Joe diGenova: What To Expect From The Horowitz IG Report

[BULLDOG]

Conservatives are sure don’t seem to mind being strung along. Hope is always around the corner.

yea, like 2 years of RUSSIA.
like bogus RAPE charges will stop someone you simply don't like from being on SCOTUS
like you found a new way to beat trump at the polls

this is why i view you as a leftist tool. cause you say shit that is purely driven to support ONE side and speak in benign stereotypes as if you're including everyone in your 2nd grade swipes.

but hey - keep hoping that this bullshit parade will get to trump. it's all you have left over there, on the left. well til your next bucket of bullshit is handed to you by pelosi and company.

It took 2 years just to convince the conservatives that Russia actually was involved in election interference.

And STILL to this day Trump is babbling on about some loony Ukraine theory regarding the hack of the DNC.

so tell me - exactly what did russia do? no theories. no supposition. facts. what did they do.

and governments jack with elections. hell we overthew saddam and forced our own system on them. seems we want to cry like a stuck pig and go FOUL FOUL *only* cause it can impact trump / excuse the left.

as for the DNC hack - i'm sorry. that was never proven nor looked into. don't give me a copy of something and tell me all is good, you got what you need. the left has gotten away with that shit for a long time.

you want my e-mails? hold on. (can we alter the headers? NO??? DAMMIT - send them paper copies while we think of something else!)

so prove something more than just you love to whine.

Just to be clear, are you actually claiming that the hack of the DNC server was never “looked at”?

Are you aware of what Mueller was doing for 2 years?

Also, overthrowing Saddam was not “jacking with elections”. Saddam was not elected. Just didn’t want that one to slip by.

i'm saying the physical server was never looked at, no.

and forcing a country to hold elections in our style after ousting their government is certainly worse than putting ads on facebook to get people fighting.

There was no physical server dumb ass. It was kept on the cloud.

 

[iceberg]

so tell me - exactly what did russia do? no theories. no supposition. facts. what did they do.

and governments jack with elections. hell we overthew saddam and forced our own system on them. seems we want to cry like a stuck pig and go FOUL FOUL *only* cause it can impact trump / excuse the left.

as for the DNC hack - i'm sorry. that was never proven nor looked into. don't give me a copy of something and tell me all is good, you got what you need. the left has gotten away with that shit for a long time.

you want my e-mails? hold on. (can we alter the headers? NO??? DAMMIT - send them paper copies while we think of something else!)

so prove something more than just you love to whine.

What a crock of lying crap....

so tell me - what exactly did russia do? you fail to show this cause you're busy just shouting out bullshit. when you're done shouting, show what russia did, how they did it, and provide links/proof to these "ads" that changed the world.

or keep being an idiot.

your call.

It's NOBODY'S job to tell you anything. All 17 of our investigative agencies agree that Russia hacked our elections. If that isn't good enough for you, then you are an idiot.

That is actually an outright lie.

This talking point is getting tiring. Russia did not hack the elections. They ran a trolling ad farm. There is a MASSIVE difference.

Does Putin pay you for spreading misinformation, or do you just do it because that's what right wingers do?

then provide the links to the 17 agencies. last i looked only a few of those would look into cyber crime or situations like this.

Twitter

in fact, only 4 looked into it. they said 17 to give you and others like you a bigger number to increase your "rage". how cute. it worked. so who is spreading mis-information? you and SEVENTEEN AGENCIES, or others saying "bullshit"?

that would be you.

 

[joaquinmiller]

Expect that Trump supporters will not believe the Horowitz Report when it comes out, or the Durham Report when it comes out.

Trump and FOX will tell them what to believe.

 

[BULLDOG]

It took 2 years just to convince the conservatives that Russia actually was involved in election interference.

And STILL to this day Trump is babbling on about some loony Ukraine theory regarding the hack of the DNC.

so tell me - exactly what did russia do? no theories. no supposition. facts. what did they do.

and governments jack with elections. hell we overthew saddam and forced our own system on them. seems we want to cry like a stuck pig and go FOUL FOUL *only* cause it can impact trump / excuse the left.

as for the DNC hack - i'm sorry. that was never proven nor looked into. don't give me a copy of something and tell me all is good, you got what you need. the left has gotten away with that shit for a long time.

you want my e-mails? hold on. (can we alter the headers? NO??? DAMMIT - send them paper copies while we think of something else!)

so prove something more than just you love to whine.

What a crock of lying crap....

so tell me - what exactly did russia do? you fail to show this cause you're busy just shouting out bullshit. when you're done shouting, show what russia did, how they did it, and provide links/proof to these "ads" that changed the world.

or keep being an idiot.

your call.

It's NOBODY'S job to tell you anything. All 17 of our investigative agencies agree that Russia hacked our elections. If that isn't good enough for you, then you are an idiot.

please provide proof they hacked our elections.

and *all 17 agencies*? please list these agencies and their relevance into such an investigation.

Again, it's not my job to educate you. If you don't even know the basic facts, you should look it up, and then try again.

 

[iceberg]

yea, like 2 years of RUSSIA.
like bogus RAPE charges will stop someone you simply don't like from being on SCOTUS
like you found a new way to beat trump at the polls

this is why i view you as a leftist tool. cause you say shit that is purely driven to support ONE side and speak in benign stereotypes as if you're including everyone in your 2nd grade swipes.

but hey - keep hoping that this bullshit parade will get to trump. it's all you have left over there, on the left. well til your next bucket of bullshit is handed to you by pelosi and company.

It took 2 years just to convince the conservatives that Russia actually was involved in election interference.

And STILL to this day Trump is babbling on about some loony Ukraine theory regarding the hack of the DNC.

so tell me - exactly what did russia do? no theories. no supposition. facts. what did they do.

and governments jack with elections. hell we overthew saddam and forced our own system on them. seems we want to cry like a stuck pig and go FOUL FOUL *only* cause it can impact trump / excuse the left.

as for the DNC hack - i'm sorry. that was never proven nor looked into. don't give me a copy of something and tell me all is good, you got what you need. the left has gotten away with that shit for a long time.

you want my e-mails? hold on. (can we alter the headers? NO??? DAMMIT - send them paper copies while we think of something else!)

so prove something more than just you love to whine.

Just to be clear, are you actually claiming that the hack of the DNC server was never “looked at”?

Are you aware of what Mueller was doing for 2 years?

Also, overthrowing Saddam was not “jacking with elections”. Saddam was not elected. Just didn’t want that one to slip by.

i'm saying the physical server was never looked at, no.

and forcing a country to hold elections in our style after ousting their government is certainly worse than putting ads on facebook to get people fighting.

There was no physical server dumb ass. It was kept on the cloud.

great. then look at the original cloud server, not a lot of snapshots. you'd never allow trump or others to look at "copies" of evidence but demand full access. is it any wonder you don't want the same for YOUR side?

 

[iceberg]

so tell me - exactly what did russia do? no theories. no supposition. facts. what did they do.

and governments jack with elections. hell we overthew saddam and forced our own system on them. seems we want to cry like a stuck pig and go FOUL FOUL *only* cause it can impact trump / excuse the left.

as for the DNC hack - i'm sorry. that was never proven nor looked into. don't give me a copy of something and tell me all is good, you got what you need. the left has gotten away with that shit for a long time.

you want my e-mails? hold on. (can we alter the headers? NO??? DAMMIT - send them paper copies while we think of something else!)

so prove something more than just you love to whine.

What a crock of lying crap....

so tell me - what exactly did russia do? you fail to show this cause you're busy just shouting out bullshit. when you're done shouting, show what russia did, how they did it, and provide links/proof to these "ads" that changed the world.

or keep being an idiot.

your call.

It's NOBODY'S job to tell you anything. All 17 of our investigative agencies agree that Russia hacked our elections. If that isn't good enough for you, then you are an idiot.

please provide proof they hacked our elections.

and *all 17 agencies*? please list these agencies and their relevance into such an investigation.

Again, it's not my job to educate you. If you don't even know the basic facts, you should look it up, and then try again.

i did refute you and pointed out there were only 4 who were qualified and in fact did look. you're the stupid moistened bint saying SEVENTEEN YOU FOOL. and you can't even name them nor back up your idiocy.

go figure.

 

[BULLDOG]

It took 2 years just to convince the conservatives that Russia actually was involved in election interference.

And STILL to this day Trump is babbling on about some loony Ukraine theory regarding the hack of the DNC.

so tell me - exactly what did russia do? no theories. no supposition. facts. what did they do.

and governments jack with elections. hell we overthew saddam and forced our own system on them. seems we want to cry like a stuck pig and go FOUL FOUL *only* cause it can impact trump / excuse the left.

as for the DNC hack - i'm sorry. that was never proven nor looked into. don't give me a copy of something and tell me all is good, you got what you need. the left has gotten away with that shit for a long time.

you want my e-mails? hold on. (can we alter the headers? NO??? DAMMIT - send them paper copies while we think of something else!)

so prove something more than just you love to whine.

Just to be clear, are you actually claiming that the hack of the DNC server was never “looked at”?

Are you aware of what Mueller was doing for 2 years?

Also, overthrowing Saddam was not “jacking with elections”. Saddam was not elected. Just didn’t want that one to slip by.

i'm saying the physical server was never looked at, no.

and forcing a country to hold elections in our style after ousting their government is certainly worse than putting ads on facebook to get people fighting.

There was no physical server dumb ass. It was kept on the cloud.

great. then look at the original cloud server, not a lot of snapshots. you'd never allow trump or others to look at "copies" of evidence but demand full access. is it any wonder you don't want the same for YOUR side?

You don't understand how the cloud works, do you? You are an idiot.

 

[BULLDOG]

What a crock of lying crap....

so tell me - what exactly did russia do? you fail to show this cause you're busy just shouting out bullshit. when you're done shouting, show what russia did, how they did it, and provide links/proof to these "ads" that changed the world.

or keep being an idiot.

your call.

It's NOBODY'S job to tell you anything. All 17 of our investigative agencies agree that Russia hacked our elections. If that isn't good enough for you, then you are an idiot.

please provide proof they hacked our elections.

and *all 17 agencies*? please list these agencies and their relevance into such an investigation.

Again, it's not my job to educate you. If you don't even know the basic facts, you should look it up, and then try again.

i did refute you and pointed out there were only 4 who were qualified and in fact did look. you're the stupid moistened bint saying SEVENTEEN YOU FOOL. and you can't even name them nor back up your idiocy.

go figure.

You refuted nothing. You tried to repeat a Hannity diatribe, but you even failed at that.

 

[colfax_m]

It took 2 years just to convince the conservatives that Russia actually was involved in election interference.

And STILL to this day Trump is babbling on about some loony Ukraine theory regarding the hack of the DNC.

so tell me - exactly what did russia do? no theories. no supposition. facts. what did they do.

and governments jack with elections. hell we overthew saddam and forced our own system on them. seems we want to cry like a stuck pig and go FOUL FOUL *only* cause it can impact trump / excuse the left.

as for the DNC hack - i'm sorry. that was never proven nor looked into. don't give me a copy of something and tell me all is good, you got what you need. the left has gotten away with that shit for a long time.

you want my e-mails? hold on. (can we alter the headers? NO??? DAMMIT - send them paper copies while we think of something else!)

so prove something more than just you love to whine.

Just to be clear, are you actually claiming that the hack of the DNC server was never “looked at”?

Are you aware of what Mueller was doing for 2 years?

Also, overthrowing Saddam was not “jacking with elections”. Saddam was not elected. Just didn’t want that one to slip by.

i'm saying the physical server was never looked at, no.

and forcing a country to hold elections in our style after ousting their government is certainly worse than putting ads on facebook to get people fighting.

There was no physical server dumb ass. It was kept on the cloud.

great. then look at the original cloud server, not a lot of snapshots. you'd never allow trump or others to look at "copies" of evidence but demand full access. is it any wonder you don't want the same for YOUR side?

Do you think that unless they examine the original hardware, you cannot determine the origin of the hack?

 

[kyzr]

Expect that Trump supporters will not believe the Horowitz Report when it comes out, or the Durham Report when it comes out.

Trump and FOX will tell them what to believe.

We'll believe the reports as they are:
1. Horowitz can only investigate current Federal employees
2. Durham can investigate and interview and subpoena anyone

So the Durham report should generate more indictments than the Horowitz report.
What happens happens, then bring on impeachment and the 2020 election.

 

[iceberg]

so tell me - exactly what did russia do? no theories. no supposition. facts. what did they do.

and governments jack with elections. hell we overthew saddam and forced our own system on them. seems we want to cry like a stuck pig and go FOUL FOUL *only* cause it can impact trump / excuse the left.

as for the DNC hack - i'm sorry. that was never proven nor looked into. don't give me a copy of something and tell me all is good, you got what you need. the left has gotten away with that shit for a long time.

you want my e-mails? hold on. (can we alter the headers? NO??? DAMMIT - send them paper copies while we think of something else!)

so prove something more than just you love to whine.

Just to be clear, are you actually claiming that the hack of the DNC server was never “looked at”?

Are you aware of what Mueller was doing for 2 years?

Also, overthrowing Saddam was not “jacking with elections”. Saddam was not elected. Just didn’t want that one to slip by.

i'm saying the physical server was never looked at, no.

and forcing a country to hold elections in our style after ousting their government is certainly worse than putting ads on facebook to get people fighting.

There was no physical server dumb ass. It was kept on the cloud.

great. then look at the original cloud server, not a lot of snapshots. you'd never allow trump or others to look at "copies" of evidence but demand full access. is it any wonder you don't want the same for YOUR side?

Do you think that unless they examine the original hardware, you cannot determine the origin of the hack?

i think when given a copy, a lot can change.

if trump said he was hacked, but only provided you a copy of his machine, do you trust it to be all there? authentic? i wouldn't. i would want to examine what he said was hacked. not a copy. not his blessed version. the actual server.

 

[iceberg]

so tell me - what exactly did russia do? you fail to show this cause you're busy just shouting out bullshit. when you're done shouting, show what russia did, how they did it, and provide links/proof to these "ads" that changed the world.

or keep being an idiot.

your call.

It's NOBODY'S job to tell you anything. All 17 of our investigative agencies agree that Russia hacked our elections. If that isn't good enough for you, then you are an idiot.

please provide proof they hacked our elections.

and *all 17 agencies*? please list these agencies and their relevance into such an investigation.

Again, it's not my job to educate you. If you don't even know the basic facts, you should look it up, and then try again.

i did refute you and pointed out there were only 4 who were qualified and in fact did look. you're the stupid moistened bint saying SEVENTEEN YOU FOOL. and you can't even name them nor back up your idiocy.

go figure.

You refuted nothing. You tried to repeat a Hannity diatribe, but you even failed at that.

YOU SAID SEVENTEEN.
i said 4.

17 intelligence agencies or 4, Russia findings still valid

it was only 4. now you just attack and be a little bitch cause you got owned by your own standards.

 

[BULLDOG]

Just to be clear, are you actually claiming that the hack of the DNC server was never “looked at”?

Are you aware of what Mueller was doing for 2 years?

Also, overthrowing Saddam was not “jacking with elections”. Saddam was not elected. Just didn’t want that one to slip by.

i'm saying the physical server was never looked at, no.

and forcing a country to hold elections in our style after ousting their government is certainly worse than putting ads on facebook to get people fighting.

There was no physical server dumb ass. It was kept on the cloud.

great. then look at the original cloud server, not a lot of snapshots. you'd never allow trump or others to look at "copies" of evidence but demand full access. is it any wonder you don't want the same for YOUR side?

Do you think that unless they examine the original hardware, you cannot determine the origin of the hack?

i think when given a copy, a lot can change.

if trump said he was hacked, but only provided you a copy of his machine, do you trust it to be all there? authentic? i wouldn't. i would want to examine what he said was hacked. not a copy. not his blessed version. the actual server.

Sure you would, but you have no idea what the best practices require. That's why we have specialists in certain things instead of just relying on someone who doesn't understand how things work.

 

[iceberg]

i'm saying the physical server was never looked at, no.

and forcing a country to hold elections in our style after ousting their government is certainly worse than putting ads on facebook to get people fighting.

There was no physical server dumb ass. It was kept on the cloud.

great. then look at the original cloud server, not a lot of snapshots. you'd never allow trump or others to look at "copies" of evidence but demand full access. is it any wonder you don't want the same for YOUR side?

Do you think that unless they examine the original hardware, you cannot determine the origin of the hack?

i think when given a copy, a lot can change.

if trump said he was hacked, but only provided you a copy of his machine, do you trust it to be all there? authentic? i wouldn't. i would want to examine what he said was hacked. not a copy. not his blessed version. the actual server.

Sure you would, but you have no idea what the best practices require. That's why we have specialists in certain things instead of just relying on someone who doesn't understand how things work.

been in IT for 30 years. yea, i have an idea.

now - you yell at someone for spreading false narratives yet you then in the same sentence scream SEVENTEEN AGENCIES LOOKED INTO IT!

i have proven that is a false narrative. why are you not chiding yourself for spreading lies?

 

[FA_Q2]

so tell me - exactly what did russia do? no theories. no supposition. facts. what did they do.

and governments jack with elections. hell we overthew saddam and forced our own system on them. seems we want to cry like a stuck pig and go FOUL FOUL *only* cause it can impact trump / excuse the left.

as for the DNC hack - i'm sorry. that was never proven nor looked into. don't give me a copy of something and tell me all is good, you got what you need. the left has gotten away with that shit for a long time.

you want my e-mails? hold on. (can we alter the headers? NO??? DAMMIT - send them paper copies while we think of something else!)

so prove something more than just you love to whine.

What a crock of lying crap....

so tell me - what exactly did russia do? you fail to show this cause you're busy just shouting out bullshit. when you're done shouting, show what russia did, how they did it, and provide links/proof to these "ads" that changed the world.

or keep being an idiot.

your call.

It's NOBODY'S job to tell you anything. All 17 of our investigative agencies agree that Russia hacked our elections. If that isn't good enough for you, then you are an idiot.

That is actually an outright lie.

This talking point is getting tiring. Russia did not hack the elections. They ran a trolling ad farm. There is a MASSIVE difference.

Does Putin pay you for spreading misinformation, or do you just do it because that's what right wingers do?

Not a rightwinger. Not getting paid.

And our election was still not hacked.

 

[BULLDOG]

It's NOBODY'S job to tell you anything. All 17 of our investigative agencies agree that Russia hacked our elections. If that isn't good enough for you, then you are an idiot.

please provide proof they hacked our elections.

and *all 17 agencies*? please list these agencies and their relevance into such an investigation.

Again, it's not my job to educate you. If you don't even know the basic facts, you should look it up, and then try again.

i did refute you and pointed out there were only 4 who were qualified and in fact did look. you're the stupid moistened bint saying SEVENTEEN YOU FOOL. and you can't even name them nor back up your idiocy.

go figure.

You refuted nothing. You tried to repeat a Hannity diatribe, but you even failed at that.

YOU SAID SEVENTEEN.
i said 4.

17 intelligence agencies or 4, Russia findings still valid

it was only 4. now you just attack and be a little bitch cause you got owned by your own standards.

Yes, 17 intelligence agencies really did say Russia was behind hacking

 

[Seawytch]

What a crock of lying crap....

so tell me - what exactly did russia do? you fail to show this cause you're busy just shouting out bullshit. when you're done shouting, show what russia did, how they did it, and provide links/proof to these "ads" that changed the world.

or keep being an idiot.

your call.

It's NOBODY'S job to tell you anything. All 17 of our investigative agencies agree that Russia hacked our elections. If that isn't good enough for you, then you are an idiot.

That is actually an outright lie.

This talking point is getting tiring. Russia did not hack the elections. They ran a trolling ad farm. There is a MASSIVE difference.

Does Putin pay you for spreading misinformation, or do you just do it because that's what right wingers do?

Not a rightwinger. Not getting paid.

And our election was still not hacked.

Yes, it was. They hacked the servers at the RNC and the DNC and selectively leaked only the Democrats information. That's the definition of hacked. And then there is this.

Russia Targeted Election Systems in All 50 States, Report Finds

 

[iceberg]

please provide proof they hacked our elections.

and *all 17 agencies*? please list these agencies and their relevance into such an investigation.

Again, it's not my job to educate you. If you don't even know the basic facts, you should look it up, and then try again.

i did refute you and pointed out there were only 4 who were qualified and in fact did look. you're the stupid moistened bint saying SEVENTEEN YOU FOOL. and you can't even name them nor back up your idiocy.

go figure.

You refuted nothing. You tried to repeat a Hannity diatribe, but you even failed at that.

YOU SAID SEVENTEEN.
i said 4.

17 intelligence agencies or 4, Russia findings still valid

it was only 4. now you just attack and be a little bitch cause you got owned by your own standards.

Yes, 17 intelligence agencies really did say Russia was behind hacking
View attachment 293945

17 intelligence agencies or 4, Russia findings still valid
All 17 Intelligence Agencies Did Not Say Russia Hacked Election | Heavy.com
Politifact concluded that 17 agencies had, indeed, agreed on this because “the U.S. Intelligence Community is made up of 17 agencies.” However, the 17 agencies had not independently made the assessment, as many believed. Politifact mentioned this in the story, but still said the statement was correct.

FACT CHECK: Did 17 Intel Agencies ‘All Agree’ Russia Influenced The Presidential Election?
Hillary Clinton -- Democratic Emails Hacked by Russia | National Review
What Clinton said was false and misleading. First of all, only two intelligence entities – the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) – have weighed in on this issue, not 17 intelligence agencies. And what they said was ambiguous about Russian involvement. An unclassified October 7, 2016 joint DNI-DHS statement on this issue said the hacks

The list of 17 intelligence agencies being used to propagate the Russian hacking lie
coast guard? we needed them to weigh in on the hacking? look at that list and you'll see only a handful are qualified to be talking about this subject. the rest just said "sure, whatever" w/o ever looking at it.

again - you're spreading the lies you choose to spread and getting all asshurt when called upon it.

 

[FA_Q2]

so tell me - what exactly did russia do? you fail to show this cause you're busy just shouting out bullshit. when you're done shouting, show what russia did, how they did it, and provide links/proof to these "ads" that changed the world.

or keep being an idiot.

your call.

It's NOBODY'S job to tell you anything. All 17 of our investigative agencies agree that Russia hacked our elections. If that isn't good enough for you, then you are an idiot.

That is actually an outright lie.

This talking point is getting tiring. Russia did not hack the elections. They ran a trolling ad farm. There is a MASSIVE difference.

Does Putin pay you for spreading misinformation, or do you just do it because that's what right wingers do?

Not a rightwinger. Not getting paid.

And our election was still not hacked.

Yes, it was. They hacked the servers at the RNC and the DNC and selectively leaked only the Democrats information. That's the definition of hacked. And then there is this.

Russia Targeted Election Systems in All 50 States, Report Finds

Hacking the RNC and DNC is not hacking our elections.

I certainly did not claim that they did not try and influence the election - that has been established. They, however, did not hack our election.

 

[Seawytch]

Just to be clear, are you actually claiming that the hack of the DNC server was never “looked at”?

Are you aware of what Mueller was doing for 2 years?

Also, overthrowing Saddam was not “jacking with elections”. Saddam was not elected. Just didn’t want that one to slip by.

i'm saying the physical server was never looked at, no.

and forcing a country to hold elections in our style after ousting their government is certainly worse than putting ads on facebook to get people fighting.

There was no physical server dumb ass. It was kept on the cloud.

great. then look at the original cloud server, not a lot of snapshots. you'd never allow trump or others to look at "copies" of evidence but demand full access. is it any wonder you don't want the same for YOUR side?

Do you think that unless they examine the original hardware, you cannot determine the origin of the hack?

i think when given a copy, a lot can change.

if trump said he was hacked, but only provided you a copy of his machine, do you trust it to be all there? authentic? i wouldn't. i would want to examine what he said was hacked. not a copy. not his blessed version. the actual server.

The actual server is sitting next to the Watergate filing cabinet. You can see it any time you are in D.C.