Journalist Says Underage Girls Were on "Many" of Clinton's Trips on Epstein Plane

[Harpy Eagle]

I do not. He is a sexual predator that has forced himself on women but has no history of doing so with underage girls.

I do not think it has any more validity than the stories that have come out about Trump and the 13 year old.

Ok I’ll take your word at face value. If you could just answer one more question. What do you think his intentions were every time he flew to an island with a guy who brings underage girls there for sex?

I have not seen any evidence he has been to the island, just that he flew on his plane.

All the stories about him being to the island are from far right conspiracy theory websites.

Bwaaaahhhhhaaaaaa. So when Epsteins plane landed, Slick Willie just stayed on the plane? Oh you are just as funny as a jackass.

The plane goes to more than one location.

So what you are saying is that instead of using Air Force one for Slick Willies trips out of the US, he chummed up with Epstein and used his jet to get around?

Even the fucked up CT sites do not say that he flew on that plane while he was POTUS. The former POTUS no longer gets to use AF1

 

[farmer]

This story only comes up at top on a duckduckgo.com search engine, my new default browser. Uncensored.

Flight logs show Bill Clinton flew on sex offender's jet much more than previously known

But it gets worse. Conchita Sarnoff, who has dedicated years to interviewing insiders, maybe Epstein pilots, for her book, says

“I have read too much information and I have spoken to too many people on the inside” to take Clinton’s statement at its word, Sarnoff said.

“I actually attempted to interview Clinton but he would not, he did not agree to do so.”

“I know from the pilot logs — and these are pilot logs that you know were written by different pilots and at different times — that Clinton went, he was a guest of Epstein’s 27 times,” she told host Shannon Bream. “Many of those times Clinton had his Secret Service with him, and many times he did not.

“Almost every time that Clinton’s name is on the pilot’s logs, there are underage girls. There are initials and there are names of many, many girls on that private plane.”

She is now is now the executive director of the advocacy group Alliance to Rescue Victims of Trafficking in DC.

fox reported it in 2016

still is the story he flew on more that was now or that he did fly on these flights

Well since you open the can of worms

how many flights did Trump take
View attachment 270493

Lets not forget Pleasure Island that Epstein owned and the black book

Yeah you can talk about Clinton but it Trump Time now

Still as FOX reported this story about Clinton, they did not even mention Trump

View attachment 270496

Was Donald J. Trump (Democrat) the president of the US in 1991? Was William Jefferson Clinton (Rapist) president of the US in 1991? Just asking?

To answer your question, neither one was president in1991.

 

[Paulie]

Amazing how willing people are to believe a boom that tells them what they think is true but every other book is just someone trying to make a buck.

Answer one question please. Do you believe bill clinton was involved in sexual encounters with underage girls?

(New here) I'll quit noting that soon enough.

Here is the problem. There are many names tied to Epstein. I have no idea if Clinton or Trump ever did anything illegal but the problem is, it's believable with both of them that they did.

We wouldn't be having these conversations about Jimmy Carter.

It’s definitely believable that either Clinton or trump are womanizers. They’re wealthy men and they live that life and I don’t really care whether or not they’re faithful to their wives. Clinton clearly only has a wife because he ran for various high office most of his adult life and bachelors don’t get to be president. I’m not sure why trump ever got married but it’s none of my business what he and another adult choose to do sexually. But Clinton has the most direct, recent, and frequent ties to Epstein and is known for being on his plane with underage girls. Trump doesn’t have that same connection and it affords him the benefit of the doubt in this case. That is the difference.

 

[pknopp]

Amazing how willing people are to believe a boom that tells them what they think is true but every other book is just someone trying to make a buck.

Answer one question please. Do you believe bill clinton was involved in sexual encounters with underage girls?

(New here) I'll quit noting that soon enough.

Here is the problem. There are many names tied to Epstein. I have no idea if Clinton or Trump ever did anything illegal but the problem is, it's believable with both of them that they did.

We wouldn't be having these conversations about Jimmy Carter.

It’s definitely believable that either Clinton or trump are womanizers. They’re wealthy men and they live that life and I don’t really care whether or not they’re faithful to their wives. Clinton clearly only has a wife because he ran for various high office most of his adult life and bachelors don’t get to be president. I’m not sure why trump ever got married but it’s none of my business what he and another adult choose to do sexually. But Clinton has the most direct, recent, and frequent ties to Epstein and is known for being on his plane with underage girls. Trump doesn’t have that same connection and it affords him the benefit of the doubt in this case. That is the difference.

I don't disagree that Clinton is tied closer to this but that really is not my argument. My argument is that it's a sad state of affairs that it's believable concerning both of them.

We should demand better.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Ok I’ll take your word at face value. If you could just answer one more question. What do you think his intentions were every time he flew to an island with a guy who brings underage girls there for sex?

I have not seen any evidence he has been to the island, just that he flew on his plane.

All the stories about him being to the island are from far right conspiracy theory websites.

Bwaaaahhhhhaaaaaa. So when Epsteins plane landed, Slick Willie just stayed on the plane? Oh you are just as funny as a jackass.

The plane goes to more than one location.

So what you are saying is that instead of using Air Force one for Slick Willies trips out of the US, he chummed up with Epstein and used his jet to get around?

Even the fucked up CT sites do not say that he flew on that plane while he was POTUS. The former POTUS no longer gets to use AF1

Dipshit, it was in the 1990's that Bill Clinton was jetting around with Epstein, dont yah think it would look bad if Bill had fucked under age girls on that plane? Of course but when you can use a buddies plane to get away with it, then as typical of liberals do what feels good.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Amazing how willing people are to believe a boom that tells them what they think is true but every other book is just someone trying to make a buck.

Answer one question please. Do you believe bill clinton was involved in sexual encounters with underage girls?

(New here) I'll quit noting that soon enough.

Here is the problem. There are many names tied to Epstein. I have no idea if Clinton or Trump ever did anything illegal but the problem is, it's believable with both of them that they did.

We wouldn't be having these conversations about Jimmy Carter.

It’s definitely believable that either Clinton or trump are womanizers. They’re wealthy men and they live that life and I don’t really care whether or not they’re faithful to their wives. Clinton clearly only has a wife because he ran for various high office most of his adult life and bachelors don’t get to be president. I’m not sure why trump ever got married but it’s none of my business what he and another adult choose to do sexually. But Clinton has the most direct, recent, and frequent ties to Epstein and is known for being on his plane with underage girls. Trump doesn’t have that same connection and it affords him the benefit of the doubt in this case. That is the difference.

I don't disagree that Clinton is tied closer to this but that really is not my argument. My argument is that it's a sad state of affairs that it's believable concerning both of them.

We should demand better.

Of course, that is the marginalization of liberalism again. If Bill did it, then of course Trump did, but Bill was a sitting president, Trump if he did was a Democrat Businessman. Both bad, but a president would never rape a woman or young girl, right?

 

[Paulie]

Amazing how willing people are to believe a book that tells them what they think is true but every other book is just someone trying to make a buck.

It may or may not be true, but it's certainly not hard to imagine.

The same exact thing is said by the Trump haters with every book that has come out and painted him in bad light. That is how these books get any sale at all, they are geared towards the wingnuts

That’s fine, but the problem is the major media spends all it’s tjme trying to connect trump to Epstein and keeps the Clinton connection as quiet as possible so it creates a narrative that trump should be suspected of being guilty as well when there’s another president with far more of a direct and troubling connection and they don’t want it to be included in the debate. Why?

 

[pknopp]

Amazing how willing people are to believe a boom that tells them what they think is true but every other book is just someone trying to make a buck.

Answer one question please. Do you believe bill clinton was involved in sexual encounters with underage girls?

(New here) I'll quit noting that soon enough.

Here is the problem. There are many names tied to Epstein. I have no idea if Clinton or Trump ever did anything illegal but the problem is, it's believable with both of them that they did.

We wouldn't be having these conversations about Jimmy Carter.

It’s definitely believable that either Clinton or trump are womanizers. They’re wealthy men and they live that life and I don’t really care whether or not they’re faithful to their wives. Clinton clearly only has a wife because he ran for various high office most of his adult life and bachelors don’t get to be president. I’m not sure why trump ever got married but it’s none of my business what he and another adult choose to do sexually. But Clinton has the most direct, recent, and frequent ties to Epstein and is known for being on his plane with underage girls. Trump doesn’t have that same connection and it affords him the benefit of the doubt in this case. That is the difference.

I don't disagree that Clinton is tied closer to this but that really is not my argument. My argument is that it's a sad state of affairs that it's believable concerning both of them.

We should demand better.

Of course, that is the marginalization of liberalism again. If Bill did it, then of course Trump did, but Bill was a sitting president, Trump if he did was a Democrat Businessman. Both bad, but a president would never rape a woman or young girl, right?

I did not argue that Trump did it. I said it was sad that it would be easily believable unlike with Jimmy Carter or even George Bush.

Trump did brag that he was able to get away with prancing around nude teenager. I believe we can do better than either without much effort.

 

[Paulie]

Amazing how willing people are to believe a boom that tells them what they think is true but every other book is just someone trying to make a buck.

Answer one question please. Do you believe bill clinton was involved in sexual encounters with underage girls?

(New here) I'll quit noting that soon enough.

Here is the problem. There are many names tied to Epstein. I have no idea if Clinton or Trump ever did anything illegal but the problem is, it's believable with both of them that they did.

We wouldn't be having these conversations about Jimmy Carter.

It’s definitely believable that either Clinton or trump are womanizers. They’re wealthy men and they live that life and I don’t really care whether or not they’re faithful to their wives. Clinton clearly only has a wife because he ran for various high office most of his adult life and bachelors don’t get to be president. I’m not sure why trump ever got married but it’s none of my business what he and another adult choose to do sexually. But Clinton has the most direct, recent, and frequent ties to Epstein and is known for being on his plane with underage girls. Trump doesn’t have that same connection and it affords him the benefit of the doubt in this case. That is the difference.

I don't disagree that Clinton is tied closer to this but that really is not my argument. My argument is that it's a sad state of affairs that it's believable concerning both of them.

We should demand better.

That’s the point I’m trying to make though, I don’t see why it’s “believable” with trump. It’s definitely believable that he’s a womanizer and probably isn’t actually in love with melania and vice versa. That’s a believable thing about him because his MO has always been to bang hot women. I wouldn’t put it past him to make questionable advances towards women in general either. But I say WOMEN because I see no other connection between trump and anything that indicates he crosses the line into underage. I would’ve said the same thing about bill Clinton until I saw that he spent quite a lot of his free time with Epstein on a plane known for carrying underage girls to epstein’s Island. That’s the difference here. The Clinton/Epstein connection is troubling and strange. I don’t see that with trump but if anyone has anything as damning as the flight logs showing Clinton’s name 27 different times I’d love to have a peek at it

 

[CrusaderFrank]

What, if anything, will be left of the Socialist democrat Party after PedoGate and FisaGate?

 

[pknopp]

Amazing how willing people are to believe a boom that tells them what they think is true but every other book is just someone trying to make a buck.

Answer one question please. Do you believe bill clinton was involved in sexual encounters with underage girls?

(New here) I'll quit noting that soon enough.

Here is the problem. There are many names tied to Epstein. I have no idea if Clinton or Trump ever did anything illegal but the problem is, it's believable with both of them that they did.

We wouldn't be having these conversations about Jimmy Carter.

It’s definitely believable that either Clinton or trump are womanizers. They’re wealthy men and they live that life and I don’t really care whether or not they’re faithful to their wives. Clinton clearly only has a wife because he ran for various high office most of his adult life and bachelors don’t get to be president. I’m not sure why trump ever got married but it’s none of my business what he and another adult choose to do sexually. But Clinton has the most direct, recent, and frequent ties to Epstein and is known for being on his plane with underage girls. Trump doesn’t have that same connection and it affords him the benefit of the doubt in this case. That is the difference.

I don't disagree that Clinton is tied closer to this but that really is not my argument. My argument is that it's a sad state of affairs that it's believable concerning both of them.

We should demand better.

That’s the point I’m trying to make though, I don’t see why it’s “believable” with trump. It’s definitely believable that he’s a womanizer and probably isn’t actually in love with melanoma and vice versa. That’s a believable thing about him because his MO has always been to bang hot women. I wouldn’t put it past him to make questionable advances towards women in general either. But I say WOMEN because I see no other connection between trunk and anything that indicates he crosses the line into underage. I would’ve said the same thing about bill Clinton until I saw that he spent quite a lot of his free time with Epstein on a plane known for carrying underage girls to epstein’s Island. That’s the difference here. The Clinton/Epstein connection is troubling and strange. I don’t see that either trump but if anyone has anything as damning as the flight logs showing Clinton’s name 27 different times I’d love to have a peek at it

I can't link yet but we have credible information that Trump did indeed walk into a dressing room with naked teen age girls. That's simply not something a decent person does.

Being a creep does not make you a pedophile. My argument is it wouldn't be surprising. My argument is that we can and should do better.

Question......you are the president. He knows what Epstein did. Knowing what Epstein did, could you have nominated Acosta for your cabinet?

 

[Mac1958]

I wonder how many bombshell news stories we've had over the last ten years that turned out to be either fantasy or distortion or false assumption.

I don't think my abacus goes up that high. And yet, we just assume they're true if they're bad for the other tribe.

WE'VE REALLY GOT HIM/HER NOW, THIS IS THE BIG ONE

Doesn't this get old for anyone?
.

 

[Dragonlady]

Interesting that blurb on the back cover of the book says that this book will have implications for the 2016 election, yet I don't recall ever hearing about it or even a discussion of it from the media. Clearly, it did not have implications on the election, or it had far fewer implications than the lies told about Donald Trump.

I personally hope that everyone named in this book is thoroughly investigated and if found to been involved, charged and if guilty, convicted. Regardless of who they are.

This article was discussed extensively in the 2016 Campaign. The FOX News article which is linked in the OP is dated May 13, 2016. This seems to be the Official Trump News Network response to the MSNBC.com clip of Donald Trump prancing about and mauling cheerleaders half his age, and leering and pointing at them with Jeffrey Epstein.



I also note that NONE of Epstein's girls have implicated or even mentioned President Clinton, but that one of Epstein's girls sued Donald Trump for rape.

 

[Paulie]

Answer one question please. Do you believe bill clinton was involved in sexual encounters with underage girls?

(New here) I'll quit noting that soon enough.

Here is the problem. There are many names tied to Epstein. I have no idea if Clinton or Trump ever did anything illegal but the problem is, it's believable with both of them that they did.

We wouldn't be having these conversations about Jimmy Carter.

It’s definitely believable that either Clinton or trump are womanizers. They’re wealthy men and they live that life and I don’t really care whether or not they’re faithful to their wives. Clinton clearly only has a wife because he ran for various high office most of his adult life and bachelors don’t get to be president. I’m not sure why trump ever got married but it’s none of my business what he and another adult choose to do sexually. But Clinton has the most direct, recent, and frequent ties to Epstein and is known for being on his plane with underage girls. Trump doesn’t have that same connection and it affords him the benefit of the doubt in this case. That is the difference.

I don't disagree that Clinton is tied closer to this but that really is not my argument. My argument is that it's a sad state of affairs that it's believable concerning both of them.

We should demand better.

That’s the point I’m trying to make though, I don’t see why it’s “believable” with trump. It’s definitely believable that he’s a womanizer and probably isn’t actually in love with melanoma and vice versa. That’s a believable thing about him because his MO has always been to bang hot women. I wouldn’t put it past him to make questionable advances towards women in general either. But I say WOMEN because I see no other connection between trunk and anything that indicates he crosses the line into underage. I would’ve said the same thing about bill Clinton until I saw that he spent quite a lot of his free time with Epstein on a plane known for carrying underage girls to epstein’s Island. That’s the difference here. The Clinton/Epstein connection is troubling and strange. I don’t see that either trump but if anyone has anything as damning as the flight logs showing Clinton’s name 27 different times I’d love to have a peek at it

I can't link yet but we have credible information that Trump did indeed walk into a dressing room with naked teen age girls. That's simply not something a decent person does.

Being a creep does not make you a pedophile. My argument is it wouldn't be surprising. My argument is that we can and should do better.

Question......you are the president. He knows what Epstein did. Knowing what Epstein did, could you have nominated Acosta for your cabinet?

I don’t give trump much credit on who he surrounds himself with in the White House. He doesn’t seem to be a very good judge of character and he doesn’t seem to know who the real deep state is, but I believe his overall intentions are for the good of the country. I don’t know why he picked Acosta. But I don’t know why he picked kavanaugh either when there’s such better judges to choose from.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I have not seen any evidence he has been to the island, just that he flew on his plane.

All the stories about him being to the island are from far right conspiracy theory websites.

Bwaaaahhhhhaaaaaa. So when Epsteins plane landed, Slick Willie just stayed on the plane? Oh you are just as funny as a jackass.

The plane goes to more than one location.

So what you are saying is that instead of using Air Force one for Slick Willies trips out of the US, he chummed up with Epstein and used his jet to get around?

Even the fucked up CT sites do not say that he flew on that plane while he was POTUS. The former POTUS no longer gets to use AF1

Dipshit, it was in the 1990's that Bill Clinton was jetting around with Epstein, dont yah think it would look bad if Bill had fucked under age girls on that plane? Of course but when you can use a buddies plane to get away with it, then as typical of liberals do what feels good.

No it was not dumbfuck, it was the early 2000s. At least get your CTs right if you are going to parrot them.

 

[Paulie]

I don’t believe trump is the savior of the world like the left saw Obama. I think economically he’s the best possible person we could have making THOSE decisions but he’s not perfect by any means. But I don’t think he’s a child molester.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Amazing how willing people are to believe a book that tells them what they think is true but every other book is just someone trying to make a buck.

It may or may not be true, but it's certainly not hard to imagine.

The same exact thing is said by the Trump haters with every book that has come out and painted him in bad light. That is how these books get any sale at all, they are geared towards the wingnuts

That’s fine, but the problem is the major media spends all it’s tjme trying to connect trump to Epstein and keeps the Clinton connection as quiet as possible so it creates a narrative that trump should be suspected of being guilty as well when there’s another president with far more of a direct and troubling connection and they don’t want it to be included in the debate. Why?

The left media spends all its time trying to connect trump to Epstein and keeps the Clinton connection as quiet as possible while the right wing media spends all its time trying to connect Clinton to Epstein and keeps the Trump connection as quiet as possible.

That is what the media in this country does, it is as useless as tits on a boar.

 

[pknopp]

(New here) I'll quit noting that soon enough.

Here is the problem. There are many names tied to Epstein. I have no idea if Clinton or Trump ever did anything illegal but the problem is, it's believable with both of them that they did.

We wouldn't be having these conversations about Jimmy Carter.

It’s definitely believable that either Clinton or trump are womanizers. They’re wealthy men and they live that life and I don’t really care whether or not they’re faithful to their wives. Clinton clearly only has a wife because he ran for various high office most of his adult life and bachelors don’t get to be president. I’m not sure why trump ever got married but it’s none of my business what he and another adult choose to do sexually. But Clinton has the most direct, recent, and frequent ties to Epstein and is known for being on his plane with underage girls. Trump doesn’t have that same connection and it affords him the benefit of the doubt in this case. That is the difference.

I don't disagree that Clinton is tied closer to this but that really is not my argument. My argument is that it's a sad state of affairs that it's believable concerning both of them.

We should demand better.

That’s the point I’m trying to make though, I don’t see why it’s “believable” with trump. It’s definitely believable that he’s a womanizer and probably isn’t actually in love with melanoma and vice versa. That’s a believable thing about him because his MO has always been to bang hot women. I wouldn’t put it past him to make questionable advances towards women in general either. But I say WOMEN because I see no other connection between trunk and anything that indicates he crosses the line into underage. I would’ve said the same thing about bill Clinton until I saw that he spent quite a lot of his free time with Epstein on a plane known for carrying underage girls to epstein’s Island. That’s the difference here. The Clinton/Epstein connection is troubling and strange. I don’t see that either trump but if anyone has anything as damning as the flight logs showing Clinton’s name 27 different times I’d love to have a peek at it

I can't link yet but we have credible information that Trump did indeed walk into a dressing room with naked teen age girls. That's simply not something a decent person does.

Being a creep does not make you a pedophile. My argument is it wouldn't be surprising. My argument is that we can and should do better.

Question......you are the president. He knows what Epstein did. Knowing what Epstein did, could you have nominated Acosta for your cabinet?

I don’t give trump much credit on who he surrounds himself with in the White House. He doesn’t seem to be a very good judge of character and he doesn’t seem to know who the real deep state is, but I believe his overall intentions are for the good of the country. I don’t know why he picked Acosta. But I don’t know why he picked kavanaugh either when there’s such better judges to choose from.

So your argument seems to be that he is not a very good judge of character. I won't argue that.

 

[Faun]

Amazing how willing people are to believe a boom that tells them what they think is true but every other book is just someone trying to make a buck.

Do you always marginalize the rape of young girls?

Ah, great to see someone on the right standing up for Katie Johnson.

 

[Paulie]

Amazing how willing people are to believe a book that tells them what they think is true but every other book is just someone trying to make a buck.

It may or may not be true, but it's certainly not hard to imagine.

The same exact thing is said by the Trump haters with every book that has come out and painted him in bad light. That is how these books get any sale at all, they are geared towards the wingnuts

That’s fine, but the problem is the major media spends all it’s tjme trying to connect trump to Epstein and keeps the Clinton connection as quiet as possible so it creates a narrative that trump should be suspected of being guilty as well when there’s another president with far more of a direct and troubling connection and they don’t want it to be included in the debate. Why?

The left media spends all its time trying to connect trump to Epstein and keeps the Clinton connection as quiet as possible while the right wing media spends all its time trying to connect Clinton to Epstein and keeps the Trump connection as quiet as possible.

That is what the media in this country does, it is as useless as tits on a boar.

Useless to us, yeah. But extremely useful to the powers that be because unless the mainstream media says it most people won’t believe it. And it’s that thought process right there that gets used against us. It’s not as easy as just writing it off as something meaningless. It’s kind of the root of a lot of our problems in this country