teapartysamurai
Gold Member
- Mar 27, 2010
- 20,056
- 2,562
- 290
- Thread starter
- #81
Ah, in other words, Nazi comparisons are reprehensible except when they suit your agenda.
Okay, duly noted.
In other words millions of babies dying is less important than YOUR agenda.
Duly noted as well.
So, by your logic, calling George Bush Hitler WOULD be acceptable, because he invaded Iraq and babies were killed.
If you can prove Bush saying that was the direct consequence he wanted from his actions.
I can from liberals!
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6vnOaq7nWU"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6vnOaq7nWU[/ame]
That's what partial birth abortion was about.
It is also what Barack Obama backed in that very state of Illinois:
I was intimately involved in the five-year process to pass the Illinois Born Alive Infant Protection Act, testifying before committees twice that then-state Sen. Barack Obama sat on.
Following are 10 excuses Obama has given through the years for voting "present" and "no" on the Illinois Born Alive Infant Protection Act, or BAIPA.
Obama's 10 reasons for supporting infanticide
Breaking news: New documents show Obama cover-up on born-alive survivors bill
Newly obtained documents prove that in 2003, Barack Obama, as chairman of an IL state Senate committee, voted down a bill to protect live-born survivors of abortion - even after the panel had amended the bill to contain verbatim language, copied from a federal bill passed by Congress without objection in 2002, explicitly foreclosing any impact on abortion. Obama's legislative actions in 2003 - denying effective protection even to babies born alive during abortions - were contrary to the position taken on the same language by even the most liberal members of Congress. The bill Obama killed was virtually identical to the federal bill that even NARAL ultimately did not oppose
Jill Stanek - Breaking news: New documents show Obama cover-up on born-alive survivors bill
This bill was about those babies that survived abortion, not be left to die. Obama was against this bill.
What this abortion doctor did was no different than what is done in a partial birth abortion (WHICH LIBERALS FOUGHT TO KEEP LEGAL) and letting babies die if they survive abortion.
And then you tell me liberals didn't look the other way on this?
All the evidence is on my side guys.
All you guys can do is become hysterical and call me names.
It's pretty obvious who loses this debate.