No need to amend the Constittion every time we adapt our governmental functionsMajoritarian pablum. History has shown that unlimited democracy is a disaster.
The thing is, "We the People" already decided the scope and limits of government power. And we can change those limits, by amending the Constitution, but it takes more than a simple majority vote.
If we're too impatient for that, we can cheat. We can elect leaders and judges who will ignore the Constitution. We can 'reinterpret' it to accommodate our current goals for society. But doing that comes at a price. Dependable limits on government power are what make democracy possible. Those limits are what make losing an election a tolerable outcome. Without them, losing to an opposing party can literally be a matter of life or death, and people will act to defend themselves. They won't accept rule of law and sovereignty crumbles. We're seeing that happen now.
We have a Congress to do that. If they violate constitutional power.....we have a court system
Sorry, you already dismissed the Constitution with all your "We the People" horseshit. No take-backs. If you want everything to be a matter of majority rule, you don't get any protection from a court system. That's the trade-off. You can't have it both ways.