MaggieMae
Reality bits
- Apr 3, 2009
- 24,043
- 1,635
- 48
the original article does not at all support WND's claim he cannot find it, in fact, it says the opposite:
(Abercrombie said there is a recording of the birth in the State Archives and he wants to use that.)
It was actually written I am told, this is what our investigation is showing, it actually exists in the archives, written down ...
The WND article includes that quote and goes on to say
"Conceivably, the yet undisclosed birth record in the state archives that Abercrombie has discovered may have come from the grandparents registering Obama's birth, an event that would have triggered both the newspaper birth announcements and availability of a Certification of Live Birth, even if no long-form birth certificate existed."
Again, someone phoning the state to advise them of the birth, while it may have been written down on some form, does not serve as proof that the birth occurred in Hawaii. In my opinion, if a full fledged birth certificate cannot be produced, which appears to be the case, then the burden of proof is on Obama.
The burden of proof ALWAYS lies with the person(s) making the allegation. Basic law.