- Thread starter
- #21
Someone had to stop the murdering Jewish terrorist, the Zionazi government refused to protect the people from him.
Are you intentionally saying things without checking first?
Natan Zada was caught and cuffed by Israeli cops after he killed those people.
What the mob did, those bloodthirsty beasts, was to tear him from the cops hands and then torturing him to death.
which is not any different from his action of terrorism.
All involved, him, and those who killed him, are terrorists.
They should sit 20 years in jail, not only 2~!
I believe it was you who said "terrorists should be shot on sight" or something like that. I'm sure it was.
Is your objection that the cops didn't shoot him?
Correct me if I am wrong, but weren't the families of those shot dead by Natan-Zada denied the normal compensation awarded to Israeli terror victims because Natan-Zada was not a member of any terrorist organization according to the Israeli Defense Ministry, which only considers it an act of terrorism if the attacker is a member of an enemy force against Israel.
Whew...
Now, let is discuss the practice of law and the dispensation of justice...unless of course you would rather accuse me of being someone else or call me names and insult me, which seems to be the most popular form of argument in these parts.
I don't know about that case, but the law regarding terror victims at many times isn't fair. For Jews and for Arabs.
But what is the point of pointing that out? I don't understand.