I didn't say that's what they said...I said that's the IMPLICATION of their position. I note that you're not even trying to argue that it's not an implication only that they didn't explicitly say that.Well, according to the people I've been responding to, we shouldn't be concerned about the girls in Rotherham because their rapists weren't Black. Blacks raping White girls is the complaint...they don't care about Pakistanis.There are multiple possibilities. The UCR only includes crimes reported to the police, and about 2/3rds of rapes/sexual assaults are not. African Americans are more likely to be victims of violent crime than other groups. We don't have enough information from the UCR to account for poverty as a factor. Greater number of arrests for a group doesn't mean a whole lot...convictions would help more.From the FBI Crime and Statistics, 2014... Tell me, can you spot the problem?Would it be better if the girls were raped and murdered by Asians? or Whites?
View attachment 111965
But that's all beside the point. I was responding to a complaint that every day a white girl is raped by a black man. Why should I care more about a white girl being raped than a black or Asian girl? Why should I care about the color of the man who rape her?
I don't think a white girl getting raped by a black man is any worse than any other combination of race. Why do you?
That is EXACTLY the type of thinking that led to the rape, torture, and forced prostitution of over a thousand white girls in Rotherham..
But I would love to hear your logic....how does my position that the rape is the same regardless of the race of either the attacker or the victim lead to people being afraid to accuse someone of rape because they're a minority? There's no connection.
1. That is not what they said. YOu are either lying, which is an admission that you know you are in the wrong, or completely not able to open your mind enough to hear what they are actually saying.
What makes you think it has anything to do with my political beliefs? And I disagree that MY position would lead to any legitimate avenues not being explored out of fear of being considered racist. If there's probable cause there's probable cause. If a suspect meets the description of the attacker then he meets the description of the attacker. My position is that the race of the attacker or victim is irrelevant except as part of the description and that focusing on the racial aspect makes no practical sense.2. Because your political belief that it is wrong to focus on the racial aspect, means that avenues of crime investigation and/or crime prevention are NOT explored because doing so would be considered racist.