Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That's a politically-expedient statement.They may have the 'right' to sue, but as with the 'gunners' insistence on carrying 24/24, discretion and reflection would tell us to take things a bit more easily and civilly. There are plenty of places to hold a 'celebration of love'.
Again, it's a NY Public Accomodation law....same thing would happen if the B & B refused to hose an interracial Wedding.Has it been a WEEK YET? (No... it's not been a week yet...) and the Left is moving like a swarm of brown shirts:
From Crowder:
"Dailey told Syracuse.com that the owner told them that it was “nothing personal” but gay marriage was “against my faith.”
The couple further stated, “We are human beings, just like anybody else. We’re not asking to impose on anybody’s else beliefs or opinions, just to celebrate our love as any other two people would.”
I’m confused. If the owners told you it wasn’t personal, but that it was against their beliefs to host a gay ceremony… and you don’t want to impose on anyone else’s beliefs… then why are you filing a complaint? Why not find another location? How do their personal beliefs effect you? Remember that?
Unless, of course, you didn’t actually mean you don’t want to impose on anyone else’s beliefs.
It’s a fair question though, and one which the Supreme Court has helped to make that much more confusing. Does a couple’s “true love” trump an individual’s right to religious freedom?
Can a business “discriminate” on any grounds whatsoever? If the answer is no… then why have Amazon and eBay remove Confederate merchandise from their site? Can a business refuse service to someone who isn’t wearing a shirt and shoes? Does a business ever have the right not to serve someone? Ever? Ever ever ever ever?
Either the answer is yes, or it is no. It cannot be both."
Read more: It s Happening Gay Couple Suing New York Bed and Breakfast For Not Hosting Wedding... Louder With Crowder
That's a politically-expedient statement.They may have the 'right' to sue, but as with the 'gunners' insistence on carrying 24/24, discretion and reflection would tell us to take things a bit more easily and civilly. There are plenty of places to hold a 'celebration of love'.
You realize of course that if your fellow cultees start suing Christians, you're BAKED in 2016. We dems will lose our butts. Suddenly now "enforcing gay rights" isn't very important...
..oh you people are slippery and you love your moles in positions of power. Maybe Christians should sue LGBT cultees for their attempts to strip them of their 1st Amendment rights?
And yet it was the so called Christians refusing service in violation of the law. Obey the law or pay.Gays are vindictive. Christians are not. Homo filth will do whatever they can to destroy Christianity. I'm not certain Christians or other moral citizens have the guts to take the gay trash on.
I had my ways of keeping them out. Worked like a charm.
Good. Bigots need to keep their hatred to themselves.Has it been a WEEK YET? (No... it's not been a week yet...) and the Left is moving like a swarm of brown shirts:
From Crowder:
"Dailey told Syracuse.com that the owner told them that it was “nothing personal” but gay marriage was “against my faith.”
The couple further stated, “We are human beings, just like anybody else. We’re not asking to impose on anybody’s else beliefs or opinions, just to celebrate our love as any other two people would.”
I’m confused. If the owners told you it wasn’t personal, but that it was against their beliefs to host a gay ceremony… and you don’t want to impose on anyone else’s beliefs… then why are you filing a complaint? Why not find another location? How do their personal beliefs effect you? Remember that?
Unless, of course, you didn’t actually mean you don’t want to impose on anyone else’s beliefs.
It’s a fair question though, and one which the Supreme Court has helped to make that much more confusing. Does a couple’s “true love” trump an individual’s right to religious freedom?
Can a business “discriminate” on any grounds whatsoever? If the answer is no… then why have Amazon and eBay remove Confederate merchandise from their site? Can a business refuse service to someone who isn’t wearing a shirt and shoes? Does a business ever have the right not to serve someone? Ever? Ever ever ever ever?
Either the answer is yes, or it is no. It cannot be both."
Read more: It s Happening Gay Couple Suing New York Bed and Breakfast For Not Hosting Wedding... Louder With Crowder
Which totally doesn't explain why you continue to post on Internet message boards.
Gee.
Again, it's a NY Public Accomodation law....same thing would happen if the B & B refused to hose an interracial Wedding.
And if they promise not to have sex in the room? Then they can rent to two men? Can they require non-married couples to likewise promise "no nookie tonight"?Again, it's a NY Public Accomodation law....same thing would happen if the B & B refused to hose an interracial Wedding.
No, it isn't the same thing as an interracial marriage. Race is static. Behaviors aren't. And that little false premise is going to be exposed when these Christians appeal these cases on the grounds of freedom of religion. Actually before, because now the Court is in a quandry being fully unable to deny polygamists and incest marriage as well. One good deviant sex behavior protected from majority regulation is as good as another...
The 9th Amendment to the Constitution says that no part of it may be interpreted in order to squelch another part's full force and effect.
Might want to brush up on that one before you prematurely claim victory..
The 9th Amendment to the Constitution says that no part of it may be interpreted in order to squelch another part's full force and effect.Again, it's a NY Public Accomodation law....same thing would happen if the B & B refused to hose an interracial Wedding.
No, it isn't the same thing as an interracial marriage. Race is static. Behaviors aren't. And that little false premise is going to be exposed when these Christians appeal these cases on the grounds of freedom of religion. Actually before, because now the Court is in a quandry being fully unable to deny polygamists and incest marriage as well. One good deviant sex behavior protected from majority regulation is as good as another...
The 9th Amendment to the Constitution says that no part of it may be interpreted in order to squelch another part's full force and effect.
Might want to brush up on that one before you prematurely claim victory..
If they believe that doing business with certain people can bring harm to their business, then they do have the right to refuse them people service."The people in charge of the business can do whatever it is that they want to do with it because it is their business." I fear you are stupid enough to actually believe that. No, there are laws that prohibit a business from doing certain things. They cannot expose their employees to harm. They have to pay them a minimum wage and overtime. They cannot employ people under a certain age. They cannot employ undocumented aliens. They cannot refuse service to people, or refuse to hire people, based on race, ethnicity, gender, religion, real or perceived disability, age and, in some states, sexual orientation.If people do not like how a business is ran, they are free to go some where else any time that they want to.
God bless you always!!!
Holly
And if they promise not to have sex in the room? Then they can rent to two men? Can they require non-married couples to likewise promise "no nookie tonight"?Again, it's a NY Public Accomodation law....same thing would happen if the B & B refused to hose an interracial Wedding.
No, it isn't the same thing as an interracial marriage. Race is static. Behaviors aren't. And that little false premise is going to be exposed when these Christians appeal these cases on the grounds of freedom of religion. Actually before, because now the Court is in a quandry being fully unable to deny polygamists and incest marriage as well. One good deviant sex behavior protected from majority regulation is as good as another...
The 9th Amendment to the Constitution says that no part of it may be interpreted in order to squelch another part's full force and effect.
Might want to brush up on that one before you prematurely claim victory..
Funny how you end every comment with a wholly disingenuous "God bless you always" when your comments reveal a hatred of some of gods creation. The hypocrisy in you is deep. You need to understand the difference between the way you think it should be and the way it is. In this country, and just about all others, you do not have the right to refuse people service if the reason you do is based on race, etc.If they believe that doing business with certain people can bring harm to their business, then they do have the right to refuse them people service."The people in charge of the business can do whatever it is that they want to do with it because it is their business." I fear you are stupid enough to actually believe that. No, there are laws that prohibit a business from doing certain things. They cannot expose their employees to harm. They have to pay them a minimum wage and overtime. They cannot employ people under a certain age. They cannot employ undocumented aliens. They cannot refuse service to people, or refuse to hire people, based on race, ethnicity, gender, religion, real or perceived disability, age and, in some states, sexual orientation.If people do not like how a business is ran, they are free to go some where else any time that they want to.
God bless you always!!!
Holly
God bless you always!!!
Holly
This has been the law in NY since 2003.
The SCOTUS decision didn't change anything in New York.
If I truly hated someone, I would be all for them being blown away and have I ever once said that homosexual people deserve to be blown away for the way that they live their lives? Never.Funny how you end every comment with a wholly disingenuous "God bless you always" when your comments reveal a hatred of some of gods creation. The hypocrisy in you is deep. You need to understand the difference between the way you think it should be and the way it is. In this country, and just about all others, you do not have the right to refuse people service if the reason you do is based on race, etc.If they believe that doing business with certain people can bring harm to their business, then they do have the right to refuse them people service."The people in charge of the business can do whatever it is that they want to do with it because it is their business." I fear you are stupid enough to actually believe that. No, there are laws that prohibit a business from doing certain things. They cannot expose their employees to harm. They have to pay them a minimum wage and overtime. They cannot employ people under a certain age. They cannot employ undocumented aliens. They cannot refuse service to people, or refuse to hire people, based on race, ethnicity, gender, religion, real or perceived disability, age and, in some states, sexual orientation.If people do not like how a business is ran, they are free to go some where else any time that they want to.
God bless you always!!!
Holly
God bless you always!!!
Holly
The couple stated, “We are human beings, just like anybody else. We’re not asking to impose on anybody’s else beliefs or opinions, just to celebrate our love as any other two people would.”
What? They are not asking to impose on anybody's beliefs but are suing so they can impose on someone's personal beliefs? I'm telling you lesbians are fucking nuts. Bat shit coo coo
The couple stated, “We are human beings, just like anybody else. We’re not asking to impose on anybody’s else beliefs or opinions, just to celebrate our love as any other two people would.”
What? They are not asking to impose on anybody's beliefs but are suing so they can impose on someone's personal beliefs? I'm telling you lesbians are fucking nuts. Bat shit coo coo
The states are going to have too come together and do something about all this. I'm afraid. or they'll be suing everyone in sight who doesn't bow to them
The couple stated, “We are human beings, just like anybody else. We’re not asking to impose on anybody’s else beliefs or opinions, just to celebrate our love as any other two people would.”
What? They are not asking to impose on anybody's beliefs but are suing so they can impose on someone's personal beliefs? I'm telling you lesbians are fucking nuts. Bat shit coo coo
The states are going to have too come together and do something about all this. I'm afraid. or they'll be suing everyone in sight who doesn't bow to them
It's all of the master plan as they go for churches
