Zhukov
VIP Member
Z=Obvious? And precisely what are these obvious reasons I assume you have proof of?
L= Already asked and answered.
Actually you provided your opinions and called them obvious reasons.
Z= Perhaps he's waiting until Kerry is the Democratic nominee in fact, and not just in all likelihood. I haven't heard President Bush decline the offer to debate, have you?
L= Kerry's winning in Illinois puts him over the top for the Democratic nominee. So, are you saying Bush is ready to debate?
Has the Democratic National Convention come and gone already?
John Kerry's nomination at his convention will be an (perhaps the) acme of his popularity during this campaign season. There is no sense debating him until after that wave of support has subsided somewhat. This is not an obvious reason, this is my opinion.
L= Maybe you can't recognize negative campaign ads when you hear them
When all the ad does is describe a Senator's voting record, one either recognizes it as negative or truthfull depending on which side of the aisle they sit apparently.
L= Have you ever had those paranoia tendencies checked?
No.
Z= Any mention of Kerry's voting record as a Senator is automatically considered negative campainging. How convenient.
L= No... just the negative campaigning. If you want a substantive discussion of Kerry's voting record then use a forum where both sides can speak on it.
I just want to know why any questions regarding anything about John Kerry at all is labeled an attack. This isn't a question we'll see asked in any debate I'd wager.