Justices Reject Campaign Finance Limits

Discussion in 'Law and Justice System' started by toomuchtime_, Jan 21, 2010.

  1. toomuchtime_
    Offline

    toomuchtime_ Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2008
    Messages:
    6,469
    Thanks Received:
    866
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,762
    http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2010/01/21/us/AP-US-Supreme-Court-Campaign-Finance.html
     
  2. mal
    Offline

    mal Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2009
    Messages:
    42,627
    Thanks Received:
    4,962
    Trophy Points:
    1,815
    Location:
    Coimhéad fearg fhear na foighde™
    Ratings:
    +5,033
    So far, Err Amerika doesn't like it... Although they won't Complain when it Further Assists the Unions.

    :)

    peace...
     
  3. RodISHI
    Offline

    RodISHI Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2008
    Messages:
    10,749
    Thanks Received:
    1,932
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +5,358
    This is a shame and a sham.
     
  4. Ipsl
    Offline

    Ipsl Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2009
    Messages:
    128
    Thanks Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    San Jose CA
    Ratings:
    +4
    fucking ridiculous
     
  5. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,995
    Thanks Received:
    6,017
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +9,487
  6. Avatar4321
    Offline

    Avatar4321 Diamond Member Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    71,060
    Thanks Received:
    8,279
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Ratings:
    +12,746
    Freedom of speech triumphs again.
     
  7. Liability
    Offline

    Liability Locked Account. Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2009
    Messages:
    35,447
    Thanks Received:
    5,050
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Mansion in Ravi's Head
    Ratings:
    +5,065
    5 out of 9 Justices determined that the First Amendment actually means what it says.

    4 out of the 9 expressed deep concern that free speech has implications. And they are right. It does.

    There are appropriate ways to deal with the concerns expressed by the dissenters. Stifling free speech is not one of them.

    Bravo for the integrity shown by this slim majority!

    :clap2:
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  8. Truthmatters
    Offline

    Truthmatters BANNED

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    80,182
    Thanks Received:
    2,223
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +2,233
    Last edited: Jan 21, 2010
  9. del
    Offline

    del BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2008
    Messages:
    45,052
    Thanks Received:
    9,830
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +9,886
    i blame bush
     
  10. WillowTree
    Offline

    WillowTree Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    68,928
    Thanks Received:
    10,358
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +15,790
    :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
     

Share This Page