Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The proper English word is accept.What happens to a party that puts the stamp of approval on a criminal. This is simple, he is guilty by not allowing the existing evidence to be presented. To me it's a automatic. There is only one type of leader that does that and that is a dictator. We aren't talking about a blowjob or lying to congress, we are talking about putting this country in harms way for a criminal action of forcing Ukraine to investigate Biden by holding back the money needed to protect this Allie from this countries biggest enemy and threat. That has already been admitted and Biden guilt has already been looked into and found to be nothing. So the rights leader wanted Ukraine to lie to get the money. The right wing and its supporters are selling out this country to stay relevant and in power.
If anyone from the right responds to this you will find out how low they have come with the ridiculous defense of this monster.
Do you idiots ever proof read your nonsense?
Goddamn Chinese trolls.
It's beyond me how the crazy left maintains as much hatred after three years to refer to the President of the United States as a "criminal".
Actually the thread title doesn't say "the President". It says "the right".
so???
thread drift ...
I blame Comey, but then for the past 20 years or so I've been wondering how the FBI could be de-politicized. And actually it's not so much that both the gop and dems have partisans in the organization, but people within the organization view its role as furthering their own wishes. And that led to Ruby Ridge, Richard Jewell, Comey's November Surprise and the NYC offices demand that Hillary be indicted …..The proper English word is accept.What happens to a party that puts the stamp of approval on a criminal. This is simple, he is guilty by not allowing the existing evidence to be presented. To me it's a automatic. There is only one type of leader that does that and that is a dictator. We aren't talking about a blowjob or lying to congress, we are talking about putting this country in harms way for a criminal action of forcing Ukraine to investigate Biden by holding back the money needed to protect this Allie from this countries biggest enemy and threat. That has already been admitted and Biden guilt has already been looked into and found to be nothing. So the rights leader wanted Ukraine to lie to get the money. The right wing and its supporters are selling out this country to stay relevant and in power.
If anyone from the right responds to this you will find out how low they have come with the ridiculous defense of this monster.
Do you idiots ever proof read your nonsense?
Goddamn Chinese trolls.
Look on the bright as written it actually means we did not allow Trump to become president. Pretty funny actually.
Jo
contribute or you are gone.What happens to a party that puts the stamp of approval on a criminal. This is simple, he is guilty by not allowing the existing evidence to be presented. To me it's a automatic. There is only one type of leader that does that and that is a dictator. We aren't talking about a blowjob or lying to congress, we are talking about putting this country in harms way for a criminal action of forcing Ukraine to investigate Biden by holding back the money needed to protect this Allie from this countries biggest enemy and threat. That has already been admitted and Biden guilt has already been looked into and found to be nothing. So the rights leader wanted Ukraine to lie to get the money. The right wing and its supporters are selling out this country to stay relevant and in power.
If anyone from the right responds to this you will find out how low they have come with the ridiculous defense of this monster.
This statement ranks up there with these zingers assuming facts not in evidence:It;s beyond me why the right would except a criminal for their leader
What law did Trump break?What happens to a party that puts the stamp of approval on a criminal. This is simple, he is guilty by not allowing the existing evidence to be presented. To me it's a automatic. There is only one type of leader that does that and that is a dictator. We aren't talking about a blowjob or lying to congress, we are talking about putting this country in harms way for a criminal action of forcing Ukraine to investigate Biden by holding back the money needed to protect this Allie from this countries biggest enemy and threat. That has already been admitted and Biden guilt has already been looked into and found to be nothing. So the rights leader wanted Ukraine to lie to get the money. The right wing and its supporters are selling out this country to stay relevant and in power.
If anyone from the right responds to this you will find out how low they have come with the ridiculous defense of this monster.
You don't have that authority, dipshit.contribute or you are gone.What happens to a party that puts the stamp of approval on a criminal. This is simple, he is guilty by not allowing the existing evidence to be presented. To me it's a automatic. There is only one type of leader that does that and that is a dictator. We aren't talking about a blowjob or lying to congress, we are talking about putting this country in harms way for a criminal action of forcing Ukraine to investigate Biden by holding back the money needed to protect this Allie from this countries biggest enemy and threat. That has already been admitted and Biden guilt has already been looked into and found to be nothing. So the rights leader wanted Ukraine to lie to get the money. The right wing and its supporters are selling out this country to stay relevant and in power.
If anyone from the right responds to this you will find out how low they have come with the ridiculous defense of this monster.
I feel no guilt in judging him that way, me doing it is 1/100 the threat that this turd puts on our legal system ,constitution and values."Criminal" is too strong. But when Gen Kelly left, he sort of predicted something like this would happen because Trump really doesn't want any adult around who will tell him, "if you do this despite me telling you it's a bad idea that will get you in trouble, I quit." Trump has a basic need to be surrounded by sycophants. He always has, or at least has since Ray Cohn died. And Cohn was more his teacher.
The same thing happened to Nixon because Erlichman and Haldemann weren't strong enough, and his Attny General really was a criminal. But Nixon didn't need sycophants, but rather operated from fear. Both LBJ and W chose to take the counsel of the wrong people. JFK was made of sterner stuff, and he had his younger brother who was even more devious but also more careful. Reagan brought an entire team with him from Calif. And he was probably the only one with a true sense of humility. HW had that too. Carter had humility but he hated being a politician.
From before day one, people were foretelling that Trump would run amuck with his schemes of illegal paybacks and cheating others in deals.
Easy , he's a criminal. Its very simple I will be proved right and you will be prove irrational and wrong.It's beyond me how the crazy left maintains as much hatred after three years to refer to the President of the United States as a "criminal".
You have to be delusional to believe Trump is a threat to our legal system. Hillary's supporters are the ones trying to flush our system of justice down the toilet.I feel no guilt in judging him that way, me doing it is 1/100 the threat that this turd puts on our legal system ,constitution and values."Criminal" is too strong. But when Gen Kelly left, he sort of predicted something like this would happen because Trump really doesn't want any adult around who will tell him, "if you do this despite me telling you it's a bad idea that will get you in trouble, I quit." Trump has a basic need to be surrounded by sycophants. He always has, or at least has since Ray Cohn died. And Cohn was more his teacher.
The same thing happened to Nixon because Erlichman and Haldemann weren't strong enough, and his Attny General really was a criminal. But Nixon didn't need sycophants, but rather operated from fear. Both LBJ and W chose to take the counsel of the wrong people. JFK was made of sterner stuff, and he had his younger brother who was even more devious but also more careful. Reagan brought an entire team with him from Calif. And he was probably the only one with a true sense of humility. HW had that too. Carter had humility but he hated being a politician.
From before day one, people were foretelling that Trump would run amuck with his schemes of illegal paybacks and cheating others in deals.
bye DickWhat happens to a party that puts the stamp of approval on a criminal. This is simple, he is guilty by not allowing the existing evidence to be presented. To me it's a automatic. There is only one type of leader that does that and that is a dictator. We aren't talking about a blowjob or lying to congress, we are talking about putting this country in harms way for a criminal action of forcing Ukraine to investigate Biden by holding back the money needed to protect this Allie from this countries biggest enemy and threat. That has already been admitted and Biden guilt has already been looked into and found to be nothing. So the rights leader wanted Ukraine to lie to get the money. The right wing and its supporters are selling out this country to stay relevant and in power.
If anyone from the right responds to this you will find out how low they have come with the ridiculous defense of this monster.
What happens to a political party when all they have left to speak for them are illiterate fucksticks like yourself?
You can't name a single crime he committed.Easy , he's a criminal. Its very simple I will be proved right and you will be prove irrational and wrong.It's beyond me how the crazy left maintains as much hatred after three years to refer to the President of the United States as a "criminal".
look a little closer , The rights environment and regulations opposition has nothing to do with irrational laws and regs , they say it does but the reality is it is always nothing but a bottom line issue or for votes. I guarantee when these clowns get in office and try to change regulation with their long list of really irrational regulation. when they get in power to do something with them, they go after profit restricting regulations and save those irrational ones like they are made out of gold to use again in the future for the transfer of wealth to themselves. and the body parts on factory floors will increase, when it comes to regulating big b, they will eat our children for the bottom line.That made sense to you. You're special."Criminal" is too strong. But when Gen Kelly left, he sort of predicted something like this would happen because Trump really doesn't want any adult around who will tell him, "if you do this despite me telling you it's a bad idea that will get you in trouble, I quit." Trump has a basic need to be surrounded by sycophants. He always has, or at least has since Ray Cohn died. And Cohn was more his teacher.
The same thing happened to Nixon because Erlichman and Haldemann weren't strong enough, and his Attny General really was a criminal. But Nixon didn't need sycophants, but rather operated from fear. Both LBJ and W chose to take the counsel of the wrong people. JFK was made of sterner stuff, and he had his younger brother who was even more devious but also more careful. Reagan brought an entire team with him from Calif. And he was probably the only one with a true sense of humility. HW had that too. Carter had humility but he hated being a politician.
From before day one, people were foretelling that Trump would run amuck with his schemes of illegal paybacks and cheating others in deals.
Were you born stupid or is dishonesty just in your Genes? First of all your last paragraph is as general as the New York times Sunday horoscope. It's a meaningless inference that qualifies as rank propaganda. Our entire government operates on that principle you doofus. Everyday there are hundreds of backroom handshakes and deals that take place. Every major bill that passes through the lawmaking body is replete with theft and Payola. The reason you guys look so ridiculous is because you want to have rules all of a sudden and just for this one instance.
Nobody is buying the double standard.
Jo
The irony of this whole thing is that today the EPA's power over regulating clean water in places where there isn't water were rolled back. BLM is actually moving to Grand Jct Co. (which is bad news if you wanted to buy real estate there, but good news for people using land in the west. Or it could be, if the users realize conservation is conservatism)
Don't get me wrong, Trump is at his basic level a grifter and bully, but there is a kernel of truth to his belief that the US has been used, and the bureaucracy in an organization can come to serve itself.
His narcissism and sense of inferiority get in his way. Nothing new.
The ones that reduce profit the most with little improvement to the environment are the most irrational and deserve to be repealed. It takes a special kind of dumbass not to understand that.look a little closer , The rights environment and regulations opposition has nothing to do with irrational laws and regs , they say it does but the reality is it is always nothing but a bottom line issue or for votes. I guarantee when these clowns get in office and try to change regulation with their long list of really irrational regulation. when they get in power to do something with them, they go after profit restricting regulations and save those irrational ones like they are made out of gold to use again in the future for the transfer of wealth to themselves. and the body parts on factory floors will increase, when it comes to regulating big b, they will eat our children for the bottom line.That made sense to you. You're special."Criminal" is too strong. But when Gen Kelly left, he sort of predicted something like this would happen because Trump really doesn't want any adult around who will tell him, "if you do this despite me telling you it's a bad idea that will get you in trouble, I quit." Trump has a basic need to be surrounded by sycophants. He always has, or at least has since Ray Cohn died. And Cohn was more his teacher.
The same thing happened to Nixon because Erlichman and Haldemann weren't strong enough, and his Attny General really was a criminal. But Nixon didn't need sycophants, but rather operated from fear. Both LBJ and W chose to take the counsel of the wrong people. JFK was made of sterner stuff, and he had his younger brother who was even more devious but also more careful. Reagan brought an entire team with him from Calif. And he was probably the only one with a true sense of humility. HW had that too. Carter had humility but he hated being a politician.
From before day one, people were foretelling that Trump would run amuck with his schemes of illegal paybacks and cheating others in deals.
Were you born stupid or is dishonesty just in your Genes? First of all your last paragraph is as general as the New York times Sunday horoscope. It's a meaningless inference that qualifies as rank propaganda. Our entire government operates on that principle you doofus. Everyday there are hundreds of backroom handshakes and deals that take place. Every major bill that passes through the lawmaking body is replete with theft and Payola. The reason you guys look so ridiculous is because you want to have rules all of a sudden and just for this one instance.
Nobody is buying the double standard.
Jo
The irony of this whole thing is that today the EPA's power over regulating clean water in places where there isn't water were rolled back. BLM is actually moving to Grand Jct Co. (which is bad news if you wanted to buy real estate there, but good news for people using land in the west. Or it could be, if the users realize conservation is conservatism)
Don't get me wrong, Trump is at his basic level a grifter and bully, but there is a kernel of truth to his belief that the US has been used, and the bureaucracy in an organization can come to serve itself.
His narcissism and sense of inferiority get in his way. Nothing new.
contribute or you are gone.What happens to a party that puts the stamp of approval on a criminal. This is simple, he is guilty by not allowing the existing evidence to be presented. To me it's a automatic. There is only one type of leader that does that and that is a dictator. We aren't talking about a blowjob or lying to congress, we are talking about putting this country in harms way for a criminal action of forcing Ukraine to investigate Biden by holding back the money needed to protect this Allie from this countries biggest enemy and threat. That has already been admitted and Biden guilt has already been looked into and found to be nothing. So the rights leader wanted Ukraine to lie to get the money. The right wing and its supporters are selling out this country to stay relevant and in power.
If anyone from the right responds to this you will find out how low they have come with the ridiculous defense of this monster.
he did not claim executive privilege once during the house impeachment .he even declassified the transcript of his talk with a foreign leader ..to my knowledge that type of openness is unprecedented ! the vile Oboma claimed executive privilege dozens of times ! its clear that what you consider a criminal is based only on your political leanings and emotions ...What happens to a party that puts the stamp of approval on a criminal. This is simple, he is guilty by not allowing the existing evidence to be presented. To me it's a automatic. There is only one type of leader that does that and that is a dictator. We aren't talking about a blowjob or lying to congress, we are talking about putting this country in harms way for a criminal action of forcing Ukraine to investigate Biden by holding back the money needed to protect this Allie from this countries biggest enemy and threat. That has already been admitted and Biden guilt has already been looked into and found to be nothing. So the rights leader wanted Ukraine to lie to get the money. The right wing and its supporters are selling out this country to stay relevant and in power.
If anyone from the right responds to this you will find out how low they have come with the ridiculous defense of this monster.
What happens to a party that puts the stamp of approval on a criminal. This is simple, he is guilty by not allowing the existing evidence to be presented. To me it's a automatic. There is only one type of leader that does that and that is a dictator. We aren't talking about a blowjob or lying to congress, we are talking about putting this country in harms way for a criminal action of forcing Ukraine to investigate Biden by holding back the money needed to protect this Allie from this countries biggest enemy and threat. That has already been admitted and Biden guilt has already been looked into and found to be nothing. So the rights leader wanted Ukraine to lie to get the money. The right wing and its supporters are selling out this country to stay relevant and in power.
If anyone from the right responds to this you will find out how low they have come with the ridiculous defense of this monster.