Justices Reject Campaign Finance Limits

Discussion in 'Law and Justice System' started by toomuchtime_, Jan 21, 2010.

  1. toomuchtime_
    Offline

    toomuchtime_ Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2008
    Messages:
    8,926
    Thanks Received:
    1,271
    Trophy Points:
    265
    Ratings:
    +4,764
    http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2010/01/21/us/AP-US-Supreme-Court-Campaign-Finance.html
     
  2. mal
    Offline

    mal Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2009
    Messages:
    42,721
    Thanks Received:
    4,985
    Trophy Points:
    1,850
    Location:
    Coimhéad fearg fhear na foighde™
    Ratings:
    +5,245
    So far, Err Amerika doesn't like it... Although they won't Complain when it Further Assists the Unions.

    :)

    peace...
     
  3. RodISHI
    Offline

    RodISHI Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2008
    Messages:
    16,072
    Thanks Received:
    4,061
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +10,495
    This is a shame and a sham.
     
  4. Ipsl
    Offline

    Ipsl Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2009
    Messages:
    128
    Thanks Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    San Jose CA
    Ratings:
    +4
    fucking ridiculous
     
  5. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    41,188
    Thanks Received:
    6,387
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +11,068
  6. Avatar4321
    Offline

    Avatar4321 Diamond Member Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    75,719
    Thanks Received:
    9,033
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Ratings:
    +16,823
    Freedom of speech triumphs again.
     
  7. Liability
    Offline

    Liability Locked Account. Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2009
    Messages:
    35,447
    Thanks Received:
    5,047
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Mansion in Ravi's Head
    Ratings:
    +5,063
    5 out of 9 Justices determined that the First Amendment actually means what it says.

    4 out of the 9 expressed deep concern that free speech has implications. And they are right. It does.

    There are appropriate ways to deal with the concerns expressed by the dissenters. Stifling free speech is not one of them.

    Bravo for the integrity shown by this slim majority!

    :clap2:
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  8. Truthmatters
    Offline

    Truthmatters BANNED

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    80,182
    Thanks Received:
    2,224
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +2,239
    Last edited: Jan 21, 2010
  9. del
    Offline

    del BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2008
    Messages:
    45,052
    Thanks Received:
    9,826
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +9,893
    i blame bush
     
  10. WillowTree
    Online

    WillowTree Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    71,189
    Thanks Received:
    10,795
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +18,130
    :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
     

Share This Page