Jarhead
Gold Member
- Jan 11, 2010
- 20,670
- 2,378
- 245
It's funny how it's SUCH a round number, isn't it? I mean, he didn't say he created 96,000 jobs or 108,000 jobs. It's 100,000. Now, what are the chances that the number would be such a round number? It's not likely. I think he just plucked the number out of thin air.
you have to be kidding me with that analysis.
Only a partisan hack would claim that he truly meant exactly 100K
Imagine the outrage if it works out that Bains created 99,999 jobs!
Only hacks like Mustang will be outraged.
Ravi will say..."I guess he was telling the truth"...even if the number is a mere 90,000.