Israel arming neo-Nazis in Ukraine.

Wow, talk about supporting the wrong side.

Wow, talk about hypocrites, considering how Israel reacts to Russia invading Crimea a majority Russian territory.

Meanwhile Israel encroaches on Palestinian majority land from today back to 1948, more, and more, and that's "Cool" it's "Israel's right"

Rights groups demand Israel stop arming neo-Nazis in Ukraine

Rights Groups Demand Israel Stop Arming neo-Nazis in Ukraine

Human rights activists petition the court to cease Israeli arms exports to Ukraine since some of these weapons reach neo-Nazi elements in Ukraine’s security forces

John Brown Jul 09, 2018 5:26 PM
4comments Subscribe
1.6248760.3204362304.png

An Azov militiaman with a Tavor rifleAzov YouTube channel screenshot
Fingerprinted, jailed and deported 'like criminals': Israel is turning away tourists from the former Soviet Union[/paste:font]
A group of more than 40 human rights activists have filed a petition with the High Court of Justice, demanding the cessation of Israeli arms exports to Ukraine.

They argue that these weapons serve forces that openly espouse a neo-Nazi ideology and cite evidence that the right-wing Azov militia, whose members are part of Ukraine’s armed forces, and are supported by the country’s ministry of internal affairs, is using these weapons.

An earlier appeal to the Defense Ministry was met with no response.

The ministry’s considerations in granting export licenses for armaments are not disclosed to the public, but it appears that the appearance of Israeli weapons in the hands of avowed neo-Nazis should be a consideration used in opposing the granting of such a license.

Nevertheless, this is not the first time in which the defense establishment is arming forces that embrace a national socialist ideology.

Keep updated: Sign up to our newsletter

Email*





In the past, Israel has armed anti-Semitic regimes, such as the generals’ regime in Argentina, which murdered thousands of Jews in camps while its soldiers stood in watchtowers guarding the abducted prisoners with their Uzi submachine guns.




According to a freedom of information petition to Israel's defense ministry from last January (Hebrew: read in full here), Israel also armed Bolivia's military regimes, knowing that Nazi war criminal Klaus Barbie was part of the regime. Legal documents used to convict the head of the junta also showed that Barbie's death squads used Israeli Uzis.

In the case of Ukraine forces using Israeli weapons are openly stating their support for racist and anti-Semitic ideas, in various publications.
Ha’eretz...nuff said.

LOL @ mega Zionist Jews hating on the Haaretz just because the Haaretz is only a minor Zionist.
You've been duped.
Haaretz is an anti-Jewish anti-Zionist publication.

The Haaretz is a Jewish, Israeli publication, just because it's not to your liking, as a minor pro-Jewish, and minor pro-Zionist publication, doesn't make it against those values.

Sure and Louise Farakhan is minor "pro-Jewish pro-Zionist" as well :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo:
As I've stated the anti-Israel audience Haaretz is targeting has no interest in facts, just a bunch of mindless sheepple ready to take any anti-Israeli say so as a divine revelation.

Very desperate at best, Farakhan is a Black anti-Semite, the Haaretz is by, and for Israeli Jews.

The Haaretz makes mostly pro-Jewish, and pro-Israel sentiments, just because it's not ridiculously biased like you, and sometimes makes anti-Israel criticisms, or pro-Palestinian sentiments, doesn't make it akin to Louise Farakhan.

But, I guess anybody who's not as pro-Israel, or pro-Jewish as you, must be an anti-Semite, outright ridiculous.
 
Ha’eretz...nuff said.

LOL @ mega Zionist Jews hating on the Haaretz just because the Haaretz is only a minor Zionist.
You've been duped.
Haaretz is an anti-Jewish anti-Zionist publication.

The Haaretz is a Jewish, Israeli publication, just because it's not to your liking, as a minor pro-Jewish, and minor pro-Zionist publication, doesn't make it against those values.

Sure and Louise Farakhan is minor "pro-Jewish pro-Zionist" as well :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo:
As I've stated the anti-Israel audience Haaretz is targeting has no interest in facts, just a bunch of mindless sheepple ready to take any anti-Israeli say so as a divine revelation.

Very desperate at best, Farakhan is a Black anti-Semite, the Haaretz is by, and for Israeli Jews.

The Haaretz makes mostly pro-Jewish, and pro-Israel sentiments, just because it's not ridiculously biased like you, and sometimes makes anti-Israel criticisms, or pro-Palestinian sentiments, doesn't make it akin to Louise Farakhan.

But, I guess anybody who's not as pro-Israel, or pro-Jewish as you, must be an anti-Semite, outright ridiculous.


When Haaretz publishes the same blood libels against Jews as Farakhan,
it's pretty difficult to call it anything but anti-semitic trash.

No wonder You're a fan.
 
LOL @ mega Zionist Jews hating on the Haaretz just because the Haaretz is only a minor Zionist.
You've been duped.
Haaretz is an anti-Jewish anti-Zionist publication.

The Haaretz is a Jewish, Israeli publication, just because it's not to your liking, as a minor pro-Jewish, and minor pro-Zionist publication, doesn't make it against those values.

Sure and Louise Farakhan is minor "pro-Jewish pro-Zionist" as well :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo:
As I've stated the anti-Israel audience Haaretz is targeting has no interest in facts, just a bunch of mindless sheepple ready to take any anti-Israeli say so as a divine revelation.

Very desperate at best, Farakhan is a Black anti-Semite, the Haaretz is by, and for Israeli Jews.

The Haaretz makes mostly pro-Jewish, and pro-Israel sentiments, just because it's not ridiculously biased like you, and sometimes makes anti-Israel criticisms, or pro-Palestinian sentiments, doesn't make it akin to Louise Farakhan.

But, I guess anybody who's not as pro-Israel, or pro-Jewish as you, must be an anti-Semite, outright ridiculous.

No wonder You're a fan.

When Haaretz publishes the same blood libels against Jews as Farakhan,
it's pretty difficult to call it anything but anti-semitic trash.

I guess the truth is anti-Semitic. LOL
 
You've been duped.
Haaretz is an anti-Jewish anti-Zionist publication.

The Haaretz is a Jewish, Israeli publication, just because it's not to your liking, as a minor pro-Jewish, and minor pro-Zionist publication, doesn't make it against those values.

Sure and Louise Farakhan is minor "pro-Jewish pro-Zionist" as well :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo:
As I've stated the anti-Israel audience Haaretz is targeting has no interest in facts, just a bunch of mindless sheepple ready to take any anti-Israeli say so as a divine revelation.

Very desperate at best, Farakhan is a Black anti-Semite, the Haaretz is by, and for Israeli Jews.

The Haaretz makes mostly pro-Jewish, and pro-Israel sentiments, just because it's not ridiculously biased like you, and sometimes makes anti-Israel criticisms, or pro-Palestinian sentiments, doesn't make it akin to Louise Farakhan.

But, I guess anybody who's not as pro-Israel, or pro-Jewish as you, must be an anti-Semite, outright ridiculous.

No wonder You're a fan.

When Haaretz publishes the same blood libels against Jews as Farakhan,
it's pretty difficult to call it anything but anti-semitic trash.

I guess the truth is anti-Semitic. LOL

LOL.
This belief that voices in Your head constitute some version of truth caused Haaretz to pay damages more than once for their outright lies.

Haaretz will pay NIS 50,000 compensation for an article by Rogel Alper


 
Keep your friends close and your enemies closer. Sobieski, you should mount a one man crusade against Israel. See how that goes for you.
 

When is Israel going to sign a property law to compensate Palestine for lands they lost to Israel?
What land/property?
Be specific.
I can provide the addresses of the property and assets my in-laws families owned.

The following table shows the 1945 land ownership of mandatory Palestine by district:

Land ownership of Palestine in 1945 by district
District Sub-district Arab-owned Jewish-owned Public / other
Haifa Haifa 42% 35% 23%
Galilee Acre 87% 3% 10%
Beisan 44% 34% 22%
Nazareth 52% 28% 20%
Safad 68% 18% 14%
Tiberias 51% 38% 11%
Lydda Jaffa 47% 39% 14%
Ramle 77% 14% 9%
Samaria Jenin 84% <1% 16%
Nablus 87% <1% 13%
Tulkarm 78% 17% 5%
Jerusalem Hebron 96% <1% 4%
Jerusalem 84% 2% 14%
Ramallah 99% <1% 1%
Gaza Beersheba 15% <1% 85%
Gaza 75% 4% 21%
Data from the Land Ownership of Palestine[124]

Mandatory Palestine - Wikipedia
 

When is Israel going to sign a property law to compensate Palestine for lands they lost to Israel?
What land/property?
Be specific.
I can provide the addresses of the property and assets my in-laws families owned.

The following table shows the 1945 land ownership of mandatory Palestine by district:

Land ownership of Palestine in 1945 by district
District Sub-district Arab-owned Jewish-owned Public / other
Haifa Haifa 42% 35% 23%
Galilee Acre 87% 3% 10%
Beisan 44% 34% 22%
Nazareth 52% 28% 20%
Safad 68% 18% 14%
Tiberias 51% 38% 11%
Lydda Jaffa 47% 39% 14%
Ramle 77% 14% 9%
Samaria Jenin 84% <1% 16%
Nablus 87% <1% 13%
Tulkarm 78% 17% 5%
Jerusalem Hebron 96% <1% 4%
Jerusalem 84% 2% 14%
Ramallah 99% <1% 1%
Gaza Beersheba 15% <1% 85%
Gaza 75% 4% 21%
Data from the Land Ownership of Palestine[124]

Mandatory Palestine - Wikipedia
I want addresses and bank accounts.
Not tents with outside standing toilets.
 

When is Israel going to sign a property law to compensate Palestine for lands they lost to Israel?
What land/property?
Be specific.
I can provide the addresses of the property and assets my in-laws families owned.

The following table shows the 1945 land ownership of mandatory Palestine by district:

Land ownership of Palestine in 1945 by district
District Sub-district Arab-owned Jewish-owned Public / other
Haifa Haifa 42% 35% 23%
Galilee Acre 87% 3% 10%
Beisan 44% 34% 22%
Nazareth 52% 28% 20%
Safad 68% 18% 14%
Tiberias 51% 38% 11%
Lydda Jaffa 47% 39% 14%
Ramle 77% 14% 9%
Samaria Jenin 84% <1% 16%
Nablus 87% <1% 13%
Tulkarm 78% 17% 5%
Jerusalem Hebron 96% <1% 4%
Jerusalem 84% 2% 14%
Ramallah 99% <1% 1%
Gaza Beersheba 15% <1% 85%
Gaza 75% 4% 21%
Data from the Land Ownership of Palestine[124]

Mandatory Palestine - Wikipedia
Ottoman Empire?
You’re joking.
 
Keep your friends close and your enemies closer. Sobieski, you should mount a one man crusade against Israel. See how that goes for you.

In the real World a lot of people don't care for Jews, or Israel.

Unfortunately, this forum has a lot of Hicks, and Jews, who both love Israel because the Bible says blah, blah, blah.
 

When is Israel going to sign a property law to compensate Palestine for lands they lost to Israel?
What land/property?
Be specific.
I can provide the addresses of the property and assets my in-laws families owned.

The following table shows the 1945 land ownership of mandatory Palestine by district:

Land ownership of Palestine in 1945 by district
District Sub-district Arab-owned Jewish-owned Public / other
Haifa Haifa 42% 35% 23%
Galilee Acre 87% 3% 10%
Beisan 44% 34% 22%
Nazareth 52% 28% 20%
Safad 68% 18% 14%
Tiberias 51% 38% 11%
Lydda Jaffa 47% 39% 14%
Ramle 77% 14% 9%
Samaria Jenin 84% <1% 16%
Nablus 87% <1% 13%
Tulkarm 78% 17% 5%
Jerusalem Hebron 96% <1% 4%
Jerusalem 84% 2% 14%
Ramallah 99% <1% 1%
Gaza Beersheba 15% <1% 85%
Gaza 75% 4% 21%
Data from the Land Ownership of Palestine[124]

Mandatory Palestine - Wikipedia

Does it precede this?

Israel is a Biblical given name. The patriarch Jacob was given the name Israel(Hebrew: יִשְׂרָאֵל‬, Standard Yisraʾel Tiberian Yiśrāʾēl) after he "wrestled with the angel" (Genesis 32:28 and 35:10). ... Israel was a common name among Chaldeans till recent times.
 

When is Israel going to sign a property law to compensate Palestine for lands they lost to Israel?
What land/property?
Be specific.
I can provide the addresses of the property and assets my in-laws families owned.

The following table shows the 1945 land ownership of mandatory Palestine by district:

Land ownership of Palestine in 1945 by district
District Sub-district Arab-owned Jewish-owned Public / other
Haifa Haifa 42% 35% 23%
Galilee Acre 87% 3% 10%
Beisan 44% 34% 22%
Nazareth 52% 28% 20%
Safad 68% 18% 14%
Tiberias 51% 38% 11%
Lydda Jaffa 47% 39% 14%
Ramle 77% 14% 9%
Samaria Jenin 84% <1% 16%
Nablus 87% <1% 13%
Tulkarm 78% 17% 5%
Jerusalem Hebron 96% <1% 4%
Jerusalem 84% 2% 14%
Ramallah 99% <1% 1%
Gaza Beersheba 15% <1% 85%
Gaza 75% 4% 21%
Data from the Land Ownership of Palestine[124]

Mandatory Palestine - Wikipedia
Ottoman Empire?
You’re joking.

It says the data is from 1945, explain why that's not valid?

Arabs owned more land, and your Israel stole it from them.

When is your Israel going to compensate Palestine for lands they lost to Israel?
 

When is Israel going to sign a property law to compensate Palestine for lands they lost to Israel?
What land/property?
Be specific.
I can provide the addresses of the property and assets my in-laws families owned.

The following table shows the 1945 land ownership of mandatory Palestine by district:

Land ownership of Palestine in 1945 by district
District Sub-district Arab-owned Jewish-owned Public / other
Haifa Haifa 42% 35% 23%
Galilee Acre 87% 3% 10%
Beisan 44% 34% 22%
Nazareth 52% 28% 20%
Safad 68% 18% 14%
Tiberias 51% 38% 11%
Lydda Jaffa 47% 39% 14%
Ramle 77% 14% 9%
Samaria Jenin 84% <1% 16%
Nablus 87% <1% 13%
Tulkarm 78% 17% 5%
Jerusalem Hebron 96% <1% 4%
Jerusalem 84% 2% 14%
Ramallah 99% <1% 1%
Gaza Beersheba 15% <1% 85%
Gaza 75% 4% 21%
Data from the Land Ownership of Palestine[124]

Mandatory Palestine - Wikipedia
Ottoman Empire?
You’re joking.

It says the data is from 1945, explain why that's not valid?

Arabs owned more land, and your Israel stole it from them.
Out of context/Out of chronological order.
Why am I not surprised.
Same old bullshit from S4Bs (Shit4Brains).
 
When is Israel going to sign a property law to compensate Palestine for lands they lost to Israel?
What land/property?
Be specific.
I can provide the addresses of the property and assets my in-laws families owned.

The following table shows the 1945 land ownership of mandatory Palestine by district:

Land ownership of Palestine in 1945 by district
District Sub-district Arab-owned Jewish-owned Public / other
Haifa Haifa 42% 35% 23%
Galilee Acre 87% 3% 10%
Beisan 44% 34% 22%
Nazareth 52% 28% 20%
Safad 68% 18% 14%
Tiberias 51% 38% 11%
Lydda Jaffa 47% 39% 14%
Ramle 77% 14% 9%
Samaria Jenin 84% <1% 16%
Nablus 87% <1% 13%
Tulkarm 78% 17% 5%
Jerusalem Hebron 96% <1% 4%
Jerusalem 84% 2% 14%
Ramallah 99% <1% 1%
Gaza Beersheba 15% <1% 85%
Gaza 75% 4% 21%
Data from the Land Ownership of Palestine[124]

Mandatory Palestine - Wikipedia
Ottoman Empire?
You’re joking.

It says the data is from 1945, explain why that's not valid?

Arabs owned more land, and your Israel stole it from them.
Out of context/Out of chronological order.
Why am I not surprised.
Same old bullshit from S4Bs (Shit4Brains).

It's out of context, because Jewish Zionists have butchered the OP, going off topic from the Ukrainian arms by Israel topic. Somehow which NEVER Warrants a ban, because this site is a Jewish Supremacist one.

If I were to go so off topic all the time, I'd get banned, but apparently when Jews do it it's Kosher.

It's however not out of context with property claims, why do Jews think half of Eurasia owes them money for properties, but Israel owes Palestine nothing.
 
What land/property?
Be specific.
I can provide the addresses of the property and assets my in-laws families owned.

The following table shows the 1945 land ownership of mandatory Palestine by district:

Land ownership of Palestine in 1945 by district
District Sub-district Arab-owned Jewish-owned Public / other
Haifa Haifa 42% 35% 23%
Galilee Acre 87% 3% 10%
Beisan 44% 34% 22%
Nazareth 52% 28% 20%
Safad 68% 18% 14%
Tiberias 51% 38% 11%
Lydda Jaffa 47% 39% 14%
Ramle 77% 14% 9%
Samaria Jenin 84% <1% 16%
Nablus 87% <1% 13%
Tulkarm 78% 17% 5%
Jerusalem Hebron 96% <1% 4%
Jerusalem 84% 2% 14%
Ramallah 99% <1% 1%
Gaza Beersheba 15% <1% 85%
Gaza 75% 4% 21%
Data from the Land Ownership of Palestine[124]

Mandatory Palestine - Wikipedia
Ottoman Empire?
You’re joking.

It says the data is from 1945, explain why that's not valid?

Arabs owned more land, and your Israel stole it from them.
Out of context/Out of chronological order.
Why am I not surprised.
Same old bullshit from S4Bs (Shit4Brains).

It's out of context, because Jewish Zionists have butchered the OP, going off topic, which NEVER Warrants a ban, because this site is a Jewish Supremacist one.

It's however not out of context with property claims, why do Jews think half of Eurasia owes them money for properties, but Israel owes Palestine nothing.
Let’s go back to Noach, S4Bs?
Why cherry pick the Ottoman Empire?
 
The following table shows the 1945 land ownership of mandatory Palestine by district:

Land ownership of Palestine in 1945 by district
District Sub-district Arab-owned Jewish-owned Public / other
Haifa Haifa 42% 35% 23%
Galilee Acre 87% 3% 10%
Beisan 44% 34% 22%
Nazareth 52% 28% 20%
Safad 68% 18% 14%
Tiberias 51% 38% 11%
Lydda Jaffa 47% 39% 14%
Ramle 77% 14% 9%
Samaria Jenin 84% <1% 16%
Nablus 87% <1% 13%
Tulkarm 78% 17% 5%
Jerusalem Hebron 96% <1% 4%
Jerusalem 84% 2% 14%
Ramallah 99% <1% 1%
Gaza Beersheba 15% <1% 85%
Gaza 75% 4% 21%
Data from the Land Ownership of Palestine[124]

Mandatory Palestine - Wikipedia
Ottoman Empire?
You’re joking.

It says the data is from 1945, explain why that's not valid?

Arabs owned more land, and your Israel stole it from them.
Out of context/Out of chronological order.
Why am I not surprised.
Same old bullshit from S4Bs (Shit4Brains).

It's out of context, because Jewish Zionists have butchered the OP, going off topic, which NEVER Warrants a ban, because this site is a Jewish Supremacist one.

It's however not out of context with property claims, why do Jews think half of Eurasia owes them money for properties, but Israel owes Palestine nothing.
Let’s go back to Noach, S4Bs?
Why cherry pick the Ottoman Empire?

Why does Israel think it's above the law?

Oh, it's okay for Israel to steal majority Palestinian land, and never compensate them.

But, when it comes to Russia, then Russia owes Jews Holocaust compensations for properties lost, and
Oh no Russia can't invade Crimea a Russian majority territory, just because what ever the f*cked up Jews say they think goes.

No wonder why the World hates you hypocritical, selfish, swine of a rabble.
 

Forum List

Back
Top