It really wasn't RAPE RAPE. Whoopi on Polanski drugging a kid and screwing her.

[tinydancer]

President Obama said a rape is a rape is a rape. Do you understand my OP at all or are you so knee jerk you can't see the hypocrisy? Don't bother answering.

Why didn't he condemn Whoopi. Obama does condemn others all the time in the media even over such small shit as Kanye West and Taylor Swift. The TMZ Prez always has an opinion.

If Obama believes a rape is a rape is a rape is a rape why did he not condemn Whoopi for her comments.

Not to the wannabe senator, show me in his quote where he condoned rape?

You can't.

It's amusing how Obama wants to interject his opinion on issues and then ignores when he might offend his base. What a moral compass.

I didn't realize that Obama's base is made up of viewers of The View. What a dumb ass statement.

Obama's base are the Views audience. That's why he goes on it. Behar is always begging to blow him on the show.

 

[J.E.D]

It's amusing how Obama wants to interject his opinion on issues and then ignores when he might offend his base. What a moral compass.

I didn't realize that Obama's base is made up of viewers of The View. What a dumb ass statement.

Obama's base are the Views audience. That's why he goes on it. Behar is always begging to blow him on the show.

My gawd, you're stupid.

 

[Noomi]

She means that there is a difference between non consensual sex and consensual sex. I knew exactly what she meant when she said it, couldn't figure why no one else could.

Besides that, the kid was 13, and a whore. She was already having sex, and drank often, and had taken the same drug Polanski gave her, with alcohol.

Not only that, what sort of a mother allows their 13 year old daughter to go home with a man 30 years older?

 

[tinydancer]

No...he just questioned the legitimacy of rape victims and came up with some ridiculous notion that a woman's body can reject spermatozoa from a "legitimate" rapist....all for some redneck logic idea to ban even those abortions.

WHOOPIng cough was wrong....100% wrong. But that doesn't justify Atkin's comments or his magical thinking....You are just trying to rationalize a fucking nut case.

Problem is with Akin he didn't make up this shit about a doctor telling him this. I think it's a medieval thought process but it's been around for centuries.

And we are talking in the medical world here. Not just nutbars.

This is centuries old in the medical world.

And he never questioned the legitimacy of rape victims. Here you lie. Stop lying.

show me where anyone but possibly a doctor who is a nutbag himself believes that tripe. And I am not lying. His whole premise was that if a woman gets pregnant while being raped, it wasn't a "legitimate" rape.

Well how about interpreting this ass backwards to fit some bizarre liberal argument. I put up his exact quote.

How fucked in the brain are you?

His point was that he has been told as have others (and I disagree with the pro lifers on this) that there is medical evidence that shows that a woman who is submitted to a forcible rape will somehow thru the stress be able to beat the shit out of the sperm and prevent pregnancy.

It's stupid. It's a medieval concept. It's been around for centuries and in my mind I think it's completely bullshit.

Now that aside. Akin was only parroting what he's been told.

But never once, not once did he deny the rape.

That is sheer and utter fucking bullshit from the left.

 

[tinydancer]

She means that there is a difference between non consensual sex and consensual sex. I knew exactly what she meant when she said it, couldn't figure why no one else could.

Besides that, the kid was 13, and a whore. She was already having sex, and drank often, and had taken the same drug Polanski gave her, with alcohol.

Not only that, what sort of a mother allows their 13 year old daughter to go home with a man 30 years older?

Oh you bitch from hell. Oh pardon me. What a liberal you are.

So you're with Whoopi on this are you. It wasn't rape rape.

Wow.

You prove my point that liberals are scumbuckets when it comes to defending one of their own.

ETA: anyone who can call a 13 year old child a whore and blame her for what happened is a piece of work from hell. You are a disgusting pig.

 

[Shelzin]

She means that there is a difference between non consensual sex and consensual sex. I knew exactly what she meant when she said it, couldn't figure why no one else could.

Besides that, the kid was 13, and a whore. She was already having sex, and drank often, and had taken the same drug Polanski gave her, with alcohol.

Not only that, what sort of a mother allows their 13 year old daughter to go home with a man 30 years older?

Oh you bitch from hell. Oh pardon me. What a liberal you are.

So you're with Whoopi on this are you. It wasn't rape rape.

Wow.

You prove my point that liberals are scumbuckets when it comes to defending one of their own.

ETA: anyone who can call a 13 year old child a whore and blame her for what happened is a piece of work from hell. You are a disgusting pig.

Well... I think it's fairly obvious from my previous replies in this thread that I'm not with Whoopi on this.

However what Noomi just said as to what Whoopi meant is exactly how I took it as well.

There is no question in my mind that a 30 year old shouldn't be having sex with a 13 year old girl in this day and age. However... I do not believe that the punishment should be the same for a willing 13 year old girl having sex with a 30 year old, as a 30 year old forcing himself on her. They are both forms of rape as defined by society, but one is certainly less heinous than the other and should warrant a lesser punishment.

 

[Noomi]

She means that there is a difference between non consensual sex and consensual sex. I knew exactly what she meant when she said it, couldn't figure why no one else could.

Besides that, the kid was 13, and a whore. She was already having sex, and drank often, and had taken the same drug Polanski gave her, with alcohol.

Not only that, what sort of a mother allows their 13 year old daughter to go home with a man 30 years older?

Oh you bitch from hell. Oh pardon me. What a liberal you are.

So you're with Whoopi on this are you. It wasn't rape rape.

Wow.

You prove my point that liberals are scumbuckets when it comes to defending one of their own.

ETA: anyone who can call a 13 year old child a whore and blame her for what happened is a piece of work from hell. You are a disgusting pig.

I never said I was with Whoopi. I simply said that I know what she meant, because unlike conservatives, I don't go by my emotions, and jump to conclusions.

The 13 year old was a whore. No 13 yr old should be having sex at that age, and why the hell aren't you conservatives attacking the mother for not bothering to stop her child from drinking and drugging and having sex?

Great parent, that one. Mother Of The Year, for sure.

 

[Noomi]

She means that there is a difference between non consensual sex and consensual sex. I knew exactly what she meant when she said it, couldn't figure why no one else could.

Besides that, the kid was 13, and a whore. She was already having sex, and drank often, and had taken the same drug Polanski gave her, with alcohol.

Not only that, what sort of a mother allows their 13 year old daughter to go home with a man 30 years older?

Oh you bitch from hell. Oh pardon me. What a liberal you are.

So you're with Whoopi on this are you. It wasn't rape rape.

Wow.

You prove my point that liberals are scumbuckets when it comes to defending one of their own.

ETA: anyone who can call a 13 year old child a whore and blame her for what happened is a piece of work from hell. You are a disgusting pig.

Well... I think it's fairly obvious from my previous replies in this thread that I'm not with Whoopi on this.

However what Noomi just said as to what Whoopi meant is exactly how I took it as well.

There is no question in my mind that a 30 year old shouldn't be having sex with a 13 year old girl in this day and age. However... I do not believe that the punishment should be the same for a willing 13 year old girl having sex with a 30 year old, as a 30 year old forcing himself on her. They are both forms of rape as defined by society, but one is certainly less heinous than the other and should warrant a lesser punishment.

You are correct.

 

[tinydancer]

She means that there is a difference between non consensual sex and consensual sex. I knew exactly what she meant when she said it, couldn't figure why no one else could.

Besides that, the kid was 13, and a whore. She was already having sex, and drank often, and had taken the same drug Polanski gave her, with alcohol.

Not only that, what sort of a mother allows their 13 year old daughter to go home with a man 30 years older?

Oh you bitch from hell. Oh pardon me. What a liberal you are.

So you're with Whoopi on this are you. It wasn't rape rape.

Wow.

You prove my point that liberals are scumbuckets when it comes to defending one of their own.

ETA: anyone who can call a 13 year old child a whore and blame her for what happened is a piece of work from hell. You are a disgusting pig.

Well... I think it's fairly obvious from my previous replies in this thread that I'm not with Whoopi on this.

However what Noomi just said as to what Whoopi meant is exactly how I took it as well.

There is no question in my mind that a 30 year old shouldn't be having sex with a 13 year old girl in this day and age. However... I do not believe that the punishment should be the same for a willing 13 year old girl having sex with a 30 year old, as a 30 year old forcing himself on her. They are both forms of rape as defined by society, but one is certainly less heinous than the other and should warrant a lesser punishment.

You and Noomi are proving my point that people look at rape in varying degrees. So what separates you then from Akin talking about legitimate rape?

Obviously both of you don't consider this thirteen year old child's rape to be a legitimate rape. Noomi going so far as to call the 13 year old a whore.

Then please explain to me why liberals are freaking out at Akin's term of "legitimate" rape when just now you consider rape to be considered heinous or less heinous?

And Noomi considers it consensual sex for a grown man to have sex with a 13 year old child.

Why the outcry?

 

[Papageorgio]

She means that there is a difference between non consensual sex and consensual sex. I knew exactly what she meant when she said it, couldn't figure why no one else could.

Besides that, the kid was 13, and a whore. She was already having sex, and drank often, and had taken the same drug Polanski gave her, with alcohol.

Not only that, what sort of a mother allows their 13 year old daughter to go home with a man 30 years older?

There is no consent at 13, there are laws in place that protect children, and Polanski being an adult knew better, Polanski is a pedophile. Polanski had an obligation as every adult does to look out for the child's best interest and not his own.

A jury of his peers convicted him on rape.

I'm not sure why liberals consider a 13 year old a whore and defend a 30 year old man.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Mr. President Obama. Your side doesn't agree with you that a rape is a rape is a rape. Why didn't you come out Mr. President and chastise Goldberg for her comments on "The View".

Were you golfing Mr. President or did you agree with Whoopi that Polanski drilling a 14 year old up the ass after plying her with drugs wasn't a "rape rape"?

I'd like to know.

When it comes to Liberals, a pedophile like Roman Polanski didn't commit a rape. Whoopi said and the you tube is out there "it really wasn't a rape rape".

Left vs Right. Left being obsessed and going koo koo bye bye nutso over a candidate who has been pro life for forever discussing "legal rape" and a doctor telling him that the stress during the rape can help prevent pregnancy because the body goes into a "repel" zone.

But the left not having any issue with Polanski. As a matter of fact, the left elite in Hollywood embracing Roman even though he fucked a 14 year old after drugging her.


Polanski was not guilty of 'rape-rape', says Whoopi Goldberg

'We're a different kind of society, we see things differently,' actor says in defence of Roman Polanski

from the article:

As a guest on The View chatshow on US television, she said: "I know it wasn't rape-rape. It was something else but I don't believe it was rape-rape. He went to jail and and when they let him out he was like, 'You know what, this guy's going to give me a hundred years in jail. I'm not staying.' So that's why he left."

Later in the programme she added: "We're a different kind of society, we see things differently ... would I want my 14-year-old having sex with somebody? Not necessarily, no."


You libs are such hypocrites.

Polanski was not guilty of 'rape-rape', says Whoopi Goldberg | Film | guardian.co.uk

WTF does Whoopi Goldberg have to do with anyone here?

 

[Noomi]

She means that there is a difference between non consensual sex and consensual sex. I knew exactly what she meant when she said it, couldn't figure why no one else could.

Besides that, the kid was 13, and a whore. She was already having sex, and drank often, and had taken the same drug Polanski gave her, with alcohol.

Not only that, what sort of a mother allows their 13 year old daughter to go home with a man 30 years older?

There is no consent at 13, there are laws in place that protect children, and Polanski being an adult knew better, Polanski is a pedophile. Polanski had an obligation as every adult does to look out for the child's best interest and not his own.

A jury of his peers convicted him on rape.

I'm not sure why liberals consider a 13 year old a whore and defend a 30 year old man.

Anyone who is having sex at that age is a whore, I don't care who you are.

A 13 year old can consent to sex. If she has sex with a 13 year old boy, that is not a crime, is it?

 

[NYcarbineer]

How many Mormons have married 13 year olds over the years?

 

[GuyPinestra]

How many Mormons have married 13 year olds over the years?

Ask the Prophet Mohammed... his wife was 9 when the marriage was 'consummated'...

 

[Papageorgio]

She means that there is a difference between non consensual sex and consensual sex. I knew exactly what she meant when she said it, couldn't figure why no one else could.

Besides that, the kid was 13, and a whore. She was already having sex, and drank often, and had taken the same drug Polanski gave her, with alcohol.

Not only that, what sort of a mother allows their 13 year old daughter to go home with a man 30 years older?

There is no consent at 13, there are laws in place that protect children, and Polanski being an adult knew better, Polanski is a pedophile. Polanski had an obligation as every adult does to look out for the child's best interest and not his own.

A jury of his peers convicted him on rape.

I'm not sure why liberals consider a 13 year old a whore and defend a 30 year old man.

Anyone who is having sex at that age is a whore, I don't care who you are.

A 13 year old can consent to sex. If she has sex with a 13 year old boy, that is not a crime, is it?

She was 13, he was 30, why do you think there are laws against it?

So what is your definition of slut?

What do you call Polanski?

 

[Papageorgio]

How many Mormons have married 13 year olds over the years?

I have no idea but in most states, it is against law and doesn't make it right.

 

[Shelzin]

Oh you bitch from hell. Oh pardon me. What a liberal you are.

So you're with Whoopi on this are you. It wasn't rape rape.

Wow.

You prove my point that liberals are scumbuckets when it comes to defending one of their own.

ETA: anyone who can call a 13 year old child a whore and blame her for what happened is a piece of work from hell. You are a disgusting pig.

Well... I think it's fairly obvious from my previous replies in this thread that I'm not with Whoopi on this.

However what Noomi just said as to what Whoopi meant is exactly how I took it as well.

There is no question in my mind that a 30 year old shouldn't be having sex with a 13 year old girl in this day and age. However... I do not believe that the punishment should be the same for a willing 13 year old girl having sex with a 30 year old, as a 30 year old forcing himself on her. They are both forms of rape as defined by society, but one is certainly less heinous than the other and should warrant a lesser punishment.

You and Noomi are proving my point that people look at rape in varying degrees. So what separates you then from Akin talking about legitimate rape?

I'm not a politician running for office.

Obviously both of you don't consider this thirteen year old child's rape to be a legitimate rape. Noomi going so far as to call the 13 year old a whore.

Oh no... She was "raped" but that tag just by itself carries a weight with it. Call it what it is... Statutory rape with a willing partner. Still wrong mind you, but hardly worthy of the title of simply being "rape"... Rape automatically promotes that one of the parties was not willing. This is not true in this case if I understand everything correctly.

Then please explain to me why liberals are freaking out at Akin's term of "legitimate" rape when just now you consider rape to be considered heinous or less heinous?

See above response. If that's not it I can't help you. I'm not what you think I am.

And Noomi considers it consensual sex for a grown man to have sex with a 13 year old child.

Eh... It was consensual sex. But that doesn't make it legal. o.0

Why the outcry?

*shrugs* Ask someone who is out crying. That would require a republican supporter to respond. Not I. I'm just giving you my view on it. I speak for no one but me.

 

[Papageorgio]

Well... I think it's fairly obvious from my previous replies in this thread that I'm not with Whoopi on this.

However what Noomi just said as to what Whoopi meant is exactly how I took it as well.

There is no question in my mind that a 30 year old shouldn't be having sex with a 13 year old girl in this day and age. However... I do not believe that the punishment should be the same for a willing 13 year old girl having sex with a 30 year old, as a 30 year old forcing himself on her. They are both forms of rape as defined by society, but one is certainly less heinous than the other and should warrant a lesser punishment.

You and Noomi are proving my point that people look at rape in varying degrees. So what separates you then from Akin talking about legitimate rape?

I'm not a politician running for office.


Oh no... She was "raped" but that tag just by itself carries a weight with it. Call it what it is... Statutory rape with a willing partner. Still wrong mind you, but hardly worthy of the title of simply being "rape"... Rape automatically promotes that one of the parties was not willing. This is not true in this case if I understand everything correctly.


See above response. If that's not it I can't help you. I'm not what you think I am.

And Noomi considers it consensual sex for a grown man to have sex with a 13 year old child.

Eh... It was consensual sex. But that doesn't make it legal. o.0

Why the outcry?

*shrugs* Ask someone who is out crying. That would require a republican supporter to respond. Not I. I'm just giving you my view on it. I speak for no one but me.

A 13 year old cannot give consent.

 

[Shelzin]

You and Noomi are proving my point that people look at rape in varying degrees. So what separates you then from Akin talking about legitimate rape?

I'm not a politician running for office.


Oh no... She was "raped" but that tag just by itself carries a weight with it. Call it what it is... Statutory rape with a willing partner. Still wrong mind you, but hardly worthy of the title of simply being "rape"... Rape automatically promotes that one of the parties was not willing. This is not true in this case if I understand everything correctly.


See above response. If that's not it I can't help you. I'm not what you think I am.


Eh... It was consensual sex. But that doesn't make it legal. o.0

Why the outcry?

*shrugs* Ask someone who is out crying. That would require a republican supporter to respond. Not I. I'm just giving you my view on it. I speak for no one but me.

A 13 cannot give consent.

Which is why it is a specific kind of rape. Statutory rape. It's illegal, period... No question something unlawful was done. However it can be statutory rape with a unwilling partner. Or with a willing partner. If the partner was willing I would suggest that it's less heinous than one who was not. Because then there is an assault with it if she wasn't willing.

Now saying that if it's "legitimate rape" is nothing more than saying we don't know if she was raped or not given that there is no such thing as lawfully raping someone.

 

[kwc57]

Could anything be more irrelevant than a BS statutory rape from 1971? Drugged her? LOL

Here is something relevant Franchole, fuck you.