Israel MUST stop recieving all USA funds

[Sixties Fan]

Totally and completely WRONG.
The Arabs came from Africa over 15,000 years ago, but then after Africa, when FIRST to the Levant.
The Canaanites, Akkadians, Urites, Amorites, Edomites, Phoenicians, Philistine, Hebrew, etc., are ALL Arabs.
The Arabs on the Arabian Peninsula came from the Levant, LATER.

And Jews did NOT at all come from Judea.
We do not know where Jews came from because they were called Hebrew until they invaded Jerusalem around 1000 BC.
They are not native.
They may have come from Egypt, but there is no history of them at all before Egypt.
Jews only stayed in Judea for less than 250 years.
As evil invaders, they were forced out by the Assyrians, the Babylonians, Romans, Crusaders, etc.
No one liked them, due to their sins of arrogance and pride.

The only reason Jews are called Semitic or have any connection to the Mideast at all is because the ancient Hebrew originally were Arab.
The word "Semitic" means "of an Arab language group".
It does not mean Jewish.

There is no such thing as semitic people.

Semitic refers to languages:

Semitic languages occur in written form from a very early historical date in West Asia, with East Semitic Akkadian and Eblaite texts (written in a script adapted from Sumerian cuneiform) appearing from the 30th century BCE and the 25th century BCE in Mesopotamia and the north eastern Levant respectively. The only earlier attested languages are Sumerian, Elamite (2800 BCE to 550 BCE), both language isolates, and Egyptian. Amorite appeared in Mesopotamia and the northern Levant circa 2000 BC, followed by the mutually intelligible Canaanite languages (including Hebrew, Phoenician, Moabite, Edomite and Ammonite, and perhaps Ekronite, Amalekite and Sutean), the still spoken Aramaic, and Ugaritic during the 2nd millennium BC.

Semitic languages - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Rigby5]

There weren't Arabs until the late 9th century BCE.

And still remain the largest illiterate group on earth,
Arab supremacists are just greedy imperialist bafoons.

That is REALLY ignorant.
The Canaanites were Arab and existed in the Levant as early as 12,000 BC.
Arabs created nearly all languages, such as Aramaic and Phoenician,
The languages they did not create were Egyptian and Sanskrit.

 

[Sixties Fan]

Wrong.
All the archeological and historic records say that all people who speak Semitic languages are from the same Arab race.
That includes the Canaanites, Akkadians, Phoenicians, Urites, Amorites, Nabatians, Philistines, Edomites, Hebrew, etc.

Jews originally were just a particular group of Arabs who went to Egypt to avoid a drought in the Sinai.
That is all.
And obviously God gave them nothing, or else they would not have had to leave or murder in order to steal land that was never theirs.
The Hebrew invading the Land of Canaan massacred Canaanite women and children at Jericho, so obviously they were not children of God.
They were evil invaders.

Be careful with your back. You are bending yourself, and the truth, totally out of shape.

So sorry that your evangelical or whatever Christian education has led you to become so bent out of shape the way you keep showing yourself, post after post.

One lie about Jews after another.

Coma could be next.

 

[Rigby5]

North, South, East or West Canaan.

Does it ever enter your mind, from what you just posted, that Jews ARE from Ancient Canaan while the Arabs ARE NOT. And never have been from Canaan, but are now, in order to destroy Israel....

suddenly Indigenous to Canaan.

Wrong.
If Jews were indigenous to the Land of Canaan, then they would not have invaded and massacred around 1000 BC.
And we know they also were forced to leave by the Assyrians withing 250 years.
If the Jews were indigenous to the Land of Canaan, they would never have gone to Egypt, because there was never a drought on the Jordan river.

 

[Rigby5]

Come to think of it, it was Arabs who though it was a nifty idea to capture Black Africans, and sell them to be shipped all over the world as slaves.

I think reparations are in order.

Wrong.
It was Egyptians, Greeks, etc., who started slavery.
Black Africans were not the original slaves.
In fact, the Black Kushites likely were the first slave traders.

 

[Rigby5]

so you cant show me where that exists,,

its OK I already knew it didnt,,

Sure I can.
Rights always have to come from our human DNA.
That is where they have to exist.
If our DNA were different, such as if we were carnivores instead of omnivores, then our concepts of inherent rights would be totally different.

Anyone looking for legislation is foolish, because most legislation is history is autocratic tyranny.

 

[Sixties Fan]

Wrong.
If Jews were indigenous to the Land of Canaan, then they would not have invaded and massacred around 1000 BC.
And we know they also were forced to leave by the Assyrians withing 250 years.
If the Jews were indigenous to the Land of Canaan, they would never have gone to Egypt, because there was never a drought on the Jordan river.

You know nothing.

Christians like you know nothing but to change the history of the Jews, as if the history of their ancestors, and of Christianity was this pure, white snow, never to be criticized for all the invasions and massacres and destructions they have caused.

Ah......you are one of those....The River Jordan never drought.....people.

You are totally ignorant and follow anything Jew haters say without knowing that there are many other rivers in the area.

Keep an eye on the history of your people, and no one else's.

Critic not, if one does not wish for the violent history of their ancestors to come to light.

 

[JGalt]

Wrong.
It was Egyptians, Greeks, etc., who started slavery.
Black Africans were not the original slaves.
In fact, the Black Kushites likely were the first slave traders.

The New World never received any slaves from Egyptians or Greeks.

 

[Rigby5]

And just like Surada, your Archeological and other people's in the area oral or written evidence is

ZERO


Funny how Abraham only became an Arab in the eyes of Jew haters after Israel declared Independence in 1948.

How sad for you that many sane Arabs do not agree with your rewriting of the history of the region.

10,000 years from Arabia?

or 15,000 years from Africa?


I do doubt your sanity.

Wrong.
All humans came from Africa and had to go through the Levant.
The earliest records were have are all Arab, like the Canaanites.
You trace lineage by language.
The Canaanites spoke and wrote in a language considered Semitic.
All Semitic languages mean "of an Arab origin".
When Arabs came out of Africa to the Levant, is not totally known, but we do have Arab Canaanite cities like Jericho going back to about 12,000 BC.

 

[Sixties Fan]

Wrong.
It was Egyptians, Greeks, etc., who started slavery.
Black Africans were not the original slaves.
In fact, the Black Kushites likely were the first slave traders.

JGalt was referring to slavery After the Common Era.

Arabs had lots to do with slavery, including Islam's creator and founder, Mohammad.

And his slaves were not only Africans, but Jews from the tribe in Medina, the one where he killed all the men and enslaved the rest of the tribe.

Get educated

 

[Rigby5]

There is no such thing as semitic people.

Semitic refers to languages:

Semitic languages occur in written form from a very early historical date in West Asia, with East Semitic Akkadian and Eblaite texts (written in a script adapted from Sumerian cuneiform) appearing from the 30th century BCE and the 25th century BCE in Mesopotamia and the north eastern Levant respectively. The only earlier attested languages are Sumerian, Elamite (2800 BCE to 550 BCE), both language isolates, and Egyptian. Amorite appeared in Mesopotamia and the northern Levant circa 2000 BC, followed by the mutually intelligible Canaanite languages (including Hebrew, Phoenician, Moabite, Edomite and Ammonite, and perhaps Ekronite, Amalekite and Sutean), the still spoken Aramaic, and Ugaritic during the 2nd millennium BC.

Semitic languages - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

And ALL Semitic languages are of Arab origins.
Hebrew is Semitic, so then the Hebrew were originally Arab.

 

[JGalt]

JGalt was referring to slavery After the Common Era.

Arabs had lots to do with slavery, including Islam's creator and founder, Mohammad.

And his slaves were not only Africans, but Jews from the tribe in Medina, the one where he killed all the men and enslaved the rest of the tribe.

Get educated

True. Slavery was never the institution it was before the Muslims made it a global commodity.

 

[progressive hunter]

Sure I can.
Rights always have to come from our human DNA.
That is where they have to exist.
If our DNA were different, such as if we were carnivores instead of omnivores, then our concepts of inherent rights would be totally different.

Anyone looking for legislation is foolish, because most legislation is history is autocratic tyranny.

you say you can but have failed to do so,,

 

[Rigby5]

You know nothing.

Christians like you know nothing but to change the history of the Jews, as if the history of their ancestors, and of Christianity was this pure, white snow, never to be criticized for all the invasions and massacres and destructions they have caused.

Ah......you are one of those....The River Jordan never drought.....people.

You are totally ignorant and follow anything Jew haters say without knowing that there are many other rivers in the area.

Keep an eye on the history of your people, and no one else's.

Critic not, if one does not wish for the violent history of their ancestors to come to light.

There clearly is ZERO evidence of any Hebrew habitation in the Levant before 1200 BC.
So that is NOT where they came from.
Since we know they went to Egypt to avoid a drought, they likely came from the Sinai.
So then do not belong in the Levant and are not native to the Levant at all.

 

[Rigby5]

The New World never received any slaves from Egyptians or Greeks.

So?
What does the slave trade after 1800 have to do with anything?

 

[Rigby5]

JGalt was referring to slavery After the Common Era.

Arabs had lots to do with slavery, including Islam's creator and founder, Mohammad.

And his slaves were not only Africans, but Jews from the tribe in Medina, the one where he killed all the men and enslaved the rest of the tribe.

Get educated

Wrong.
After the Asian invasions around 1200, Arabs ruled nothing any more.
After around 1200, the Mongols, Moghuls, Turks, Moors, and Mamelukes were in power.
And they were not Arab.

You know nothing of Jews or Islam.
Mohammad would have lost to the Meccans if not for the Jews deciding to defend him.
Jews were the majority of Mohammad's army.
Mohammad did not attack or enslave Jews.
There was one tribe that turned traitor and were annihilated by the other Jewish tribes, not Mohammad.
The Banu Qurayza tried to assassinate Mohammad and the other 11 tribes of Jews punished them for their crime.

Why did Prophet Muhammed kill around 400 Jewish traitors of Banu Qurayza Fighters? - Islam Compass

🔊 Listen to this 𝐖𝐡𝐲 𝐝𝐢𝐝 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐩𝐡𝐞𝐭 𝐌𝐮𝐡𝐚𝐦𝐦𝐞𝐝 𝐤𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐚𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝 𝟒𝟎𝟎 𝐉𝐞𝐰𝐢𝐬𝐡 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐢𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐁𝐚𝐧𝐮 𝐐𝐮𝐫𝐚𝐲𝐳𝐚 𝐅𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐬? Mohamad Mostafa NassarTwitter:@NassarMohamadMR 𝐈𝐧 𝐚 𝐍𝐮𝐭𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐥𝐥 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐜𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐦 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝟗𝟎𝟎 𝐩𝐞𝐨𝐩𝐥𝐞 𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐤𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐬 𝐰𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐠. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐧𝐮𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫, 𝐚𝐜𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐨 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐬, 𝐟𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐬 𝐛𝐞𝐭𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝟒𝟎 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝟒𝟎𝟎. 𝐓𝐡𝐨𝐬𝐞 𝐞𝐱𝐞𝐜𝐮𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐞...

islamcompass.com

{...
When the Prophet (saw) migrated to Medina, he agreed a treaty with the Jews of Banu Qurayza for the protection of the city against invaders. This was a critical treaty as the Banu Qurayza were settled at the rear of Medina – a weak point exploitable by enemies in a battle.

During the battle of the trench, the Quraysh and her allies could not breach the front of Medina due to the trench that was used to defend it. They then sought an agreement with Banu Qurayza to allow them to attack from the rear of the city.

The Banu Qurayza Jews thus violated their treaty with the Prophet (saw) creating an existential issue for the Muslim community. Following the battle, they received the punishment specified in the treaty. They deserved the punishment even according to their scripture, modern international law, and treaty they violated.

When the Prophet (saw) surrounded them for twenty-five days, he promised whoever did not contribute and came out peacefully would be released. Number of people did so such as Amr ibn Sa’d.
...}

 

[Rigby5]

True. Slavery was never the institution it was before the Muslims made it a global commodity.

But by 1200 AD, Islam was taken over by Asian invaders, and was no longer Arab.
It was Mongol, Moghul, Turk, Moor, and Mameluke.

 

[Rigby5]

you say you can but have failed to do so,,

No, I never said I can point to legislation on privacy.
That is because rights do NOT come from legislation.
It is the other way around.
Legislation has to come from pre-existing rights.
Otherwise the legislation is illegal, autocratic, and must be destroyed.

You need to read up on Common Law history.

Common law | Definition, Origins, Development, & Examples

Common law, the body of customary law, based on judicial decisions and embodied in reports of decided cases, that has been administered by the courts of England since the Middle Ages. From it has evolved the legal systems found in the United States and most of the Commonwealth countries as well.

www.britannica.com

 

[Sixties Fan]

Wrong.
All humans came from Africa and had to go through the Levant.
The earliest records were have are all Arab, like the Canaanites.
You trace lineage by language.
The Canaanites spoke and wrote in a language considered Semitic.
All Semitic languages mean "of an Arab origin".
When Arabs came out of Africa to the Levant, is not totally known, but we do have Arab Canaanite cities like Jericho going back to about 12,000 BC.

Just which cult exactly do you belong to where they repeat all of this garbage and you end up believing it?

So what if all humans may have come from Africa?

There are no earliest records where Canaanites are referred to as Arabs, and you definitely would not find evidence from any people in the area which would say such a thing, or Arabic written in any pottery, or any archeological evidence found to this day.

I would fight your attempt to rewrite the history of this region as I would if anyone was trying to change the history of the Aboriginals, Mauri, Hawaiians, Mayans, Aztecs, Apache, Blackfeet, and all the other hundreds of indigenous people of the world.

No one is attempting to rewrite and destroy the history of any other people on the planet but of one people, and one people only. The Jewish People.


The only ones who do it are Christians and Muslims who were taught to hate Jews from their "holy" books.

One is not allowed to lie in order to destroy a people who have brought nothing but good things to the world, unlike Christianity and Islam.


Educate yourself and stop the hatred.

 

[Sixties Fan]

And ALL Semitic languages are of Arab origins.
Hebrew is Semitic, so then the Hebrew were originally Arab.

Again, which cult do you belong to where they would repeat and repeat such a thing until you came to believe it?