Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Get lost you illiterate fool. "A NATIONAL home for the Jewish people". That just about says it all, it's going to be a JEWISH NATION. That's why they created an Arab Palestine and a Jewish Palestine. Hello?! Anybody home? Knock knock.Nah, I'll take an actual governmental announcement and LEGAL DOCUMENT, rather than your stupid "minutes" which essentially was a LOG of things being discussed.
VOTED UNANIMOUSLY BY 51 MEMBER STATES:
League of Nations Palestine Mandate: July 24, 1922 (28th of Tamuz, 5682)
The Council of the League of Nations:
July 24, 1922
Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have agreed, for the purpose of giving effect to the provisions of Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations, to entrust to a Mandatory selected by the said Powers the administration of the territory of Palestine, which formerly belonged to the Turkish Empire, within such boundaries as may be fixed by them; and
Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have also agreed that the Mandatory should be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 2nd, 1917, by the Government of His Britannic Majesty, and adopted by the said Powers, in favor of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, it being clearly understood that nothing should be done which might prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country; and
Whereas recognition has thereby been given to the historical connection of the Jewish people with Palestine and to the grounds for reconstituting their national home in that country.....
.....
.....
The present instrument shall be deposited in original in the archives of the League of Nations and certified copies shall be forwarded by the Secretary-General of the League of Nations to all members of the League.
Done at London the twenty-fourth day of July, one thousand nine hundred and twenty-two.
You forgot to highlight this bit
it being clearly understood that nothing should be done which might prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine
and the little part that said a national home in Palestine, not a separate Jewish ruled country.
Thanks for confirming the facts.
And 1.8 million Arab Muslims, a quarter of Israel's population, living as Israeli citizens with full rights, means that Israel has more than allowed for the civil and religious rights of the non Jews.
Certainly more than any Islamic shithole that was formed from the remains of the Ottoman empire provides for it's minorities, including the Palestinian Hamas savages and their barbaric Hamas Charter which calls for AN ISLAMIC STATE. Which part of THAT complies to the 1922 league of nations vote? Hee hee hee.
Moron.
The land was Ottoman territory for 700 years and then the entire region was divided by the British and French, which were part of the conquering powers. Although the Arabs had no say whatsoever I what those that controlled the land decided, the entire region was divided into Muslim shitholes except forgone JEWISH nation..The territory West of the Jordan River was supposed to be Israel in the first place. East of the Jordan was supposed to be Arab Palestine. Those Arabs West of the river are invaders and squatters."As long as in this territory west of the Jordan River there is only one political entity called Israel it is going to be either non-Jewish, or non-democratic. If this bloc of millions of Palestinians cannot vote, that will be an apartheid state."
Ehud Olmert
according to whom? The imperialist powers of 1917? That was a long time ago and holds no relevance today.
Stop repeating Arab slogans like you know what you're talking about.
Potatoe, or Potato...who cares?! A Jewish nation in Palestine.Get lost you illiterate fool. "A NATIONAL home for the Jewish people". That just about says it all, it's going to be a JEWISH NATION. That's why they created an Arab Palestine and a Jewish Palestine. Hello?! Anybody home? Knock knock.You forgot to highlight this bit
it being clearly understood that nothing should be done which might prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine
and the little part that said a national home in Palestine, not a separate Jewish ruled country.
Thanks for confirming the facts.
And 1.8 million Arab Muslims, a quarter of Israel's population, living as Israeli citizens with full rights, means that Israel has more than allowed for the civil and religious rights of the non Jews.
Certainly more than any Islamic shithole that was formed from the remains of the Ottoman empire provides for it's minorities, including the Palestinian Hamas savages and their barbaric Hamas Charter which calls for AN ISLAMIC STATE. Which part of THAT complies to the 1922 league of nations vote? Hee hee hee.
Moron.
No, it was never to be a separate nation, as all the source documents demonstrate. You can make things up all you want, punk, but it doesn't make it true. It plainly states a national home in Palestine, which was to become an independent state with Jews and the existing communities as citizens.
They would if Mexico and Italy were next door neighbors. You can't put a simple two and two together. Jordan was supposed to be Arab Palestine. And the proof of that is even in their flag.Oh dear, now you present flags. The Mexican and Italian flags are the same too, does that mean anything?
Because Israel keeps peace off the table and the result is more Islamic frustration, the result, more tension and war, America is turning away slowly from the Zionist entity.
Kerry Warns of Israeli ?Apartheid?
If theres no two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict soon, Israel risks becoming an apartheid state, Secretary of State John Kerry told a room of influential world leaders in a closed-door meeting Friday.
Related Stories
How John Kerry can find success in the ashes of Middle East peace The Week (RSS)
'Pause' perhaps needed in Israeli-Palestinian talks: Obama Reuters
For Washington, Palestinian pact not the end of Middle East peace hopes Reuters
US in 'holding period' in Mideast peace talks AFP
Troubled Mideast peace effort compounds U.S. policy woes in region Reuters
Senior American officials have rarely, if ever, used the term "apartheid" in reference to Israel, and President Obama has previously rejected the idea that the word should apply to Jewish State. Kerry's use of the loaded term is already rankling Jewish leaders in Americaand almost certain to Israeli leaders abroad.
Yes by 1926, Tranjordan which was supposed to be Arab Palestine became Jordan. Point?I usually wait to blow the Zionist bozos out of the water when they post the Trans-Jordan propaganda, but heck I feel like blowing this zionutter out of the water. So, everytime you now post that propaganda map, everyone will realize you are a propagandist and bullshitter after they carefully read the source document below especially the section in bold.
LEAGUE OF NATIONS
PERMANENT MANDATES COMMISSION
MINUTES
OF THE
NINTH SESSION
Held at Geneva from June 8th to 25th, 1926
including the
REPORT OF THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL
Sir F. LUGARD noted a reference on page 8 of the report to two agreements. There was the Hadda Agreement, defining the frontier line between Transjordan and Nejd, and there was an agreement concerning the status of the Transjordan Government, which His Majesty's Government proposed to conclude with the Amir Abdullah but which had not yet been settled.
Colonel SYMES said that the operative part of the Hadda Agreement would be found on page 80 of the report, in which the frontier of Transjordan and Nejd was defined.
Sir F. LUGARD said that the map did not go sufficiently far south to enable the frontier to be traced.
Colonel SYMES said he did not know to what extent the country had been mapped. He would endeavour to obtain a map of the frontier for the Commission.
Sir F. LUGARD enquired whether this delimitation of the frontier would make additional land available for the Jews.
Colonel SYMES said this was improbable. Political opposition to Jewish penetration was very strong in that region and Transjordan was excluded by the mandate from the provisions of the Balfour Declaration.
Sir F. LUGARD enquired whether the southern frontier had yet been delimited.
Colonel SYMES replied in the negative. - See more at: Mandate for Palestine - League of Nations 9th session- Minutes of the Permanent Mandates Commission (25 June 1926)
As the record shows, it was not part of the Balfour Declaration and had nothing to do with the existing (indigenous) non-Jewish communities in Palestine whose civil rights were not to be threatened. As the Mandate states.
Nah, I'll take an actual governmental announcement and LEGAL DOCUMENT, rather than your stupid "minutes" which essentially was a LOG of things being discussed.As the record shows, it was not part of the Balfour Declaration and had nothing to do with the existing (indigenous) non-Jewish communities in Palestine whose civil rights were not to be threatened. As the Mandate states.
VOTED UNANIMOUSLY BY 51 MEMBER STATES:
League of Nations Palestine Mandate: July 24, 1922 (28th of Tamuz, 5682)
The Council of the League of Nations:
July 24, 1922
Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have agreed, for the purpose of giving effect to the provisions of Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations, to entrust to a Mandatory selected by the said Powers the administration of the territory of Palestine, which formerly belonged to the Turkish Empire, within such boundaries as may be fixed by them; and
Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have also agreed that the Mandatory should be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on November 2nd, 1917, by the Government of His Britannic Majesty, and adopted by the said Powers, in favor of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, it being clearly understood that nothing should be done which might prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country; and
Whereas recognition has thereby been given to the historical connection of the Jewish people with Palestine and to the grounds for reconstituting their national home in that country.....
.....
.....
The present instrument shall be deposited in original in the archives of the League of Nations and certified copies shall be forwarded by the Secretary-General of the League of Nations to all members of the League.
Done at London the twenty-fourth day of July, one thousand nine hundred and twenty-two.
You forgot to highlight this bit
it being clearly understood that nothing should be done which might prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine
and the little part that said a national home in Palestine, not a separate Jewish ruled country.
Thanks for confirming the facts.
Get lost you illiterate fool. "A NATIONAL home for the Jewish people". That just about says it all, it's going to be a JEWISH NATION. That's why they created an Arab Palestine and a Jewish Palestine. Hello?! Anybody home? Knock knock.You forgot to highlight this bit
it being clearly understood that nothing should be done which might prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine
and the little part that said a national home in Palestine, not a separate Jewish ruled country.
Thanks for confirming the facts.
And 1.8 million Arab Muslims, a quarter of Israel's population, living as Israeli citizens with full rights, means that Israel has more than allowed for the civil and religious rights of the non Jews.
Certainly more than any Islamic shithole that was formed from the remains of the Ottoman empire provides for it's minorities, including the Palestinian Hamas savages and their barbaric Hamas Charter which calls for AN ISLAMIC STATE. Which part of THAT complies to the 1922 league of nations vote? Hee hee hee.
Moron.
No, it was never to be a separate nation, as all the source documents demonstrate. You can make things up all you want, punk, but it doesn't make it true. It plainly states a national home in Palestine, which was to become an independent state with Jews and the existing communities as citizens.
Well of course there was no such thing as a Palestinian nation, capital, currency, rulers, food, or separate culture ever in history.Of all the stupid Zionist arguments the "there was no Palestine" is undoubtably the stupidist! Denying the existence of someone you have warred with for 66 years is simple lunacy. Quite, quite mad.
Dumbass convert can't understand what the meaning of a national home means? Ha ha ha. Here let me spell it out for you in first grade language. It means the Jewish people get to have their own nation. Not somebody else's nation, their own. That's why it didn't say "Arab national home or "Muslim national home". Comprende MOHOMOD? Study hard you will be quizzed tomorrow on this. This will apply to your Islamic studies GPA.Wow, the facts have left you all dazed and confused. Making up story lines doesn't help your case. The source documents are so clear e.g. separating the term "national home" from the "country" of Palestine that you have to bold and color your fonts in attempt to cloud the issue.
Muslim converts are a special breed of dumb. You smack them in the face with facts and they keep repeating the same Islamic propaganda and lie.Get lost you illiterate fool. "A NATIONAL home for the Jewish people". That just about says it all, it's going to be a JEWISH NATION. That's why they created an Arab Palestine and a Jewish Palestine. Hello?! Anybody home? Knock knock.
And 1.8 million Arab Muslims, a quarter of Israel's population, living as Israeli citizens with full rights, means that Israel has more than allowed for the civil and religious rights of the non Jews.
Certainly more than any Islamic shithole that was formed from the remains of the Ottoman empire provides for it's minorities, including the Palestinian Hamas savages and their barbaric Hamas Charter which calls for AN ISLAMIC STATE. Which part of THAT complies to the 1922 league of nations vote? Hee hee hee.
Moron.
No, it was never to be a separate nation, as all the source documents demonstrate. You can make things up all you want, punk, but it doesn't make it true. It plainly states a national home in Palestine, which was to become an independent state with Jews and the existing communities as citizens.
No mention of any Palestinian nation or a National Home for the Palestinians is their in that agreement. Just the RESURECTION OF THE NATIONAL HOME OF THE JEWS IN PALESTINE. That means the nation of the Jews child once more in Palestine which at the time was 20 times larger that the Palestine you know today. It included Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Jordan and what is now called Palestine.
Now history shows that it was the existing muslim communities that breached the INTERNATIONAL LAW of the time and attacked Israel and the Jews. So under INTERNATIONAL LAW the Jews evicted the enemies and terrorists from the state of Israel to go and live elsewhere.
They would if Mexico and Italy were next door neighbors. You can't put a simple two and two together. Jordan was supposed to be Arab Palestine. ....Oh dear, now you present flags. The Mexican and Italian flags are the same too, does that mean anything?
... can't understand what the meaning of a national home means? Ha ha ha. Here let me spell it out for you in first grade language. It means the Jewish people get to have their own nation. Not somebody else's nation, their own. ...
... can't understand what the meaning of a national home means? Ha ha ha. Here let me spell it out for you in first grade language. It means the Jewish people get to have their own nation. Not somebody else's nation, their own. ...
Actually no.
Many people live at home, yet don't own the building they live in.
Many people live at home and live with others who do own it.
Many people call home somewhere that they don't own, and where they don't live.
Home is a place to go back to, but not always where you need to live.
The term is utterly ambiguous, and intentionally so. British statesmen were smart enough to know how to use language with precision when needed, and if they had wanted to say 'State', they would have said 'State'.
They didn't.
What they DID say was:
"it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious' rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country".
Clever that.
