Kavanaugh Confirmation > 61-39 To Confirm

[skye]

B Kavanaugh WILL be confirmed!

Bless him and his family and wishing him all the best!


....no matter what the Circus on the Left puts up.

End of story, my friends.

 

[busybee01]

It actually looks like the Supreme Court nomination vote will not be a boon for red state Republicans.

"Now, Republicans worry, that line of attack, once an easy blow against conservative Democrats, no longer works—especially in states like North Dakota, where the incumbent Democrat is a woman.

“Assuming there are no new revelations and Kavanaugh is confirmed, I think the biggest impact is that Republicans can’t use SCOTUS as a cudgel against red-state Democrats,” said a Republican strategist working on a 2018 Senate race. “SCOTUS nominations always motivate the base on both sides. I don’t think that’s changed. If anything I think it’s been amplified.”

Indeed, some GOP candidates have stopped mentioning the Supreme Court nomination altogether when attacking their opponents. For example, Indiana businessman Mike Braun, the Republican running against Sen. Joe Donnelly (D-IN) in a state Trump won by 20 points, has not mentioned Kavanaugh in a campaign email ever since Ford went public."

Republicans Fret That Kavanaugh Push Will Crush Them in Midterm Elections

 

[LoneLaugher]

It’s such bullshit that the liberals come up with the bullshit allegations now. It’s a disgrace. When he gets in I can’t wait for him to fuck the liberals every chance he get. He is not going to forget this witch hunt. Liberals better grow eyes in the back of there heads. There pissing the wrong people off.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yeah. That’s the spirit! You know the fucker won’t be impartial as a judge...and you like that.

Idiot.

 

[protectionist]

According to the latest Fox poll, suburban women do not support Kavanaugh by about a 61-30 margin. It looks like suburban women are telling you how they feel.

If the poll is true, what it really reveals is that, in general, suburban women are a bunch of dum dums. Or it could be that most Suburban women who answer polls, are Democrats.

 

[protectionist]

Yeah. That’s the spirit! You know the fucker won’t be impartial as a judge...and you like that.

Idiot.

Like the SCOTUS Democrats have been, huh ? LOL.

 

[DOTR]

I know it’s an unnecessary thing to wish for but I would enjoy seeing a 50-50 vote with Future-President Pence breaking the tie.
Imagine the rage

 

[DOTR]

Don't think so ? Consider that 10 Democrat Senators are in RED STATES that went solidly for Donald Trump in 2016. Consider also that Judge Kavanaugh is President Trump's person pick. So do Senators in 10 states really want to go against the majority of their voters, and right smack dab before the 2018 election ? The answer to that is an unequivocal "No". But don't let just me tell it to you. All you hardened leftists can instead listen to your beloved New York Times tell it to you, by clicking the link at the bottom if this page. View attachment 218170

Byron Dorgan, a former Democratic senator from North Dakota said >> “This close to an election, having an issue this significant out there, it’s not helpful at all to somebody running in a red state,”

This same uneasiness was voiced by Natalie Tennant, a Democrat and former West Virginia secretary of state who ran for the Senate there in 2014. Referring to Senator Manchin, she said: “It’s not easy, if he votes no, people will think he’s against Trump. If he votes yes, they’ll think he’s for Trump."

Senate Republicans may have less to worry about than the liberal media would have us believe. One always has to look past them to get at the truth. In this case, the New York Times, to their credit, has shown more honesty on the subject than most of their liberal media colleagues.

For Red-State Democrats, Accusation Against Kavanaugh Scrambles Midterm Calculus

Bullshit.

There are no 10 states. that are at stake. Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin are either solidly in the Democrat column or are running away with it. The more suburbs there are, the more troublesome the state is for Republicans. McCaskill could very well pull this out becau7se of suburban women either staying home or voting Democrat. The Fox poll shows that rural areas only support Kavanaugh by a 48-39 margin. That is not a strong showing.

I love it when people tell me, a suburban woman, how I'm going to vote. Of course, Dems are very very good at telling people what to think. It's their reason for breathing.

According to the latest Fox poll, suburban women do not support Kavanaugh by about a 61-30 margin. It looks like suburban women are telling you how they feel.

Keep winning those polls. We prefer winning elections.

 

[Billo_Really]

Don't think so ? Consider that 10 Democrat Senators are in RED STATES that went solidly for Donald Trump in 2016. Consider also that Judge Kavanaugh is President Trump's person pick. So do Senators in 10 states really want to go against the majority of their voters, and right smack dab before the 2018 election ? The answer to that is an unequivocal "No". But don't let just me tell it to you. All you hardened leftists can instead listen to your beloved New York Times tell it to you, by clicking the link at the bottom if this page. View attachment 218170

Byron Dorgan, a former Democratic senator from North Dakota said >> “This close to an election, having an issue this significant out there, it’s not helpful at all to somebody running in a red state,”

This same uneasiness was voiced by Natalie Tennant, a Democrat and former West Virginia secretary of state who ran for the Senate there in 2014. Referring to Senator Manchin, she said: “It’s not easy, if he votes no, people will think he’s against Trump. If he votes yes, they’ll think he’s for Trump."

Senate Republicans may have less to worry about than the liberal media would have us believe. One always has to look past them to get at the truth. In this case, the New York Times, to their credit, has shown more honesty on the subject than most of their liberal media colleagues.

For Red-State Democrats, Accusation Against Kavanaugh Scrambles Midterm Calculus

39% of the country is against his confirmation. 38% are for it.

 

[protectionist]

39% of the country is against his confirmation. 38% are for it.

Yeah ? Who told you that ? The mob who chased Ted Cruz out of the restaurant ? LOL.

Let's put it like this. If anybody is really opposed to Kavanaugh's confirmation (not just politically), they need to take some stupid pills, in a hurry.

Oh, CNN it was ? HA HA. Now I'm laughing even louder.

 

[protectionist]

It actually looks like the Supreme Court nomination vote will not be a boon for red state Republicans.

"Now, Republicans worry, that line of attack, once an easy blow against conservative Democrats, no longer works—especially in states like North Dakota, where the incumbent Democrat is a woman.

“Assuming there are no new revelations and Kavanaugh is confirmed, I think the biggest impact is that Republicans can’t use SCOTUS as a cudgel against red-state Democrats,” said a Republican strategist working on a 2018 Senate race. “SCOTUS nominations always motivate the base on both sides. I don’t think that’s changed. If anything I think it’s been amplified.”

Indeed, some GOP candidates have stopped mentioning the Supreme Court nomination altogether when attacking their opponents. For example, Indiana businessman Mike Braun, the Republican running against Sen. Joe Donnelly (D-IN) in a state Trump won by 20 points, has not mentioned Kavanaugh in a campaign email ever since Ford went public."

Republicans Fret That Kavanaugh Push Will Crush Them in Midterm Elections

If I were a Republican candidate, I'd mention Kavanaugh everywhere I went, and I'd also mention the disgraceful lowlifes on the left, and the depths to which they have descended, and disgraced this country.

 

[centerleftFL]

Don't think so ? Consider that 10 Democrat Senators are in RED STATES that went solidly for Donald Trump in 2016. Consider also that Judge Kavanaugh is President Trump's person pick. So do Senators in 10 states really want to go against the majority of their voters, and right smack dab before the 2018 election ? The answer to that is an unequivocal "No". But don't let just me tell it to you. All you hardened leftists can instead listen to your beloved New York Times tell it to you, by clicking the link at the bottom if this page. View attachment 218170

Byron Dorgan, a former Democratic senator from North Dakota said >> “This close to an election, having an issue this significant out there, it’s not helpful at all to somebody running in a red state,”

This same uneasiness was voiced by Natalie Tennant, a Democrat and former West Virginia secretary of state who ran for the Senate there in 2014. Referring to Senator Manchin, she said: “It’s not easy, if he votes no, people will think he’s against Trump. If he votes yes, they’ll think he’s for Trump."

Senate Republicans may have less to worry about than the liberal media would have us believe. One always has to look past them to get at the truth. In this case, the New York Times, to their credit, has shown more honesty on the subject than most of their liberal media colleagues.

For Red-State Democrats, Accusation Against Kavanaugh Scrambles Midterm Calculus

Your math is WRONG cause you are dreaming.

 

[protectionist]

Your math is WRONG cause you are dreaming.

It's not MY math. it's the math of the New York Times. Take it up with them.

And I wasn't dreaming, I was READING. Can you do that ?

 

[Billo_Really]

Yeah ? Who told you that ? The mob who chased Ted Cruz out of the restaurant ? LOL.

Let's put it like this. If anybody is really opposed to Kavanaugh's confirmation (not just politically), they need to take some stupid pills, in a hurry.

Oh, CNN it was ? HA HA. Now I'm laughing even louder.

I provided the link, dumbass. It's not my problem if you don't click it.

Why would anyone be for Kavanaugh?

1. he doesn't answer direct questions
2. the WH won't release over 100,000 documents about him; what are they hiding?
3. he's already lied under oath
4. he thinks the Nixon ruling was wrong
5. he doesn't know shit about law (or the Constitution)
6. he's a corporate whore who can be bought for the highest bidder
7. he's a total fake

 

[rightwinger]

What can motivate Red State Democrats to vote against Kavanaugh, and risk defeat in November ? They have to be fearful of doing that.

What can motivate swing state Republicans to push through a vote on an accused rapist and not lose the women’s vote?

 

[2aguy]

Don't think so ? Consider that 10 Democrat Senators are in RED STATES that went solidly for Donald Trump in 2016. Consider also that Judge Kavanaugh is President Trump's person pick. So do Senators in 10 states really want to go against the majority of their voters, and right smack dab before the 2018 election ? The answer to that is an unequivocal "No". But don't let just me tell it to you. All you hardened leftists can instead listen to your beloved New York Times tell it to you, by clicking the link at the bottom if this page. View attachment 218170

Byron Dorgan, a former Democratic senator from North Dakota said >> “This close to an election, having an issue this significant out there, it’s not helpful at all to somebody running in a red state,”

This same uneasiness was voiced by Natalie Tennant, a Democrat and former West Virginia secretary of state who ran for the Senate there in 2014. Referring to Senator Manchin, she said: “It’s not easy, if he votes no, people will think he’s against Trump. If he votes yes, they’ll think he’s for Trump."

Senate Republicans may have less to worry about than the liberal media would have us believe. One always has to look past them to get at the truth. In this case, the New York Times, to their credit, has shown more honesty on the subject than most of their liberal media colleagues.

For Red-State Democrats, Accusation Against Kavanaugh Scrambles Midterm Calculus

Yes....the democrats have put those 10 democrats into a trick bag......the asshat tactics of the democrats have pissed off Repubicans....so if a democrat votes against Kavanaugh in a Red State now? They will suffer the consequences, where before they might have been okay.

 

[2aguy]

It’s such bullshit that the liberals come up with the bullshit allegations now. It’s a disgrace. When he gets in I can’t wait for him to fuck the liberals every chance he get. He is not going to forget this witch hunt. Liberals better grow eyes in the back of there heads. There pissing the wrong people off.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I don't think they realize this potential for backfire.

They very rarely do, actually. They're not the greatest thinkers the world has ever known.

Yes..... emotion, emotion emotion...that is what the democrats have....Like a Vulcan in heat...

 

[protectionist]

What can motivate swing state Republicans to push through a vote on an accused rapist and not lose the women’s vote?

Intelligence on the part of both the women voters and the swing state Republicans.

 

[Deno]

Don't think so ? Consider that 10 Democrat Senators are in RED STATES that went solidly for Donald Trump in 2016. Consider also that Judge Kavanaugh is President Trump's person pick. So do Senators in 10 states really want to go against the majority of their voters, and right smack dab before the 2018 election ? The answer to that is an unequivocal "No". But don't let just me tell it to you. All you hardened leftists can instead listen to your beloved New York Times tell it to you, by clicking the link at the bottom if this page. View attachment 218170

Byron Dorgan, a former Democratic senator from North Dakota said >> “This close to an election, having an issue this significant out there, it’s not helpful at all to somebody running in a red state,”

This same uneasiness was voiced by Natalie Tennant, a Democrat and former West Virginia secretary of state who ran for the Senate there in 2014. Referring to Senator Manchin, she said: “It’s not easy, if he votes no, people will think he’s against Trump. If he votes yes, they’ll think he’s for Trump."

Senate Republicans may have less to worry about than the liberal media would have us believe. One always has to look past them to get at the truth. In this case, the New York Times, to their credit, has shown more honesty on the subject than most of their liberal media colleagues.

For Red-State Democrats, Accusation Against Kavanaugh Scrambles Midterm Calculus

Bullshit.

There are no 10 states. that are at stake. Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin are either solidly in the Democrat column or are running away with it. The more suburbs there are, the more troublesome the state is for Republicans. McCaskill could very well pull this out becau7se of suburban women either staying home or voting Democrat. The Fox poll shows that rural areas only support Kavanaugh by a 48-39 margin. That is not a strong showing.

I love it when people tell me, a suburban woman, how I'm going to vote. Of course, Dems are very very good at telling people what to think. It's their reason for breathing.

According to the latest Fox poll, suburban women do not support Kavanaugh by about a 61-30 margin. It looks like suburban women are telling you how they feel.

We will soon see won't we...…

I know all the women I know think she is a lying slut.....

 

[Deno]

It actually looks like the Supreme Court nomination vote will not be a boon for red state Republicans.

"Now, Republicans worry, that line of attack, once an easy blow against conservative Democrats, no longer works—especially in states like North Dakota, where the incumbent Democrat is a woman.

“Assuming there are no new revelations and Kavanaugh is confirmed, I think the biggest impact is that Republicans can’t use SCOTUS as a cudgel against red-state Democrats,” said a Republican strategist working on a 2018 Senate race. “SCOTUS nominations always motivate the base on both sides. I don’t think that’s changed. If anything I think it’s been amplified.”

Indeed, some GOP candidates have stopped mentioning the Supreme Court nomination altogether when attacking their opponents. For example, Indiana businessman Mike Braun, the Republican running against Sen. Joe Donnelly (D-IN) in a state Trump won by 20 points, has not mentioned Kavanaugh in a campaign email ever since Ford went public."

Republicans Fret That Kavanaugh Push Will Crush Them in Midterm Elections

BULLSHIT...………..

 

[Deno]

What can motivate Red State Democrats to vote against Kavanaugh, and risk defeat in November ? They have to be fearful of doing that.

What can motivate swing state Republicans to push through a vote on an accused rapist and not lose the women’s vote?

All women are not as stupid as libtard women.....

We are going to ROLL your ASSES in November......