Zone1 Is redlining a part of the oppression covered by crt ?

Tommy Tainant

Diamond Member
Jan 20, 2016
46,688
20,135
2,300
Y Cae Ras

It seems obvious that restricting access to services will hold people back.
It is also obvious that this type of discrimination has held back the black community.

In effect it offers a leg up to white people to the disadvantage of black people.

Is learning about this systematic racism considered to be CRT ? If so why on earth is it not taught to kids ?
 
Is learning about this systematic racism considered to be CRT ? If so why on earth is it not taught to kids ?
IMO? NO, this is not CRT. And yes, every well educated person knows about The Fair Housing Act, it is factual, and part of our history.





1686509802487.png


 
IMO? NO, this is not CRT. And yes, every well educated person knows about The Fair Housing Act, it is factual, and part of our history.





View attachment 794083


Isnt crt about systematic racism ?
 
Isnt crt about systematic racism ?
Not exactly.

CRT is an offshoot of critical theory.

"A critical theory is any approach to social philosophy that focuses on society and culture to attempt to reveal, critique, and challenge power structures.[1] With roots in sociology and literary criticism, it argues that social problems stem more from social structures and cultural assumptions than from individuals.[citation needed] It argues that ideology is the principal obstacle to human liberation.[2] Critical theory finds applications in various fields of study, including psychoanalysis, sociology, history, communication theory, philosophy and feminist theory.[3]"


". . . CRT began in the United States in the post–civil rights era, as 1960s landmark civil rights laws were being eroded and schools were being re-segregated.[16][17] With racial inequalities persisting even after civil rights legislation and color-blind laws were enacted, CRT scholars in the 1970s and 1980s began reworking and expanding critical legal studies (CLS) theories on class, economic structure, and the law[18] to examine the role of U.S. law in perpetuating racism.[19] CRT, a framework of analysis grounded in critical theory,[20] originated in the mid-1970s in the writings of several American legal scholars, including Derrick Bell, Alan Freeman, Kimberlé Crenshaw, Richard Delgado, Cheryl Harris, Charles R. Lawrence III, Mari Matsuda, and Patricia J. Williams.[21] CRT draws from the work of thinkers such as Antonio Gramsci, Sojourner Truth, Frederick Douglass, and W. E. B. Du Bois, as well as the Black Power, Chicano, and radical feminist movements from the 1960s and 1970s.[21]

Academic critics of CRT argue it is based on storytelling instead of evidence and reason, rejects truth and merit, and opposes liberalism.[16][22] Since 2020, conservative U.S. lawmakers have sought to ban or restrict the instruction of CRT education in primary and secondary schools,[9][23] as well as relevant training inside federal agencies.[24] Advocates of such bans argue that CRT is false, anti-American, villainizes white people, promotes radical leftism, and indoctrinates children.[16][25] Advocates of bans on CRT have been accused of misrepresenting its tenets, and of having the goal to broadly silence discussions of racism, equality, social justice, and the history of race.[26][27]"


CRT opposes the Enlightenment values of western society, which the US Constitution is based on. It is opposed to factual evidence and reason and the free market of ideas construct an equal society for individuals and organizations, and it is more focused on an outcomes based approach seeking equity, mouthing platitudes of "justice," whether it is just or not for individuals and groups, like the utopian fantasies of Marxism.

Anytime you need to implement speech codes and censor people? You are on the wrong path. IMO

If you need to redefine pornography as enlightenment? (Queer Theory, another offshoot of CRT) Again, you are on the wrong path. IMO
 
Not exactly.

CRT is an offshoot of critical theory.

"A critical theory is any approach to social philosophy that focuses on society and culture to attempt to reveal, critique, and challenge power structures.[1] With roots in sociology and literary criticism, it argues that social problems stem more from social structures and cultural assumptions than from individuals.[citation needed] It argues that ideology is the principal obstacle to human liberation.[2] Critical theory finds applications in various fields of study, including psychoanalysis, sociology, history, communication theory, philosophy and feminist theory.[3]"


". . . CRT began in the United States in the post–civil rights era, as 1960s landmark civil rights laws were being eroded and schools were being re-segregated.[16][17] With racial inequalities persisting even after civil rights legislation and color-blind laws were enacted, CRT scholars in the 1970s and 1980s began reworking and expanding critical legal studies (CLS) theories on class, economic structure, and the law[18] to examine the role of U.S. law in perpetuating racism.[19] CRT, a framework of analysis grounded in critical theory,[20] originated in the mid-1970s in the writings of several American legal scholars, including Derrick Bell, Alan Freeman, Kimberlé Crenshaw, Richard Delgado, Cheryl Harris, Charles R. Lawrence III, Mari Matsuda, and Patricia J. Williams.[21] CRT draws from the work of thinkers such as Antonio Gramsci, Sojourner Truth, Frederick Douglass, and W. E. B. Du Bois, as well as the Black Power, Chicano, and radical feminist movements from the 1960s and 1970s.[21]

Academic critics of CRT argue it is based on storytelling instead of evidence and reason, rejects truth and merit, and opposes liberalism.[16][22] Since 2020, conservative U.S. lawmakers have sought to ban or restrict the instruction of CRT education in primary and secondary schools,[9][23] as well as relevant training inside federal agencies.[24] Advocates of such bans argue that CRT is false, anti-American, villainizes white people, promotes radical leftism, and indoctrinates children.[16][25] Advocates of bans on CRT have been accused of misrepresenting its tenets, and of having the goal to broadly silence discussions of racism, equality, social justice, and the history of race.[26][27]"


CRT opposes the Enlightenment values of western society, which the US Constitution is based on. It is opposed to factual evidence and reason and the free market of ideas construct an equal society for individuals and organizations, and it is more focused on an outcomes based approach seeking equity, mouthing platitudes of "justice," whether it is just or not for individuals and groups, like the utopian fantasies of Marxism.

Anytime you need to implement speech codes and censor people? You are on the wrong path. IMO

If you need to redefine pornography as enlightenment? (Queer Theory, another offshoot of CRT) Again, you are on the wrong path. IMO
When you deny the facts you are on the wrong path When govt policies seek to onpress minoritiesyou are on the wrong path.. But thanks for that.
 

It seems obvious that restricting access to services will hold people back.
It is also obvious that this type of discrimination has held back the black community.

In effect it offers a leg up to white people to the disadvantage of black people.

Is learning about this systematic racism considered to be CRT ? If so why on earth is it not taught to kids ?

CRT is a legal theory only taught in college law schools. Redlining would be discussed..
 
CRT is a legal theory only taught in college law schools. Redlining would be discussed..
Thanks. The impression I get is that nobody really knows what it is. I only have a rough knowledge.
When I see the boks that Desantis is banning in Florida it makes me think that a lot of it is tied up with the iil rights movement.
Redlining has obviously contributed to an inbalance in American society
It is so obviously unconstitutional and explains why you have black areas and white areas.
Britain is a fucked up country but you can live where you want if you have the tin. Imagine UK being more of a meritocracy than the US ?
 
Thanks. The impression I get is that nobody really knows what it is. I only have a rough knowledge.
When I see the boks that Desantis is banning in Florida it makes me think that a lot of it is tied up with the iil rights movement.
Redlining has obviously contributed to an inbalance in American society
It is so obviously unconstitutional and explains why you have black areas and white areas.
Britain is a fucked up country but you can live where you want if you have the tin. Imagine UK being more of a meritocracy than the US ?
The people arguing against it have no clue of what it is. They're opposing anything that kills their belief in white supremacy. And you are correct about the effect of redlining, which was a government policy.
 
Redlining is illegal in the U.S. and has been for many decades.
 

It seems obvious that restricting access to services will hold people back.
It is also obvious that this type of discrimination has held back the black community.

In effect it offers a leg up to white people to the disadvantage of black people.

Is learning about this systematic racism considered to be CRT ? If so why on earth is it not taught to kids ?
not only has it already been taught,, its been ended for decades,,
 

It seems obvious that restricting access to services will hold people back.
It is also obvious that this type of discrimination has held back the black community.

In effect it offers a leg up to white people to the disadvantage of black people.

Is learning about this systematic racism considered to be CRT ? If so why on earth is it not taught to kids ?

Is that what your country does to remain virtually all white?

1686678734146.png
 
But the effects of it are with us today. Depending on your skin colour you will be richer or poorer today because of it.
It isnt so easy to be rid of evil.
whats this we shit??

youre just a one legged faggot from a foreign country sticking his nose where it doesnt belong,,,

now as a person here in the country in question,, there are no effects lingering from that democrat policy of controlling blacks other than the welfare and public housing the democrats work so hard to maintain,,
 

Forum List

Back
Top