Kerry's Front Man from 2004 Stripped of Silver Star

And the TeaBotRok continues.

You guys have become less than 20% of those likely to vote and are dropping in numbers.

You are becoming meaningless.
 
Holy toledo!!!!

Back to my own OP. I just finished reading this Daily Mail article which says that Kerry and others backed Sanders despite his guilty plea to the child pornography charges.

And YOWZAH I read the pdf file on his conviction last night and the kiddie porn was sickening. I don't think I would be allowed to put up the link even though it's a court document.

And that S.O.B. tried of a defense of post traumatic stress disorder which drove him to ARE YOU READY TO BAZOOKA BARF? be compulsive about "researching" child pornography.

Aye carumba. What a sicko!

 
Whoopsies hit post instead of preview.

Here's the article link:

Vietnam veteran Wade Sanders who defended John Kerry stripped of Silver Star | Mail Online

At the time, Mr Kerry and others officials presented letters to the court testifying on behalf of his character and service.

Sanders' lawyers had argued that he obtained the graphic images because he was doing research on child pornography.

They also claimed he was driven to conduct that research in part because of post-traumatic stress disorder.
 
Holy toledo!!!!

Back to my own OP. I just finished reading this Daily Mail article which says that Kerry and others backed Sanders despite his guilty plea to the child pornography charges.

And YOWZAH I read the pdf file on his conviction last night and the kiddie porn was sickening. I don't think I would be allowed to put up the link even though it's a court document.

And that S.O.B. tried of a defense of post traumatic stress disorder which drove him to ARE YOU READY TO BAZOOKA BARF? be compulsive about "researching" child pornography.

Aye carumba. What a sicko!

Geez. What a POS.
 
So these are not hundreds of strike combat operations.

And for anyone's need to know, anyone who does not shoot back when shot at is an idiot.





By your logic (do you have any?) then the simplest thing to do is not fly over Libya. No fly over Libya and the Libyans don't shoot at you and thus you don't have to defend yourself.

Simple, so simple a moron could understand it. So why do you have such difficulty?
 
No, you are lying. Obama said from the beginning that the USAF would be in support of the allies once they took the lead. That is what happened.

Quit lying, daveman. You don't get to make up facts.







:lol::lol::lol::lol: Sure stark raving mad. Sure. You're the one who claimed the US isn't dropping bomb and killing Libyans...geez you're a poster child for dupe.:lol::lol::lol:
 
Last edited:
There have been 800 strike missions conducted by American aircraft since March, Fake.

Why do you have to keep lying? Why are you mindlessly defending Obama?

Uhhhh because she's mindless? Just sayin!

Because you guys continue to lie? You have right to your opinions but not your own definitions or facts. Both are against you. :lol:





Sure starkers sure. So tell me, 'cause I'm obviously not on the same planet as you, what exactly do you call 132 weapons deliveries on targets in Libya?
 
westwall, you lack context in nuance. Can you develop your theory that our ECW planes, promised months ago as support for our allies, are dropping munitions? Go ahead. The world wonders.
 
westwall, you lack context in nuance. Can you develop your theory that our ECW planes, promised months ago as support for our allies, are dropping munitions? Go ahead. The world wonders.
Once again, for the willfully ignorant:

AFRICOM: AF, Navy still flying Libya missions - Air Force News | News from Afghanistan & Iraq - Air Force Times
Air Force and Navy aircraft are still flying hundreds of strike missions over Libya despite the Obama administration’s claim that American forces are playing only a limited support role in the NATO operation.

An Africa Command (AFRICOM) spokeswoman confirmed Wednesday that since NATO’s Operation Unified Protector (OUP) took over from the American-led Operation Odyssey Dawn on March 31, the U.S. military has flown hundreds of strike sorties. Previously, Washington had claimed that it was mostly providing intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) and tanker support to NATO forces operating over Libya.

“U.S. aircraft continue to fly support [ISR and refueling] missions, as well as strike sorties under NATO tasking,” AFRICOM spokeswoman Nicole Dalrymple said in an emailed statement. “As of today, and since 31 March, the U.S. has flown a total of 3,475 sorties in support of OUP. Of those, 801 were strike sorties, 132 of which actually dropped ordnance.”​
Obama lied to you, Fake.
 
westwall, you lack context in nuance. Can you develop your theory that our ECW planes, promised months ago as support for our allies, are dropping munitions? Go ahead. The world wonders.





Oh I don't need a theory there stark raving mad. I have simple obsevation. No lawyer speak (you do that very poorly I might add) needed. The USAF reports what they do all the time. There are many sources to get that info. My favorite is a Ian Allen publication called Combat Aircraft which deals with all aspects of military aviation. They have had in- depth reports on the Libyan conflict the last two months.

See? No need to warp your mind around some imaginary messiah, just read a little bit from the other side and open your mind. I know, it's hard to actually be truthful (you are after all a looney) but if you try real hard you may be able to save yourself. I doubt it though. Lefty looneyism is much like a drug addiction. You have to actually want to get better to have a chance.

You havn't hit bottom yet.




Combat Aircraft Magazine
 
There were PLENTY of Vietnam soldiers who agreed with Kerry.Terrible war. Obvious by Nixon's time we couldn't win.

You make me regret that brave American Soldiers died to save your worthless country Warsaw. Why don't you find a forum in Poland? Is Poland and forum an oxymoron?
 
Geesh, where do you clowns get your education? You quoted an unnamed source telling a story from long ago with no verification and used that as your evidence to refute what has been said about Kerry. Do you get it now?

No, I didn't think so. Go to school. You don't even realise what you are saying. My 5 year old understands the English language better then you.

I provided a story about what was told to me by a Navel Captain who was the commanding officer of Kerry's commanding officer. Whether you believe it or not is inconsequential to my life. Get over it, Mary. /B]






Uhhh sweetie it's NAVAL officer, navel is what you stare at in the mirror all day long.


So, spelling is the only argument that you have. Thank you.
 
Yeah, we have one of those uncles too. He served in Korea and knew a man who was shot down twice and twice escaped from North Korean POW camps by commandeering a train. He was awarded the MOH too. That story is as credible as the one you posted.

Why would my wife's uncle lie about this? You just choose to accept what you believe, this is known as ignorance.





Why would my uncle lie about people he knows? People lie all the time to make themselves more important. I choose to believe what I believe based on MANY other people's recollections who were there and who actually did do things. Nothing about Kerry's record adds up. Did he serve? Yes. Was he in harms way? Yes. Did he "earn" the medals involve? Maybe. There are a lot of questions about that. Most of my contacts are in SF and they all categorically say that Kerry's war record has been massaged.

That's their opinion which I value far more than mine on this issue. They were there, I wasn't. They worked within the system and know how it was abused by officers wanting to pad their record to advance their careers.

My wife's uncle made the point that the Swiftboaters refuted Kerry's medals, but their medals were put through by the same officer who ok'd Kerry's medals. This tarnishes their commendations.
 
I provided a story about what was told to me by a Navel Captain who was the commanding officer of Kerry's commanding officer. Whether you believe it or not is inconsequential to my life. Get over it, Mary. /B]






Uhhh sweetie it's NAVAL officer, navel is what you stare at in the mirror all day long.


So, spelling is the only argument that you have. Thank you.






:lol::lol::lol: Sure thing. The fact that multiple people blow holes in your limited ability to comprehend the English language, and your attempt to defend the actions of Kerry with some unnamed, unknown, undocumented "uncles 3rd cousin twice removed from Timbuktu who happens to know Kerry's former commander through a sisters college roomate" gets totally reamed and you claim it is merely your inability to spell simple words that negates your pointles blather.

Sure pal sure.:lol::lol::lol:
 

Forum List

Back
Top