Labor Participation Rate Lowest Since 1978 - Yet there are 10 Fold More Working Mom's Now!!!

. The stock market recovered in early 2002.

typical liberal liar !!!!

threats of war drove the Dow down for another year, until October 9, 2002, when it closed at 7,286.27, a 37.8% decline from its peak. No one knew for sure if the bull market had begun until the Dow hit a higher low on March 11, 2003, closing at 7,524.06. Unemployment continued to climb until June 2003, when it reached 6% -- the peak for that recession.
I'm not a conservative, I don't lie like you.

On September 10th, 2001, the Dow closed at 9,606. It fell as low as 8,236 following the 9.11 attacks. By March 19th, 2002, it closed at 10,635; more than a 1000 points higher than before the attacks.

DJI Historical Prices Dow Jones Industrial Average Stock - Yahoo Finance

The Dow (and the other indexes) recovered from 9.11 by March, 2002, just as I said.

And again, you lied when you said all presidents decrease the U6 rate following a recession.

There have been only two since the 1994 U6 changes. And Bush did not reduce it for three years following his first recession.
 
Suuuuure ... Bush was a Liberal like Obama is a conservative. :lmao:

and thats good since Bush was a liberal anyway introducing the first $2 and then $3 trillion budgets.
I'm glad you think it's good that Bush was a Liberal a Obama is a conservative by your standards (those standards being up is down, left is right, etc...). :cuckoo:
 
"highly regulated, which was the cause of the crisis."

You do know what cause means right? PLEASE do me a favor and show that regulation CAUSED the Bankster subprime crisis!

The banks were regulated, and the crisis happened.

That's correlation. PLEASE do what you posited. SHOW CAUSE.



BUT WHO REGULATED THE BANKSTERS?



“When regulators don’t believe in regulation and don’t get what is going on at the companies they oversee, there can be no major white-collar crime prosecutions,”...“If they don’t understand what we call collective embezzlement, where people are literally looting their own firms, then it’s impossible to bring cases.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/14/business/14prosecute.html?pagewanted=all

The FBI correctly identified the epidemic of mortgage control fraud at such an early point that the financial crisis could have been averted had the Bush administration acted with even minimal competence.
'
The Two Documents Everyone Should Read to Better Understand the Crisis William K. Black

Dubya was warned by the FBI of an "epidemic" of mortgage fraud in 2004. He gave them less resources.

FBI saw threat of loan crisis - latimes

Shockingly, the FBI clearly makes the case for the need to combat mortgage fraud in 2005, the height of the housing crisis:

Financial Crimes Report to the Public 2005

FBI Financial Crimes Report 2005

The Bush Rubber Stamp Congress ignored the obvious and extremely detailed and well reported crime spree by the FBI.

THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION and CONGRESS stripped the White Collar Crime divisions of money and manpower.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/19/washington/19fbi.html?pagewanted=all

DUBYA FOUGHT ALL 50 STATE AG'S IN 2003, INVOKING A CIVIL WAR ERA RULE SAYING FEDS RULE ON "PREDATORY" LENDERS!

The free market did not cause the banking crisis, because the banks were not operating under a free market. They were operating under a highly regulated market. So your contention that the free market caused the crisis is blatantly false.

Utter nonsense!

The private lenders were NOT REGULATED and that was how the subprime mortgages were dumped onto the market.

The private lenders were not bailed out. The highly regulated banks were.
Yeah, sure. :rolleyes:

Goldman Sachs received $10 billion in TARP funds.

Using the TARP program, the government lent Morgan Stanley $10 billion.

4 TARP Recipients That Made A Profit - Forbes
 
He said the retired counted as a negative in the labor participation rate.

They aren't a part of the equation.
Dead wrong!

Retired are part of the people in the civilian noninstitutional population 16 years old and over, the denominator of the equation for the LFPR>

The labor force participation rate. This measure is the number of people in the labor force as a percentage of the civilian noninstitutional population 16 years old and over.
 
Dear its down to 5.5 because so many gave up looking for work. Don't forget u6 is 11% and incomes are down for those who work.

Think before you post please.
U-4 is the UE rate that includes the discouraged workers who have given up and is 5.9% not 11%, not the U-6 which includes people who are working.

Think before you lie please.
 
Dear its down to 5.5 because so many gave up looking for work. Don't forget u6 is 11% and incomes are down for those who work.

Think before you post please.
U-4 is the UE rate that includes the discouraged workers who have given up and is 5.9% not 11%, not the U-6 which includes people who are working.

Think before you lie please.
You're asking too much of that one.
 
I'm glad you think it's good that Bush was a Liberal a Obama is a conservative by your standards (those standards being up is down, left is right, etc...). :cuckoo:

Bush introduced first $2 and $3 trillion budgets. Obama is at $4 and makes no secret that he'd love to go higher without current Republicans holding him back.

Does the liberal idiot understand that they are both liberals.
 
Dear its down to 5.5 because so many gave up looking for work. Don't forget u6 is 11% and incomes are down for those who work.

Think before you post please.
U-4 is the UE rate that includes the discouraged workers who have given up and is 5.9% not 11%, not the U-6 which includes people who are working.

Think before you lie please.
Think before you lie please.

dear, if you can point out the lie I will pay you $10,000. Bet?? or run away with your liberal tail between your legs once again.
You already owe me $40,000 from your past lies, this lie now makes $50,000. You know you lied by the part of my post you edited out.
 
I'm glad you think it's good that Bush was a Liberal a Obama is a conservative by your standards (those standards being up is down, left is right, etc...). :cuckoo:

Bush introduced first $2 and $3 trillion budgets. Obama is at $4 and makes no secret that he'd love to go higher without current Republicans holding him back.

Does the liberal idiot understand that they are both liberals.
Does the Right-wing moron understand that they are both CON$ervatives?
 
Dear its down to 5.5 because so many gave up looking for work. Don't forget u6 is 11% and incomes are down for those who work.

Think before you post please.
U-4 is the UE rate that includes the discouraged workers who have given up and is 5.9% not 11%, not the U-6 which includes people who are working.

Think before you lie please.
Think before you lie please.

dear, if you can point out the lie I will pay you $10,000. Bet?? or run away with your liberal tail between your legs once again.
You already owe me $40,000 from your past lies, this lie now makes $50,000. You know you lied by the part of my post you edited out.
dear, if you can point out the lie I will pay you $10,000. Bet?? or run away with your liberal tail between your legs once again.
 
Does the Right-wing moron understand that they[bush and obama] are both CON$ervatives?

Dear, doubling the size of govt from $2 to $4 trillion is hardly conservative by anyone's definition. It has been a liberals wet dream. Liberals are always dissatisfied though because they lack the IQ to understand that the bigger govt gets the worse things are. So, like Stalin, they always want another 5 year plan to correct the problems created by the last one until eventually it results in 60 million slowly starving to death. Now do you understand why our liberals spied for Stalin and Hitler?
 
Dear its down to 5.5 because so many gave up looking for work. Don't forget u6 is 11% and incomes are down for those who work.

Think before you post please.
U-4 is the UE rate that includes the discouraged workers who have given up and is 5.9% not 11%, not the U-6 which includes people who are working.

Think before you lie please.
Think before you lie please.

dear, if you can point out the lie I will pay you $10,000. Bet?? or run away with your liberal tail between your legs once again.
You already owe me $40,000 from your past lies, this lie now makes $50,000. You know you lied by the part of my post you edited out.
dear, if you can point out the lie I will pay you $10,000. Bet?? or run away with your liberal tail between your legs once again.
You always play dumb when you are caught lying.
That's $60,000 you owe me.
 
Dear its down to 5.5 because so many gave up looking for work. Don't forget u6 is 11% and incomes are down for those who work.

Think before you post please.
U-4 is the UE rate that includes the discouraged workers who have given up and is 5.9% not 11%, not the U-6 which includes people who are working.

Think before you lie please.
Think before you lie please.

dear, if you can point out the lie I will pay you $10,000. Bet?? or run away with your liberal tail between your legs once again.
You already owe me $40,000 from your past lies, this lie now makes $50,000. You know you lied by the part of my post you edited out.
dear, if you can point out the lie I will pay you $10,000. Bet?? or run away with your liberal tail between your legs once again.
You always play dumb when you are caught lying.
That's $60,000 you owe me.
dear, if you can point out the lie I will pay you $10,000. Bet?? or run away with your liberal tail between your legs once again.
 
Dear its down to 5.5 because so many gave up looking for work. Don't forget u6 is 11% and incomes are down for those who work.

Think before you post please.
U-4 is the UE rate that includes the discouraged workers who have given up and is 5.9% not 11%, not the U-6 which includes people who are working.

Think before you lie please.
Think before you lie please.

dear, if you can point out the lie I will pay you $10,000. Bet?? or run away with your liberal tail between your legs once again.
You already owe me $40,000 from your past lies, this lie now makes $50,000. You know you lied by the part of my post you edited out.
dear, if you can point out the lie I will pay you $10,000. Bet?? or run away with your liberal tail between your legs once again.
You always play dumb when you are caught lying.
That's $60,000 you owe me.
dear, if you can point out the lie I will pay you $10,000. Bet?? or run away with your liberal tail between your legs once again.
Already did.
You now owe me $70,000.
 
Does the Right-wing moron understand that they[bush and obama] are both CON$ervatives?

Dear, doubling the size of govt from $2 to $4 trillion is hardly conservative by anyone's definition. It has been a liberals wet dream. Liberals are always dissatisfied though because they lack the IQ to understand that the bigger govt gets the worse things are. So, like Stalin, they always want another 5 year plan to correct the problems created by the last one until eventually it results in 60 million slowly starving to death.
As a percentage of GDP, Obama is more Conservative than Reagan, the conservative god of conservatives.... :ack-1:

usgs_line.php


Now do you understand why our liberals spied for Stalin and Hitler?
Liberals defeated the Nazi's. Fascists, Imperialists, and the racist conservatives of the south.

Conservatives defeated the Grenadians :lol:.
 
As a percentage of GDP, Obama is more Conservative than Reagan, the conservative god of conservatives.... :ack-1:

Dear, are stupid are you?? Obama is just the president not the govt. If he had his way we'd have single payer communism in a flash. Only a child assumes the president is the government. And, Reagans spending does not really count since it was mostly military spending to win the cold war, save the world from nuclear anniliation, and free 2 billion from liberal communism.
 
Liberals defeated the Nazi's. Fascists, Imperialists, and the racist conservatives of the south.
.

But not Stalin who they spied for as he was slowly starvig 60 million to death?? How could liberals defeat big govt Nazis socialists when liberals are big govt socialists??
 

Forum List

Back
Top