Oddball
Unobtanium Member
S&H stamps.How does labor get hired if there's no capital?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
S&H stamps.How does labor get hired if there's no capital?
Same thing happened to agriculture...But, strangely, you don't hear the liberoidals pissing and moaning that there aren't enough farming jobs anymore.Labor will always be technology and capital's lil' bitch now. Automation has captured and displaced much of labor's utility to productivity.
You can long for the good ol' days all you want, but they are gone for good.
Capital is king. It takes a hell of a lot less labor now to produce the goods and services we need.
How does labor get hired if there's no capital?
How does labor get hired if there's no capital?
Labor is what first produced the capital.
Lets talk about when humans first started growing crops and quit beinf hunter gatherers for the most part.
Lets talk about when humans first started growing crops and quit beinf hunter gatherers for the most part.
You Leftists are trying to pretend the relative utility of labor to capital has not changed since the hunter gatherer days.
Technology changed those dynamics forever.
What part of that are you have such difficulty grasping?
Lets talk about when humans first started growing crops and quit beinf hunter gatherers for the most part.
You Leftists are trying to pretend the relative utility of labor to capital has not changed since the hunter gatherer days.
Technology changed those dynamics forever.
What part of that are you have such difficulty grasping?
Ohh things have changed due to technology. However no products can be produced with there first being labor.
Lets talk about when humans first started growing crops and quit beinf hunter gatherers for the most part.
You Leftists are trying to pretend the relative utility of labor to capital has not changed since the hunter gatherer days.
Technology changed those dynamics forever.
What part of that are you have such difficulty grasping?
So honest Abe was a liberal after all?
You Leftists are trying to pretend the relative utility of labor to capital has not changed since the hunter gatherer days.
Technology changed those dynamics forever.
What part of that are you have such difficulty grasping?
Ohh things have changed due to technology. However no products can be produced with there first being labor.
Of course labor still has utility. But it no longer has your grandpappy-sleep-on-the-job-half-his-shift-and-run-the-press-a-couple-hours utility.
Labor is the weakhand now in the production of goods and services the world needs.
The 19th century Lincoln quote you are defending is outdated.
Give up.
So honest Abe was a liberal after all?
Was there ever any doubt? Please don't confuse him, however, with today's so called liberals, because they have absolutely nothing in common.
Ohh things have changed due to technology. However no products can be produced with there first being labor.
Of course labor still has utility. But it no longer has your grandpappy-sleep-on-the-job-half-his-shift-and-run-the-press-a-couple-hours utility.
Labor is the weakhand now in the production of goods and services the world needs.
The 19th century Lincoln quote you are defending is outdated.
Give up.
You have a pretty poor view of labor. Did not your father work for a living? And all your ancestors? Or are you a little spoiled pissant who has never had to work for a living?
Of course labor still has utility. But it no longer has your grandpappy-sleep-on-the-job-half-his-shift-and-run-the-press-a-couple-hours utility.
Labor is the weakhand now in the production of goods and services the world needs.
The 19th century Lincoln quote you are defending is outdated.
Give up.
You have a pretty poor view of labor. Did not your father work for a living? And all your ancestors? Or are you a little spoiled pissant who has never had to work for a living?
Seems to me you are conceding the point and now want to abandon arguing labor's utility to productivity versus capital investment, and would now just like to obfuscate and try to characterize me as a hater since you have failed to support your argument.
Sound about right?
Seems to me you are conceding the point and now want to abandon arguing labor's utility to productivity versus capital investment
Seems to me you are conceding the point and now want to abandon arguing labor's utility to productivity versus capital investment
Seems to me you haven't thought through all the implications of this changed reality we have, coupled with attitudes like yours.
It involves lampposts and ropes.
Seems to me you are conceding the point and now want to abandon arguing labor's utility to productivity versus capital investment
Seems to me you haven't thought through all the implications of this changed reality we have, coupled with attitudes like yours.
It involves lampposts and ropes.
Oh, I have certainly thought about it.
But would you not agree that most of the Leftists on this thread are not ready to admit such 'changed reality,' much less start discussing solutions?
I mean, uscitizen is still arguing from a hunter/gatherer perspective.
Oh, I have certainly thought about it.
But would you not agree that most of the Leftists on this thread are not ready to admit such 'changed reality,' much less start discussing solutions?