It's Time To Talk Treason

Webb seems like a good man in the WRONG party. He is in a party that supports LIARS and FOOLS and Socialists.
You may want to check out where he actually stands on the issues.

Outside of pissing off the PC Police, he definitely leans Left.

He's my first choice, but he doesn't have a chance after annoying the wrong people, above.

.
I know he is on the left. His politics are not mine BUT as a man I respect him. And as a American I would rather see the other party put up and SUPPORT somebody who is real and not stupid nor a fool.

Webb at least strikes me as honest in what he thinks. I may dislike his politics but can still respect his honesty.
 
Webb seems like a good man in the WRONG party. He is in a party that supports LIARS and FOOLS and Socialists.
You may want to check out where he actually stands on the issues.

Outside of pissing off the PC Police, he definitely leans Left.

He's my first choice, but he doesn't have a chance after annoying the wrong people, above.

.
I know he is on the left. His politics are not mine BUT as a man I respect him. And as a American I would rather see the other party put up and SUPPORT somebody who is real and not stupid nor a fool.

Webb at least strikes me as honest in what he thinks. I may dislike his politics but can still respect his honesty.
Yeah, we could definitely use more of that.

.
 
Webb seems like a good man in the WRONG party. He is in a party that supports LIARS and FOOLS and Socialists.
You may want to check out where he actually stands on the issues.

Outside of pissing off the PC Police, he definitely leans Left.

He's my first choice, but he doesn't have a chance after annoying the wrong people, above.

.
I know he is on the left. His politics are not mine BUT as a man I respect him. And as a American I would rather see the other party put up and SUPPORT somebody who is real and not stupid nor a fool.

Webb at least strikes me as honest in what he thinks. I may dislike his politics but can still respect his honesty.

Yes! Honesty is your key deciding factor. That's why you are supporting Trump. It's so clear.
 
Webb seems like a good man in the WRONG party. He is in a party that supports LIARS and FOOLS and Socialists.
You may want to check out where he actually stands on the issues.

Outside of pissing off the PC Police, he definitely leans Left.

He's my first choice, but he doesn't have a chance after annoying the wrong people, above.

.
I know he is on the left. His politics are not mine BUT as a man I respect him. And as a American I would rather see the other party put up and SUPPORT somebody who is real and not stupid nor a fool.

Webb at least strikes me as honest in what he thinks. I may dislike his politics but can still respect his honesty.
Yeah, we could definitely use more of that.

.
A Webb win in Iowa for the democrat side would be fine with me.
 
Webb seems like a good man in the WRONG party. He is in a party that supports LIARS and FOOLS and Socialists.
You may want to check out where he actually stands on the issues.

Outside of pissing off the PC Police, he definitely leans Left.

He's my first choice, but he doesn't have a chance after annoying the wrong people, above.

.
I know he is on the left. His politics are not mine BUT as a man I respect him. And as a American I would rather see the other party put up and SUPPORT somebody who is real and not stupid nor a fool.

Webb at least strikes me as honest in what he thinks. I may dislike his politics but can still respect his honesty.

Yes! Honesty is your key deciding factor. That's why you are supporting Trump. It's so clear.
You CAN'T buy Trump but as of this morning you CAN blackmail Hillary. Trump USED to OWN Hillary and he has the check to PROVE it.
 
A Webb win in Iowa for the democrat side would be fine with me.
Well, unfortunately he doesn't have a chance.

One thing, though - the GOP would be making a mistake if Biden gets in and they dismiss him as a gaffe machine. That could get interesting.

.
Biden would have to run from his direct support of Obama. Webb does not have to do that. He could run as a democrat "outsider" and do well.
 
A Webb win in Iowa for the democrat side would be fine with me.
Well, unfortunately he doesn't have a chance.

One thing, though - the GOP would be making a mistake if Biden gets in and they dismiss him as a gaffe machine. That could get interesting.

.
Biden would have to run from his direct support of Obama. Webb does not have to do that. He could run as a democrat "outsider" and do well.
Could be, I'm lousy at predicting this stuff. He sure as hell doesn't have any traction yet, though. We'll see.

.
 
Well, 214, the cat is out of the bag. She will be indicted any day now. Your worries are over.


December 2013: "Clinton is falling in the Polls!"

May 2014: "Clinton is falling in the Polls!"

January 2015: "Clinton is falling in the Polls!"

July 2015: "Clinton is falling in the Polls!"

Uhuh. Sure.

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2015/PPP_Release_National_72215.pdf

07/22/2015

General Election matchups:

values in parentheses are from the previous PPP poll, from June 16, 2015, where applicable.

Clinton 45 (47) / Paul 42 (40), margin = Clinton +3 (+7)
Clinton 46 (46) / Rubio 41 (43), margin = Clinton +5 (+3)
Clinton 46 (45) / Bush 41 (41), margin = Clinton +5 (+4)
Clinton 46 (46) / Walker 41 (42), margin = Clinton +5 (+4)
Clinton 46 (47) / Huckabee 40 (42), margin = Clinton +6 (+5)
Clinton 47 (46) / Carson 39 (41), margin = Clinton +8 (+5)
Clinton 48 (48) / Cruz 40 (42), margin = Clinton +8 (+2)
Clinton 46 (45) / Christie 38 (41), margin = Clinton +8 (+4)
Clinton 47 (46) / Fiorina 37 (40), margin = Clinton +10 (+6)
Clinton 50 / Trump 37, margin = Clinton +13

And a three-way matchup, with Trump running as a possible Independent:

Clinton 45 / Bush 25 / Trump 23, margin = Clinton +18

That is the second three-way matchup released in as many days. If we compared that to the ABC/WAPO matchup from July 20th, 2015:

Clinton 46 / Bush 30 / Trump 20, margin = Clinton +16



Yepp, she's falling!!!

:rofl:
 
Webb seems like a good man in the WRONG party. He is in a party that supports LIARS and FOOLS and Socialists.
You may want to check out where he actually stands on the issues.

Outside of pissing off the PC Police, he definitely leans Left.

He's my first choice, but he doesn't have a chance after annoying the wrong people, above.

.
I know he is on the left. His politics are not mine BUT as a man I respect him. And as a American I would rather see the other party put up and SUPPORT somebody who is real and not stupid nor a fool.

Webb at least strikes me as honest in what he thinks. I may dislike his politics but can still respect his honesty.

Yes! Honesty is your key deciding factor. That's why you are supporting Trump. It's so clear.


LOL!!!
 
Well, 214, the cat is out of the bag. She will be indicted any day now. Your worries are over.


December 2013: "Clinton is falling in the Polls!"

May 2014: "Clinton is falling in the Polls!"

January 2015: "Clinton is falling in the Polls!"

July 2015: "Clinton is falling in the Polls!"

Uhuh. Sure.

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2015/PPP_Release_National_72215.pdf

07/22/2015

General Election matchups:

values in parentheses are from the previous PPP poll, from June 16, 2015, where applicable.

Clinton 45 (47) / Paul 42 (40), margin = Clinton +3 (+7)
Clinton 46 (46) / Rubio 41 (43), margin = Clinton +5 (+3)
Clinton 46 (45) / Bush 41 (41), margin = Clinton +5 (+4)
Clinton 46 (46) / Walker 41 (42), margin = Clinton +5 (+4)
Clinton 46 (47) / Huckabee 40 (42), margin = Clinton +6 (+5)
Clinton 47 (46) / Carson 39 (41), margin = Clinton +8 (+5)
Clinton 48 (48) / Cruz 40 (42), margin = Clinton +8 (+2)
Clinton 46 (45) / Christie 38 (41), margin = Clinton +8 (+4)
Clinton 47 (46) / Fiorina 37 (40), margin = Clinton +10 (+6)
Clinton 50 / Trump 37, margin = Clinton +13

And a three-way matchup, with Trump running as a possible Independent:

Clinton 45 / Bush 25 / Trump 23, margin = Clinton +18

That is the second three-way matchup released in as many days. If we compared that to the ABC/WAPO matchup from July 20th, 2015:

Clinton 46 / Bush 30 / Trump 20, margin = Clinton +16



Yepp, she's falling!!!

:rofl:
Public Policy Polling - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

PPP is described as one of the "most accurate" polling companies[3][4] and also as a "Democratic-leaning"[5] polling company because it polls only for Democratic and progressive campaigns and organizations on a private basis.

In addition to political issues, the company has polled the public on such diverse topics as the approval rating of God,[6] whether Republican voters believe President Obama would be eligible to enter heaven in the event of the Rapture[7] and whether hipstersshould be subjected to a special tax for being annoying.[8]


Here at PPP we polled 100 Democratic leaning people and found that the COUNTRY thinks the Democrats are the shit..............
We also say the easter bunny today stocking up on dye...................Film at 11.
 
Well, 214, the cat is out of the bag. She will be indicted any day now. Your worries are over.


December 2013: "Clinton is falling in the Polls!"

May 2014: "Clinton is falling in the Polls!"

January 2015: "Clinton is falling in the Polls!"

July 2015: "Clinton is falling in the Polls!"

Uhuh. Sure.

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2015/PPP_Release_National_72215.pdf

07/22/2015

General Election matchups:

values in parentheses are from the previous PPP poll, from June 16, 2015, where applicable.

Clinton 45 (47) / Paul 42 (40), margin = Clinton +3 (+7)
Clinton 46 (46) / Rubio 41 (43), margin = Clinton +5 (+3)
Clinton 46 (45) / Bush 41 (41), margin = Clinton +5 (+4)
Clinton 46 (46) / Walker 41 (42), margin = Clinton +5 (+4)
Clinton 46 (47) / Huckabee 40 (42), margin = Clinton +6 (+5)
Clinton 47 (46) / Carson 39 (41), margin = Clinton +8 (+5)
Clinton 48 (48) / Cruz 40 (42), margin = Clinton +8 (+2)
Clinton 46 (45) / Christie 38 (41), margin = Clinton +8 (+4)
Clinton 47 (46) / Fiorina 37 (40), margin = Clinton +10 (+6)
Clinton 50 / Trump 37, margin = Clinton +13

And a three-way matchup, with Trump running as a possible Independent:

Clinton 45 / Bush 25 / Trump 23, margin = Clinton +18

That is the second three-way matchup released in as many days. If we compared that to the ABC/WAPO matchup from July 20th, 2015:

Clinton 46 / Bush 30 / Trump 20, margin = Clinton +16



Yepp, she's falling!!!

:rofl:
Public Policy Polling - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

PPP is described as one of the "most accurate" polling companies[3][4] and also as a "Democratic-leaning"[5] polling company because it polls only for Democratic and progressive campaigns and organizations on a private basis.

In addition to political issues, the company has polled the public on such diverse topics as the approval rating of God,[6] whether Republican voters believe President Obama would be eligible to enter heaven in the event of the Rapture[7] and whether hipstersshould be subjected to a special tax for being annoying.[8]


Here at PPP we polled 100 Democratic leaning people and found that the COUNTRY thinks the Democrats are the shit..............
We also say the easter bunny today stocking up on dye...................Film at 11.
Stat should hire them. He's been tanking a LOT of late.
 
I sense a deceleration of intent in the making....
Well, 214, the cat is out of the bag. She will be indicted any day now. Your worries are over.


December 2013: "Clinton is falling in the Polls!"

May 2014: "Clinton is falling in the Polls!"

January 2015: "Clinton is falling in the Polls!"

July 2015: "Clinton is falling in the Polls!"

Uhuh. Sure.

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2015/PPP_Release_National_72215.pdf

07/22/2015

General Election matchups:

values in parentheses are from the previous PPP poll, from June 16, 2015, where applicable.

Clinton 45 (47) / Paul 42 (40), margin = Clinton +3 (+7)
Clinton 46 (46) / Rubio 41 (43), margin = Clinton +5 (+3)
Clinton 46 (45) / Bush 41 (41), margin = Clinton +5 (+4)
Clinton 46 (46) / Walker 41 (42), margin = Clinton +5 (+4)
Clinton 46 (47) / Huckabee 40 (42), margin = Clinton +6 (+5)
Clinton 47 (46) / Carson 39 (41), margin = Clinton +8 (+5)
Clinton 48 (48) / Cruz 40 (42), margin = Clinton +8 (+2)
Clinton 46 (45) / Christie 38 (41), margin = Clinton +8 (+4)
Clinton 47 (46) / Fiorina 37 (40), margin = Clinton +10 (+6)
Clinton 50 / Trump 37, margin = Clinton +13

And a three-way matchup, with Trump running as a possible Independent:

Clinton 45 / Bush 25 / Trump 23, margin = Clinton +18

That is the second three-way matchup released in as many days. If we compared that to the ABC/WAPO matchup from July 20th, 2015:

Clinton 46 / Bush 30 / Trump 20, margin = Clinton +16



Yepp, she's falling!!!

:rofl:
Public Policy Polling - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

PPP is described as one of the "most accurate" polling companies[3][4] and also as a "Democratic-leaning"[5] polling company because it polls only for Democratic and progressive campaigns and organizations on a private basis.

In addition to political issues, the company has polled the public on such diverse topics as the approval rating of God,[6] whether Republican voters believe President Obama would be eligible to enter heaven in the event of the Rapture[7] and whether hipstersshould be subjected to a special tax for being annoying.[8]


Here at PPP we polled 100 Democratic leaning people and found that the COUNTRY thinks the Democrats are the shit..............
We also say the easter bunny today stocking up on dye...................Film at 11.



PPP was without a doubt the best pollster of 2010 and 2012. It nailed 11 of 12 battleground states, and was also the only major pollster to correctly call Florida by 1 point for Obama. He won Florida by 1 point. It's only miss-call was North Carolina, an automatic miss-call, because it called a mathematical tie between Obama and Romney and by end polls, a mathematical tie is automatically a miss-call. Romney won NC by +2.04%, which means that PPP was off to the Left by 2 points on that one. It absolutely nailed the toplines and the margin in Virginia. It called the correct national winner, but was off to the RIGHT by three points. It was off to the right by 7 points in Oregon, but called the correct winner. Overall, PPP (D)'s mathematical bias is about 1 point to the RIGHT, not to the LEFT, and I can prove it.

In 2010, PPP was the only major firm to predict DEM holds in both NV and CO, and indeed, both seats were held.

Whether or not you like the (D) by the title, PPP has an outstanding track record, one it can proudly stand on, unlike Rasmussen, which missed SIX of TWELVE battleground states in 2012. SIX!

And I can prove all of what I just wrote, down the the 100th of a percentage point.

Can you?
 
I sense a deceleration of intent in the making....
Well, 214, the cat is out of the bag. She will be indicted any day now. Your worries are over.


December 2013: "Clinton is falling in the Polls!"

May 2014: "Clinton is falling in the Polls!"

January 2015: "Clinton is falling in the Polls!"

July 2015: "Clinton is falling in the Polls!"

Uhuh. Sure.

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2015/PPP_Release_National_72215.pdf

07/22/2015

General Election matchups:

values in parentheses are from the previous PPP poll, from June 16, 2015, where applicable.

Clinton 45 (47) / Paul 42 (40), margin = Clinton +3 (+7)
Clinton 46 (46) / Rubio 41 (43), margin = Clinton +5 (+3)
Clinton 46 (45) / Bush 41 (41), margin = Clinton +5 (+4)
Clinton 46 (46) / Walker 41 (42), margin = Clinton +5 (+4)
Clinton 46 (47) / Huckabee 40 (42), margin = Clinton +6 (+5)
Clinton 47 (46) / Carson 39 (41), margin = Clinton +8 (+5)
Clinton 48 (48) / Cruz 40 (42), margin = Clinton +8 (+2)
Clinton 46 (45) / Christie 38 (41), margin = Clinton +8 (+4)
Clinton 47 (46) / Fiorina 37 (40), margin = Clinton +10 (+6)
Clinton 50 / Trump 37, margin = Clinton +13

And a three-way matchup, with Trump running as a possible Independent:

Clinton 45 / Bush 25 / Trump 23, margin = Clinton +18

That is the second three-way matchup released in as many days. If we compared that to the ABC/WAPO matchup from July 20th, 2015:

Clinton 46 / Bush 30 / Trump 20, margin = Clinton +16



Yepp, she's falling!!!

:rofl:
Public Policy Polling - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

PPP is described as one of the "most accurate" polling companies[3][4] and also as a "Democratic-leaning"[5] polling company because it polls only for Democratic and progressive campaigns and organizations on a private basis.

In addition to political issues, the company has polled the public on such diverse topics as the approval rating of God,[6] whether Republican voters believe President Obama would be eligible to enter heaven in the event of the Rapture[7] and whether hipstersshould be subjected to a special tax for being annoying.[8]


Here at PPP we polled 100 Democratic leaning people and found that the COUNTRY thinks the Democrats are the shit..............
We also say the easter bunny today stocking up on dye...................Film at 11.



PPP was without a doubt the best pollster of 2010 and 2012. It nailed 11 of 12 battleground states, and was also the only major pollster to correctly call Florida by 1 point for Obama. He won Florida by one point. It's only misscall was North Carolina, an automatic misscall, because it called a mathematical tie between Obama and Romney and by end polls, a mathematical tie is automatically a miscall. It absolutely nailed the toplines and the margin in Virginia. It called the correct national winner, but was off to the RIGHT by three points. Overall, PPP (D) mathematical bias is about 1 point to the RIGHT, not to the LEFT, and I can prove it.

In 2010, PPP was the only major firm to predict DEM holds in both NV and CO, and indeed, both seats were held.

Whether or not you like the (D) by the title, PPP has an outstanding track record, one it can proudly stand on, unlike Rasmussen, which missed SIX of TWELVE battleground states in 2012. SIX!

And I can prove all of what I just wrote, down the the 100th of a percentage point.

Can you?
You are a liberal Propaganda artist..................That's my opinion......
Other sites show your source to be biased...........

You want the Hildabeast................
You will show articles that support your position...............and therefore when you post advice and data I DISMISS it most of the time.................Not always, but I know you are for the opposing side..............and I don't need advice from those who would cream themself to get the Hildabeast elected.
 
Well, 214, the cat is out of the bag. She will be indicted any day now. Your worries are over.


December 2013: "Clinton is falling in the Polls!"

May 2014: "Clinton is falling in the Polls!"

January 2015: "Clinton is falling in the Polls!"

July 2015: "Clinton is falling in the Polls!"

Uhuh. Sure.

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2015/PPP_Release_National_72215.pdf

07/22/2015

General Election matchups:

values in parentheses are from the previous PPP poll, from June 16, 2015, where applicable.

Clinton 45 (47) / Paul 42 (40), margin = Clinton +3 (+7)
Clinton 46 (46) / Rubio 41 (43), margin = Clinton +5 (+3)
Clinton 46 (45) / Bush 41 (41), margin = Clinton +5 (+4)
Clinton 46 (46) / Walker 41 (42), margin = Clinton +5 (+4)
Clinton 46 (47) / Huckabee 40 (42), margin = Clinton +6 (+5)
Clinton 47 (46) / Carson 39 (41), margin = Clinton +8 (+5)
Clinton 48 (48) / Cruz 40 (42), margin = Clinton +8 (+2)
Clinton 46 (45) / Christie 38 (41), margin = Clinton +8 (+4)
Clinton 47 (46) / Fiorina 37 (40), margin = Clinton +10 (+6)
Clinton 50 / Trump 37, margin = Clinton +13

And a three-way matchup, with Trump running as a possible Independent:

Clinton 45 / Bush 25 / Trump 23, margin = Clinton +18

That is the second three-way matchup released in as many days. If we compared that to the ABC/WAPO matchup from July 20th, 2015:

Clinton 46 / Bush 30 / Trump 20, margin = Clinton +16



Yepp, she's falling!!!

:rofl:
Public Policy Polling - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

PPP is described as one of the "most accurate" polling companies[3][4] and also as a "Democratic-leaning"[5] polling company because it polls only for Democratic and progressive campaigns and organizations on a private basis.

In addition to political issues, the company has polled the public on such diverse topics as the approval rating of God,[6] whether Republican voters believe President Obama would be eligible to enter heaven in the event of the Rapture[7] and whether hipstersshould be subjected to a special tax for being annoying.[8]


Here at PPP we polled 100 Democratic leaning people and found that the COUNTRY thinks the Democrats are the shit..............
We also say the easter bunny today stocking up on dye...................Film at 11.
Stat should hire them. He's been tanking a LOT of late.
Stat couldn't hire a maid in his Luxury 900 Square Foot Suite in Germany.....................
Damn! Germany has some BIG dumpsters!
 
I sense a deceleration of intent in the making....
Well, 214, the cat is out of the bag. She will be indicted any day now. Your worries are over.


December 2013: "Clinton is falling in the Polls!"

May 2014: "Clinton is falling in the Polls!"

January 2015: "Clinton is falling in the Polls!"

July 2015: "Clinton is falling in the Polls!"

Uhuh. Sure.

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2015/PPP_Release_National_72215.pdf

07/22/2015

General Election matchups:

values in parentheses are from the previous PPP poll, from June 16, 2015, where applicable.

Clinton 45 (47) / Paul 42 (40), margin = Clinton +3 (+7)
Clinton 46 (46) / Rubio 41 (43), margin = Clinton +5 (+3)
Clinton 46 (45) / Bush 41 (41), margin = Clinton +5 (+4)
Clinton 46 (46) / Walker 41 (42), margin = Clinton +5 (+4)
Clinton 46 (47) / Huckabee 40 (42), margin = Clinton +6 (+5)
Clinton 47 (46) / Carson 39 (41), margin = Clinton +8 (+5)
Clinton 48 (48) / Cruz 40 (42), margin = Clinton +8 (+2)
Clinton 46 (45) / Christie 38 (41), margin = Clinton +8 (+4)
Clinton 47 (46) / Fiorina 37 (40), margin = Clinton +10 (+6)
Clinton 50 / Trump 37, margin = Clinton +13

And a three-way matchup, with Trump running as a possible Independent:

Clinton 45 / Bush 25 / Trump 23, margin = Clinton +18

That is the second three-way matchup released in as many days. If we compared that to the ABC/WAPO matchup from July 20th, 2015:

Clinton 46 / Bush 30 / Trump 20, margin = Clinton +16



Yepp, she's falling!!!

:rofl:
Public Policy Polling - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

PPP is described as one of the "most accurate" polling companies[3][4] and also as a "Democratic-leaning"[5] polling company because it polls only for Democratic and progressive campaigns and organizations on a private basis.

In addition to political issues, the company has polled the public on such diverse topics as the approval rating of God,[6] whether Republican voters believe President Obama would be eligible to enter heaven in the event of the Rapture[7] and whether hipstersshould be subjected to a special tax for being annoying.[8]


Here at PPP we polled 100 Democratic leaning people and found that the COUNTRY thinks the Democrats are the shit..............
We also say the easter bunny today stocking up on dye...................Film at 11.



PPP was without a doubt the best pollster of 2010 and 2012. It nailed 11 of 12 battleground states, and was also the only major pollster to correctly call Florida by 1 point for Obama. He won Florida by one point. It's only misscall was North Carolina, an automatic misscall, because it called a mathematical tie between Obama and Romney and by end polls, a mathematical tie is automatically a miscall. It absolutely nailed the toplines and the margin in Virginia. It called the correct national winner, but was off to the RIGHT by three points. Overall, PPP (D) mathematical bias is about 1 point to the RIGHT, not to the LEFT, and I can prove it.

In 2010, PPP was the only major firm to predict DEM holds in both NV and CO, and indeed, both seats were held.

Whether or not you like the (D) by the title, PPP has an outstanding track record, one it can proudly stand on, unlike Rasmussen, which missed SIX of TWELVE battleground states in 2012. SIX!

And I can prove all of what I just wrote, down the the 100th of a percentage point.

Can you?
You are a liberal Propaganda artist..................That's my opinion......
Other sites show your source to be biased...........

You want the Hildabeast................
You will show articles that support your position...............and therefore when you post advice and data I DISMISS it most of the time.................Not always, but I know you are for the opposing side..............and I don't need advice from those who would cream themself to get the Hildabeast elected.


So, you are saying that you cannot back up your claims. I can back up mine.

Let history record this moment.
 
Well, 214, the cat is out of the bag. She will be indicted any day now. Your worries are over.


December 2013: "Clinton is falling in the Polls!"

May 2014: "Clinton is falling in the Polls!"

January 2015: "Clinton is falling in the Polls!"

July 2015: "Clinton is falling in the Polls!"

Uhuh. Sure.

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2015/PPP_Release_National_72215.pdf

07/22/2015

General Election matchups:

values in parentheses are from the previous PPP poll, from June 16, 2015, where applicable.

Clinton 45 (47) / Paul 42 (40), margin = Clinton +3 (+7)
Clinton 46 (46) / Rubio 41 (43), margin = Clinton +5 (+3)
Clinton 46 (45) / Bush 41 (41), margin = Clinton +5 (+4)
Clinton 46 (46) / Walker 41 (42), margin = Clinton +5 (+4)
Clinton 46 (47) / Huckabee 40 (42), margin = Clinton +6 (+5)
Clinton 47 (46) / Carson 39 (41), margin = Clinton +8 (+5)
Clinton 48 (48) / Cruz 40 (42), margin = Clinton +8 (+2)
Clinton 46 (45) / Christie 38 (41), margin = Clinton +8 (+4)
Clinton 47 (46) / Fiorina 37 (40), margin = Clinton +10 (+6)
Clinton 50 / Trump 37, margin = Clinton +13

And a three-way matchup, with Trump running as a possible Independent:

Clinton 45 / Bush 25 / Trump 23, margin = Clinton +18

That is the second three-way matchup released in as many days. If we compared that to the ABC/WAPO matchup from July 20th, 2015:

Clinton 46 / Bush 30 / Trump 20, margin = Clinton +16



Yepp, she's falling!!!

:rofl:
Public Policy Polling - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

PPP is described as one of the "most accurate" polling companies[3][4] and also as a "Democratic-leaning"[5] polling company because it polls only for Democratic and progressive campaigns and organizations on a private basis.

In addition to political issues, the company has polled the public on such diverse topics as the approval rating of God,[6] whether Republican voters believe President Obama would be eligible to enter heaven in the event of the Rapture[7] and whether hipstersshould be subjected to a special tax for being annoying.[8]


Here at PPP we polled 100 Democratic leaning people and found that the COUNTRY thinks the Democrats are the shit..............
We also say the easter bunny today stocking up on dye...................Film at 11.
Stat should hire them. He's been tanking a LOT of late.
Stat couldn't hire a maid in his Luxury 900 Square Foot Suite in Germany.....................
Damn! Germany has some BIG dumpsters!


That made no sense at all.

Question: are you on drugs, baby Huey?
 
I sense a deceleration of intent in the making....
Well, 214, the cat is out of the bag. She will be indicted any day now. Your worries are over.


December 2013: "Clinton is falling in the Polls!"

May 2014: "Clinton is falling in the Polls!"

January 2015: "Clinton is falling in the Polls!"

July 2015: "Clinton is falling in the Polls!"

Uhuh. Sure.

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2015/PPP_Release_National_72215.pdf

07/22/2015

General Election matchups:

values in parentheses are from the previous PPP poll, from June 16, 2015, where applicable.

Clinton 45 (47) / Paul 42 (40), margin = Clinton +3 (+7)
Clinton 46 (46) / Rubio 41 (43), margin = Clinton +5 (+3)
Clinton 46 (45) / Bush 41 (41), margin = Clinton +5 (+4)
Clinton 46 (46) / Walker 41 (42), margin = Clinton +5 (+4)
Clinton 46 (47) / Huckabee 40 (42), margin = Clinton +6 (+5)
Clinton 47 (46) / Carson 39 (41), margin = Clinton +8 (+5)
Clinton 48 (48) / Cruz 40 (42), margin = Clinton +8 (+2)
Clinton 46 (45) / Christie 38 (41), margin = Clinton +8 (+4)
Clinton 47 (46) / Fiorina 37 (40), margin = Clinton +10 (+6)
Clinton 50 / Trump 37, margin = Clinton +13

And a three-way matchup, with Trump running as a possible Independent:

Clinton 45 / Bush 25 / Trump 23, margin = Clinton +18

That is the second three-way matchup released in as many days. If we compared that to the ABC/WAPO matchup from July 20th, 2015:

Clinton 46 / Bush 30 / Trump 20, margin = Clinton +16



Yepp, she's falling!!!

:rofl:
Public Policy Polling - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

PPP is described as one of the "most accurate" polling companies[3][4] and also as a "Democratic-leaning"[5] polling company because it polls only for Democratic and progressive campaigns and organizations on a private basis.

In addition to political issues, the company has polled the public on such diverse topics as the approval rating of God,[6] whether Republican voters believe President Obama would be eligible to enter heaven in the event of the Rapture[7] and whether hipstersshould be subjected to a special tax for being annoying.[8]


Here at PPP we polled 100 Democratic leaning people and found that the COUNTRY thinks the Democrats are the shit..............
We also say the easter bunny today stocking up on dye...................Film at 11.



PPP was without a doubt the best pollster of 2010 and 2012. It nailed 11 of 12 battleground states, and was also the only major pollster to correctly call Florida by 1 point for Obama. He won Florida by one point. It's only misscall was North Carolina, an automatic misscall, because it called a mathematical tie between Obama and Romney and by end polls, a mathematical tie is automatically a miscall. It absolutely nailed the toplines and the margin in Virginia. It called the correct national winner, but was off to the RIGHT by three points. Overall, PPP (D) mathematical bias is about 1 point to the RIGHT, not to the LEFT, and I can prove it.

In 2010, PPP was the only major firm to predict DEM holds in both NV and CO, and indeed, both seats were held.

Whether or not you like the (D) by the title, PPP has an outstanding track record, one it can proudly stand on, unlike Rasmussen, which missed SIX of TWELVE battleground states in 2012. SIX!

And I can prove all of what I just wrote, down the the 100th of a percentage point.

Can you?
You are a liberal Propaganda artist..................That's my opinion......
Other sites show your source to be biased...........

You want the Hildabeast................
You will show articles that support your position...............and therefore when you post advice and data I DISMISS it most of the time.................Not a
I sense a deceleration of intent in the making....
Well, 214, the cat is out of the bag. She will be indicted any day now. Your worries are over.


December 2013: "Clinton is falling in the Polls!"

May 2014: "Clinton is falling in the Polls!"

January 2015: "Clinton is falling in the Polls!"

July 2015: "Clinton is falling in the Polls!"

Uhuh. Sure.

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2015/PPP_Release_National_72215.pdf

07/22/2015

General Election matchups:

values in parentheses are from the previous PPP poll, from June 16, 2015, where applicable.

Clinton 45 (47) / Paul 42 (40), margin = Clinton +3 (+7)
Clinton 46 (46) / Rubio 41 (43), margin = Clinton +5 (+3)
Clinton 46 (45) / Bush 41 (41), margin = Clinton +5 (+4)
Clinton 46 (46) / Walker 41 (42), margin = Clinton +5 (+4)
Clinton 46 (47) / Huckabee 40 (42), margin = Clinton +6 (+5)
Clinton 47 (46) / Carson 39 (41), margin = Clinton +8 (+5)
Clinton 48 (48) / Cruz 40 (42), margin = Clinton +8 (+2)
Clinton 46 (45) / Christie 38 (41), margin = Clinton +8 (+4)
Clinton 47 (46) / Fiorina 37 (40), margin = Clinton +10 (+6)
Clinton 50 / Trump 37, margin = Clinton +13

And a three-way matchup, with Trump running as a possible Independent:

Clinton 45 / Bush 25 / Trump 23, margin = Clinton +18

That is the second three-way matchup released in as many days. If we compared that to the ABC/WAPO matchup from July 20th, 2015:

Clinton 46 / Bush 30 / Trump 20, margin = Clinton +16



Yepp, she's falling!!!

:rofl:
Public Policy Polling - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

PPP is described as one of the "most accurate" polling companies[3][4] and also as a "Democratic-leaning"[5] polling company because it polls only for Democratic and progressive campaigns and organizations on a private basis.

In addition to political issues, the company has polled the public on such diverse topics as the approval rating of God,[6] whether Republican voters believe President Obama would be eligible to enter heaven in the event of the Rapture[7] and whether hipstersshould be subjected to a special tax for being annoying.[8]


Here at PPP we polled 100 Democratic leaning people and found that the COUNTRY thinks the Democrats are the shit..............
We also say the easter bunny today stocking up on dye...................Film at 11.



PPP was without a doubt the best pollster of 2010 and 2012. It nailed 11 of 12 battleground states, and was also the only major pollster to correctly call Florida by 1 point for Obama. He won Florida by one point. It's only misscall was North Carolina, an automatic misscall, because it called a mathematical tie between Obama and Romney and by end polls, a mathematical tie is automatically a miscall. It absolutely nailed the toplines and the margin in Virginia. It called the correct national winner, but was off to the RIGHT by three points. Overall, PPP (D) mathematical bias is about 1 point to the RIGHT, not to the LEFT, and I can prove it.

In 2010, PPP was the only major firm to predict DEM holds in both NV and CO, and indeed, both seats were held.

Whether or not you like the (D) by the title, PPP has an outstanding track record, one it can proudly stand on, unlike Rasmussen, which missed SIX of TWELVE battleground states in 2012. SIX!

And I can prove all of what I just wrote, down the the 100th of a percentage point.

Can you?
You are a liberal Propaganda artist..................That's my opinion......
Other sites show your source to be biased...........

You want the Hildabeast................
You will show articles that support your position...............and therefore when you post advice and data I DISMISS it most of the time.................Not always, but I know you are for the opposing side..............and I don't need advice from those who would cream themself to get the Hildabeast elected.


So, you are saying that you cannot back up your claims. I can back up mine.

Let history record this moment.
Record it.............I don't care...............I understand you for what you are.................A shrill for a party I oppose...............

Just calling you out for being your little giggly self going RAH RAH for the Hildabeast............the only thing missing is the pom poms...........

Are you wearing your skirt as well..................That's kinda scary ya no.
 
December 2013: "Clinton is falling in the Polls!"

May 2014: "Clinton is falling in the Polls!"

January 2015: "Clinton is falling in the Polls!"

July 2015: "Clinton is falling in the Polls!"

Uhuh. Sure.

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2015/PPP_Release_National_72215.pdf

07/22/2015

General Election matchups:

values in parentheses are from the previous PPP poll, from June 16, 2015, where applicable.

Clinton 45 (47) / Paul 42 (40), margin = Clinton +3 (+7)
Clinton 46 (46) / Rubio 41 (43), margin = Clinton +5 (+3)
Clinton 46 (45) / Bush 41 (41), margin = Clinton +5 (+4)
Clinton 46 (46) / Walker 41 (42), margin = Clinton +5 (+4)
Clinton 46 (47) / Huckabee 40 (42), margin = Clinton +6 (+5)
Clinton 47 (46) / Carson 39 (41), margin = Clinton +8 (+5)
Clinton 48 (48) / Cruz 40 (42), margin = Clinton +8 (+2)
Clinton 46 (45) / Christie 38 (41), margin = Clinton +8 (+4)
Clinton 47 (46) / Fiorina 37 (40), margin = Clinton +10 (+6)
Clinton 50 / Trump 37, margin = Clinton +13

And a three-way matchup, with Trump running as a possible Independent:

Clinton 45 / Bush 25 / Trump 23, margin = Clinton +18

That is the second three-way matchup released in as many days. If we compared that to the ABC/WAPO matchup from July 20th, 2015:

Clinton 46 / Bush 30 / Trump 20, margin = Clinton +16



Yepp, she's falling!!!

:rofl:
Public Policy Polling - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

PPP is described as one of the "most accurate" polling companies[3][4] and also as a "Democratic-leaning"[5] polling company because it polls only for Democratic and progressive campaigns and organizations on a private basis.

In addition to political issues, the company has polled the public on such diverse topics as the approval rating of God,[6] whether Republican voters believe President Obama would be eligible to enter heaven in the event of the Rapture[7] and whether hipstersshould be subjected to a special tax for being annoying.[8]


Here at PPP we polled 100 Democratic leaning people and found that the COUNTRY thinks the Democrats are the shit..............
We also say the easter bunny today stocking up on dye...................Film at 11.
Stat should hire them. He's been tanking a LOT of late.
Stat couldn't hire a maid in his Luxury 900 Square Foot Suite in Germany.....................
Damn! Germany has some BIG dumpsters!


That made no sense at all.

Question: are you on drugs, baby Huey?
Nope, four boards in four countries it's about over for today. You really need to quit backing the idiot the traitor Hillary at this point. She's going down fast and hard and your stats lose meaning the longer you support her.
 

Forum List

Back
Top