Ravi
Diamond Member
Across the board. Why would you even feel the need to ask that question?Do you believe this to be an across the board truism or something that only applies when spoken by liberals ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Across the board. Why would you even feel the need to ask that question?Do you believe this to be an across the board truism or something that only applies when spoken by liberals ?
Across the board. Why would you even feel the need to ask that question?
I guess he fears liberals.Because heckling is what he does....
Across the board. Why would you even feel the need to ask that question?
Pardon?It's just trying to get some clarification. If what you hate is really what you fear than there are a hell of a lot of scaredy cats here..
Pardon?
Hey! You piece of pavement pizza! Firstly, as I'm sure you really know I ain't a female. Secondly, I would never, ever consider insulting or demeaning your service as a US Marine (although I'll not hesitate to insult you personally), so kindly don't fuckingwell attempt to demean my service as a Royal Marine!!!!
As for the rest of your post, what the fuck does it have to do with the op or courts of arbitration????
As I said before, youy're no better than that arsehole collins.
so what other religion or culture can you point out to me that does "honor killing"
oh and btw, labeling me anti-muslim does your cause no good. I am anti-honor killing. I don't care who you are. Okay, go back to watching where the moon don't shine.
Soggs, I'm just as rabidly anti clerical as you, but I can see no reason how allowing alternate arbitration interferes with seperation of church and state. No one is obliged to use the Jewish or Muslim arbitrators. The only thing that doesn't seem fair to me is that only Jews or Muslims can use them. I can't see why a non Jew or non Muslim would want to use them but everyone should be allowed the option.
WE have a common law that applies to each of us equally. When we start making amends for specific groups then this common law cannot be equally enforced. Obligated or not, it should not even be an option. You hit on it yourself, what are non-dogma junkies to think about a state concession of an establishment of religious criteria? an atheists make shit up now too? Can pastafarianism balance out the influence of other dogmas?
Bootneck, your posts are informative and interesting. You are clearly smarter than the average bear. It never crossed my mind that you might be a woman but all the same, you are articulate and don't suffer fools gladly so I if you were a woman, I would be very proud to have you as a member of my sex
WE have a common law that applies to each of us equally. When we start making amends for specific groups then this common law cannot be equally enforced. Obligated or not, it should not even be an option. You hit on it yourself, what are non-dogma junkies to think about a state concession of an establishment of religious criteria? an atheists make shit up now too? Can pastafarianism balance out the influence of other dogmas?
so should I be able to use the hippie tribunal? The Metalhead tribunal? Im not interested in rationalization. Im interested in the common application of law. But, since this is happening in England I really dont care.
Then relax, the main thing is that the Chicken Littles calm down because Britain is not allowing Sharia to be part of its secular legal system.
They cant calm down... they have been so deeply brainwashed.. that they will fall for any muslim hating stories.
BUSHTEAM did a good job on these extremely gullibile jesus freaks.
They cant calm down... they have been so deeply brainwashed.. that they will fall for any muslim hating stories.
BUSHTEAM did a good job on these extremely gullibile jesus freaks.
Then relax, the main thing is that the Chicken Littles calm down because Britain is not allowing Sharia to be part of its secular legal system.
I think that is something these paranoid people are overlooking. This is not about making laws, it is about arbitrating civil disputes. The courts are costly to maintain and this type of alternative arbitration will save money for the taxpayers. It even provides religious organizations with an opportunity to actually do something useful for the community. No one is forced to use these kinds of arbitration if they don't want to. As was pointed out earlier in the the thread, the same type of procedure has been available to British Jews for 30 years or so and has not been shown to be a problem.