Kermit Gosnell Drugged, Tied Up Woman Before Forced Abortion

[teapartysamurai]

I think, if it were possible, that the OP has lost her mind even more than before.

Pathetic really.

The evidence is on my side, and all they can do is attack.

Sense the pattern yet?

I'm comprehensively refuting your points, and all you can do is cry about people attacking you.

Once again Carb, the only thing you are refuting is that liberalism, has anything in which to comend itself, except talking points and lies.

 

[mdn2000]

teapartysamurai, what Obama supported was allowing babies who lived after abortion to die.

Abortion is what happens when people believe they are superior in intellect and morals. Countless tragedies are the result of abortion yet its a woman's right to choose. That is any woman of any intelligence, of any or no eductaion, of any age, child or not.

Funny thing, seems Liberals believe anything and everything told to them, they are parrots, at least the majority of them on this board, sensless responses at best. Parrots, if the news tells them this is one psychotic nut, that is what they chirp endlessly.

Only problem, this is not a nut, its a person authorized and supported by specific Liberal morals.

Some say there is no morals in abortion, is this ONE CASE OF THOUSANDS proof of what happens when there are no morals involved.

 

[G.T.]

Pea brain your youtube doesn't involve illegally tying up a woman against her will and all, now does it?

 

[teapartysamurai]

Considering your OP I suggest you take a long hard look in the mirror.

When liberals can't debate the op, they attack you personally.

You just did that.

Makes it pretty obvious, liberals know this is terrible, but they don't want it discussed.

Like I said, the agenda of abortion is more important than the lives ruined or killed.

Proof postive, liberals have no shame, nor conscience.

I'm not attacking you personally TP.

It's merely your ideas, thoughts and harebrained conclusions that are under attack.

Yes, yes.

Just because Barack Obama PERSONALLY FOUGHT to allow abortion doctors to allow babies to die, even if they were born alive has nothing to do with this.

Why did Obama do that? BECAUSE THE AGENDA OF ABORTION WAS MORE IMPORTANT. He made that clear in his objection to the bill.

And after liberals fought like crazy to kill live born babies, as long as their heads were still in the vagina, and fought against saving babies who survived abortions --

NOW WE ARE SUPPOSED TO BELIEVE THEY DIDN'T LOOK THE OTHER WAY ON THIS?

Really? It's crazy to believe that after 20 years of trying to justify killing babies that could fully be born alive, yet killed with partial birth abortion?


[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6vnOaq7nWU"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6vnOaq7nWU[/ame]


That's what partial birth abortion was about.

It is also what Barack Obama backed in that very state of Illinois:

I was intimately involved in the five-year process to pass the Illinois Born Alive Infant Protection Act, testifying before committees twice that then-state Sen. Barack Obama sat on.

Following are 10 excuses Obama has given through the years for voting "present" and "no" on the Illinois Born Alive Infant Protection Act, or BAIPA.

Obama's 10 reasons for supporting infanticide

Breaking news: New documents show Obama cover-up on born-alive survivors bill

Newly obtained documents prove that in 2003, Barack Obama, as chairman of an IL state Senate committee, voted down a bill to protect live-born survivors of abortion - even after the panel had amended the bill to contain verbatim language, copied from a federal bill passed by Congress without objection in 2002, explicitly foreclosing any impact on abortion. Obama's legislative actions in 2003 - denying effective protection even to babies born alive during abortions - were contrary to the position taken on the same language by even the most liberal members of Congress. The bill Obama killed was virtually identical to the federal bill that even NARAL ultimately did not oppose

Jill Stanek - Breaking news: New documents show Obama cover-up on born-alive survivors bill

This bill was about those babies that survived abortion, not be left to die. Obama was against this bill.

What this abortion doctor did was no different than what is done in a partial birth abortion (WHICH LIBERALS FOUGHT TO KEEP LEGAL) and letting babies die if they survive abortion.

And then you tell me liberals didn't look the other way on this?

All the evidence is on my side guys.

All you guys can do is become hysterical and call me names.

It's pretty obvious who loses this debate.

 

[teapartysamurai]

teapartysamurai, what Obama supported was allowing babies who lived after abortion to die.

Abortion is what happens when people believe they are superior in intellect and morals. Countless tragedies are the result of abortion yet its a woman's right to choose. That is any woman of any intelligence, of any or no eductaion, of any age, child or not.

Funny thing, seems Liberals believe anything and everything told to them, they are parrots, at least the majority of them on this board, sensless responses at best. Parrots, if the news tells them this is one psychotic nut, that is what they chirp endlessly.

Only problem, this is not a nut, its a person authorized and supported by specific Liberal morals.

Some say there is no morals in abortion, is this ONE CASE OF THOUSANDS proof of what happens when there are no morals involved.

This thread is living proof that liberals are liars when they say they are for a woman's right to choose.

Because if a WOMAN LIKE ME CHOOSES TO BE AGAINST ABORTION, look at the attacks that come her way.

Liberals are never for choice.

Another lie of theirs exposed by their own obvious actions.

 

[G.T.]

teapartysamurai, what Obama supported was allowing babies who lived after abortion to die.

Abortion is what happens when people believe they are superior in intellect and morals. Countless tragedies are the result of abortion yet its a woman's right to choose. That is any woman of any intelligence, of any or no eductaion, of any age, child or not.

Funny thing, seems Liberals believe anything and everything told to them, they are parrots, at least the majority of them on this board, sensless responses at best. Parrots, if the news tells them this is one psychotic nut, that is what they chirp endlessly.

Only problem, this is not a nut, its a person authorized and supported by specific Liberal morals.

Some say there is no morals in abortion, is this ONE CASE OF THOUSANDS proof of what happens when there are no morals involved.

This thread is living proof that liberals are liars when they say they are for a woman's right to choose.

Because if a WOMAN LIKE ME CHOOSES TO BE AGAINST ABORTION, look at the attacks that come her way.

Liberals are never for choice.

Another lie of theirs exposed by their own obvious actions.

This thread is about a woman who was forcefull drugged and operated on against her will. I'm not seeing the correlation to what *your brain* says is going on. You're a mouth-frothing loon.

 

[teapartysamurai]

Pea brain your youtube doesn't involve illegally tying up a woman against her will and all, now does it?

Oh gosh that's the ONLY thing we are talking about are we?

Not about killing babies after they were born alive. That isn't in the article, right?

OF COURSE you don't want to talk about that.

Or how it's pretty obvious liberals ARE for what happened to these babies.

Twenty years of liberals trying to legalize murderously similiar procedures, make that sadly obvious.

Or are you going to tell me liberals didn't support Clinton when he vetoed the Partial birth abortion ban?

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6vnOaq7nWU"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6vnOaq7nWU[/ame]


That's what partial birth abortion was about.

It is also what Barack Obama backed in that very state of Illinois:

I was intimately involved in the five-year process to pass the Illinois Born Alive Infant Protection Act, testifying before committees twice that then-state Sen. Barack Obama sat on.

Following are 10 excuses Obama has given through the years for voting "present" and "no" on the Illinois Born Alive Infant Protection Act, or BAIPA.

Obama's 10 reasons for supporting infanticide

Breaking news: New documents show Obama cover-up on born-alive survivors bill

Newly obtained documents prove that in 2003, Barack Obama, as chairman of an IL state Senate committee, voted down a bill to protect live-born survivors of abortion - even after the panel had amended the bill to contain verbatim language, copied from a federal bill passed by Congress without objection in 2002, explicitly foreclosing any impact on abortion. Obama's legislative actions in 2003 - denying effective protection even to babies born alive during abortions - were contrary to the position taken on the same language by even the most liberal members of Congress. The bill Obama killed was virtually identical to the federal bill that even NARAL ultimately did not oppose

Jill Stanek - Breaking news: New documents show Obama cover-up on born-alive survivors bill

This bill was about those babies that survived abortion, not be left to die. Obama was against this bill.

What this abortion doctor did was no different than what is done in a partial birth abortion (WHICH LIBERALS FOUGHT TO KEEP LEGAL) and letting babies die if they survive abortion.

And then you tell me liberals didn't look the other way on this?

All the evidence is on my side guys.

All you guys can do is become hysterical and call me names.

It's pretty obvious who loses this debate.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Murder has been legal since Roe v. Wade.

The only question is the age of your victim.

Oh, so this is part of the Holocaust of the unborn as you like to call it?

Only a very small part. Liberals have been trying to enlarge that holocaust for a great number of years:

Aha! So you were attacking Cohen the other day for a 'holocaust' comparison, but, today,

it's okay again.

Hmmmm....would that be hypocrisy? You tell me.

 

[xotoxi]

TPS...do you realize that by implying that liberals support what this guy did is similar to someone saying that conservatives support a gunman who uses his guns to kill a bunch of people?

On second thought...I'm sure you DON'T realize that.

 

[teapartysamurai]

teapartysamurai, what Obama supported was allowing babies who lived after abortion to die.

Abortion is what happens when people believe they are superior in intellect and morals. Countless tragedies are the result of abortion yet its a woman's right to choose. That is any woman of any intelligence, of any or no eductaion, of any age, child or not.

Funny thing, seems Liberals believe anything and everything told to them, they are parrots, at least the majority of them on this board, sensless responses at best. Parrots, if the news tells them this is one psychotic nut, that is what they chirp endlessly.

Only problem, this is not a nut, its a person authorized and supported by specific Liberal morals.

Some say there is no morals in abortion, is this ONE CASE OF THOUSANDS proof of what happens when there are no morals involved.

This thread is living proof that liberals are liars when they say they are for a woman's right to choose.

Because if a WOMAN LIKE ME CHOOSES TO BE AGAINST ABORTION, look at the attacks that come her way.

Liberals are never for choice.

Another lie of theirs exposed by their own obvious actions.

This thread is about a woman who was forcefull drugged and operated on against her will. I'm not seeing the correlation to what *your brain* says is going on. You're a mouth-frothing loon.

No, that's what you are trying to LIMIT this thread to about. YOU didn't make the thread, YOU CAN'T LIMIT IT, Mr. Control freak.

This thread is about the CASE of this man and how he was facillitated by liberals looking the other way.

And he didnt JUST tie this woman up. He also killed babies born alive.

Nice try, but it won't work.


[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6vnOaq7nWU"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6vnOaq7nWU[/ame]


That's what partial birth abortion was about.

It is also what Barack Obama backed in that very state of Illinois:

I was intimately involved in the five-year process to pass the Illinois Born Alive Infant Protection Act, testifying before committees twice that then-state Sen. Barack Obama sat on.

Following are 10 excuses Obama has given through the years for voting "present" and "no" on the Illinois Born Alive Infant Protection Act, or BAIPA.

Obama's 10 reasons for supporting infanticide

Breaking news: New documents show Obama cover-up on born-alive survivors bill

Newly obtained documents prove that in 2003, Barack Obama, as chairman of an IL state Senate committee, voted down a bill to protect live-born survivors of abortion - even after the panel had amended the bill to contain verbatim language, copied from a federal bill passed by Congress without objection in 2002, explicitly foreclosing any impact on abortion. Obama's legislative actions in 2003 - denying effective protection even to babies born alive during abortions - were contrary to the position taken on the same language by even the most liberal members of Congress. The bill Obama killed was virtually identical to the federal bill that even NARAL ultimately did not oppose

Jill Stanek - Breaking news: New documents show Obama cover-up on born-alive survivors bill

This bill was about those babies that survived abortion, not be left to die. Obama was against this bill.

What this abortion doctor did was no different than what is done in a partial birth abortion (WHICH LIBERALS FOUGHT TO KEEP LEGAL) and letting babies die if they survive abortion.

And then you tell me liberals didn't look the other way on this?

All the evidence is on my side guys.

All you guys can do is become hysterical and call me names.

It's pretty obvious who loses this debate.

 

[Ravi]

There was already a law on the books that protected infants born alive, in fact it is still in force...and that Stanek woman should be charged with murder. I'm surprised she hasn't been.

 

[G.T.]

I'm not going to read your drivel, because really, using this illegal act to point to the abortion debate is fucking stupid. Start another thread if you want to argue about abortion, because this illegal act has nothing to do with the argument of abortion.

It's illegal what he did.

Noone wants it to be legal to drug women against their will and abort their babies against their will. You're a crackhead.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Pathetic really.

The evidence is on my side, and all they can do is attack.

Sense the pattern yet?

I'm comprehensively refuting your points, and all you can do is cry about people attacking you.

Once again Carb, the only thing you are refuting is that liberalism, has anything in which to comend itself, except talking points and lies.

I asked you how if Roe v Wade were not in place, it would have prevented this.

Did you answer yet?

 

[bodecea]

TPS...do you realize that by implying that liberals support what this guy did is similar to someone saying that conservatives support a gunman who uses his guns to kill a bunch of people?

On second thought...I'm sure you DON'T realize that.

Actually, I think it's that she doesn't care. The rules of debate are different for her just because....er....they are.

 

[teapartysamurai]

Oh, so this is part of the Holocaust of the unborn as you like to call it?

Only a very small part. Liberals have been trying to enlarge that holocaust for a great number of years:

Aha! So you were attacking Cohen the other day for a 'holocaust' comparison, but, today,

it's okay again.

Hmmmm....would that be hypocrisy? You tell me.

Well nice try but there is one problem with that.

A) Cohen doesn't have any evidence of anyone dying from republicans repealing Obama care.

B) Millions of unborn babies have died from abortions, including those born alive, as is evidenced in this latest case.

C) Liberals have been fighting for the right to kill babies born alive since their fight to kill babies as long as their heads are still in the vagina.

Not even close.

Unless you are telling me Republicans are fighting to stick sharp instruments into the heads of all recipients of Obamacare.

Even when you think you are clever, you always fall short.



[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6vnOaq7nWU"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6vnOaq7nWU[/ame]


That's what partial birth abortion was about.

It is also what Barack Obama backed in that very state of Illinois:

I was intimately involved in the five-year process to pass the Illinois Born Alive Infant Protection Act, testifying before committees twice that then-state Sen. Barack Obama sat on.

Following are 10 excuses Obama has given through the years for voting "present" and "no" on the Illinois Born Alive Infant Protection Act, or BAIPA.

Obama's 10 reasons for supporting infanticide

Breaking news: New documents show Obama cover-up on born-alive survivors bill

Newly obtained documents prove that in 2003, Barack Obama, as chairman of an IL state Senate committee, voted down a bill to protect live-born survivors of abortion - even after the panel had amended the bill to contain verbatim language, copied from a federal bill passed by Congress without objection in 2002, explicitly foreclosing any impact on abortion. Obama's legislative actions in 2003 - denying effective protection even to babies born alive during abortions - were contrary to the position taken on the same language by even the most liberal members of Congress. The bill Obama killed was virtually identical to the federal bill that even NARAL ultimately did not oppose

Jill Stanek - Breaking news: New documents show Obama cover-up on born-alive survivors bill

This bill was about those babies that survived abortion, not be left to die. Obama was against this bill.

What this abortion doctor did was no different than what is done in a partial birth abortion (WHICH LIBERALS FOUGHT TO KEEP LEGAL) and letting babies die if they survive abortion.

And then you tell me liberals didn't look the other way on this?

All the evidence is on my side guys.

All you guys can do is become hysterical and call me names.

It's pretty obvious who loses this debate.

 

[NYcarbineer]

I would like the OP to list all the liberals she can think of who support a woman seeking an abortion to opt OUT of her opportunity to go to a legitimate safe licensed sanitary abortion provider,

and then go off to do business in the illegal abortion market.

You're blaming liberals for that, now name them.

 

[teapartysamurai]

TPS...do you realize that by implying that liberals support what this guy did is similar to someone saying that conservatives support a gunman who uses his guns to kill a bunch of people?

On second thought...I'm sure you DON'T realize that.

No, it's not even close BECAUSE YOU DON'T HAVE THE YEARS OF LEGISLATIVE EVIDENCE I DO.

When you have evidence Republicans are trying to make it EASIER for people like Loughner to kill people do let us know. And that would have to be evidence they DIRECTLY WANTED THEM TO KILL CONGRESS WOMEN.

Because I DO have evidence that liberals DIRECTLY WANTED BABIES BORN ALIVE TO DIE!

Not EVEN CLOSE.

And I will keep posting it, untill it gets through even the thickest liberal head.


[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6vnOaq7nWU"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6vnOaq7nWU[/ame]


That's what partial birth abortion was about.

It is also what Barack Obama backed in that very state of Illinois:

I was intimately involved in the five-year process to pass the Illinois Born Alive Infant Protection Act, testifying before committees twice that then-state Sen. Barack Obama sat on.

Following are 10 excuses Obama has given through the years for voting "present" and "no" on the Illinois Born Alive Infant Protection Act, or BAIPA.

Obama's 10 reasons for supporting infanticide

Breaking news: New documents show Obama cover-up on born-alive survivors bill

Newly obtained documents prove that in 2003, Barack Obama, as chairman of an IL state Senate committee, voted down a bill to protect live-born survivors of abortion - even after the panel had amended the bill to contain verbatim language, copied from a federal bill passed by Congress without objection in 2002, explicitly foreclosing any impact on abortion. Obama's legislative actions in 2003 - denying effective protection even to babies born alive during abortions - were contrary to the position taken on the same language by even the most liberal members of Congress. The bill Obama killed was virtually identical to the federal bill that even NARAL ultimately did not oppose

Jill Stanek - Breaking news: New documents show Obama cover-up on born-alive survivors bill

This bill was about those babies that survived abortion, not be left to die. Obama was against this bill.

What this abortion doctor did was no different than what is done in a partial birth abortion (WHICH LIBERALS FOUGHT TO KEEP LEGAL) and letting babies die if they survive abortion.

And then you tell me liberals didn't look the other way on this?

All the evidence is on my side guys.

All you guys can do is become hysterical and call me names.

It's pretty obvious who loses this debate.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Only a very small part. Liberals have been trying to enlarge that holocaust for a great number of years:

Aha! So you were attacking Cohen the other day for a 'holocaust' comparison, but, today,

it's okay again.

Hmmmm....would that be hypocrisy? You tell me.

Well nice try but there is one problem with that.

A) Cohen doesn't have any evidence of anyone dying from republicans repealing Obama care.

B) Millions of unborn babies have died from abortions, including those born alive, as is evidenced in this latest case.

C) Liberals have been fighting for the right to kill babies born alive since their fight to kill babies as long as their heads are still in the vagina.

Ah, in other words, Nazi comparisons are reprehensible except when they suit your agenda.

Okay, duly noted.

 

[teapartysamurai]

I'm not going to read your drivel, because really, using this illegal act to point to the abortion debate is fucking stupid. Start another thread if you want to argue about abortion, because this illegal act has nothing to do with the argument of abortion.

It's illegal what he did.

Noone wants it to be legal to drug women against their will and abort their babies against their will. You're a crackhead.

In other words you can't get your way on limiting what is said in this thread and you know you are losing, so you are running away.

Boo freaking hoo! The impotent control freak, can't get his way.

But it's all related to this case, because it establishes a pattern of conduct that is EXACTLY what liberals wanted, and their own push in legislation proves it.



[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6vnOaq7nWU"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6vnOaq7nWU[/ame]


That's what partial birth abortion was about.

It is also what Barack Obama backed in that very state of Illinois:

I was intimately involved in the five-year process to pass the Illinois Born Alive Infant Protection Act, testifying before committees twice that then-state Sen. Barack Obama sat on.

Following are 10 excuses Obama has given through the years for voting "present" and "no" on the Illinois Born Alive Infant Protection Act, or BAIPA.

Obama's 10 reasons for supporting infanticide

Breaking news: New documents show Obama cover-up on born-alive survivors bill

Newly obtained documents prove that in 2003, Barack Obama, as chairman of an IL state Senate committee, voted down a bill to protect live-born survivors of abortion - even after the panel had amended the bill to contain verbatim language, copied from a federal bill passed by Congress without objection in 2002, explicitly foreclosing any impact on abortion. Obama's legislative actions in 2003 - denying effective protection even to babies born alive during abortions - were contrary to the position taken on the same language by even the most liberal members of Congress. The bill Obama killed was virtually identical to the federal bill that even NARAL ultimately did not oppose

Jill Stanek - Breaking news: New documents show Obama cover-up on born-alive survivors bill

This bill was about those babies that survived abortion, not be left to die. Obama was against this bill.

What this abortion doctor did was no different than what is done in a partial birth abortion (WHICH LIBERALS FOUGHT TO KEEP LEGAL) and letting babies die if they survive abortion.

And then you tell me liberals didn't look the other way on this?

All the evidence is on my side guys.

All you guys can do is become hysterical and call me names.

It's pretty obvious who loses this debate.

 

[teapartysamurai]

I'm comprehensively refuting your points, and all you can do is cry about people attacking you.

Once again Carb, the only thing you are refuting is that liberalism, has anything in which to comend itself, except talking points and lies.

I asked you how if Roe v Wade were not in place, it would have prevented this.

Did you answer yet?

Geeze Carb, like ages ago! You don't read your replies??????

Email dude! Invest in it! Unlike Obama, it's one investment that costs nothing.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/3248462-post34.html