It's Good To Be Rich! More Republican Tax Breaks!

[francoHFW]

That's because you don't have the mentality that everyone else's money doesn't belong to them.

Do you think that it's OK for the rich to pay a less percentage of their total income toward taxes than you do?

The rich pay more in taxes in one year than many of the middle class and poor will pay in their lifetime.

Because they've NEVER made a higher percentage of the money before, dingbat. The richest are getting 95% of new wealth while the nonrich are going to hell. THAT'S YOU! lol. Functional MORON.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Just look at the dem one percenters begging to pay more in taxes. Its so touching.

 

[-S-]

It's both predictable and sad, the way all of these poor conservatives here take the time to lick the boots of the rich any chance they get.

 

[francoHFW]

The RW obstruction of any investment in the country's infrastructure, education, and training, AND their pandering to the bloated megarich , have been killing the nonrich and the country for 30 years, dumbass dupes. see sig.

Amazingly, you're not outraged in the least when O gives 80 billion a month, for six years, to wall street.

That's all the obstructionist GOP allowed, Pub dupe, and THEY just love it. How about a gd infrastructure/jobs bill and education/training for 3 million good jobs going begging? Of course NOT!- to save money for the rich! Your idiot party wrecks the world, obstructs a recovery, and bitches. A disgrace, functional idiot.

You got a 750 billion dollar bill for shovel ready jobs but your buffoon of a president gave it all to green unicorns.

Total BS. 200 billion for jobs, 40% of that stimulus was TAX CUTS, a great investment, jobs, 50% growth in a new industry that China was going to take over, stimulus ENDED the corrupt BOOOSH DEPRESSION. So dumb....

 

[Siete]

That's because you don't have the mentality that everyone else's money doesn't belong to them.

Do you think that it's OK for the rich to pay a less percentage of their total income toward taxes than you do?

The rich pay more in taxes in one year than many of the middle class and poor will pay in their lifetime.

Because they've NEVER made a higher percentage of the money before, dingbat. The richest are getting 95% of new wealth while the nonrich are going to hell. THAT'S YOU! lol. Functional MORON.

"higher percentage" .. screws with the simpletons little brain... poor genetics I'd say.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

The RW obstruction of any investment in the country's infrastructure, education, and training, AND their pandering to the bloated megarich , have been killing the nonrich and the country for 30 years, dumbass dupes. see sig.

Amazingly, you're not outraged in the least when O gives 80 billion a month, for six years, to wall street.

That's all the obstructionist GOP allowed, Pub dupe, and THEY just love it. How about a gd infrastructure/jobs bill and education/training for 3 million good jobs going begging? Of course NOT!- to save money for the rich! Your idiot party wrecks the world, obstructs a recovery, and bitches. A disgrace, functional idiot.

You got a 750 billion dollar bill for shovel ready jobs but your buffoon of a president gave it all to green unicorns.

Total BS. 200 billion for jobs, 40% of that stimulus was TAX CUTS, a great investment, jobs, 50% growth in a new industry that China was going to take over, stimulus ENDED the corrupt BOOOSH DEPRESSION. So dumb....

You'll believe anything your party tells you. Lol.

 

[OnePercenter]

Amazingly, you're not outraged in the least when O gives 80 billion a month, for six years, to wall street.

Convince corporate America who is making record profits to hire more people instead of closing stores for 'plumbing problems.'

 

[The Rabbi]

It's both predictable and sad, the way all of these poor conservatives here take the time to lick the boots of the rich any chance they get.

Look at the poor stupid libs here who think they can tax other people into prosperity. Greed and envy are such ugly things.

 

[The Rabbi]

Amazingly, you're not outraged in the least when O gives 80 billion a month, for six years, to wall street.

Convince corporate America who is making record profits to hire more people instead of closing stores for 'plumbing problems.'

Why should they need convincing? Do you think people who run corporations are too stupid to know what's good for them?

 

[Avatar4321]

Dealing with homelessness is a state issue at best via the 9th and 10th amendments to the constitution.

The best solution for child homelessness is to encourage people to get married and stay married before engaging in activities that create children.

 

[PredFan]

Thanks for demonstrating that the tax that was just cut didn't really accomplish anything in the first place.

 

[Moonglow]

Dealing with homelessness is a state issue at best via the 9th and 10th amendments to the constitution.

The best solution for child homelessness is to encourage people to get married and stay married before engaging in activities that create children.

Most do, they just don't end up that whey...

 

[Avatar4321]

That's because you don't have the mentality that everyone else's money doesn't belong to them.

Do you think that it's OK for the rich to pay a less percentage of their total income toward taxes than you do?

Does anybody know what is he talking about?

I'm not sure he does

 

[Siete]

peasants fighting for the King hoping the Prince will toss them a crumb ..

how nobel ...

 

[The Rabbi]

peasants fighting for the King hoping the Prince will toss them a crumb ..

how nobel ...

Stupids pretending to know what's best. How pathetic.

 

[francoHFW]

Just look at the dem one percenters begging to pay more in taxes. Its so touching.

True. Idiot. Keep voting for the greedy a-hole megarich, hater dupe. MY party doesn't lie, these are neutral stats, dupe. Can you spot the Problem, DUH....:

The Demise of the American Middle Class In Numbers.
Over the past 30 years the American dream has gradually disappeared. The process was slow, so most people didn’t notice. They just worked a few more hours, borrowed a little more and cut back on non-essentials. But looking at the numbers and comparing them over long time periods, it is obvious that things have changed drastically. Here are the details:
1. WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.
Over the past 63 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.
But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):
1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% – Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%
A 13% drop since 1980
2. THE TOP 10% GET A LARGER SHARE.
Share of National Income going to Top 10%:
1950 = 35%
1960 = 34%
1970 = 34%
1980 = 34% – Reagan
1990 = 40%
2000 = 47%
2007 = 50%
An increase of 16% since Reagan.
3. WORKERS COMPENSATED FOR THE LOSS OF INCOME BY SPENDING THEIR SAVINGS.
The savings Rose up to Reagan and fell during and after.
1950 = 6.0%
1960 = 7.0%
1970 = 8.5%
1980 = 10.0% – Reagan
1982 = 11.2% – Peak
1990 = 7.0%
2000 = 2.0%
2006 = -1.1% (Negative = withdrawing from savings)
A 12.3% drop after Reagan.
4. WORKERS ALSO BORROWED TO MAKE UP FOR THE LOSS.
Household Debt as percentage of GDP:
1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% – Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%
A 45% increase after 1980.
5. SO THE GAP BETWEEN THE RICHEST AND THE POOREST HAS GROWN.
Gap Between the Share of Capital Income earned by the top 1%
and the bottom 80%:
1980 = 10%
2003 = 56%
A 5.6 times increase.
6. AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IS GONE.
The Probably of Moving Up from the Bottom 40% to the Top 40%:
1945 = 12%
1958 = 6%
1990 = 3%
2000 = 2%
A 10% Decrease.
Links:
1 = ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/pf/totalf1.txt
1 = https://www.clevelandfed.org/Research/PolicyDis/No7Nov04.pdf
1 = http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Zh1bveXc8rA/SuddUhLWUaI/AAAAAAAAA7M/iU2gefk317M/s1600-h/Clipboard01.jpg
2 – http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/blog/09/04/27/CongratulationstoEmmanuelSaez/
3 = http://www.demos.org/inequality/images/charts/uspersonalsaving_thumb.gif
3 = http://www.bea.gov/national/nipaweb/TableView.asp?SelectedTable=58&Freq=Qtr&FirstYear=2008&LastYear=2010
4 = http://www.prudentbear.com/index.php/household-sector-debt-of-gdp
4 = http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/z1/current/
5/6 = http://www.businessinsider.com/15-charts-about-wealth-and-inequality-in-america-2010-4?slop=1#slideshow-start
Overview = http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2010062415/reagan-revolution-home-roost-charts

 

[OnePercenter]

Exactly how does it "screw" the Middle Class and the poor? Please explain. Thanks.
FYI -- Basically, with the amount of waste and fraud, every single citizen gets screwed. Our tax dollars are given away to foreign governments, used for the care and support of illegal immigrants, we build mosques on foreign soil, we supply weapons to drug lords and terrorists, we pay bribes to North Korea and Iran, we engage in senseless deadly costly wars, defense spending is out of control, we have way too many military bases on foreign soil, we give ridiculous perks and benefits to members of Congress, we bailout Wall Street, the financials, and corporate America, and we're exploring the far reaches of the universe, all on taxpayers' hard earned dollars.

The above doesn't include Medicare and Medicaid fraud and corruption, the fraud and corruption associated with the ACA, subsidies to rich farmers and big oil, and income tax evasion by hiding money off-shore. And, some large corporations pay no taxes at all ( GE ).

Now, exactly how are we getting screwed? Especially the Middle Class and the poor?

Less money for public services which are used by the middle class and poor much more than rich folks.

For instance, who got screwed when Republicans cut IRS employees? Not me, I can afford to hire my own people.

Less money for fire? Doesn't affect me, I have sprinklers. If I get really paranoid, I'll buy my own fire engine and staff it.

Less money for Police? I'll hire my own.

 

[OnePercenter]

This isnt about income tax, dolt.

Republican tax cuts for the rich aren't about income tax? How so?

 

[Avatar4321]

That's because you don't have the mentality that everyone else's money doesn't belong to them.

Do you think that it's OK for the rich to pay a less percentage of their total income toward taxes than you do?

This isnt about income tax, dolt.

You're assuming he understands the difference between income tax and inheritance tax

 

[Spare_change]

That's because you don't have the mentality that everyone else's money doesn't belong to them.

Do you think that it's OK for the rich to pay a less percentage of their total income toward taxes than you do?

Yes.

Your argument is fallacious and fails the logic test.