference is of course that America has done nothing to address these attacks. Not one thing. In fact, people like you actively fight against it. So when you use arguments like, " ya but...trucks", it is not only simplistic but dumb.

European Cities Add Barriers to Thwart Vehicle Attacks

Guns are designed to propel a projectile at a target
Anything else that happens is the shooter's responsibility.

OK so how do you stop these type of attacks without trampling on the rights of people who own guns or want to own guns who will never commit such a crime?

You do not need to propel a projectile at a target at 500 rounds per minute

It's not up to you to tell other people what they "need" is it?

I don't shoot like that because it's an impractical way to shoot a gun if you are concerned at all about accuracy.

But it doesn't matter if people can because the vast majority of people who own guns and who might use a bump stock will never ever turn their weapons on other people

 

[beagle9]

From now on the security at these events should consist of Marshall's in plain clothes mingling within the crowds, and they should have on their person in consealment of, a snap together sniper rifle that can be brought into action immediately. If this would have been the case, the snyper could have laid down suppression fire on that room, and therefore he or she could have drove the perp backwards, and kept him off balance until the SWAT team could have charged the room. I say a snyper because the high-powered scope would instantly have allowed the situation to be assessed quickly, suppression fire applied, and communication between swat and security would have been directed.

 

[Leo123]

Just a thought...What if every person at the concert had a little laser pointer and the ones with adequate cover were able to direct their beams toward the shooter? I have heard that these things can totally disorient pilots and it is illegal to do so.

 

[MarkDuffy]

Pictured: Las Vegas shooter dead on the floor of his room | Daily Mail Online

Stacked magazines. He was not done yet. Good Job Sheriff

 

[rightwinger]

how did it help?

Koper concluded by saying that “a new ban on large capacity magazines and assault weapons would certainly not be a panacea for gun crime, but it may help to prevent further spread of particularly dangerous weaponry and eventually bring small reductions in some of the most serious and costly gun crimes.”

That kind of guarded language may not make for great sound bites for either side in the gun debate, but it more accurately reflects Koper’s findings and conclusion.

— Robert Farley

Did the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban Work? - FactCheck.org

the effect of the 'assault weapon ban' was minimal, because 'assault weapons' were rarely used in crimes, even murders.

You have offered nothing to the discussion, just poking at our posts.

What is your solution?

_______________ no limit to fire rate?

_______________ no limit to arsenal size?

_______________ no limit to magazine/drum size?

______________ yes machine guns should be legal?

______________ the more guns the better?

ding! ding! We have a winner, winner, chicken dinner!

In this case they are, dope.

And you can't see why using the argument that a particular thing is good for mass murder to support regulation is simplistic?

It's not simplistic. Your argument is. These are guns. Guns designed to kill.
Measures have been taken to mitigate the possibility of attacks in every other way. Cockpit doors are fortified and TSA screens passengers. Cities around the world are working to better protect large gatherings of pedestrians from vehicles. The glaring difference is of course that America has done nothing to address these attacks. Not one thing. In fact, people like you actively fight against it. So when you use arguments like, " ya but...trucks", it is not only simplistic but dumb.

European Cities Add Barriers to Thwart Vehicle Attacks

Theresa May Sums Up A Sobering Reality About U.S. Gun Laws
“Most people would look at this and assume that people in America would be so shocked by this attack that they would want to take some action,” she said.

Theresa May Sums Up A Sobering Reality About U.S. Gun Laws | HuffPost

Oh yeah, let's be like the UK and disarm everybody, then let Muslims in unrestricted so they can murder us with swords, bombs, and illegal guns.

That is part of the problem...start talking about any sort of restrictions and you guys go on about disarming everyone. Almost no one wants that just like almost no one wants heavy armaments in civilisn hands.

Why should machinr guns be legal? They hsve one purpose and one purpose only and that is to kill large numbrts of people very quickly.

The rapid fire coming from those windows was horrific

The amount of bullets he was able to rain down on people has no place in our society.

 

[Marion Morrison]

Lots of info here: Pictured: Las Vegas shooter dead on the floor of his room | Daily Mail Online

 

[beagle9]

Just a thought...What if every person at the concert had a little laser pointer and the ones with adequate cover were able to direct their beams toward the shooter? I have heard that these things can totally disorient pilots and it is illegal to do so.

. Not every person, but of course the Marshall's who are hired or appointed for security yes.

 

[Pop23]

Thinking only guns are good weapons for mass murder is a bit shallow no?

In this case they are, dope.

And you can't see why using the argument that a particular thing is good for mass murder to support regulation is simplistic?

It's not simplistic. Your argument is. These are guns. Guns designed to kill.
Measures have been taken to mitigate the possibility of attacks in every other way. Cockpit doors are fortified and TSA screens passengers. Cities around the world are working to better protect large gatherings of pedestrians from vehicles. The glaring difference is of course that America has done nothing to address these attacks. Not one thing. In fact, people like you actively fight against it. So when you use arguments like, " ya but...trucks", it is not only simplistic but dumb.

European Cities Add Barriers to Thwart Vehicle Attacks

Guns are designed to propel a projectile at a target
Anything else that happens is the shooter's responsibility.

OK so how do you stop these type of attacks without trampling on the rights of people who own guns or want to own guns who will never commit such a crime?

You do not need to propel a projectile at a target at 500 rounds per minute

You don't need to comment like a buffoon either.

But you do anyway.

If a target shooter wants to propel 500 rounds per minute, why the hell should you care?

 

[Pop23]

Koper concluded by saying that “a new ban on large capacity magazines and assault weapons would certainly not be a panacea for gun crime, but it may help to prevent further spread of particularly dangerous weaponry and eventually bring small reductions in some of the most serious and costly gun crimes.”

That kind of guarded language may not make for great sound bites for either side in the gun debate, but it more accurately reflects Koper’s findings and conclusion.

— Robert Farley

Did the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban Work? - FactCheck.org

the effect of the 'assault weapon ban' was minimal, because 'assault weapons' were rarely used in crimes, even murders.

You have offered nothing to the discussion, just poking at our posts.

What is your solution?

_______________ no limit to fire rate?

_______________ no limit to arsenal size?

_______________ no limit to magazine/drum size?

______________ yes machine guns should be legal?

______________ the more guns the better?

ding! ding! We have a winner, winner, chicken dinner!

And you can't see why using the argument that a particular thing is good for mass murder to support regulation is simplistic?

It's not simplistic. Your argument is. These are guns. Guns designed to kill.
Measures have been taken to mitigate the possibility of attacks in every other way. Cockpit doors are fortified and TSA screens passengers. Cities around the world are working to better protect large gatherings of pedestrians from vehicles. The glaring difference is of course that America has done nothing to address these attacks. Not one thing. In fact, people like you actively fight against it. So when you use arguments like, " ya but...trucks", it is not only simplistic but dumb.

European Cities Add Barriers to Thwart Vehicle Attacks

Theresa May Sums Up A Sobering Reality About U.S. Gun Laws
“Most people would look at this and assume that people in America would be so shocked by this attack that they would want to take some action,” she said.

Theresa May Sums Up A Sobering Reality About U.S. Gun Laws | HuffPost

Oh yeah, let's be like the UK and disarm everybody, then let Muslims in unrestricted so they can murder us with swords, bombs, and illegal guns.

That is part of the problem...start talking about any sort of restrictions and you guys go on about disarming everyone. Almost no one wants that just like almost no one wants heavy armaments in civilisn hands.

Why should machinr guns be legal? They hsve one purpose and one purpose only and that is to kill large numbrts of people very quickly.

The rapid fire coming from those windows was horrific

The amount of bullets he was able to rain down on people has no place in our society.

He had no place in society. For some reason you seem to want to make excuses for him

 

[beagle9]

Koper concluded by saying that “a new ban on large capacity magazines and assault weapons would certainly not be a panacea for gun crime, but it may help to prevent further spread of particularly dangerous weaponry and eventually bring small reductions in some of the most serious and costly gun crimes.”

That kind of guarded language may not make for great sound bites for either side in the gun debate, but it more accurately reflects Koper’s findings and conclusion.

— Robert Farley

Did the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban Work? - FactCheck.org

the effect of the 'assault weapon ban' was minimal, because 'assault weapons' were rarely used in crimes, even murders.

You have offered nothing to the discussion, just poking at our posts.

What is your solution?

_______________ no limit to fire rate?

_______________ no limit to arsenal size?

_______________ no limit to magazine/drum size?

______________ yes machine guns should be legal?

______________ the more guns the better?

ding! ding! We have a winner, winner, chicken dinner!

And you can't see why using the argument that a particular thing is good for mass murder to support regulation is simplistic?

It's not simplistic. Your argument is. These are guns. Guns designed to kill.
Measures have been taken to mitigate the possibility of attacks in every other way. Cockpit doors are fortified and TSA screens passengers. Cities around the world are working to better protect large gatherings of pedestrians from vehicles. The glaring difference is of course that America has done nothing to address these attacks. Not one thing. In fact, people like you actively fight against it. So when you use arguments like, " ya but...trucks", it is not only simplistic but dumb.

European Cities Add Barriers to Thwart Vehicle Attacks

Theresa May Sums Up A Sobering Reality About U.S. Gun Laws
“Most people would look at this and assume that people in America would be so shocked by this attack that they would want to take some action,” she said.

Theresa May Sums Up A Sobering Reality About U.S. Gun Laws | HuffPost

Oh yeah, let's be like the UK and disarm everybody, then let Muslims in unrestricted so they can murder us with swords, bombs, and illegal guns.

That is part of the problem...start talking about any sort of restrictions and you guys go on about disarming everyone. Almost no one wants that just like almost no one wants heavy armaments in civilisn hands.

Why should machinr guns be legal? They hsve one purpose and one purpose only and that is to kill large numbrts of people very quickly.

The rapid fire coming from those windows was horrific

The amount of bullets he was able to rain down on people has no place in our society.

. Who ever sold that evil bastard the conversion kits to make those weapons operate in that manor should be put out of business in this country forever. Anyone making kits to illegally make a weapon fully automatic like that, needs their doors broken down tonight, and everything they own in such a thing as that to be confiscated, and then they should be put out of business forever in this country... Such equipment should be banned in this country forever. There is NO DAM NEED FOR ANY SUCH MODIFIED WEAPON(S) OF MASS DESTRUCTION AVAILABLE FOR ANYONE TO GET THEIR HANDS ON LIKE THAT. FED-EX, UPS AND OTHERS SHOULD BE NOTIFIED THAT IF THEY SEE ANYTHING COMING FROM COMPANIES THAT WANT TO SELL SUCH A KIT, AND THEN AFTERWARDS THEY WANT TO SHIP SUCH PRODUCTS TO CITIZENS, SHOULD REPORT THEM TO THE FEDS IMMEDIATELY... THESE SHIPPING COMPANIES SHOULD NOT ALLOW THEIR TRUCKS TO ACCEPT SUCH PRODUCTS TO BE SHIPPED OUT EVER. ENOUGH OF THIS HAVING LAWS, BUT THEN WE HAVE ALL THESE CRAZIES GETTING AROUND THE LAWS DUE TO COMPANIES PUTTING THEIR LOVE FOR MONEY OVER THE SAFETY OF THIS NATION AND IT'S PEOPLE. IT DISGUSTED ME THAT THIS CAT HAD A DAM KIT THAT HE PURCHASED IN WHICH ALLOWED HIM TO MODIFY A WEAPON, AND THEN DO THE KIND OF DAMAGE HE DID. NOT AGAINST GUNS, BUT MAKING KITS AVAILABLE TO TURN A WEAPON INTO A WEAPON OF MASS DESTRUCTION ?? HELL NO. The internet companies that sell products that are in the form of kits that can be shipped out to anyone without the proper vetting of these individuals, should be banned or stopped immediately.

 

[Auld Phart]

the effect of the 'assault weapon ban' was minimal, because 'assault weapons' were rarely used in crimes, even murders.

You have offered nothing to the discussion, just poking at our posts.

What is your solution?

_______________ no limit to fire rate?

_______________ no limit to arsenal size?

_______________ no limit to magazine/drum size?

______________ yes machine guns should be legal?

______________ the more guns the better?

ding! ding! We have a winner, winner, chicken dinner!

It's not simplistic. Your argument is. These are guns. Guns designed to kill.
Measures have been taken to mitigate the possibility of attacks in every other way. Cockpit doors are fortified and TSA screens passengers. Cities around the world are working to better protect large gatherings of pedestrians from vehicles. The glaring difference is of course that America has done nothing to address these attacks. Not one thing. In fact, people like you actively fight against it. So when you use arguments like, " ya but...trucks", it is not only simplistic but dumb.

European Cities Add Barriers to Thwart Vehicle Attacks

Theresa May Sums Up A Sobering Reality About U.S. Gun Laws
“Most people would look at this and assume that people in America would be so shocked by this attack that they would want to take some action,” she said.

Theresa May Sums Up A Sobering Reality About U.S. Gun Laws | HuffPost

Oh yeah, let's be like the UK and disarm everybody, then let Muslims in unrestricted so they can murder us with swords, bombs, and illegal guns.

That is part of the problem...start talking about any sort of restrictions and you guys go on about disarming everyone. Almost no one wants that just like almost no one wants heavy armaments in civilisn hands.

Why should machinr guns be legal? They hsve one purpose and one purpose only and that is to kill large numbrts of people very quickly.

The rapid fire coming from those windows was horrific

The amount of bullets he was able to rain down on people has no place in our society.

He had no place in society. For some reason you seem to want to make excuses for him

you forget...

it's not the shooters fault, it's the guns fault

 

[Marion Morrison]

the effect of the 'assault weapon ban' was minimal, because 'assault weapons' were rarely used in crimes, even murders.

You have offered nothing to the discussion, just poking at our posts.

What is your solution?

_______________ no limit to fire rate?

_______________ no limit to arsenal size?

_______________ no limit to magazine/drum size?

______________ yes machine guns should be legal?

______________ the more guns the better?

ding! ding! We have a winner, winner, chicken dinner!

It's not simplistic. Your argument is. These are guns. Guns designed to kill.
Measures have been taken to mitigate the possibility of attacks in every other way. Cockpit doors are fortified and TSA screens passengers. Cities around the world are working to better protect large gatherings of pedestrians from vehicles. The glaring difference is of course that America has done nothing to address these attacks. Not one thing. In fact, people like you actively fight against it. So when you use arguments like, " ya but...trucks", it is not only simplistic but dumb.

European Cities Add Barriers to Thwart Vehicle Attacks

Theresa May Sums Up A Sobering Reality About U.S. Gun Laws
“Most people would look at this and assume that people in America would be so shocked by this attack that they would want to take some action,” she said.

Theresa May Sums Up A Sobering Reality About U.S. Gun Laws | HuffPost

Oh yeah, let's be like the UK and disarm everybody, then let Muslims in unrestricted so they can murder us with swords, bombs, and illegal guns.

That is part of the problem...start talking about any sort of restrictions and you guys go on about disarming everyone. Almost no one wants that just like almost no one wants heavy armaments in civilisn hands.

Why should machinr guns be legal? They hsve one purpose and one purpose only and that is to kill large numbrts of people very quickly.

The rapid fire coming from those windows was horrific

The amount of bullets he was able to rain down on people has no place in our society.

. Who ever sold that evil bastard the conversion kits to make those weapons operate in that manor should be put out of business in this country forever. Anyone making kits to illegally make a weapon fully automatic like that, needs their doors broken down tonight, and everything they own in such a thing as that to be confiscated, and then they should be put out of business forever in this country... Such equipment should be banned in this country forever. There is NO DAM NEED FOR ANY SUCH MODIFIED WEAPON(S) OF MASS DESTRUCTION AVAILABLE FOR ANYONE TO GET THEIR HANDS ON LIKE THAT. FED-EX, UPS AND OTHERS SHOULD BE NOTIFIED THAT IF THEY SEE ANYTHING COMING FROM COMPANIES THAT WANT TO SELL, AND THEN THEY WANT TO SHIP SUCH PRODUCTS TO CITIZENS, TO REPORT THEM TO THE FEDS IMMEDIATELY, AND NOT ALLOW THEIR TRUCKS TO ACCEPT SUCH PRODUCTS TO BE SHIPPED OUT EVER. ENOUGH OF THIS HAVING LAWS, BUT THEN WE HAVE ALL THESE CRAZIES GETTING AROUND THE LAWS DUE TO COMPANIES PUTTING THEIR LOVE FOR MONEY OVER THE SAFETY OF THIS NATION AND IT'S PEOPLE. IT DISGUSTED ME THAT THIS CAT HAD A DAM KIT THAT HE PURCHASED IN WHICH ALLOWED HIM TO DO THE KIND OF DAMAGE HE DID.

^

 

[Vastator]

the effect of the 'assault weapon ban' was minimal, because 'assault weapons' were rarely used in crimes, even murders.

You have offered nothing to the discussion, just poking at our posts.

What is your solution?

_______________ no limit to fire rate?

_______________ no limit to arsenal size?

_______________ no limit to magazine/drum size?

______________ yes machine guns should be legal?

______________ the more guns the better?

ding! ding! We have a winner, winner, chicken dinner!

It's not simplistic. Your argument is. These are guns. Guns designed to kill.
Measures have been taken to mitigate the possibility of attacks in every other way. Cockpit doors are fortified and TSA screens passengers. Cities around the world are working to better protect large gatherings of pedestrians from vehicles. The glaring difference is of course that America has done nothing to address these attacks. Not one thing. In fact, people like you actively fight against it. So when you use arguments like, " ya but...trucks", it is not only simplistic but dumb.

European Cities Add Barriers to Thwart Vehicle Attacks

Theresa May Sums Up A Sobering Reality About U.S. Gun Laws
“Most people would look at this and assume that people in America would be so shocked by this attack that they would want to take some action,” she said.

Theresa May Sums Up A Sobering Reality About U.S. Gun Laws | HuffPost

Oh yeah, let's be like the UK and disarm everybody, then let Muslims in unrestricted so they can murder us with swords, bombs, and illegal guns.

That is part of the problem...start talking about any sort of restrictions and you guys go on about disarming everyone. Almost no one wants that just like almost no one wants heavy armaments in civilisn hands.

Why should machinr guns be legal? They hsve one purpose and one purpose only and that is to kill large numbrts of people very quickly.

The rapid fire coming from those windows was horrific

The amount of bullets he was able to rain down on people has no place in our society.

. Who ever sold that evil bastard the conversion kits to make those weapons operate in that manor should be put out of business in this country forever. Anyone making kits to illegally make a weapon fully automatic like that, needs their doors broken down tonight, and everything they own in such a thing as that to be confiscated, and then they should be put out of business forever in this country... Such equipment should be banned in this country forever. There is NO DAM NEED FOR ANY SUCH MODIFIED WEAPON(S) OF MASS DESTRUCTION AVAILABLE FOR ANYONE TO GET THEIR HANDS ON LIKE THAT. FED-EX, UPS AND OTHERS SHOULD BE NOTIFIED THAT IF THEY SEE ANYTHING COMING FROM COMPANIES THAT WANT TO SELL, AND THEN THEY WANT TO SHIP SUCH PRODUCTS TO CITIZENS, TO REPORT THEM TO THE FEDS IMMEDIATELY, AND NOT ALLOW THEIR TRUCKS TO ACCEPT SUCH PRODUCTS TO BE SHIPPED OUT EVER. ENOUGH OF THIS HAVING LAWS, BUT THEN WE HAVE ALL THESE CRAZIES GETTING AROUND THE LAWS DUE TO COMPANIES PUTTING THEIR LOVE FOR MONEY OVER THE SAFETY OF THIS NATION AND IT'S PEOPLE. IT DISGUSTED ME THAT THIS CAT HAD A DAM KIT THAT HE PURCHASED IN WHICH ALLOWED HIM TO DO THE KIND OF DAMAGE HE DID.

It’s not illegal...

 

[Leo123]

Who ever sold that evil bastard the conversion kits to make those weapons operate in that manor should be put out of business in this country forever. Anyone making kits to illegally make a weapon fully automatic like that, needs their doors broken down tonight, and everything they own in such a thing as that to be confiscated, and then they should be put out of business forever in this country... Such equipment should be banned in this country forever. There is NO DAM NEED FOR ANY SUCH MODIFIED WEAPON(S) OF MASS DESTRUCTION AVAILABLE FOR ANYONE TO GET THEIR HANDS ON LIKE THAT. FED-EX, UPS AND OTHERS SHOULD BE NOTIFIED THAT IF THEY SEE ANYTHING COMING FROM COMPANIES THAT WANT TO SELL, AND THEN THEY WANT TO SHIP SUCH PRODUCTS TO CITIZENS, TO REPORT THEM TO THE FEDS IMMEDIATELY, AND NOT ALLOW THEIR TRUCKS TO ACCEPT SUCH PRODUCTS TO BE SHIPPED OUT EVER. ENOUGH OF THIS HAVING LAWS, BUT THEN WE HAVE ALL THESE CRAZIES GETTING AROUND THE LAWS DUE TO COMPANIES PUTTING THEIR LOVE FOR MONEY OVER THE SAFETY OF THIS NATION AND IT'S PEOPLE. IT DISGUSTED ME THAT THIS CAT HAD A DAM KIT THAT HE PURCHASED IN WHICH ALLOWED HIM TO DO THE KIND OF DAMAGE HE DID.

I heard that that the conversion kits are legal but, to use the gun with one (bump stock kit) installed is illegal. I am guessing that these kits will be made illegal from what I am hearing.

 

[MarkDuffy]

republican solutions today

Get used to it

Republican Senator Has Worst Solution Ever to Mass Shootings

“But I think people are going to have to take steps in their own lives to take precautions. To protect themselves. And in situations like that, you know, try to stay safe. As somebody said — get small.”

GET SMALL

 

[Marion Morrison]

Who ever sold that evil bastard the conversion kits to make those weapons operate in that manor should be put out of business in this country forever. Anyone making kits to illegally make a weapon fully automatic like that, needs their doors broken down tonight, and everything they own in such a thing as that to be confiscated, and then they should be put out of business forever in this country... Such equipment should be banned in this country forever. There is NO DAM NEED FOR ANY SUCH MODIFIED WEAPON(S) OF MASS DESTRUCTION AVAILABLE FOR ANYONE TO GET THEIR HANDS ON LIKE THAT. FED-EX, UPS AND OTHERS SHOULD BE NOTIFIED THAT IF THEY SEE ANYTHING COMING FROM COMPANIES THAT WANT TO SELL, AND THEN THEY WANT TO SHIP SUCH PRODUCTS TO CITIZENS, TO REPORT THEM TO THE FEDS IMMEDIATELY, AND NOT ALLOW THEIR TRUCKS TO ACCEPT SUCH PRODUCTS TO BE SHIPPED OUT EVER. ENOUGH OF THIS HAVING LAWS, BUT THEN WE HAVE ALL THESE CRAZIES GETTING AROUND THE LAWS DUE TO COMPANIES PUTTING THEIR LOVE FOR MONEY OVER THE SAFETY OF THIS NATION AND IT'S PEOPLE. IT DISGUSTED ME THAT THIS CAT HAD A DAM KIT THAT HE PURCHASED IN WHICH ALLOWED HIM TO DO THE KIND OF DAMAGE HE DID.

I heard that that the conversion kits are legal but, to use the gun with one (bump stock kit) installed is illegal. I am guessing that these kits will be made illegal from what I am hearing.

And there goes another degree of freedom taken away. Le sigh.

I have no desire for one, looks like if I ever do, it will be expensive.

 

[Marion Morrison]

It wasn't cheap to set that whole scenario up.

$30K+ in guns alone, that's without scopes, ammo, extra mags.

Certain position in the building in an expensive suite.

I highly doubt the man acted alone.

 

[Pop23]

You have offered nothing to the discussion, just poking at our posts.

What is your solution?

_______________ no limit to fire rate?

_______________ no limit to arsenal size?

_______________ no limit to magazine/drum size?

______________ yes machine guns should be legal?

______________ the more guns the better?

ding! ding! We have a winner, winner, chicken dinner!

Theresa May Sums Up A Sobering Reality About U.S. Gun Laws
“Most people would look at this and assume that people in America would be so shocked by this attack that they would want to take some action,” she said.

Theresa May Sums Up A Sobering Reality About U.S. Gun Laws | HuffPost

Oh yeah, let's be like the UK and disarm everybody, then let Muslims in unrestricted so they can murder us with swords, bombs, and illegal guns.

That is part of the problem...start talking about any sort of restrictions and you guys go on about disarming everyone. Almost no one wants that just like almost no one wants heavy armaments in civilisn hands.

Why should machinr guns be legal? They hsve one purpose and one purpose only and that is to kill large numbrts of people very quickly.

The rapid fire coming from those windows was horrific

The amount of bullets he was able to rain down on people has no place in our society.

He had no place in society. For some reason you seem to want to make excuses for him

you forget...

it's not the shooters fault, it's the guns fault

I think it's hate speech of the left that causes these kinds of actions.

Maybe denying the left their 1st amendment rights will stop these shootings?

 

[Pop23]

republican solutions today

Get used to it

Republican Senator Has Worst Solution Ever to Mass Shootings

“But I think people are going to have to take steps in their own lives to take precautions. To protect themselves. And in situations like that, you know, try to stay safe. As somebody said — get small.”

GET SMALL

In your case, don't take the advise. It's actually pretty good.