CDZ Isn't smaller governance better?

Discussion in 'Clean Debate Zone' started by K9Buck, Mar 6, 2018.

  1. K9Buck
    Offline

    K9Buck Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2009
    Messages:
    4,773
    Thanks Received:
    700
    Trophy Points:
    265
    Ratings:
    +3,762
    The topic of my thread is whether or not having smaller government is better than larger government. One reason I posited that places like Denmark and Sweden might be happier than those in other nations is that they are small nations with more of a "local" federalized government, unlike the U.S. or China or Russia, etc.
     
  2. K9Buck
    Offline

    K9Buck Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2009
    Messages:
    4,773
    Thanks Received:
    700
    Trophy Points:
    265
    Ratings:
    +3,762
    The federal budget for the DoED is about $70 billion. If this department didn't exist, it would be possible to reduce federal taxes, which would leave more money in local jurisdictions, who could then ask for more money and, possibly, get it.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  3. rightwinger
    Online

    rightwinger Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Top Poster Of Month

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    162,837
    Thanks Received:
    25,176
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Ratings:
    +78,334
    We have a population of 330 million, the largest economy in the history of mankind, the largest military

    Why would we settle for small government ???
     
  4. rightwinger
    Online

    rightwinger Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Top Poster Of Month

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    162,837
    Thanks Received:
    25,176
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Ratings:
    +78,334
    $70 billion will reduce expenses?

    The military budget is ten times that
     
  5. Tehon
    Offline

    Tehon Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2015
    Messages:
    6,808
    Thanks Received:
    971
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Ratings:
    +3,281
    Possibly, depending on the locale. How do disadvantaged kids catch a break when they live in a locale that would not support higher taxes at the local level?
     
  6. K9Buck
    Offline

    K9Buck Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2009
    Messages:
    4,773
    Thanks Received:
    700
    Trophy Points:
    265
    Ratings:
    +3,762
    I didn't say we should have a "small" government, whatever that would entail.

    I do believe that we would be better off if we did LESS governing at the federal level in as I believe there are some things that local government can do better, such as, for example, managing our public schools.
     
  7. K9Buck
    Offline

    K9Buck Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2009
    Messages:
    4,773
    Thanks Received:
    700
    Trophy Points:
    265
    Ratings:
    +3,762
    I think states and local communities can better address the needs of their students.
     
  8. Tehon
    Offline

    Tehon Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2015
    Messages:
    6,808
    Thanks Received:
    971
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Ratings:
    +3,281
    I would think it depends largely on the tax base. Federal programs help those in need.
     
  9. K9Buck
    Offline

    K9Buck Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2009
    Messages:
    4,773
    Thanks Received:
    700
    Trophy Points:
    265
    Ratings:
    +3,762
    I take it you're opposed to cutting anything from the federal budget. The more the fed spends, the better, right?
     
  10. K9Buck
    Offline

    K9Buck Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2009
    Messages:
    4,773
    Thanks Received:
    700
    Trophy Points:
    265
    Ratings:
    +3,762
    I believe it's a matter the state should address.
     

Share This Page