Jeb, Hello Jeb?

No one really wants another Bush. If Bush was elected, that would mean during a 32 year period, every time we had a Republican President his name was Bush.

Fuggedabuttet.
No one wants another Clinton either. It would just be another 4 years of nothing but scandals.
 
RINOS will eventually be dealt with

:badgrin:

The GOP Establishment totally owns the House and Senate. Teapers are nowhere in sight. So good luck with that!


Bullcrap.

WASHINGTON (TheBlaze/AP) — The Republican-controlled House unexpectedly rejected short-term funding for the Department of Homeland Security on Friday, increasing the prospect of a partial shutdown at midnight of an agency with major anti-terrorism responsibilities.

The vote was 224-203 against the measure, as 52 Republicans defected on the leadership-backed legislation to fund DHS for three weeks.



And what did Boehner do...ran to Pelosi, begging for her help to keep his Speakership.
 
RINOS will eventually be dealt with

:badgrin:

The GOP Establishment totally owns the House and Senate. Teapers are nowhere in sight. So good luck with that!


Bullcrap.

WASHINGTON (TheBlaze/AP) — The Republican-controlled House unexpectedly rejected short-term funding for the Department of Homeland Security on Friday, increasing the prospect of a partial shutdown at midnight of an agency with major anti-terrorism responsibilities.

The vote was 224-203 against the measure, as 52 Republicans defected on the leadership-backed legislation to fund DHS for three weeks.



And what did Boehner do...ran to Pelosi, begging for her help to keep his Speakership.
They caved, did they not?

Yes. Yes they did.

The Establishment owns.

The Teapers had their asses kicked in the primaries by Establishment candidates.
 
RINOS will eventually be dealt with

:badgrin:

The GOP Establishment totally owns the House and Senate. Teapers are nowhere in sight. So good luck with that!


Bullcrap.

WASHINGTON (TheBlaze/AP) — The Republican-controlled House unexpectedly rejected short-term funding for the Department of Homeland Security on Friday, increasing the prospect of a partial shutdown at midnight of an agency with major anti-terrorism responsibilities.

The vote was 224-203 against the measure, as 52 Republicans defected on the leadership-backed legislation to fund DHS for three weeks.



And what did Boehner do...ran to Pelosi, begging for her help to keep his Speakership.
They caved, did they not?

Yes. Yes they did.

The Establishment owns.

The Teapers had their asses kicked in the primaries by Establishment candidates.


Yep, the establishment caved, that's what they do.

You'll have to provide a link to the "Teapers had their ass kicked"...where was this?
 
RINOS will eventually be dealt with

:badgrin:

The GOP Establishment totally owns the House and Senate. Teapers are nowhere in sight. So good luck with that!


Bullcrap.

WASHINGTON (TheBlaze/AP) — The Republican-controlled House unexpectedly rejected short-term funding for the Department of Homeland Security on Friday, increasing the prospect of a partial shutdown at midnight of an agency with major anti-terrorism responsibilities.

The vote was 224-203 against the measure, as 52 Republicans defected on the leadership-backed legislation to fund DHS for three weeks.



And what did Boehner do...ran to Pelosi, begging for her help to keep his Speakership.
yeah that was a real pill to swallow....the rinos are going to continue to act like rinos....but the door has been cracked open and at some point the teapers will hold sway.....i think the nomination might do it...

of course Bush has all the support now....even FOX is promoting him like he's a favorite even though the polls show him in like 5th place.....i know it's going to be a battle royale....
 
The Republicans haven't won the Presidency without a Bush or a Nixon on the ticket since 1928.

So unless there's a Nixon running ...


Shouldn't this post read "As a strong supporter of the last loser, I wish to throw my early support behind the next loser." ;P

The last Bush may have been a loser as a President, but he DID win the election.
 
Shouldn't this post read "As a strong supporter of the last loser, I wish to throw my early support behind the next loser." ;P

The last Bush may have been a loser as a President, but he DID win the election.


I meant this last loser:

220px-Mitt_Romney_by_Gage_Skidmore_7.jpg
 
Yo, for all you people who responded, its easier to say one message to the naysayers? The Tea Party is not dead, they are waiting to pounce! You idiots on the Left like to listen to the Propaganda on MSNBC, no thought of your own!

Shame, because they are working, shopping, going to the beach, eating out, going to the movies, etc.! Yes, that is right, Golly, they are just everyday True Americans, not invaders like the Socialist destroying this Country!!! Yo, so put your panties on, and be ready for 2016!!! The Snake Is Coming To Bite You on The Ass!!!
P.S. Get the Shovels out Tea Party, :dig:
that way, we can bury the intruders!


"GTP"

"OBAMA IS A JACKASS"
Democratic-Party-Progressive-Agenda-Mirrors-Dantes-Seven-Deadlies-2-of-21-770x375.jpg

03palin1-blog480.jpg

Ted Cruz In 2016!!!
Cruz.jpg

america is calling.jpg
 
Shouldn't this post read "As a strong supporter of the last loser, I wish to throw my early support behind the next loser." ;P

The last Bush may have been a loser as a President, but he DID win the election.


I meant this last loser:

220px-Mitt_Romney_by_Gage_Skidmore_7.jpg

You may have missed this, but he isn't running again.


No, I knew he wasn't running, or you would be supporting him again.

Hence, you, as a strong supporter of the last loser, wish to throw your early support behind the next loser.

Hey, I get it...you don't want the taint of supporting Romney to to get all over the fresh clean smelling support of next moderate loser, Bush the third. But it's there nonetheless.
 
Yo, for all you people who responded, its easier to say one message to the naysayers? The Tea Party is not dead, they are waiting to pounce! You idiots on the Left like to listen to the Propaganda on MSNBC, no thought of your own!

Shame, because they are working, shopping, going to the beach, eating out, going to the movies, etc.! Yes, that is right, Golly, they are just everyday True Americans, not invaders like the Socialist destroying this Country!!! Yo, so put your panties on, and be ready for 2016!!! The Snake Is Coming To Bite You on The Ass!!!
P.S. Get the Shovels out Tea Party, :dig:
that way, we can bury the intruders!


"GTP"

"OBAMA IS A JACKASS"
View attachment 38084
View attachment 38085
Ted Cruz In 2016!!!
View attachment 38087
View attachment 38089
Looking at all those pics, I did not know there was a Most Jingoistic Post competition. I'd say you are a shoo-in.
 
Shouldn't this post read "As a strong supporter of the last loser, I wish to throw my early support behind the next loser." ;P

The last Bush may have been a loser as a President, but he DID win the election.


I meant this last loser:

220px-Mitt_Romney_by_Gage_Skidmore_7.jpg

You may have missed this, but he isn't running again.


No, I knew he wasn't running, or you would be supporting him again.

No I wouldn't.
 
I'd be Ok with Jeb, and were it not for the composition of the Scotus, I'd vote for him without a second thought. I think he'd be the most formidable challenger for Hillary. If the gop runs another guy with misogynist and anti-latino baggage, I just don't see him winning, and he might even lose Fla.

Yes, Cruz and Rubio are horrifically anti-Latino.

:cuckoo:
Ah genius, I was responding to a post that Rubio is toast because Jeb has Fla sewn up. Cruz is too nutty to even get the Gop nomination. Notice how Scott Walker picks fights, but only OUTSIDE the party.
Netanyahu Wins Big -- But At What Cost - NBC News
 
Looking at all those pics, I did not know there was a Most Jingoistic Post competition. I'd say you are a shoo-in.

"jingoistic"...I ain't heard that word since the SDS became stockbrokers....I bet you're mostly bald, got a ponytail and don't bathe but once a month.
 

Forum List

Back
Top